Describe him again."
I described my man again, and he followed every point on his fingers.
"Well," he said; "I could have sworn I knew every man who ever fished at Blank, but this fellow----Oh, wait a minute! You say he is tall and bulky and had travelled. Why, it must be old Carstairs. And yet it can"t be. Carstairs was never married and was never in Parliament."
He pondered again.
Then he said, "You"re sure it wasn"t a clean-shaven bald man with a single eyegla.s.s?"
"Quite," I said.
"Because," he went on, "if he had been, it would have been old Peterson to the life."
"He wasn"t bald or clean-shaven," I said.
"You"re sure he said Blank?" he inquired after another interval of profound thought.
"Absolutely," I replied.
"Tell me again what he was like. Tell me exactly. I know every one up there; I must know him."
"He was a vigorous, bulky, very tall man," I said, "with a pointed beard and a ma.s.s of grey hair under a Panama; and he used to go to Blank every August. He had been a great traveller and knew Persia; he had been in Parliament, and one of his sons was in the siege of Mafeking."
"I don"t know him," he said.
II. DR. SULLIVAN
It had been decided that there never was such a resemblance as is to be traced between my homely features and those of a visitor to the same hotel the previous year--Dr. Sullivan of Harley Street. This had become an established fact, irrefutable like a proposition of Euclid, and one of my new friends, and a friend also of the Harley Street physician who had so satisfyingly and minutely antic.i.p.ated my countenance, made it the staple of his conversation. "Isn"t this gentleman," he would say to this and that habitue of the smoking-room as they dropped in from the neighbouring farms at night, "the very image of Dr. Sullivan of Harley Street, who was here last year?" And they would subject my physiognomy to a searching study and agree that I was. Perhaps the nose--a little bigger, don"t you think? or a shade of dissimilarity between the chins (he having, I suppose, only two, confound him!), but, taking it all around, the likeness was extraordinary.
This had been going on for some time, until I was accustomed, if not exactly inured, to it, and was really rather looking forward to the time when, on returning to London, I could trump up a sufficient ailment to justify me in calling upon my double in Harley Street and scrutinising him with my own eyes. But last night my friend had something of a set-back, which may possibly, by deflecting his conversation to other topics, give me relief. I hope so.
It happened like this. We were as usual sitting in the smoking-room, he and I, when another local acquaintance entered--one who, I gathered, had been away for a few weeks and whom I had therefore not yet seen, and who (for this was the really important thing to my friend) consequently had not yet seen me.
In course of time the inevitable occurred. "Don"t you think," my friend asked, "that this gentleman is the very image of Dr. Sullivan of Harley Street, who was here last summer?"
"What Dr. Sullivan"s that?" the new-comer inquired.
"Dr. Sullivan of Harley Street, who was fishing here last summer. Don"t you remember him? The very image of this gentleman."
"The only Dr. Sullivan I know," replied the new-comer, "is Dr. Sullivan of Newcastle. He"s a very old man by now. A very learned man too. He has a wonderful private museum. He----"
"No, no, the Dr. Sullivan I mean was from Harley Street--a specialist--who took the Manor fishing last summer and stayed in the hotel."
"Dr. Sullivan of Newcastle is a very old man--much older than this gentleman," replied the stranger, "and not a bit like him. He"s a most interesting personality. He is the great authority on the South Sea Islanders. You should see his collection of Fiji war clubs."
"But that"s not the Dr. Sullivan I mean. You must remember him," said my impresario; "we all used to meet evening after evening, just as we"re doing now--Dr. Sullivan of Harley Street, the specialist, a clean-shaven man, exactly like this gentleman here. Every one has noticed the likeness."
"Dr. Sullivan of Newcastle has a beard," said the new-comer. "And he"s a very old man by now. A great receptacle of miscellaneous learning. He showed me once his collection of coins and medals. He"s got coins back to the Roman Emperors and stories about every one of them. His collection----"
"Yes, but----"
"--of idols is amazing. You never saw such comic figures as those natives worship. There"s nothing he doesn"t collect. He"s got a mummy covered with blue beads. He"s got skulls from all over the world, showing different formations. It"s some years----"
"Yes, but----"
"--since I saw him last, and of course he may be----"
"Yes, but----"
"--dead. But if not, he"s a man worth knowing. If ever you go to Newcastle, sir,"--this was to me,--"don"t forget about him. But he must be very old by now. He----"
At this point I finished my gla.s.s and slipped away to bed. Consulting the mirror as I undressed, I smiled at the reflection that confronted me. "You can sleep more comfortably to-night," I said, "for there are signs that you are about to have a rest."
THE WORLD"S DESIRE
Reading the terms of the agreement which Charlie Chaplin refused in New York early in 1916 I had a kind of nervous collapse. For we English are not so accustomed to great sums of money as the Americans are. Then I bound a wet towel round my head and studied the figures as dispa.s.sionately as it is possible to study figures when they run into kings" ransoms. Charlie was offered ten thousand dollars a week for a year: which came then to 104,000 and is now (1920) much more. He was offered one hundred thousand dollars as a bonus for signing the agreement. He was also offered 50 per cent. of any profits made by his films after his salary had been paid. But it did not satisfy him. He refused it.
Now here is a most remarkable state of affairs--that the popular demand for laughter is such that a little acrobatic man with splay feet and a funny way with a cigarette, a hat, and a cane could be offered and could repudiate such colossal wealth as that, and for no other services than to clown it for the cinematoscope. Nor is the oddity of the matter decreased by the reflection that these figures which make an ordinary person dizzy, belonged to war-time. Charlie Chaplin"s rise to affluence and power coincided with the bloodiest struggle in history.
If it is needful for so many people to hold their sides, Charlie"s career is justified. He is also the first droll to conquer the whole world. I suppose that it is no exaggeration to say that at any moment of the day and night--allowing for divergences of time--it would be safe to maintain that ten million people are laughing at the Chaplin antics somewhere or other on this planet of ours. For wherever there is a township of more than two thousand inhabitants, there, I imagine, is a cinema; and wherever there is a cinema there is Charlie; not always quite up to date, of course, for managers are wily birds, but in some film, even though an ancient one. Does the Funniest Man on Earth, as he is called, I should like to know, realise what a role he fills? Does he stand before the gla.s.s and search the recesses of his countenance--which is now far more familiar to the world than any other--and marvel?
Charlie, by the way, has his private uses too. During a recent visit from a young friend, I found that the ordinary gulf that is fixed between a boy in the neighbourhood of ten and a man in the neighbourhood of five times that number was for once easily bridgeable.
We found common ground, and very wisely stuck to it, in the circ.u.mstance that each of us had seen Charlie, and, by great good fortune, we had each seen him in his latest sketch. Whenever, therefore, a _longueur_ threatened, I had but to mention another aspect of Charlie"s genius, and in the discussion that followed all was well.
That Charlie is funny is beyond question. I will swear to that. His humour is of such elemental variety that he could, and probably does, make a Tierra del Fuegan or a Bushman of Central Australia laugh not much less than our sophistical selves. One needs no civilised culture to appreciate the fun of the harlequinade, and to that has Charlie, with true instinct, returned. But it is the harlequinade accelerated, intensified, toned up for the exacting taste of the great and growing "picture" public. It is also farce at its busiest, most furious. Charlie brought back that admirable form of humour which does not disdain the co-operation of fisticuffs, and in which, by way of variety, one man is aimed at, and another, too intrusive, is. .h.i.t. However long the world may last, it is safe to say that the spectacle of one man receiving a blow meant for another will be popular.
What strikes one quickly is the realisation of how much harder Charlie works than many of the more ill.u.s.trious filmers. He is rarely out of the picture, he is rarely still, and he gives full measure. There is no physical indignity that he does not suffer--and inflict. Such impartiality is rare in drama, where usually men are either on top or underneath. In the ordinary way our pet comedians must be on top and untouched. Even the clown, though he receives punishment _en route_, eventually triumphs. But Charlie seldom wins. He remains a b.u.t.t, or, at any rate, a victim of circ.u.mstances whom nothing can discourage or deter. His very essence is resiliency under difficulties, an unabashed and undefeatable front. His especial fascination to me is that life finds him always ready for it--not because he is armed by sagacity, but because he is even better armed by folly. He is first cousin to the village idiot, a natural child of nonsense, licensed up to the hilt, and (like Antaeus) every time he rises from a knockdown blow he is the stronger.
It is a proof of the charter which the world has handed to this irresistible humourist that he has been permitted to introduce such an innovation in stage manners as the hitting of women. We only laugh the more when, having had his ears boxed by the fair, he retaliates with double strength. And there is one of his plays in which every audience becomes practically helpless, as after, with great difficulty, extricating a lady in evening dress from a fountain, he deliberately pushes her in again. It required a Charlie Chaplin to make this tolerable; but such is his radiant unworldliness that we accept it as quite legitimate fun.
One of the chief causes--after the personality of the protagonist--of the popularity of the Chaplin films is probably that in them certain things happen which cannot happen in real life without the intervention of the law, and which are almost always withheld from the real stage. I mean that men so freely a.s.sault each other; physical violence has the fullest and most abundant play. Every one longs to see kicks and blows administered, but is usually defrauded, and Charlie is a spendthrift with both. And so cheerfully and victoriously does he distribute them that I wonder an epidemic of such attentions has not broken out in both hemispheres. I know this--that a fat policeman with his back towards the exit of a cinema at the time a Chaplin film had ended would be in great danger from my foot were I then leaving. I should hope for enough self-control; but I could promise nothing, and I should feel that Charlie"s example, behind the action, sanctified it. Film life and real life would merge into each other so naturally that if the policeman repaid me--or attempted to--in any other way but kind, I should feel outraged. To be arrested for it would be like a stab in the back from a friend.
How long Charlie will remain the darling of two hemispheres we must wait to see. But of one thing I am certain, and that is that if at any time the "The Funniest Man on Earth" ceases to compel laughter, he might by slightly changing his methods draw tears. For while he can be as diverting as the greatest glutton for mirth desires, he has all the machinery of dejection too. One of his melancholy smiles is really beautiful.
A CONQUEROR
It is proverbial that a child may lead a horse to the water, but that not even Mr. Lloyd George, with all his persuasive gifts, can make him drink. An even more difficult task is to induce a horse in the pink of robust health to convey a suggestion of being seriously ill--as I chance just to have discovered. It is not the kind of discovery that one can antic.i.p.ate; indeed, when I woke on the morning of the day on which it happened and, as is my habit, lay for a while forecasting the possible or probable course of events during the next four-and-twenty hours, this example of equine limitation had no place whatever in my thoughts. To the receptive and adventurous observer many curious things may, however, occur; and no sooner was lunch finished than out of a clear sky fell a friend and a taxi (the G.o.d and the machine, if you will), and jointly they conveyed me to as odd a building as I have ever thought to find any horse in, where, under a too searching blue glare, was an a.s.semblage of people as strange as their environment.
There were men in evening dress, toying with cigarettes and bending over women in evening dress; there was an adventuress or two, one with hair in such fluffed-out abundance as can only be a perquisite of notable wickedness; there was a stockman, who was, I fancy, too fond of her; there was a lady in riding boots; there was a comely youth in pyjamas; and there were footmen and page-boys. And all seemed to me made-up to a point of excess. Who could they be? a stranger to the marvel of science might well ask. Strayed revellers? A lost party of masqueraders being held here on bail and photographed for identification purposes?--for there was no doubt about the photography, because the benignant, masterful gentleman with a ma.n.u.script, who gave them instructions, every now and then stood aside in order that the camera-operator might direct his machine-gun and turn the handle; but what was said I could not hear, such was the crackling and fizzling of the blue lights.