The Secretary laughed outright.
"Your frankness shocks the Archbishop."
Again the Archbishop looked up.
"I am not easily shocked at the difference of opinion on questions of taste. It is so easy to jeer at what others hold sacred."
"My dear Archbishop, I do implore your pardon a thousand times; nothing was farther from my intention. I merely enunciated what I supposed to be a truism."
"I am unfortunately aware, my lord, that Christianity is to some but a social form. But I believe, from my heart, that, relatively, they are few. I believe that to the great body of Englishmen and Englishwomen Christianity is still a vital force, probably more so to-day than it was some years ago. To the clergy I know it is; by their lives they prove it every hour of every day."
"In a social or a spiritual sense? Because, as a vital force, it may act in either direction. Let me explain to you exactly what I mean.
That it is nothing offensive you will see. My own Rector is a most estimable man; he, his curates, and his family are untiring in their efforts to increase the influence of the Church among the people.
There is not a cottager in the parish who does not turn towards the Rectory in time of trouble--he would rather turn there than towards heaven. In that sense I say that the Rector"s is a social, rather than a spiritual, influence; he himself would be the first to admit it. The work which the Church is doing in the East of London is social. The idea seems to be that if you improve the social conditions, spiritual improvement will follow. Does it? I wonder.
Christianity is a vital force in a social sense, thank goodness! But my impression is that its followers await the Second Coming of their Founder with the same dilettante interest with which the Jews antic.i.p.ate the rebuilding of Jerusalem. Both parties would be uncomfortably surprised if their antic.i.p.ations were fulfilled. They would be confronted with a condition for which they were not in any way prepared. Candidly, wouldn"t they? What would you yourself do if this person who is turning London topsy-turvy were actually the Christ?"
"I am unable to answer so very serious a question at a moment"s notice."
"In other words, you don"t believe that he is the Christ; and nothing would make you believe. You know such things don"t happen--if they ever did."
"You would not believe even though one rose from the dead--eh, Archbishop?"
The question came from Sir William Braidwood, the surgeon. The Earl of Hailsham looked towards him down the table.
"By the way, what is the truth about that woman at the hospital?"
"The woman was dead; living, she was cancerous. He restored her to life; healed of her cancer. No greater miracle is recorded of the Christ of tradition. This afternoon a woman came to me who has been paralysed for nearly five years, unable to move hand or foot, to raise herself on her bed, or to do anything for herself whatever. She came on her own feet, ran up the stairs, radiant with life, health, and good spirits, in the full enjoyment of all her limbs. She was one of those who were at Maida Vale, whither she had been borne upon her bed. You should hear her account of what took place. The wonder to me is that the crowd was not driven stark, staring mad!"
"These things cause one to think furiously." The Secretary sipped his wine. He addressed the Archbishop. "Have you received any official intimation of what is taking place?"
"I have had letters, couched in the most extraordinary language, and even telegrams. Also verbal reports, full of the wildest and most contradictory statements. I occupy a position of extreme responsibility, in which my slightest word or action is liable to misconstruction."
"Has it been clearly proved," asked Farquharson, "that he himself claims to be the Christ?" No one seemed to know; no one answered. "Do I understand, Braidwood, that you are personally convinced that this person is possessed of supernatural powers?"
"I am; though it does not necessarily follow on that account that he is the Christ, any more than that he is Gautama Siddartha or Mahomet.
I believe that we are all close to what is called the supernatural, that we are divided from it by something of no more definite texture than a membrane. We have only to break through that something to find such powers are. Possibly this person has performed that feat. My own impression is that he"s a public danger."
"A public danger? How?"
"Augustus Jebb called to see me before I came away--the social science man, I mean. He followed close on the heels of the woman of whom I told you. He was himself in Mrs. Powell"s house at the time, and from a window saw all that occurred. He corroborates her story, with additions of his own. A few moments before he, with others, had an interview with the miracle-worker. He says that he was afraid of him, mentally, physically, morally, because of the possibilities which he saw in the man. He justifies his fear by two facts. As you are aware, this person stopped last night at the house of Mrs. Miriam Powell, the misguided creature who preaches what she calls social purity. She was a hale, hearty woman, in the prime of life, as late as yesterday afternoon. She was, however, a terrible bore. The probability is that, during the night, for some purpose of her own, she forced herself into her guest"s presence; with the result that this morning she was a thing of horror."
"In what sense?"
"Age had prematurely overtaken her--unnatural age. She looked and moved like a hag of ninety. She was mentally affected also, seeming haunted by an unceasing causeless terror. She kept repeating: "I have seen Him face to face!"--significant words. Jebb"s other fact referred to Robins, the Salvation Army man. When Robins came into this person"s presence he was attacked as with paralysis, and transformed into a nerveless coward. Jebb says that he is a pitiable object. His inference--which I am disposed to endorse--is, that if that person can do good he can also do evil, and that it is dependent upon his mood which he does. A man who can perform wholesale cures with a word may, for all we know, also strike down whole battalions with a word. His powers may be new to him, or the probability is that we should have heard of him before. As they become more familiar, to gratify a whim he may strike down a whole cityful. And there is another danger."
"You pile up the agony, Braidwood."
"Wait till I have finished. There are a number of wrong-headed persons who think that he may be used as a tool for their own purposes. For instance, Jebb actually endeavoured to induce him to transform London, as it were, with a touch of his wand."
"What do you mean?"
"You know Jebb"s panacea--better houses for the poor, and that sort of thing. He tried to persuade this person to provide the London poor with better houses, money in their pockets, clothes on their backs, and food in their stomachs, in the same instantaneous fashion in which he performed his miracle of healing."
"Is Mr. Jebb mad?"
"I should say certainly not. He has been brought into contact with this person, and should be better able to judge of his powers than we are. He believes them to be limitless. Jebb himself was badly snubbed. But that is only the beginning. He tells me that the man Walters, the socialistic agitator, and his friends are determined to make a dead set at the wonder-worker, and to leave no stone unturned to induce him to bring about a revolution in London. The possibility of even such an attempt is not agreeable to contemplate."
"If these things come to pa.s.s, religion--at least, so far as this gentleman is concerned--will at once be brought within the sphere of practical politics. Don"t you think so, Hailsham?"
"It might bring something novel into the political arena. I should like to see how parties would divide upon such a question, and the shape which it would take. Would the question as to whether he was or was not the Christ be made the subject of a full-dress debate, and would the result of the ensuing division be accepted as final by everyone concerned?"
"I should say no. If the "ayes" had it in the House, the "noes" would have it in the country, and _vice versa_."
"Farquharson, you suggest some knowledge of English human nature. In our fortunate country obstinacy and contrariness are the dominant public notes. A Briton resents authority in matters of conscience, especially when it emanates from the ill-conditioned persons who occupy the benches in the Lords and Commons; which is why religious legislation is such a frightful failure."
This with a sly glance at the Archbishop, who had been a.s.sociated with a Bill for the Better Ordering of Public Worship.
The Duke of Trent joined in the conversation. He was a young man who had recently succeeded to the Dukedom. Coming from a cadet branch of the family, he had hitherto lived a life of comparative retirement.
His present peers had not yet made up their minds as to the kind of character he was. He spoke with that little air of awkwardness peculiar to a certain sort of Englishman who approaches a serious subject. His first remark was addressed to Sir William Braidwood:
"But if this is the Christ, would you not expect Him to mete out justice as well as mercy? He may have come to condemn as well as to bless. In that case a sinner could hardly expect to force himself into His presence and escape unscathed."
"On points of theology I refer you to the Archbishop. My point is, that an autocrat possessed of supernatural powers is a public danger."
"Does that include G.o.d the Father? He is omnipotent. Whom He will He raises up, and whom He will He puts down. So we Christians believe."
The Archbishop turned towards him.
"You are quite right, Duke; we know it. To suppose that Christ could be in any sense a public danger is not only blasphemous but absurd.
Such a notion could only spring from something worse than ignorance.
I take it that Sir William discredits the idea that about this person there is anything divine."
"I believe He is the Christ!"
"You do?"
"I do."
"But why?"
All eyes had turned towards the young man; who had gone white to the lips.
"I do not know that I am able to furnish you with what you would esteem a logical reason. Could the Apostles have given a mathematical demonstration of the causes of their belief? I only know that I feel Him in the air."
"Of this room?"
"Yes, thank G.o.d! of this room."
"You use strange words. Do you base your belief on his reported miracles?"