CHIEFSWOOD, _September_ 16, 1831.
"Yesterday determined Sir W. Scott"s motions. He owes to Croker the offer of a pa.s.sage to Naples in a frigate which sails in about a fortnight. He will therefore proceed southwards by land next week, halting at Rokeby, and with his son at Notts, by the way. We shall leave Edinburgh by next Tuesday"s steamer, so as to be in town before him, and ready for his reception. We are all deeply obliged to Croker on this occasion, for Sir Walter is quite unfit for the fatigues of a long land journey, and the annoyances innumerable of Continental inns; and, above all, he will have a good surgeon at hand, in case of need. The arrangement has relieved us all of a great burden of annoyances and perplexities and fears."
Another, and the last of Lockhart"s letters on this subject, may be given:
_Mr. Lockhart to John Murray_.
CHIEFSWOOD, _September_ 19, 1831.
DEAR MURRAY,
In consequence of my sister-in-law, Annie Scott, being taken unwell, with frequent fainting fits, the result no doubt of over anxieties of late, I have been obliged to let my wife and children depart by tomorrow"s steamer without me, and I remain to attend to Sir Walter thro" his land progress, which will begin on Friday, and end, I hope well, on Wednesday. If this should give any inconvenience to you, G.o.d knows I regret it, and G.o.d knows also I couldn"t do otherwise without exposing Sir W. and his daughter to a feeling that I had not done my duty to them. On the whole, public affairs seem to be so dark, that I am inclined to think our best course, in the _Quarterly_, may turn out to have been and to be, that of not again appearing until the fate of this Bill has been quite settled. My wife will, if you are in town, be much rejoiced with a visit; and if you write to me, so as to catch me at Rokeby Park, Greta Bridge, next Sat.u.r.day, "tis well.
Yours,
J.G. LOCKHART.
P.S.--But I see Rokeby Park would not do. I shall be at Major Scott"s, 15th Hussars, Nottingham, on Monday night.
It would be beyond our province to describe in these pages the closing scenes of Sir Walter Scott"s life: his journey to Naples, his attempt to write more novels, his failure, and his return home to Abbotsford to die. His biography, by his son-in-law Lockhart, one of the best in the whole range of English literature, is familiar to all our readers; and perhaps never was a more faithful memorial erected, in the shape of a book, to the beauty, goodness, and faithfulness of a n.o.ble literary character.
In this work we are only concerned with Sir Walter"s friendship and dealings with Mr. Murray, and on these the foregoing correspondence, extending over nearly a quarter of a century, is sufficient comment.
When a committee was formed in Sir Walter"s closing years to organize and carry out some public act of homage and respect to the great genius, Mr. Murray strongly urged that the money collected, with which Abbotsford was eventually redeemed, should be devoted to the purchase of all the copyrights for the benefit of Scott and his family: it cannot but be matter of regret that this admirable suggestion was not adopted.
During the year 1827 Mr. Murray"s son, John Murray the Third, was residing in Edinburgh as a student at the University, and attended the memorable dinner at which Scott was forced to declare himself the author of the "Waverley Novels."
His account of the scene, as given in a letter to his father, forms a fitting conclusion to this chapter.
"I believe I mentioned to you that Mr. Allan had kindly offered to take me with him to a Theatrical Fund dinner, which took place on Friday last. There were present about 300 persons--a mixed company, many of them not of the most respectable order. Sir Walter Scott took the chair, and there was scarcely another person of any note to support him except the actors. The dinner, therefore, would have been little better than endurable, had it not been remarkable for the confession of Sir Walter Scott that he was the author of the "Waverley Novels."
"This acknowledgment was forced from him, I believe, contrary to his own wish, in this manner. Lord Meadowbank, who sat on his left hand, proposed his health, and after paying him many compliments, ended his speech by saying that the clouds and mists which had so long surrounded the Great Unknown were now revealed, and he appeared in his true character (probably alluding to the _expose_ made before Constable"s creditors, for I do not think there was any preconcerted plan). Upon this Sir Walter rose, and said, "I did not expect on coming here today that I should have to disclose before 300 people a secret which, considering it had already been made known to about thirty persons, had been tolerably well kept. I am not prepared to give my reasons for preserving it a secret, caprice had certainly a great share in the matter. Now that it is out, I beg leave to observe that I am sole and undivided author of those novels. Every part of them has originated with me, or has been suggested to me in the course of my reading. I confess I am guilty, and am almost afraid to examine the extent of my delinquency. "Look on"t again, I dare not!" The wand of Prospero is now broken, and my book is buried, but before I retire I shall propose the health of a person who has given so much delight to all now present, The Bailie Nicol Jarvie."
"I report this from memory. Of course it is not quite accurate in words, but you will find a tolerable report of it in the _Caledonian Mercury_ of Sat.u.r.day. This declaration was received with loud and long applause.
As this was gradually subsiding, a voice from the end of the room was heard [Footnote: The speaker on this occasion was the actor Mackay, who had attained considerable celebrity by his representation of Scottish characters, and especially of that of the famous Bailie in "Rob Roy."]
exclaiming in character," Ma conscience! if my father the Bailie had been alive to hear that ma health had been proposed by the Author of Waverley," etc., which, as you may suppose, had a most excellent effect."
CHAPTER XXVII
NAPIER"S "PENINSULAR WAR"--CHOKER"S "BOSWELL"--"THE FAMILY LIBRARY,"
ETC.
The public has long since made up its mind as to the merits of Colonel Napier"s "History of the Peninsular War." It is a work which none but a soldier who had served through the war as he had done, and who, moreover, combined with practical experience a thorough knowledge of the science of war, could have written.
At the outset of his work he applied to the Duke of Wellington for his papers. This rather abrupt request took the Duke by surprise. The doc.u.ments in his possession were so momentous, and the great part of them so confidential in their nature, that he felt it to be impossible to entrust them indiscriminately to any man living. He, however, promised Napier to put in his hands any specified paper or doc.u.ment he might ask for, provided no confidence would be broken by its examination. He also offered to answer any question Napier might put to him, and with this object invited him to Stratfieldsaye, where the two Generals discussed many points connected with the campaign.
_Colonel W. Napier to John Murray_.
BROMHAM, WILTS,
_December_ 5, 1828.
Dear Sir,
My first volume is now nearly ready for the press, and as I think that in matters of business a plain straightforward course is best, I will at once say what I conceive to be the valuable part of my work, and leave you to make a proposition relative to publication of the single volume, reserving further discussion about the whole until the other volumes shall be in a more forward state.
The volume in question commences with the secret treaty of Fontainebleau concluded in 1809, and ends with the battle of Corunna. It will have an appendix of original doc.u.ments, many of which are extremely interesting, and there will also be some plans of the battles. My authorities have been:
1. All the original papers of Sir Hew Dalrymple.
2. Those of Sir John Moore.
3. King Joseph"s correspondence taken at the battle of Vittoria, and placed at my disposal by the Duke of Wellington. Among other papers are several notes and detailed instructions by Napoleon which throw a complete light upon his views and proceedings in the early part of the war.
4. Notes of conversations held with the Duke of Wellington for the especial purpose of connecting my account of his operations.
5. Notes of conversation with officers of high rank in the French, English, and Spanish services.
6. Original journals, and the most unreserved communications with Marshal Soult.
7. My own notes of affairs in which I have been present.
8. Journals of regimental officers of talent, and last but not least, copies taken by myself from the original muster rolls of the French army as they were transmitted to the Emperor.
Having thus distributed all my best wares in the bow window, I shall leave you to judge for yourself; and, as the diplomatists say, will be happy to treat upon a suitable basis. In the meantime,
I remain, your very obedient Servant,
W. NAPIER.
About a fortnight later (December 25, 1827) he again wrote that he would have the pleasure of putting a portion of his work into Mr. Murray"s hands in a few days; but that "it would be disagreeable to him to have it referred to Mr. Southey for an opinion." Murray, it should be mentioned, had published Southey"s "History of the War in Spain." Some negotiations ensued, in the course of which Mr. Murray offered 500 guineas for the volume. This proposal, however, was declined by Colonel Napier.
Murray after fuller consideration offered a thousand guineas, which Colonel Napier accepted, and the volume was accordingly published in the course of 1828. Notwithstanding the beauty of its style and the grandeur of its descriptions, the book gave great offence by the severity of its criticism, and called forth a mult.i.tude of replies and animadversions.
More than a dozen of these appeared in the shape of pamphlets bearing their authors" names, added to which the _Quarterly Review_, departing from the general rule, gave no less than four criticisms in succession.
This innovation greatly disgusted the publisher, who regarded them as so much lead weighing down his _Review_, although they proceeded from the pen of the Duke"s right-hand man, the Rt. Hon. Sir George Murray. They were unreadable and produced no effect. It is needless to add the Duke had nothing to do with them.
Mr. Murray published no further volumes of the "History of the Peninsular War," but at his suggestion Colonel Napier brought out the second and succeeding volumes on his own account. In ill.u.s.tration of the loss which occurred to Mr. Murray in publishing the first volume of the history, the following letter may be given, as addressed to the editor of the _Morning Chronicle_:
_John Murray to the Editor of the Morning Chronicle_.
ALBEMARLE STREET, _February_ 13, 1837.
SIR,
My attention has been called to an article in your paper of the 14th of January, containing the following extract from Colonel Napier"s reply to the third article in the _Quarterly Review_, on his "History of the Peninsular War." [Footnote: The article appeared in No. 111 of _Quarterly_, April 1836.]