The processes, then, may be divided into two kinds, one based on oxidation and the other on reduction. In each case the t.i.tration must be preceded by an exact preparation of the solution to be a.s.sayed in order that the iron may be in the right state of oxidation.
~PERMANGANATE AND BICHROMATE METHODS.~
These consist of three operations:--
(1) Solution of the ore; (2) Reduction of the iron to the ferrous state; and (3) t.i.tration.
~Solution.~--The only point to be noticed concerning the first operation (in addition to those already mentioned) is that nitric acid must be absent. If nitric acid has been used, evaporate to dryness, of course without previous dilution; add hydrochloric or sulphuric acid, and boil for five or ten minutes. Dilute with water to about 100 c.c., and warm until solution is complete.
The reduction is performed by either of the following methods:--
1. _With Stannous Chloride._--Fill a burette with a solution of stannous chloride,[67] and cautiously run the liquid into the hot a.s.say solution (in which the iron is present as _chloride_) until the colour is discharged. A large excess of the stannous chloride must be avoided.
Then add 5 c.c. of a 2-1/2 per cent. solution of mercuric chloride, this will cause a white precipitate (or a grey one if too large an excess of the stannous chloride has been added). Boil till the solution clears, cool, dilute, and t.i.trate.
2. _With Sulphuretted Hydrogen._--Cool the solution and pa.s.s through it a current of washed sulphuretted hydrogen till the liquid smells strongly of the gas after withdrawal and shaking. A white precipitate of sulphur will be formed, this will not interfere with the subsequent t.i.tration provided it is precipitated in the cold. If, however, the precipitate is coloured (showing the presence of the second group metals), or if the precipitation has been carried out in a hot solution, it should be filtered off. Boil the solution until the sulphuretted hydrogen is driven off; this may be tested by holding a strip of filter paper dipped in lead acetate solution in the steam issuing from the flask. The presence of sulphuretted hydrogen should be looked for rather than its absence. It is well to continue the boiling for a few minutes after the gas has been driven off. Cool and t.i.trate.
3. _With Sodium Sulphite._--Add ammonia (a few drops at a time) until the precipitate first formed redissolves with difficulty. If a permanent precipitate is formed, redissolve with a few drops of acid. To the warm solution add from 2 to 3 grams of sodium sulphite crystals. The solution will become strongly coloured, but the colour will fade away on standing for a few minutes in a warm place. When the colour is quite removed, add 20 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid, and boil until the steam is quite free from the odour of sulphurous acid. Cool and t.i.trate.
4. _With Zinc._--Add about 10 grams of granulated zinc; if the hydrogen comes off violently add water; if, on the other hand, the action is very slow, add sufficient dilute sulphuric acid to keep up a brisk effervescence. The reduction is hastened by warming, and is complete when the solution is quite colourless and a drop of the liquid tested with sulphocyanate of pota.s.sium gives no reaction for ferric iron.
Filter through "gla.s.s wool" or quick filtering paper. The zinc should be still giving off gas rapidly, indicating a freely acid solution; if not, acid must be added. Wash with water rendered acid. Cool and t.i.trate.
With regard to the relative advantages of the different methods they may be roughly summed up as follows:--The stannous chloride method has the advantage of immediately reducing the ferric iron whether in hot or cold solution and under varied conditions in regard to acidity, but has the disadvantage of similarly reducing salts of copper and antimony, which, in a subsequent t.i.tration, count as iron. Moreover, there is no convenient method of eliminating any large excess of the reagent that may have been used; and, consequently, it either leaves too much to the judgment of the operator, or entails as much care as a t.i.tration.
Students generally get good results by this method.
The sulphuretted hydrogen method also has the advantage of quick reduction under varying conditions, and the further one of adding nothing objectionable to the solution; in fact it removes certain impurities. The disadvantages are the necessity for boiling off the excess of the gas, and of filtering off the precipitated sulphur, although this last is not necessary if precipitated cold. The tendency with students is to get high results. The sodium sulphite method has the advantages of being clean and neat, and of requiring no nitration. On the other hand it requires practice in obtaining the best conditions for complete reduction; and, as with sulphuretted hydrogen, there is the necessity for boiling off the gas, while there is no simple and delicate test for the residual sulphurous acid. In addition, if an excess of sodium sulphite has been used and enough acid not subsequently added, the excess will count as iron. Students generally get low results by this method.
The advantages of the zinc method are, that it is easily worked and that the excess of zinc is readily removed by simply filtering. The disadvantages are the slowness[68] with which the last portions of ferric iron are reduced, the danger of loss by effervescence, the precipitation of basic salts, and, perhaps, of iron, and the loading of the solution with salts of zinc, which in the t.i.tration with bichromate have a prejudicial effect. The tendency in the hands of students is to get variable results, sometimes low and sometimes high.
Generally speaking, the sulphuretted hydrogen and sodium sulphite methods are to be preferred. Carefully worked each method will yield good results.
The t.i.tration may be done with a standard solution of (1) permanganate of potash, or (2) bichromate of potash.
1. _With Permanganate of Potash._--Prepare a standard solution by dissolving 2.82 grams of the salt and diluting to one litre. The strength of this should be 100 c.c. = 0.5 gram of iron, but it varies slightly, and should be determined (and afterwards checked every two or three weeks) by weighing up 0.2 gram of iron wire, dissolving in 10 c.c.
of dilute sulphuric acid, diluting to about 100 c.c., and t.i.trating.
The standard solution must be put in a burette with a gla.s.s stopc.o.c.k, as it attacks india-rubber. The a.s.say should be contained in a pint flask, and be cooled before t.i.trating. The standard solution must be run in until a pinkish tinge permeates the whole solution; this must be taken as the finishing point. When certain interfering bodies are present this colour quickly fades, but the fading must be ignored. With pure solutions the colour is fairly permanent, and a single drop of the pota.s.sium permanganate solution is sufficient to determine the finishing point.
2. _With Bichromate of Potash._--Prepare a standard solution by dissolving 4.39 grams of the powdered and dried salt in water, and diluting to 1 litre. This solution is permanent, its strength is determined by dissolving 0.2 gram of iron wire in 10 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid, diluting to about a quarter of a litre, and t.i.trating.
Also prepare a test solution by dissolving 0.1 gram of ferricyanide of pota.s.sium in 100 c.c. of water. This solution does not keep well and must be freshly prepared.
An ordinary burette is used. The a.s.say is best contained in a glazed earthenware dish, and may be t.i.trated hot or cold. To determine the finishing point, place a series of drops of the ferricyanide solution on a dry white glazed plate. The drops should be of about the same size and be placed in lines at fairly equal distances. The bichromate is run in, in a steady stream, the a.s.say solution being continuously stirred until the reaction is sensibly slackened. Then bring a drop of the a.s.say with the stirrer in contact with one of the test drops on the plate. The standard can be safely run in 1 c.c. at a time, so long as the test drop shows signs of a precipitate. When only a coloration is produced run in cautiously a few drops at a time so long as two drops of the a.s.say gives with the test a colour which is even faintly greener than two drops of the a.s.say solution placed alongside. The finishing point is decided and practically permanent, although it demands a little practice to recognise it. The t.i.tration with permanganate of pota.s.sium has the advantage of a more distinct finishing point and easier mode of working; its application, however, is somewhat limited by the disturbing effects of hydrochloric acid. The bichromate method has the advantage of a standard solution which does not alter in strength, and the further one of being but little affected by altering conditions of a.s.say.
Hydrochloric acid has practically no effect on it. Both methods give accurate results and are good examples of volumetric methods.
The following results ill.u.s.trate the extent to which the methods may be relied on; and the influence which the various conditions of experiment have on the a.s.say.
Solutions of ferrous sulphate and of ferrous chloride were made containing 0.5 gram of iron in each 100 c.c., thus corresponding to the standard solutions of permanganate and bichromate of pota.s.sium. These last were prepared in the way already described. The solution of ferrous sulphate was made by dissolving 5.01 grams of iron wire in 100 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid and diluting to 1 litre. A similar solution may be made by dissolving 24.82 grams of pure ferrous sulphate crystals in water, adding 100 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid, and diluting to 1 litre.
~Rate of Oxidation by Exposure to Air.~--This is an important consideration, and if the rate were at all rapid would have a serious influence on the manner of working, since exclusion of air in the various operations would be troublesome. 20 c.c. of the solution of ferrous sulphate were taken in each experiment, acidified with 10 c.c.
of dilute sulphuric acid, and diluted to 100 c.c. The solution was exposed, cold, in an open beaker for varying lengths of time, and t.i.trated with permanganate of pota.s.sium.
Time exposed 1 hour 1 day 2 days 3 days c.c. required 19.2 19.1 19.0 19.0
These results show that the atmospheric oxidation in cold solutions is unimportant. With boiling solutions the results are somewhat different; a solution which at the outset required 20 c.c. of permanganate of pota.s.sium, after boiling for an hour in an open beaker (without any precautions to prevent oxidation), water being added from time to time to replace that lost by evaporation, required 19.2 c.c. If the solution be evaporated to dryness the oxidising power of concentrated sulphuric acid comes into play, so that very little ferrous iron will be left. A solution evaporated in this way required only 2.2 c.c. of permanganate of pota.s.sium.
~Effect of Varying Temperature.~--In these experiments the bulk was in each case 100 c.c., and 10 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid were present.
The permanganate required by
1 c.c. of ferrous sulphate was, at 15 1.0 c.c., and at 70 1.1 c.c.
10 " " " 9.7 " 9.8 "
100 " " " 97.7 " 96.8 "
The lower result with the 100 c.c. may be due to oxidation from exposure.
~Effect of Varying Bulk.~--The following experiments show that considerable variations in bulk have no practical effect. In each case 20 c.c. of ferrous sulphate solution and 10 c.c. of dilute acid were used.
Bulk of a.s.say 30 c.c. 100 c.c. 500 c.c. 1000 c.c.
Permanganate required 20.0 " 20.0 " 20.2 " 20.5 "
~Effect of Free Sulphuric Acid.~--Free acid is necessary for these a.s.says; if there is an insufficiency, the a.s.say solution, instead of immediately decolorising the permanganate, a.s.sumes a brown colour. The addition of 10 c.c. of dilute sulphuric acid suffices to meet requirements and keep the a.s.say clear throughout. The following experiments show that a considerable excess of acid may be used without in the least affecting the results. In each case 20 c.c. of ferrous sulphate were used.
Dilute sulphuric acid 1.0 c.c. 5.0 c.c. 10.0 c.c. 20.0 c.c. 50.0 c.c. 100.0 c.c.
Permanganate required 19.3 " 19.3 " 19.3 " 19.3 " 19.3 " 19.3 "
~Effect of Foreign Salts.~--When the a.s.say has been reduced with zinc varying quant.i.ties of salts of this metal pa.s.s into solution, the amount depending on the quant.i.ty of acid and iron present. Salts of sodium or ammonium may similarly be introduced. It is essential to know by experiment that these salts do not exert any effect on the t.i.tration.
The following series of experiments show that as much as 50 grams of zinc sulphate may be present without interfering.
Zinc sulphate present 0 gram 1 gram 10 grams 50 grams Permanganate required 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c.
Magnesium, sodium, and ammonium salts, are equally without effect.
Ammonic sulphate present 0 gram 1 gram 10 grams Permanganate required 19.3 c.c. 19.2 c.c. 19.3 c.c.
Sodic sulphate present 0 gram 1 gram 10 grams Permanganate required 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c.
Magnesic sulphate present 0 gram 1 gram 10 grams Permanganate required 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c. 19.3 c.c.
~Effect of Varying Amounts of Iron.~--It is important to know within what limits the quant.i.ty of iron in an a.s.say may safely vary from that used in standardising. In the following experiments the conditions as to bulk, acidity, and mode of working were the same as before:--
Ferrous sulphate solution taken 1 c.c. 10 c.c. 20 c.c. 50 c.c. 100 c.c.
Permanganate required 1.0 " 9.7 " 19.6 " 48.9 " 97.7 "
The ferrous sulphate solution is here a little weaker than that of the permanganate of pota.s.sium, but the results show that the permanganate required is proportional to the iron present.
~t.i.trations in Hydrochloric Solutions.~--These are less satisfactory than those in sulphuric solutions, since an excess of hydrochloric acid decomposes permanganate of pota.s.sium, evolving chlorine, and since the finishing point is indicated, not by the persistence of the pink colour of the permanganate, but by a brown coloration probably due to perchloride of manganese. Nevertheless, if the solution contains only from 5 to 10 per cent. of free hydrochloric acid (sp. g. 1.16) the results are the same as those obtained in a sulphuric acid solution.
Equal weights (0.1 gram) of the same iron wire required exactly the same quant.i.ty of the permanganate of pota.s.sium solution (20 c.c.) whether the iron was dissolved in dilute sulphuric or dilute hydrochloric acid. The following series of experiments are on the same plan as those given above with sulphuric acid solutions. A solution of ferrous chloride was made by dissolving 5.01 grams of iron wire in 50 c.c. of dilute hydrochloric acid and diluting to 1 litre. The dilute hydrochloric acid was made by mixing equal volumes of the acid (sp. g. 1.16) and water.
~Rate of Atmospheric Oxidation.~--20 c.c. of the ferrous chloride solution were acidified with 10 c.c. of the dilute hydrochloric acid and diluted to 100 c.c. This solution was exposed cold in open beakers.