I have not as yet heard a surmise as to the new Lord Privy Seal.
Lord O"Neil has signed the Duke of Richmond"s protest against the Franchise Bill. It is very hostile to the Government, and Lord O"Neil will probably be put out.
The Duke of Richmond has been very imprudent. Had he taken a moderate line he probably might have been Privy Seal. His time is now gone by.
_April 17._
Went by appointment to see Lady Jersey. Found there Duncannon and Lord Sefton. Duncannon talked big about O"Connell"s power, and in the same sense in which he talked to Fitzgerald, wishing to induce the Government to let him take his seat. I said we could not. It depended not on us, but upon the law.
Lady Sefton came in afterwards for a few minutes, and Lord Rosslyn. Lady Jersey talked a great deal about the restoration, and feared the Whigs would imagine they were never to come in, and would form a violent opposition. She mentioned Mr. Stanley as being much annoyed, he having made a laudatory speech in favour of Peel.
I told her it would have been very harsh to have eliminated those who had taken office under the idea that the Government was rather against than for the Catholics, certainly _neutral_, and that it was a little unreasonable to expect others to be turned out to make way for new friends.
_April 18._
The Duke thinks he could not offer the Privy Seal to Lord Grey, but he would be conciliated by having a friend--that is, Rosslyn--in. If we could get Lord Beresford out, Lord Rosslyn would go to the Ordnance.
The Duke says the King would make it a point of honour to resist the introduction of Lord Grey, though in reality he was in communication with Lord Grey in 1820-21, after the Queen"s trial, and then intended to bring him in and to turn out the then Ministers for the Milan Commission, he having been himself at the bottom of that Commission. The Duke, the only member of the Cabinet who was not mixed up with the Milan Commission, induced the King to give up his idea of making a change.
Bankes received a letter from the Duke of c.u.mberland, very long, and against his acceptance of office; but he begged Bankes to go down to see him and talk it over. He did so. Bankes told him he would not accept if he on consideration objected, but he was determined not to join any other Government. The Duke of c.u.mberland spoke of himself as having been ill-used by the Duke of Wellington. This was explained. The conference ended by the Duke of c.u.mberland"s acquiescing entirely in Bankes"s acceptance of office.
Bankes saw the Duke of Wellington and detailed the whole to him.
_April 21._
Called on Sir H. Hardinge at Richmond. He told me the Duke had at first great reluctance to have anything to do with the Whigs. By his account he must have princ.i.p.ally contributed to lead the Duke to adopt that view which he has now of admitting Rosslyn, &c.
_April 22._
The Duke of Norfolk called, and, not finding me, left a note begging me to ascertain privately from the Duke of Wellington whether the King would be pleased if the English Catholics presented an address to him thanking him for the Relief Bill.
Received a letter from the Duke of Wellington expressing a decided opinion against any address from the Roman Catholics. He says, "Everything has been done that is possible to efface all distinctions between the King"s subjects on the score of religion, and this with a view to the general benefit, and not to that of a particular body. I confess I shall think that this measure has failed in attaining its object if there should be any general act of a particular body.
"In respect to the King himself I am certain that the most agreeable thing to him would be that all should remain quiet.
"We must have no distinct body of Roman Catholics except in the churches and in affairs of religion. The less we act inconsistently with the principle the better."
I so entirely agree in opinion with the Duke of Wellington that, having for my own amus.e.m.e.nt written an address for the Roman Catholics in the event of their making any to the King, the first sentence I imagined was this: "The Roman Catholics of England approach your Majesty for the last time as a body distinct from the rest of your Majesty"s subjects."
_April 25._
I had a good deal of conversation as to the next Director. There are three city men candidates, but none are good--Lyall, Ellice, and Douglas.
Of Ellice no one knows anything. He is brother to the Ellice who married Lord Grey"s sister. Lyall is, or was, Chairman of the Committee of Shipowners. Douglas is brother to Lord Queensbury. They say his is not a very good house.
_April 28._
Read the correspondence between the Duke and Lord Anglesey. Then read a memorandum of the Duke"s in reply to one of Hardinge"s on the subject of the discipline of the British army. Hardinge wished to introduce the Prussian [Footnote: Which did not include capital punishment. See _Wellington Correspondence_, vol. v. p. 932.] discipline into ours. The Duke shows that with our discipline we have more men fit for duty in proportion to our numbers than the Prussians in the proportion of two to one. That in Prussia the army is everything. There is no other profession.
All are soldiers--the officer lives much with his men--they are always in ma.s.ses, always in fertile countries.
In our service the worst men in the community enter the army. The officers are gentlemen. They cannot mix with the men. Without discipline our army would be inferior to others. It is not even now the favourite profession.
There is much jealousy of it. It is not popular with the common people. It is difficult to find recruits even in times of distress.
I was in an army, the Duke concludes, which cannot be governed on the Prussian principle. You cannot treat the English soldier as a man of honour.
The Duke had been with the King, who was in very good humour. He had not, however, got to close quarters with him as to the changes.
_April 29._
Cabinet at 12. A letter has been received from Lord Heytesbury, from which it is clear that Russia will very soon resume altogether the exercise of her belligerent rights in the Mediterranean.
Nesselrode communicated to him the blockade of Candia. Lord Heytesbury only observed that "it was a resumption of belligerent rights." This Count Nesselrode did not deny, and he said they could not long remain in the false position in which they now were in the Mediterranean.
Count Heyden at the end of January blockaded Candia on pretexts arising out of the state of Greece. In three weeks from that time he rested his interception of the Egyptian vessels near Candia on the necessary exercise of his rights as a belligerent. Lieven, when first spoken to, disavowed Heyden. He now changes his tone, and it is evident that Russia now for the second time breaks her word. The French do not behave much better. They have 6,000 men in the Morea, and mean to keep them there notwithstanding their engagement to withdraw their troops as soon as the Egyptians were embarked. To be sure, they say if we insist upon it they will withdraw them.
I have always been for getting out of the treaty. We have been dragged along very unwillingly--we have been subjected to much humiliation. We seem to me to have gained nothing by all our compliances. We have been led on from the violation of one principle to that of another. Our position has discouraged Turkey. We have been made the tools of Russia, and have been duped with our eyes open. I think the sooner we get out of this false position the better, and there is no time so favourable for us to hold strong language as this, when by the settlement of the Catholic question we are really strengthened, and when all foreign Powers believe we are yet more strengthened than we are. The Duke is certainly for getting out. He has long wished it.
A paper of Peel"s was read suggesting the difficulties in which we should still be placed by our moral obligation towards the Greeks, and by our reasonable fear that on the principles of the Greek Treaty, to which we have unfortunately given our adhesion, Russia and France may combine and make a part.i.tion treaty. My expectation is that Russia and France would soon quarrel, and I think I could before now have made them jealous of each other, but we have done nothing.
After much conversation, V. Fitzgerald agreeing with me and the others saying nothing, it was determined to insist upon the freedom of communication with Candia under the protocol, to insist upon the Greeks withdrawing from their advanced position near Prevesa _under the protocol_, and to insist likewise upon the withdrawing of the French troops from the Morea, according to the engagement.
I am not satisfied with this. Every part of our diplomacy has been unfortunate. We have succeeded in nothing. I predicted if we became engaged in the war, it would be ultimately on a little point and not upon a great one. Our diplomacy cannot be defended. It is our weak point.
House. All the Catholics there. Every good old name in England.
The Duke of Norfolk is much pleased with the Duke of Wellington"s answer to his enquiry as to the propriety of addressing the King. I am going to send him the Duke"s original letter as a _record_.
The King certainly received the Protestant peers, and particularly those who had been at Windsor, with great favour, and so the Bishop of Durham.
The Duke of c.u.mberland stood at the King"s left hand, and quizzed the people as they pa.s.sed. He seemed _rayonnant_.
After dinner I had some conversation with Loch, the Chairman, as to governing India in the King"s name. He does not positively object. I think I shall be able to carry that point. I consider it to be of the most essential importance.
_April 30._
Cabinet at 12. Determined to fund eight millions of Exchequer Bills. No taxes to be taken off or imposed. We had some conversation as to the East Retford question. V. Fitzgerald communicated a proposal from Littleton to propose the adjournment of all discussion upon the subject till next year, as it is evident nothing can be done this year. Littleton proposed this because he wished to disappoint the mischievous designs of some people.
(Palmerston particularly.)
It was determined to adhere to the line taken by the Government last year-- namely, to that of throwing East Retford into the hundred. The Duke was decidedly of opinion that whatever we did we should do from ourselves, and certainly not act in concert with an enemy. The Tories look to our conduct upon this question as the touchstone.
Drawing-room. The King, as yesterday, very civil to the Brunswickers and taking no notice of our friends. He took particular notice of the Brazilians. Madame de Lieven is endeavouring to form a Government with the Duke of c.u.mberland, the Ultra-Tories, the Canningites, and some Whigs.