MY DEAR SIR,
I arrived here the day before yesterday for my spring campaign in literature, drinking whiskey, etc., and as I have not heard a word of you or from you since we parted on the top of the hill above Abbotsford, I dedicate my first letter from the metropolis to you. And first of all, I was rather disappointed in getting so little cracking with you at that time. Scott and you had so much and so many people to converse about, whom n.o.body knew anything of but yourselves, that you two got all to say, and some of us great men, who deem we know everything at home, found that we knew nothing. You did not even tell me what conditions you were going to give me for my "Jacobite Relics of Scotland," the first part of which will make its appearance this spring, and I think bids fair to be popular....
Believe me, yours very faithfully,
JAMES HOGG.
After the discontinuance of Murray"s business connection with Blackwood, described in the preceding chapter, James Hogg wrote in great consternation:
_Mr. James Hogg to John Murray_,
ELTRIVE, by SELKIRK, _December_ 9, 1829.
MY DEAR SIR,
By a letter from Blackwood to-day, I have the disagreeable intelligence that circ.u.mstances have occurred which I fear will deprive me of you as a publisher--I hope never as a friend; for I here attest, though I have heard some bitter things against you, that I never met with any man whatever who, on so slight an acquaintance, has behaved to me so much like a gentleman. Blackwood asks to transfer your shares of my trifling works to his new agents. I answered, "Never! without your permission."
As the "Jacobite Relics" are not yet published, and as they would only involve you further with one with whom you are going to close accounts, I gave him liberty to transfer the shares you were to have in them to Messrs. Cadell & Davies. But when I consider your handsome subscription for "The Queen"s Wake," if you have the slightest inclination to retain your shares of that work and "The Brownie," as your name is on them, _along with Blackwood_, I would much rather, not only from affection, but interest, that you should continue to dispose of them.
I know these books are of no avail to you; and that if you retain them, it will be on the same principle that you published them, namely, one of friendship for your humble poetical countryman. I"ll never forget your kindness; for I cannot think that I am tainted with the general vice of authors" _ingrat.i.tude_; and the first house that I call at in London will be the one in Albemarle Street.
I remain, ever yours most truly,
JAMES HOGG.
Murray did not cease to sell the Shepherd"s works, and made arrangements with Blackwood to continue his agency for them, and to account for the sales in the usual way.
The name of Robert Owen is but little remembered now, but at the early part of the century he attained some notoriety from his endeavours to reform society. He was manager of the Lanark Cotton Mills, but in 1825 he emigrated to America, and bought land on the Wabash whereon to start a model colony, called New Harmony. This enterprise failed, and he returned to England in 1827. The following letter is in answer to his expressed intention of adding Mr. Murray"s name to the t.i.tle-page of the second edition of his "New View of Society."
_John Murray to Mr. Robert Owen_.
_September_ 9, 1817.
DEAR SIR,
As it is totally inconsistent with my plans to allow my name to be a.s.sociated with any subject of so much political notoriety and debate as your New System of Society, I trust that you will not consider it as any diminution of personal regard if I request the favour of you to cause my name to be immediately struck out from every sort of advertis.e.m.e.nt that is likely to appear upon this subject. I trust that a moment"s reflection will convince which I understand you talked of sending to my house. I beg leave again to repeat that I retain the same sentiments of personal esteem, and that I am, dear Sir,
Your faithful servant,
JOHN MURRAY.
Among the would-be poets was a young Quaker gentleman of Stockton-on-Tees who sent Mr. Murray a batch of poems. The publisher wrote an answer to his letter, which fell into the hands of the poet"s father, who bore the same name as his son. The father answered:
_Mr. Proctor to Mr. Murray_.
ESTEEMED FRIEND,
I feel very much obliged by thy refusing to _publish_ the papers sent thee by my son. I was entirely ignorant of anything of the kind, or should have nipt it in the bud. On receipt of this, please burn the whole that was sent thee, and at thy convenience inform me that it has been done. With thanks for thy highly commendable care.
I am respectfully, thy friend,
JOHN PROCTOR.
The number of persons who desired to publish poetry was surprising, even Sharon Turner, Murray"s solicitor, whose valuable historical works had been published by the Longmans, wrote to him about the publication of poems, which he had written "to idle away the evenings as well as he could." Murray answered his letter:
_John Murray to Mr. Sharon Turner_.
_November_ 17, 1817.
I do not think it would be creditable to your name, or advantageous to your more important works, that the present one should proceed from a different publisher. Many might fancy that Longman had declined it.
Longman might suspect me of interference; and thus, in the uncertainty of acting with propriety myself, I should have little hope of giving satisfaction to you. I therefore refer the matter to your own feelings and consideration. It has afforded me great pleasure to learn frequently of late that you are so much better. I hope during the winter, if we have any, to send you many amusing books to shorten the tediousness of time, and charm away your indisposition. Mrs. Murray is still up and well, and desires me to send her best compliments to you and Mrs.
Turner.
Ever yours faithfully,
J. MURRAY.
Mr. Turner thanked Mr. Murray for his letter, and said that if he proceeded with his intentions he would adopt his advice. "I have always found Longman very kind and honourable, but I will not offer him now what you think it right to decline."
During Gifford"s now almost incessant attacks of illness, Mr. Croker took charge of the _Quarterly Review_. The following letter embodies some of his ideas as to editing:
_Mr. Croker to John Murray_.
BRIGHTON, _March_ 29, 1823.
DEAR MURRAY,
As I shall not be in Town in time to see you to-morrow, I send you some papers. I return the _Poor_ article [Footnote: "On the Poor Laws," by Mr. Gleig.] with its additions. Let the author"s amendments be attended to, and let his termination be inserted _between_ his former conclusion and that which I have written. It is a good article, not overdone and yet not dull. I return, to be set up, the article [by Captain Procter]
on Southey"s "Peninsular War." It is very bad--a mere _abstracted history of the war itself_, and not in the least a _review of the book_.
I have taken pains to remove some part of this error, but you must feel how impossible it is to change the whole frame of such an article. A touch thrown in here and there will give some relief, and the character of a _review_ will be in some small degree preserved. This cursed system of writing dissertations will be the death of us, and if I were to edit another number, I should make a great alteration in that particular. But for this time I must be satisfied with plastering up what I have not time to rebuild. One thing I would do immediately if I were you. I would pay for articles of _one_ sheet as much as for articles of two and three, and, in fact, I would _scarcely_ permit an article to exceed one sheet. I would reserve such extension for matters of great and immediate interest and importance. I am delighted that W. [Footnote: Probably Blanco White.] undertakes one, he will do it well; but remember the necessity of _absolute secrecy_ on this point, and indeed on all others.
If you were to publish such names as Cohen and Croker and Collinson and Coleridge, the magical WE would have little effect, and your _Review_ would be absolutely despised--_omne ignotum pro mirifico_. I suppose I shall see you about twelve on Tuesday. Could you not get me a gay light article or two? If I am to _edit_ for you, I cannot find time to _contribute_. Madame Campan"s poem will more than expend my leisure. I came here for a little recreation, and I am all day at the desk as if I were at the Admiralty. This Peninsular article has cost me two days"
hard work, and is, after all, not worth the trouble; but we must have something about it, and it is, I suppose, too late to expect anything better. Mr. Williams"s article on Sir W. Scott [Lord Stowell] is contemptible, and would expose your _Review_ to the ridicule of the whole bar; but it may be made something of, and I like the subject. I had a long and amusing talk with the Chancellor the night before last, on his own and his brother"s judgments; I wish I had time to embody our conversation in an article.
Yours ever,
J.W.C.
Southey is _very_ long, but as good as he is long--I have nearly done with him. I write _very slowly_, and cannot write long. This letter is written at three sittings.
No sooner had Croker got No. 56 of the _Review_ out of his hands than he made a short visit to Paris. On this Mr. Barrow writes to Murray;
_Mr. Barrow to John Murray_.
_April_ 2, 1823.
"Croker has run away to Paris, and left poor Gifford helpless. What will become of the _Quarterly?_ ... Poor Gifford told me yesterday that he felt he _must_ give up the Editorship, and that the doctors had _ordered_ him to do so."
Some months later, Barrow wrote to Murray saying that he had seen Gifford that morning: