DEAR SIR,
Although I dare not address you as the author of certain Tales--which, however, must be written either by Walter Scott or the devil--yet nothing can restrain me from thinking that it is to your influence with the author of them that I am indebted for the essential honour of being one of their publishers; and I must intrude upon you to offer my most hearty thanks, not divided but doubled, alike for my worldly gain therein, and for the great acquisition of professional reputation which their publication has already procured me. As to delight, I believe I could, under any oath that could be proposed, swear that I never experienced such great and unmixed pleasure in all my life as the reading of this exquisite work has afforded me; and if you witnessed the wet eyes and grinning cheeks with which, as the author"s chamberlain, I receive the unanimous and vehement praise of them from every one who has read them, or heard the curses of those whose needs my scanty supply would not satisfy, you might judge of the sincerity with which I now entreat you to a.s.sure the author of the most complete success. After this, I could throw all the other books which I have in the press into the Thames, for no one will either read them or buy. Lord Holland said, when I asked his opinion: "Opinion? we did not one of us go to bed all night, and nothing slept but my gout." Frere, Hallam, and Boswell; Lord Glenbervie came to me with tears in his eyes. "It is a cordial," he said, "which has saved Lady Glenbervie"s life." Heber, who found it on his table on his arrival from a journey, had no rest till he had read it. He has only this moment left me, and he, with many others, agrees that it surpa.s.ses all the other novels. Wm. Lamb also; Gifford never read anything like it, he says; and his estimate of it absolutely increases at each recollection of it. Barrow with great difficulty was forced to read it; and he said yesterday, "Very good, to be sure, but what powerful writing is _thrown away_." Heber says there are only two men in the world, Walter Scott and Lord Byron. Between you, you have given existence to a third.
Ever your faithful servant,
JOHN MURRAY.
This letter did not effectually "draw the badger." Scott replied in the following humorous but Jesuitical epistle:
_Mr. Scott to John Murray_.
_December 18, 1816_.
MY DEAR SIR,
I give you hearty joy of the success of the Tales, although I do not claim that paternal interest in them which my friends do me the credit to a.s.sign to me. I a.s.sure you I have never read a volume of them till they were printed, and can only join with the rest of the world in applauding the true and striking portraits which they present of old Scottish manners.
I do not expect implicit reliance to be placed on my disavowal, because I know very well that he who is disposed not to own a work must necessarily deny it, and that otherwise his secret would be at the mercy of all who chose to ask the question, since silence in such a case must always pa.s.s for consent, or rather a.s.sent. But I have a mode of convincing you that I am perfectly serious in my denial--pretty similar to that by which Solomon distinguished the fict.i.tious from the real mother--and that is by reviewing the work, which I take to be an operation equal to that of quartering the child.... Kind compliments to Heber, whom I expected at Abbotsford this summer; also to Mr. Croker and all your four o"clock visitors. I am just going to Abbotsford, to make a small addition to my premises there. I have now about seven hundred acres, thanks to the booksellers and the discerning public.
Yours truly,
WALTER SCOTT.
The happy chance of securing a review of the Tales by the author of "Waverley" himself exceeded Murray"s most sanguine expectations, and filled him with joy. He suggested that the reviewer, instead of sending an article on the Gypsies, as he proposed, should introduce whatever he had to say about that picturesque race in his review of the Tales, by way of comment on the character of Meg Merrilies. The review was written, and appeared in No. 32 of the _Quarterly_, in January 1817, by which time the novel had already gone to a third edition. It is curious now to look back upon the author reviewing his own work. He adopted Murray"s view, and besides going over the history of "Waverley," and the characters introduced in that novel, he introduced a disquisition about Meg Merrilies and the Gypsies, as set forth in his novel of "Guy Mannering." He then proceeded to review the "Black Dwarf" and "Old Mortality," but with the utmost skill avoided praising them, and rather endeavoured to put his friends off the scent by undervaluing them, and finding fault. The "Black Dwarf," for example, was full of "violent events which are so common in romance, and of such rare occurrence in real life." Indeed, he wrote, "the narrative is unusually artificial; neither hero nor heroine excites interest of any sort, being just that sort of _pattern_ people whom n.o.body cares a farthing about."
"The other story," he adds, "is of much deeper interest." He describes the person who gave the t.i.tle to the novel--Robert Paterson, of the parish of Closeburn, in Dumfriesshire--and introduces a good deal of historical knowledge, but takes exception to many of the circ.u.mstances mentioned in the story, at the same time quoting some of the best pa.s.sages about Cuddie Headrigg and his mother. In respect to the influence of Claverhouse and General Dalzell, the reviewer states that "the author has cruelly falsified history," and relates the actual circ.u.mstances in reference to these generals. "We know little," he says, "that the author can say for himself to excuse these sophistications, and, therefore, may charitably suggest that he was writing a romance, and not a history." In conclusion, the reviewer observed, "We intended here to conclude this long article, when a strong report reached us of certain trans-Atlantic confessions, which, if genuine (though of this we know nothing), a.s.sign a different author to these volumes than the party suspected by our Scottish correspondents. Yet a critic may be excused seizing upon the nearest suspicious person, on the principle happily expressed by Claverhouse in a letter to the Earl of Linlithgow. He had been, it seems, in search of a gifted weaver who used to hold forth at conventicles. "I sent to seek the webster (weaver); they brought in his _brother_ for him; though he maybe cannot preach like his brother, I doubt not but he is as well-principled as he, wherefore I thought it would be no great fault to give him the trouble to go to the jail with the rest."
Mr. Murray seems to have accepted the suggestion and wrote in January 1817 to Mr. Blackwood:
"I can a.s.sure you, but _in the greatest confidence_, that I have discovered the author of all these Novels to be Thomas Scott, Walter Scott"s brother. He is now in Canada. I have no doubt but that Mr.
Walter Scott did a great deal to the first "Waverley Novel," because of his anxiety to serve his brother, and his doubt about the success of the work. This accounts for the many stories about it. Many persons had previously heard from Mr. Scott, but you may rely on the certainty of what I have told you. The whole country is starving for want of a complete supply of the "Tales of my Landlord," respecting the interest and merit of which there continues to be but one sentiment."
A few weeks later Blackwood wrote to Murray:
_January_ 22, 1817.
"It is an odd story here, that Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Scott are the authors of all these Novels. I, however, still think, as Mr. Croker said to me in one of his letters, that if they were not by Mr. Walter Scott, the only alternative is to give them to the devil, as by one or the other they must be written."
On the other hand, Bernard Barton wrote to Mr. Murray, and said that he had "heard that James Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, was the author of "Tales of my Landlord," and that he had had intimation from himself to that effect," by no means an improbable story considering Hogg"s vanity.
Lady Mackintosh also wrote to Mr. Murray: "Did you hear who this _new_ author of "Waverley" and "Guy Mannering" is? Mrs. Thomas Scott, as Mr.
Thomas Scott a.s.sured Lord Selkirk (who had been in Canada), and his lordship, like Lord Monboddo, believes it." Murray again wrote to Blackwood (February 15, 1817): "What is your theory as to the author of "Harold the Dauntless"? I will believe, till within an inch of my life, that the author of "Tales of my Landlord" is Thomas Scott."
Thus matters remained until a few years later, when George IV. was on his memorable visit to Edinburgh. Walter Scott was one of the heroes of the occasion, and was the selected cicerone to the King. One day George IV., in the sudden and abrupt manner which is peculiar to our Royal Family, asked Scott point-blank: "By the way, Scott, are you the author of "Waverley"?" Scott as abruptly answered: "No, Sire!" Having made this answer (said Mr. Thomas Mitch.e.l.l, who communicated the information to Mr. Murray some years later), "it is supposed that he considered it a matter of honour to keep the secret during the present King"s reign. If the least personal allusion is made to the subject in Sir Walter"s presence, Matthews says that his head gently drops upon his breast, and that is a signal for the person to desist."
With respect to the first series of the "Tales of my Landlord," so soon as the 6,000 copies had been disposed of which the author, through Ballantyne, had covenanted as the maximum number to be published by Murray and Blackwood, the work reverted to Constable, and was published uniformly with the other works by the author of "Waverley."
CHAPTER XVIII
ALLIANCE WITH BLACKWOOD--BLACKWOOD"S "EDINBURGH MAGAZINE"--TERMINATION OF PARTNERSHIP
We have already seen that Mr. Murray had some correspondence with Thomas Campbell in 1806 respecting the establishment of a monthly magazine; such an undertaking had long been a favourite scheme of his, and he had mentioned the subject to many friends at home as well as abroad. When, therefore, Mr. Blackwood started his magazine, Murray was ready to enter into his plans, and before long announced to the public that he had become joint proprietor and publisher of Blackwood"s _Edinburgh Magazine_.
There was nothing very striking in the early numbers of the _Magazine_, and it does not appear to have obtained a considerable circulation. The first editors were Thomas Pringle, who--in conjunction with a friend--was the author of a poem ent.i.tled "The Inst.i.tute," and James Cleghorn, best known as a contributor to the _Farmers" Magazine_.
Constable, who was himself the proprietor of the _Scots Magazine_ as well as of the _Farmers" Magazine_, desired to keep the monopoly of the Scottish monthly periodicals in his own hands, and was greatly opposed to the new compet.i.tor. At all events, he contrived to draw away from Blackwood Pringle and Cleghorn, and to start a new series of the _Scots Magazine_ under the t.i.tle of the _Edinburgh Magazine_. Blackwood thereupon changed the name of his periodical to that by which it has since been so well known. He undertook the editing himself, but soon obtained many able and indefatigable helpers.
There were then two young advocates walking the Parliament House in search of briefs. These were John Wilson (Christopher North) and John Gibson Lockhart (afterwards editor of the _Quarterly_). Both were West-countrymen--Wilson, the son of a wealthy Paisley manufacturer, and Lockhart, the son of the minister of Cambusnethan, in Lanarkshire--and both had received the best of educations, Wilson, the robust Christian, having carried off the Newdigate prize at Oxford, and Lockhart, having gained the Snell foundation at Glasgow, was sent to Balliol, and took a first cla.s.s in cla.s.sics in 1813. These, with Dr. Maginn--under the _sobriquet_ of "Morgan O"Dogherty,"--Hogg--the Ettrick Shepherd,--De Quincey--the Opium-eater,--Thomas Mitch.e.l.l, and others, were the princ.i.p.al writers in _Blackwood_.
No. 7, the first of the new series, created an unprecedented stir in Edinburgh. It came out on October 1, 1817, and sold very rapidly, but after 10,000 had been struck off it was suppressed, and could be had neither for love nor money. The cause of this sudden attraction was an article headed "Translation from an Ancient Chaldee Ma.n.u.script,"
purporting to be an extract from some newly discovered historical doc.u.ment, every paragraph of which contained a special hit at some particular person well known in Edinburgh society. There was very little ill-nature in it; at least, nothing like the amount which it excited in those who were, or imagined themselves to be, caricatured in it.
Constable, the "Crafty," and Pringle and Cleghorn, editors of the _Edinburgh Magazine_, as well as Jeffrey, editor of the _Edinburgh Review_, came in for their share of burlesque description.
Among the persons delineated in the article were the publisher of Blackwood"s _Edinburgh Magazine_, whose name "was as it had been, the colour of Ebony": indeed the name of Old Ebony long clung to the journal. The princ.i.p.al writers of the article were themselves included in the caricature. Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, was described as "the great wild boar from the forest of Lebanon, and he roused up his spirit, and I saw him whetting his dreadful tusks for the battle." Wilson was "the beautiful leopard," and Lockhart "the scorpion,"--names which were afterwards hurled back at them with interest. Walter Scott was described as "the great magician who dwelleth in the old fastness, hard by the river Jordan, which is by the Border." Mackenzie, Jameson, Leslie, Brewster, Tytler, Alison, M"Crie, Playfair, Lord Murray, the Duncans--in fact, all the leading men of Edinburgh were hit off in the same fashion.
Mrs. Garden, in her "Memorials of James Hogg," says that "there is no doubt that Hogg wrote the first draft; indeed, part of the original is still in the possession of the family.... Some of the more irreverent pa.s.sages were not his, or were at all events largely added to by others before publication." [Footnote: Mrs. Garden"s "Memorials of James Hogg,"
p. 107.] In a recent number of _Blackwood_ it is said that:
"Hogg"s name is nearly a.s.sociated with the Chaldee Ma.n.u.script. Of course he claimed credit for having written the skit, and undoubtedly he originated the idea. The rough draft came from his pen, and we cannot speak with certainty as to how it was subsequently manipulated. But there is every reason to believe that Wilson and Lockhart, probably a.s.sisted by Sir William Hamilton, went to work upon it, and so altered it that Hogg"s original offspring was changed out of all knowledge."
[Footnote: _Blackwood"s Magazine_, September 1882, pp. 368-9.]
The whole article was probably intended as a harmless joke; and the persons indicated, had they been wise, might have joined in the laugh or treated the matter with indifference. On the contrary, however, they felt profoundly indignant, and some of them commenced actions in the Court of Session for the injuries done to their reputation.
The same number of _Blackwood_ which contained the "Translation from an Ancient Chaldee Ma.n.u.script," contained two articles, one probably by Wilson, on Coleridge"s "Biographia Literaria," the other, signed "Z," by Lockhart, being the first of a series on "The c.o.c.kney School of Poetry."
They were both clever, but abusive, and exceedingly personal in their allusions.
Murray expostulated with Blackwood on the personality of the articles.
He feared lest they should be damaging to the permanent success of the journal. Blackwood replied in a long letter, saying that the journal was prospering, and that it was only Constable and his myrmidons who were opposed to it, chiefly because of its success.
In August 1818, Murray paid 1,000 for a half share in the magazine, and from this time he took a deep and active interest in its progress, advising Blackwood as to its management, and urging him to introduce more foreign literary news, as well as more scientific information. He did not like the idea of two editors, who seem to have taken the management into their own hands.
Subsequent numbers of _Blackwood_ contained other reviews of "The c.o.c.kney School of Poetry": Leigh Hunt, "the King of the c.o.c.kneys," was attacked in May, and in August it was the poet Keats who came under the critic"s lash, four months after Croker"s famous review of "Endymion" in the _Quarterly_. [Footnote: It was said that Keats was killed by this brief notice, of four pages, in the _Quarterly_; and Byron, in his "Don Juan," gave credit to this statement:
"Poor Keats, who was killed off by one critique, Just as he really promised something great,...
"Tis strange, the mind, that very fiery particle, Should let itself be snuffed out by an article."
Leigh Hunt, one of Keats" warmest friends, when in Italy, told Lord Byron (as he relates in his Autobiography) the real state of the case, proving to him that the supposition of Keats" death being the result of the review was a mistake, and therefore, if printed, would be a misrepresentation. But the stroke of wit was not to be given up. Either Mr. Gifford, or "the poet-priest Milman," has generally, but erroneously, been blamed for being the author of the review in the _Quarterly_, which, as is now well known, was written by Mr. Croker.]
The same number of _Blackwood_ contained a short article about Hazlitt--elsewhere styled "pimpled Hazlitt." It was very short, and ent.i.tled "Hazlitt cross-questioned." Hazlitt considered the article full of abuse, and commenced an action for libel against the proprietors of the magazine. Upon this Blackwood sent Hazlitt"s threatening letter to Murray, with his remarks:
_Mr. Blackwood to John Murray_.
_September_ 22, 1818.
"I suppose this fellow merely means to make a little bl.u.s.ter, and try if he can pick up a little money. There is nothing whatever actionable in the paper.... The article on Hazlitt, which will commence next number, will be a most powerful one, and this business will not deprive it of any of its edge."