_Mr. Magnus to John Murray_. _March_ 17, 1834.
Sir,
Will you have the goodness to inform me of the Christian name of the Rev. Mr. Milman, and the correct manner of spelling his name; as a subscription is about to be opened by individuals of the Jewish nation for the purpose of presenting him with a piece of plate for the liberal manner in which he has written their history.
The piece of plate was duly subscribed for and presented, with every demonstration of acknowledgment and thanks. Milman"s "History of the Jews" did not prevent his preferment, as he was promoted from the vicarage of St. Mary"s, Reading, to the rectorship of St. Margaret"s, Westminster, and a canonry in the Collegiate Church of St. Peter; after which, in 1849, he was made Dean of St. Paul"s.
CHAPTER XXVIII
MOORE"S "LIFE OF BYRON"
In 1827 or 1828 Mr. Hanson, the late Lord Byron"s solicitor, wrote to Murray, enquiring, on behalf of the executors, whether he would be willing to dispose of his interest in the first five cantos of "Don Juan." Mr. Murray, however, had long been desirous of publishing a complete edition of the works of Lord Byron, "for the public," he wrote, "are absolutely indignant at not being able to obtain a complete edition of Lord Byron"s works in this country; and at least 15,000 copies have been brought here from France." Murray proposed that those copyrights of Lord Byron, which were the property of his executors, should be valued by three respectable publishers, and that he should purchase them at their valuation. Mr. Hobhouse, to whom as one of the executors this proposal was made, was anxious that the complete edition should be published in England with as little delay as possible, but he stated that "some obstacles have arisen in consequence of the Messrs. Hunt having upon hand some hundred copies of their two volumes, which they have asked a little time to get rid of, and for which they are now accounting to the executors."
Murray requested Mr. Hanson to apply to the executors, and inform him what sum they required for the works of Lord Byron, the copyrights of which were in their possession. This they refused to state, but after considerable delay, during which the Hunts were disposing of the two volumes, the whole of the works of Lord Byron which were not in Mr.
Murray"s possession were put up to auction, and bought by him for the sum of 3,885. These included the "Hours of Idleness," eleven cantos of "Don Juan," the "Age of Bronze," and other works--all of which had already been published.
Notwithstanding the destruction of Lord Byron"s Memoirs, described in a previous chapter, Murray had never abandoned the intention of bringing out a Biography of his old friend the poet, for which he possessed plenteous materials in the ma.s.s of correspondence which had pa.s.sed between them. Although his arrangement with Thomas Moore had been cancelled by that event, his eye rested on him as the fittest person, from his long intimacy with the poet, to be entrusted with the task, for which, indeed, Lord Byron had himself selected him.
Accordingly in 1826 author and publisher seem to have drawn together again, and begun the collection of materials, which was carried on in a leisurely way, until Leigh Hunt"s scandalous attack on his old patron and benefactor [Footnote: "Recollections of Lord Byron and some of his Contemporaries," 1828. 4to.] roused Murray"s ardour into immediate action.
It was eventually resolved to publish the Life and Correspondence together; and many letters pa.s.sed between Murray and Moore on the subject.
From the voluminous correspondence we retain the following extract from a letter from Moore to Murray:
"One of my great objects, as you will see in reading me, is to keep my style down to as much simplicity as I am capable of; for nothing could be imagined more discordant than the mixture of any of our Asiatico-Hibernian eloquence with the simple English diction of Byron"s letters."
Murray showed the early part of "Byron"s Life" to Lockhart, who replied to him at once:
_Mr. Lockhart to John Murray_.
_February_ 23, 1829.
"I can"t wait till tomorrow to say that I think the beginning of "Byron"
quite perfect in every way--the style simple, and unaffected, as the materials are rich, and how sad. It will be Moore"s greatest work--at least, next to the "Melodies," and will be a fortune to you. My wife says it is divine. By all means engrave the early miniature. Never was anything so drearily satisfactory to the imagination as the whole picture of the lame boy"s start in life."
Moore was greatly touched by this letter. He wrote from Sloperton:
_Mr. Moore to John Murray_.
"Lockhart"s praise has given me great pleasure, and his wife"s even still greater; but, after all, the merit is in my subject--in the man, not in me. He must be a sad bungler who would spoil such a story."
As the work advanced, Sir Walter Scott"s opinion also was asked.
_Mr. Lockhart to John Murray_.
_September_ 29, 1829.
"Sir Walter has read the first 120 pages of Moore"s "Life of Byron"; and he says they are charming, and not a syllable _de trop_. He is now busy at a grand rummage among his papers, and has already found one of Lord Byron"s letters which shall be at Mr. Moore"s service forthwith. He expects to find more of them. This is curious, as being the first of "Byron" to Scott."
The first volume of "Lord Byron"s Life and Letters," published on January 1, 1830, was read with enthusiasm, and met with a very favourable reception. Moore says in his Diary that "Lady Byron was highly pleased with the "Life,"" but among the letters received by Mr.
Murray, one of the most interesting was from Mrs. Sh.e.l.ley, to whom a presentation copy had been sent.
_Mrs. Sh.e.l.ley to John Murray_.
_January_ 19, 1830.
Except the occupation of one or two annoyances, I have done nothing but read, since I got "Lord Byron"s Life." I have no pretensions to being a critic, yet I know infinitely well what pleases me. Not to mention the judicious arrangement and happy _tact_ displayed by Mr. Moore, which distinguish the book, I must say a word concerning the style, which is elegant and forcible. I was particularly struck by the observations on Lord Byron"s character before his departure to Greece, and on his return. There is strength and richness, as well as sweetness.
The great charm of the work to me, and it will have the same to you, is that the Lord Byron I find there is _our_ Lord Byron--the fascinating, faulty, philosophical being--daring the world, docile to a private circle, impetuous and indolent, gloomy, and yet more gay than any other.
I live with him again in these pages--getting reconciled (as I used in his lifetime) to those waywardnesses which annoyed me when he was away, through the delightful tone of his conversation and manners.
His own letters and journals mirror himself as he was, and are invaluable. There is something cruelly kind in this single volume. When will the next come? Impatient before, how tenfold more so am I now.
Among its many other virtues, this book is accurate to a miracle. I have not stumbled on one mistake with regard either to time, place, or feeling.
I am, dear Sir,
Your obedient and obliged Servant,
MARY Sh.e.l.lEY.
The preparation of the second volume proceeded more rapidly than the first, for Lord Byron"s letters to Murray and Moore during the later years of his life covered the whole period, and gave to the record an almost autobiographical character. It appeared in January 1831, and amongst many other readers of it Mrs. Somerville, to whom Mr. Murray sent a present of the book, was full of unstinted praise.
_Mrs. Somerville to John Murray_.
_January_ 13, 1831.
You have kindly afforded me a source of very great interest and pleasure in the perusal of the second volume of Moore"s "Life of Byron." In my opinion, it is very superior to the first; there is less repet.i.tion of the letters; they are better written, abound more in criticism and observation, and make the reader better acquainted with Lord Byron"s principles and character. His morality was certainly more suited to the meridian of Italy than England; but with all his faults there is a charm about him that excites the deepest interest and admiration. His letter to Lady Byron is more affecting and beautiful than anything I have read; it must ever be a subject of regret that it was not sent; it seems impossible that it should not have made a lasting impression, and might possibly have changed the destinies of both. With kind remembrances to Mrs. Murray and the young people,
Believe me, truly yours,
MARY SOMERVILLE.
Mr. Croker"s opinion was as follows:
"As to what you say of Byron"s volume, no doubt there are _longueurs_, but really not many. The most teasing part is the blanks, which perplex without concealing. I also think that Moore went on a wrong principle, when, publishing _any_ personality, he did not publish _all_. It is like a suppression of evidence. When such horrors are published of Sir S.
Romilly, it would have been justice to his memory to show that, on the _slightest_ provocation, Byron would treat his dearest friend in the same style. When his sneers against Lady Byron and her mother are recorded, it would lessen their effect if it were shown that he sneered at all man and womankind in turn; and that the friend of his choicest selection, or the mistress of his maddest love, were served no better, when the maggot (selfishness) bit, than his wife or his mother-in-law."
The appearance of the Life induced Captain Medwin to publish his "Conversations with Lord Byron," a work now chiefly remembered as having called forth from Murray, who was attacked in it, a reply which, as a crashing refutation of personal charges, has seldom been surpa.s.sed.
[Footnote: Mr. Murray"s answer to Medwin"s fabrications is published in the Appendix to the 8vo edition of "Lord Byron"s Poems."]
Amongst the reviews of the biography was one by Lockhart in the _Quarterly_ (No. 87), which was very favourable; but an article, by Mr.
Croker in No. 91, on another of Moore"s works--the "Life of Lord Edward Fitzgerald"--was of a very different character. Murray told Moore of the approaching appearance of the article in the next number, and Moore enters in his Diary, "Saw my "Lord Edward Fitzgerald" announced as one of the articles in the _Quarterly_, to be abused of course; and this too immediately after my dinings and junketings with both author and publisher."
_Mr. Moore to John Murray_.