[Sidenote: Women in the professions.]
Since then women"s right to any higher education which they may wish to embrace has been permanently a.s.sured. As early as 1868 Edinburgh opened its courses in pharmacy to women. In 1895 there were already 264 duly qualified female physicians in Great Britain. In many schools they are allowed to study with men, as at the College of Physicians and Surgeons at Edinburgh; there are four medical schools for women only. We find women now actively engaged in agriculture, apiculture, poultry-keeping, horticulture; in library work and indexing; in stenography; in all trades and professions. The year 1893 witnessed the first appointment of women as factory inspectors, two being chosen that year in London and in Glasgow. Nottingham had chosen women as sanitary inspectors in 1892.
Thus in about two decades woman has advanced farther than in the combined ages which preceded. Before these very modern movements we may say that the stage was the only profession which had offered them any opportunity of earning their living in a dignified way. It seems that a Mrs. Coleman, in 1656, was the first female to act on the stage in England; before that, all female parts had been taken by boys or young men. A Mrs. Sanderson played Desdemona in 1660 at the Clare Market Theatre. In 1661, as we may see from Pepys" _Diary_ (Feb. 12, 1661), an actress was still a novelty; but within a few decades there were already many famous ones.
[Sidenote: Woman suffrage in England]
We have seen that now woman has obtained practically all rights on a par with men. There are still grave injustices, as in divorce; but the battle is substantially won. One right still remains for her to win, the right, namely, to vote, not merely on issues such as education--this privilege she has had for some time--but on all political questions; and connected with this is the right to hold political office. We may fittingly close this chapter by a review of the history of the agitation for woman suffrage.
In the year 1797 Charles Fox remarked: "It has never been suggested in all the theories and projects of the most absurd speculation, that it would be advisable to extend the elective suffrage to the female s.e.x."
Yet five years before Mary Wollstonecraft had published her _Vindication of the Rights of Women_. Presently the writings of Harriet Martineau upon political economy proved that women could really think on politics.
We may say that the general public first began to think seriously on the matter after the epoch-making Reform Act of 1832. This celebrated measure admitted 10 householders to the right to vote and carefully excluded females; yet it marked a new era in the awakening of civic consciousness: women had taken active part in the attendant campaigns; and the very fact that "male persons" needed now to be so specifically designated in the bill, whereas. .h.i.therto "persons" and "freeholders" had been deemed sufficient, attests the recognition of a new factor in political life.
In 1865 John Stuart Mill was elected to Parliament. That able thinker had written on _The Subjection of Women_ and was ready to champion their rights. A pet.i.tion was prepared under the direction of women like Mrs.
Bodichon and Miss Davies; and in 1867 Mill proposed in Parliament that the word _man_ be omitted from the People"s Bill and _person_ subst.i.tuted. The amendment was rejected, 196 to 83.
Nevertheless, the agitation was continued. The next year const.i.tutional lawyers like Mr. Chisholm Anstey decided that women might be legally ent.i.tled to vote; and 5000 of them applied to be registered. In a test case brought before the Court of Common Pleas the verdict was adverse, on the ground that it was contrary to usage for women to vote. The fight went on. Mr. Jacob Bright in 1870 introduced a "Bill to Remove the Electoral Disabilities of Women" and lost. In 1884 Mr. William Woodall tried again; he lost also, largely through the efforts of Gladstone; and the same statesman was instrumental in killing another bill in 1892, when Mr. A.J. Balfour urged its pa.s.sage.
At the present day women in England cannot vote on great questions of universal state policy nor can they hold great offices of state. Yet their gains have been enormous, as I shall next demonstrate; and in this connection I shall also glance briefly at their vast strides in the colonies.
In 1850 Ontario gave all women school suffrage. In 1867 New South Wales gave them munic.i.p.al suffrage. In 1869 England granted munic.i.p.al suffrage to single women and widows; Victoria gave it to all women, married or single. In England in 1870 the Education Act, by which school boards were created, gave women the same rights as men, both as regards electing and being elected. In 1871 West Australia gave them munic.i.p.al suffrage; in 1878 New Zealand gave school suffrage. In 1880 South Australia gave munic.i.p.al suffrage. In 1881 widows and single women obtained munic.i.p.al suffrage in Scotland and Parliamentary suffrage on the Isle of Man. Munic.i.p.al suffrage was given by Ontario and Tasmania in 1884 and by New Zealand and New Brunswick in 1886; by Nova Scotia and Manitoba in 1887. In 1888 England gave women county suffrage and British Columbia and the North-West Territory gave them munic.i.p.al suffrage. In 1889 county suffrage was given the women of Scotland and munic.i.p.al suffrage to single women and widows in the Province of Quebec. In 1893 New Zealand gave full suffrage. In 1894 parish and district suffrage was given in England to women married and single, with power to elect and to be elected to parish and district councils. In 1895 South Australia gave full state suffrage to all women. In 1898 the women of Ireland were given the right to vote for all officers except members of Parliament.
In 1900 West Australia granted full state suffrage to all. In 1902 full national suffrage was given all the women in federated Australia and full state suffrage to those of New South Wales. In 1903 Tasmania gave full state suffrage; in 1905 Queensland did the same; in 1908 Victoria followed. In 1907 England made women eligible as mayors, aldermen, and county and town councillors. In London, for example, at the present time women can vote for the 28 borough councils and 31 boards of guardians of the London City Council; they can also be themselves elected to these; be members of the central unemployed body or of the 23 district committees, and can be co-opted to all other bodies, like the local pension committees. Women can be aldermen of the Council; and there is nothing to prevent one from holding even the office of chairman.
At the present moment the cause of woman suffrage in England is being furthered chiefly by two organizations which differ in methods. The National Union of Women"s Suffrage Societies has adopted the "const.i.tutional" or peaceful policy; but the National Women"s Social and Political Union is "militant" and coercive.
SOURCES
I. The English Statutes. Published by Authority during the Various Reigns.
II. Studies in History and Jurisprudence: by James Bryce. Oxford University Press, 1901. Pages 782-859 on "Marriage and Divorce."
III. History of English Law: by Frederick Pollock and Frederic Maitland.
2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1898--second edition.
IV. Commentaries on the Laws of England: by Sir William Blackstone. With notes selected from the editions of Archbold, Christian, Coleridge, etc., and additional notes by George Sharswood, of the University of Pennsylvania. 2 vols. Philadelphia, 1860--Childs and Peterson, 602 Arch Street.
V. A History of Matrimonial Inst.i.tutions, chiefly in England and the United States: by George Elliott Howard. 4 vols. The University of Chicago Press, 1904.
VI. Social England: edited by H.D. Traill. 6 vols. G.P. Putnam"s Sons, 1901.
VII. Social Life in the Reign of Queen Anne, taken from original sources: by John Ashton. London, Chatto and Windus, 1897.
VIII. The Renaissance of Girls" Education in England: by Alice Zimmern.
London, A.D. Innes and Co., 1898.
IX. Progress in Women"s Education in the British Empire: edited by the Countess of Warwick. Being the Report of the Education Section, Victorian Era Exhibition, 1897. Longmans, Green, & Co., 1898.
X. Current Literature from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, references to which are noted as they occur.
NOTES:
[393] If a woman sentenced to execution declared she was pregnant, a jury of twelve matrons could be appointed on a writ _de venire inspiciendo_ to determine the truth of the matter; for she could not be executed if the infant was alive in the womb. The same jury determined the case of a widow who feigned herself with child in order to exclude the next heir and when she was suspected of trying to palm off a supposit.i.tious birth. But from all other jury duties women have always been excluded "on account of the weakness of the s.e.x"--_propter defectum s.e.xus_.
[394] Blackstone, i, ch. 16.
[395] Reg. Brev. Orig., f. 89: quod ipse praefatam A bene et honeste tractabit et gubernabit, ac d.a.m.num vel malum aliquod eidem A de corpore suo, aliter quam ad virum suum ex causa regiminis et castigationis uxoris suae licite et rationabiliter pertinet, non faciet nec fieri procurabit.
[396] "Except in so far as he may lawfully and reasonably do so in order to correct and chastise his wife."
[397] The learned commentator Christian adds a few more cases where formerly the criminal law was harshly prejudiced against women. Thus: "By the Common Law, all women were denied the benefit of clergy; and till the 3 and 4 _W. and M_., c. 9 [William and Mary] they received sentence of death and might have been executed for the first offence in simple larceny, bigamy, manslaughter, etc., however learned they were, merely because their s.e.x precluded the possibility of their taking holy orders; though a man who could read was for the same crime subject only to burning in the hand and a few months" imprisonment."
[398] I Q.B. p. 671--in the Court of Appeal.
[399] _Married Women"s Property Act_, 45 and 46 V., c. 75--Aug. 18, 1882.
[400] Note this incident, from the _Westminister Review_, October, 1856: "A lady whose husband had been unsuccessful in business established herself as a milliner in Manchester. After some years of toil she realised sufficient for the family to live upon comfortably, the husband having done nothing meanwhile. They lived for a time in easy circ.u.mstances after she gave up business and then the husband died, _bequeathing all his wife"s earnings to his own illegitimate children_.
At the age of 62 she was compelled, in order to gain her bread, to return to business."
[401] For a full account of the elaborate machinery see Chitty"s note to Blackstone, vol. i, p. 441, of Sharswood"s edition.
[402] _Holy Living, ch. 3, section I: Rules for Married Persons._
[403] Boswell, vii, 288. Perhaps if the venerable Samuel had had the statistics of venereal disease given by adulterous husbands to wives and children he might not have been so sure of his contention.
[404] Quoted by Professor Thomas in the _American Magazine_, July, 1909.
[405] See 20 and 21 V., c. 85--Aug. 28. 1857.
[406] See 7 Edw., c. 12--Aug. 9, 1907--Matrimonial Causes Act, which also gives the court discretion in alimony.
[407] Blackstone, iv, ch. 15.
[408] 4 _and_ 5 _V., c._ 56, _s._ 3.
[409] The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1885, 48 _and_ 49 _V. c._ 69, section 5: "Any person who (1) unlawfully and carnally knows or attempts to have unlawful carnal knowledge of any girl being of or above the age of thirteen years and under the age of sixteen, or (2) unlawfully and carnally knows or attempts to have carnal knowledge of any female idiot or imbecile woman or girl under circ.u.mstances which do not amount to rape, but which prove that the offender knew at the time of the commission of the offence that the woman or girl was an idiot or imbecile, shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and being convicted thereof shall be liable at the discretion of the Court to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour." Section 4: "Any one who unlawfully and carnally knows any girl under the age of thirteen shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude for life." Any one who merely attempts it can be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years, with or without hard labour.
CHAPTER VIII
WOMEN"S RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES
It has been my aim, in this short history of the growth of women"s rights, to depict for the most part the strictly legal aspect of the matter; but from time to time I have interposed some typical ill.u.s.tration of public opinion, in order to bring into greater prominence the ferment that was going on or the misery which existed behind the scenes. A history of legal processes might otherwise, from the coldness of the laws, give few hints of the conflicts of human pa.s.sion which combined to set those processes in motion. Before I present the history of the progress of women"s rights in the United States, I shall place before the reader some extracts which are typical and truly representative of the opposition which from the beginning of the agitation to the present day has voiced itself in all ranks of life.
Let the reader bear carefully in mind that from 1837 to the beginning of the twentieth century such abuse as that which I shall quote as typical was hurled from ten thousand throats of men and women unceasingly; that Mrs. Stanton, Miss Anthony, and Mrs. Gage were hissed, insulted, and offered physical violence by mobs in New York[410] and Boston to an extent inconceivable in this age; and that the marvellously unselfish labour of such women as these whom I have mentioned and of men like Wendell Phillips is alone responsible for the improvement in the legal status of women, which I propose to trace in detail. Some expressions of the popular att.i.tude follow:
[Sidenote: Examples of opposition to women"s rights.]