Many of the readers of this number will, from their own memories, be better able to do justice to him, whom Henry Hunt named "The Devil"s Chaplain," than we shall in our limited s.p.a.ce. Robert Taylor was born at Edmonton, in the county of Middles.e.x, on the 18th of August, 1784.
His family was highly respectable, and his parents were in affluent circ.u.mstances; but, being a younger son in a family of eleven children, it was necessary that Robert Taylor should follow some profession. His father died when he was about seven years old, leaving him under the guardianship of a paternal uncle. When seventeen years of age, he was apprenticed to a surgeon, at Birmingham, and studied medicine afterwards under Sir Astley Cooper and Mr. Clive, pa.s.sing the College of Surgeons with considerable _eclat_. When about twenty-three, he became acquainted with the Rev. Thomas Cotterell, a clergyman of the Established Church, of high evangelical principles, who induced him to quit physic for metaphysics, and in 1809 Robert Taylor entered Saint John"s College, Cambridge, and in 1813 took his degree of Bachelor of Arts. He was publicly complimented by the Master of the College as a singular honor to the University in his scholarship, and was ordained on the 14th of March, 1813, by the bishop of Chichester; from that time until 1818, Taylor officiated as curate at Midhurst. Here he became acquainted with a person named Ayling who held Deistical opinions, and who induced Taylor to read various Free-thinking works; this soon resulted in an avowal of Deism on the part of Taylor, who tendered his resignation to his Bishop. His friends and family were much alarmed, and much pressure was brought to bear upon him, and we regret to state that it had the effect of producing a temporary recantation. This, however, brought Taylor no relief; he found himself in distress, and shunned by his family. Through the kindness of an old friend, he obtained the curacy of Yardley, near Birmingham, but his previous apostacy having reached the ears of the Bishop, the necessary license was refused, and the rector received a peremptory notice to dismiss Taylor. This harsh treatment caused a reaction, and while the rector sought another curate, Taylor preached a series of sermons, by means of which he shook the faith of nearly the whole of his congregation. The following is an abstract of his last sermon at Yardley:--
"The text was, "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale"s belly, so shall the son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."--Matt, xii., 40. He began, "Then this glorious miracle of the man having been swallowed alive by a fish, and remaining alive for seventy-two hours, undigested and unhurt, in the fish"s bowels, and being vomited up unhurt and safe upon the dry land, was as true as the gospel; and consequently the gospel was as true, but not more true, than this sea-sick miracle. He inferred that no person could have a right to pretend to believe in the death and resurrection of Christ, who had the least doubt as to the reality of the deglut.i.tion and evomition of the prophet Jonah. As to the natural improbabilities and physical impossibilities of this very wonderful Bible miracle, these were nothing in the way of a true and lively faith. Where miracles of any sort were concerned, there could be no distinction into the greater and the less, since infinite power was as necessary to the reality of the least as to the greatest. We should never forget that it was the Lord who prepared the fish, and prepared him for the express purpose of swallowing the man, and probably gave him a little opening physic, to cleanse the apartment for the accommodation of its intended tenant; and had the purpose been, that the whole ship and all the crew should have been swallowed as well as he, there"s no doubt that they could have been equally well accommodated. But as to what some wicked Infidels objected, about the swallow of the whale being too narrow to admit the pa.s.sage of the man, it only required a little stretching, and even a herring or a sprat might have gulped him. He enlarged, most copiously, on the circ.u.mstance of the Lord speaking to the fish, in order to cause him to vomit; and insisted on the natural efficacy of the Lord, which was quite enough to make anybody sick. He pointed out the many interesting examples of faith and obedience which had been set by the scaly race, who were not only at all times easy to be caught in the gospel net, when thrown over them by the preaching of the word, but were always ready to surrender their existence to the Almighty, whenever he pleased to drop "em a line. That as the first preachers of the gospel were fishermen, so the preachers of the gospel, to this day, might truly be said to be looking after the loaves and fishes, and they who, as the Scripture says, are "wise to catch soles," speak to them for no other purpose than that for which the Lord spake unto the whale--that is, to ascertain how much they can swallow. The moral of this pungent persiflage, aimed to admonish the proud and uncharitable believer, who expected his acceptance with the deity on the score of his credulity, that when his credulity was fairly put to trial, it might be found that he was in reality as far from believing what he did not take to be true as the most honest and avowed Infidel. "Thou then who wouldst put a trick upon infinite wisdom, and preferest the imagined merit of a weak understanding to the real utility of an honest heart--thou who wouldst
"Compound for sins thou art inclined to, By d.a.m.ning those thou hast no mind to;"
hast thou no fears for thy presumptuous self? Thou believest only that which seemeth to thee to be true; what does the Atheist less? And that which appeareth to be a lie thou rejectest; what does the Atheist more?
Can we think that G.o.d has given us reason only to betray us, and made us so much superior to the brute creation, only to deal with us so much worse than they, to punish us for making the best use we could of the faculties he has given us, and to make the very excellence of our nature the cause of our d.a.m.nation?""
This concluded his connection with the Church of England, and his brother having consented to make him an allowance of one pound per week if he would quit England, he retired to the Isle of Man. After nine weeks his brother ceased to remit; and to support himself, Taylor wrote for the two newspapers then published in the island, but his articles attracting attention, he was summoned before the Bishop, and compelled to quit the island under a threat of imprisonment. In deep distress, he went to Dublin, where he lectured on Deism until 1824, when he came to London, and founded the Christian Evidence Society.
Many of the discourses delivered by him were printed in "The Lion."
which was first published in 1828. In 1827 Mr. Taylor was tried at Guildhall for blasphemy, and was sentenced to imprisonment in Oakham gaol for one year. In Oakham he wrote "The Diegesis" and "Syntagma."
After his release from prison in 1829, he, together with Richard Carlile, made a tour through England on an Infidel mission, commencing with a challenge to the Cambridge University. In 1830 and 1831 he delivered a series of discourses, which are printed together under the t.i.tle of "The Devil"s Pulpit." On the 4th July, 1831, he was again tried for blasphemy and sentenced to two years" imprisonment In 1833 he delivered a number of discourses, which were printed in the "Philalethean." He was the friend and companion of Richard Carlile for several years. It is difficult to quote from Robert Taylor"s works, unless at the risk of doing him great injustice, and we must therefore refer our readers to the works we have named. The following is from "The Devil"s Pulpit:"--
"The gentlemen who distribute religious tracts, the general body of dissenting preachers, and almost all persons engaged in the trade of religion, imagine themselves to have a mighty advantage against Infidels, upon the strength of that last and reckless argument--that whether the Christian religion be true or false, there can be no harm in believing; and that belief is, at any rate, the safe side. Now, to say nothing of this old Popish argument, which a sensible man must see is the very essence of Popery, and would oblige us to believe all the absurdities and nonsense in the world: inasmuch as if there be no harm in believing, and there be some harm and danger in not believing, the more we believe the better: and all the argument necessary for any religion whatever would be, that it should frighten us out of our wits: the more terrible, the more true: and it would be our duty to become the converts of that religion whatever it might be, whose priests could swear the loudest, and d.a.m.n and curse the fiercest. But I am here to grapple with this Popery in disguise, this wolfish argument in sheepish clothing, upon Scriptural ground, and on Scriptural ground only; taking the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, for this argument"s sake, to be divine authority. The question proposed is, "Whether is the believer or the unbeliever the more likely to be saved, taking the Scriptures to be of divine authority!" And I stand here, on this divine authority, to prove that the unbeliever is the more likely to be saved: that unbelief, and not belief, is the safe side, and that a man is more likely to be d.a.m.ned for believing the gospel, and because of his having believed it, than for rejecting and despising it, as I do.... But, if a patient hearing be more than good Christians be minded to give us, when thus advance to meet them on their own ground, their impatience and intolerance itself will supply the evidence and demonstration of the fact, that, after all, they dare not stand to the text of their own book, that it is not the Bible that they go by, nor G.o.d whom they regard: but that they want to be G.o.d-a"-mighties themselves, and would have us take their words for G.o.d"s words; you must read it as they read it, and understand it as they understand it: you must "skip, and go on,"
just where a hard word comes in the way of the sense they choose to put upon it: you must believe what the book contains, what you see with your own eyes that it does not contain: you must shut your eyes, and not see what it does contain; or you"ll be none the nearer the mark of their liking.... Taking the authority of Scripture, for this argument"s sake, to be decisive, I address the believer who would give himself airs of superiority, would chuckle in an imaginary safety in believing, and presume to threaten the unbeliever as being in a worse case, or more dangerous plight, than he. "Hast thou no fears for thy presumptuous self?" when on the showing of thine own book, the safety (if safety there be) is all on the unbelieving side? When for any one text that can be produced, seeming to hold out any advantage or safety in believing, we can produce two in which the better hope is held out to the unbeliever? For any one apparent exhortation to believe, we can produce two forbiddances to believe, and many threaten-ings of G.o.d"s vengeance to, and for the crime and folly of, believing. To this proof I proceed, by showing you:--1st. What the denunciations of G.o.d"s vengeance are: with no comment of mine, but in the words of the text itself. 2d. That these dreadful denunciations are threatened to believers: and that they are not threatened to unbelievers. And 3d. That all possible advantages and safety, which believing could confer on any man, are likely, and more likely to be conferred on the unbeliever than on the believer. That the danger of the believer is so extreme, that no greater danger can possibly be. 1st. What are the denunciations of G.o.d"s vengeance! "There are" (says the holy Revelation, xiv. 10,) "who shall drink of the wine of the wrath of G.o.d, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation, and shall be tormented with fire and brimstone, and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever: and they have no rest day or night." There"s "glad tidings of great joy" for you! The Christian may get, over the terror of this denunciation by the selfish and ungenerous chuckle of his "Ah! well, these were very wicked people, and must have deserved their doom; it need not alarm us: it doesn"t apply to us." But good-hearted men would rather say, "It does apply.
We cannot be indifferent to the misery of our fellow-creatures. The self-same Heaven that frowns on them, looks lowering upon us." And who were they? and what was their offence? Was it Atheism! was it Deism"
was it Infidelity? No! It was for church and chapel-going; it was for adoring, believing, and worshipping. They worshipped the beast: I know not what beast they worshipped; but I know that if you go into any of our churches and chapels at this day, you will find them worshipping the Lamb; and if worshipping a lamb be not most suspiciously like worshiping a beast, you may keep the color in your cheeks, while mine are blanched with fear. The unbeliever only can be absolutely safe from this danger.
He only who has no religion at all, is sure not to be of the wrong religion. He who worships neither G.o.d nor Devil, is sure not to mistake one of those gentlemen for the other. But will it be pretended, that these are only metaphors of speech, that the thing said is not the thing that"s meant? Why, then, they are very ugly metaphors. And what is saying that which you don"t mean, and meaning the contrary to what you say, but lying? And what worse can become of the Infidel, who makes it the rule of his life "to hear and speak the plain and simple truth,"
than of the Christian, whose religion itself is a system of metaphors and allegories, of double meanings, of quirk and quiddities in dread defiance of the text that warns him, that "All liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone?" Rev. xxi. 8.
"Is it a parable that a man may merely entertain his imagination withal, and think no more on"t,--though not a word be hinted about a parabolical signification, and the text stands in the mouth of him who, we are told, was the truth itself? And he it is who brought life and immortality to light, that hath described in the 16th of Luke, such an immortality as that of one who was a sincere believer, a son of Abraham, who took the Bible for the rule of his life, and was anxious to promote the salvation of his brethren, yet found for himself no Saviour, no salvation; but, "In h.e.l.l he lifted up his eyes being in torment: and saith Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue, for I am tormented in this flame." But that request was refused. "Then he said, I pray thee, therefore, Father, that thou wouldst send him to my father"s house; for I have five brethren, that he may testify unto them, lest they also come to this place of torment." But that request was refused. There"s "glad tidings of great joy" for you! That the believer"s danger of coming or going into that place of torment is so great, that greater cannot possibly be: and that his belief will stand him in no stead at all, but make his plight a thousand times worse than if he had not been a believer; and that unbelief is the safer side--Christ himself being judge--I quote no words but his to prove. Is the believer concerned to save his soul, then shall he most a.s.suredly be d.a.m.ned for being so concerned: for Christ hath said, "Whosoever will save his soul shall lose it." Matthew xvi. 25. Is the believer a complete beggar? If he be not so, if he hath a rag that he doth call his own, he will be d.a.m.ned to all eternity. For Christ hath said, "Whosoever he be of you who forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple." Luke xiv.
33. Is the believer a rich man? and dreams he of going to Heaven? It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle." Matthew xix. 24.
Is he a man at all, then he cannot be saved, for Christ hath said, "Thou believest that there is one G.o.d;" saith St. James, "Thou dost well, the Devils also believe and tremble." 2 James xix. And so much good, and no more, than comes to d.a.m.ned spirits in the flames of h.e.l.l, is all the good that ever did and can come of believing. "For though thou hadst all faith, so that thou couldst remove mountains," saith St. Paul, "It should profit thee nothing." 1 Cor. xiii. 2. Well, then! let the good Christian try what saving his prayers will do for him: this is the good that they"!! do for him; and he hath Christ"s own word to comfort him in"t, "He shall receive the greater d.a.m.nation." Luke xx. 47. Well, then, since believing will not save him, since faith will not save him, since prayer will not save him, but all so positively make things all the worse, and none the better, there"s one other chance for him. Let him go and receive the Sacrament, the most comfortable Sacrament, you know, "of the body and blood of Christ," remembering, as all good communicants should, "that he is not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs that fall from that table." "Truth, Lord! But the dogs eat of the crumbs that fall from their master"s table!" O what happy dogs! But let those dogs remember, that it is also truth, that "He that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh d.a.m.nation to himself." 1 Cor. xvi. 29. O what precious eating and drinking!
""My G.o.d! and is thy table spread; And doth thy cup with love o"erflow?
Thither be all the children led, And let them all thy sweetness know."
"That table is a snare, that cup is deadly poison that bread shall send thy soul to h.e.l.l. Well, then! try again, believer: perhaps you had better join the Missionary Society, and subscribe to send these glad tidings of these blessed privileges, and this jolly eating and drinking, to the Heathen. Why, then; you have Christ"s own a.s.surance, that when you shall have made one proselyte, you shall just have done him the kindness of making him twofold more the child of h.e.l.l than yourself.
Mat. xxiii. 15. Is the believer liable to the ordinary gusts of pa.s.sion, and in a pa.s.sion shall he drop the hasty word, "thou fool!" for that one word "he shall be in danger of h.e.l.l fire." Mat. v. 22. Nay, Sirs! this isn"t the worst of the believer"s danger. Would he but keep his legs and arms together, and spare his own eyes and limbs; he doth by that very mercy to himself d.a.m.n his eyes and limbs--and hath Christ"s a.s.surance that it would have been profitable for him rather to have plucked out his eyes, and chopt off his limbs, and so to have wriggled and groped his way through the "Straight gate and the narrow way that leadeth unto life," than having two eyes and two arms, or two legs, to be cast into h.e.l.l, into the fire that never shall be quenched, where their "worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." Mark ix. 43. Well, then! will the believer say, what were all the miracles and prophecies of both the Old and the New Testament for those unquestionable miracles, and clearly-accomplished prophecies, if it were not that men should believe?
Why, absolutely, they were the very arguments appointed by G.o.d himself to show us that men should not believe, but that d.a.m.nation should be their punishment if they did believe. "To the law and the testimony.""
Sirs! These are the very words:--"Of miracles, saith G.o.d"s word, "They are the spirits of devils, that work miracles." Rev. xvi. 14. And it is the Devil who "deceiveih them which dwell on the earth, by means of those miracles which he hath power to do." Rev. xiii. 14. So much for miracles. Is it on the score of prophets and of prophecies, then, that you will take believing to be the safe side? Then "thus saith the Lord of Hosts, the G.o.d of Israel, the prophets prophesy falsely and the priests bear rule by their means." Jer. v. 31. "The prophet is a fool: the spiritual man is mad." Hosea i. 7. "Thus saith the Lord of Hosts: hearken not unto the prophets." Jer. xxiii. 15. "O Israel, thy prophets are like the foxes of the desert." Ezekiel xiii. 4. "They lie unto thee." Jerem. xiv. 14. "And they shall be tormented day and night forever and ever." Rev. xx. 10. "And the punishment of the prophet shall be even as the punishment of him that seeketh unto him." Ezekiel xiv.
10. Nay more, then, it is, when G.o.d hath determined to d.a.m.n men, that he, in every instance, causeth them to become believers, and to have faith in divine Revelation, in order that they may be d.a.m.ned. Believers, and none but believers, becoming liable to d.a.m.nation; believers and none but believers, being capable of committing that unpardonable sin against the Holy Ghost, which hath never forgiveness, neither in this world nor in that which is to come. "Whereas all other kinds of blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men, and all sorts of blasphemy wherewith soever they shall blaspheme. But there is no forgiveness for believers." Mark iii. 28. For it is written, "For this cause G.o.d shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they all might be d.a.m.ned." 2 Thessal. ii. 11. So when it was determined by G.o.d that the wicked Ahab should perish, the means to bring him to destruction, both of body and soul, was to make him become a believer.
"I offer no comment of my own on words so sacred; but these are the words: "Hear thou, therefore, the word of the Lord. I saw the Lord sitting upon his throne, and all the hosts of Heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left. And the Lord said, who shall persuade Ahab that he may go up and fall at Ramoth Gilead? and one said on this manner, and another said on that manner. And there stood forth a spirit, and stood before the Lord, and said: I will persuade him. And the Lord said unto him wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, thou shalt persuade him, and prevail also. Go forth and do so. Now, therefore, behold the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all thy prophets." 1 kings xxii. 22. There were 400 of "em; they were "the goodly-fellowship of the prophets for you; all of them inspired by the spirit from on high, and all of them lying as fast as they could lie."
So much for getting on the safe side by believing. Had Ahab been an Infidel, he would have saved his soul alive. As it was, we may address him in the words of St. Paul to just such another fool, "King Ahab, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest: but no better than I know, that for that very belief, fell slaughter on thy soul: and where thou soughtest to be saved by believing, it was by believing thou wert d.a.m.ned." So when Elijah had succeeded in converting the 450 worshippers of Baal, who had been safe enough while they were Infidels, and they began crying, "the Lord He is G.o.d, the Lord He is G.o.d:" the moment they got into the right faith, they found themselves in the wrong box; and the prophet, by the command of G.o.d, put a stop to their Lord-G.o.dding, by cutting their throats for "em, "Elijah brought them down to the brook of Kishon, and slew them there." 1 Kings xviii. 40.
Oh! what a blessed thing, you see, to be converted to the true faith!
Thus all the sins and crimes that have been committed in the world, and all G.o.d"s judgments upon sin and sinners have been the consequence of religion, and faith, and believing. What was the first sin committed in the world? It was believing. Had our great mother Eve not been a believing credulous fool, she would not have been in the transgression.
Who was the first reverend divine that began preaching about G.o.d and immortality? It was the Devil. What was the first lie that was ever told, the very d.a.m.ning and d.a.m.nable lie? It was the lie told to make folks believe that they would not be dead when they were dead, that they should not surely die, but that they should be as G.o.ds, and live in a future state of existence. "When G.o.d himself hath declared, that there is no future state of existence: that "Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." Who is it, then, that prefers believing in the Devil rather than in G.o.d, but the believer?--And from whom is the hope of a future state derived, but from the father of lies--the Devil? But if in defiance of so positive a declaration of Almighty G.o.d, men will have it that there is a future state of existence after death, who are they who shall sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of Heaven, but unbelievers, let them come from the north, from the south, from the east, or from the west? And who are they that shall be cast out, but believers, "the children of the kingdom?" As St. Peter very charitably calls them, "cursed children." 2 Peter ii. 14. That is, I suppose, children with beards, children that never grew to sense enough to put away childish things, but did in gawky manhood, like new-born babes, desire the pure milk and lollipop of the gospel. "For of such is the kingdom of Heaven." And who are they whom Christ will set upon his right hand, and to whom he will say, "Come ye blessed of my father!" but unbelievers, who never troubled their minds about religion, and never darkened the doors of a gospel shop? But who are they to whom he will say, "Depart ye cursed into everlasting fire, prepared for the Devil and his angels," but believers, every one of them believers, chapel-going folks, Christ"s blood men, and incorrigible bigots, that had been bothering him all their days with their "Lord! Lord!" to come off at last with no better reward of their faith than that he will protest unto them, I never knew ye.
"One text there is, and only one, against ten thousand of a contrary significancy: which, being garbled and torn from its context, seems, for a moment, to give the advantage to the believer; the celebrated 19th chapter of Mark, v. 16:--"He that believeth, and is baptized, shall be saved; but he that believeth not, shall be d.a.m.ned." But little will this serve the deceitful hope of the Christian, for it is immediately added.
And these signs shall follow them that believe; in my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover." Can the Christian show these signs, or any of them? Will he dare to take-up a serpent, or drink prussic acid? If he hesitate, he is not a believer, and his profession of belief is a falsehood. Let belief confer what privilege it may, he hath no part nor lot in the matter; the threat which he denounces against Infidels hangs over himself, and he hath no sign of salvation to show. Believing the gospel, then, (or rather, I should say, professing to believe it, for I need not tell you that there"s a great deal more professing to believe, than believing,) instead of making a man the more likely to be saved, doubles his danger of d.a.m.nation, inasmuch as Christ hath said, that "the last state of that man shall be worse than the first." Luke xi. 26. And his holy apostle Peter addeth, "It would have been better for them not to have known the way (2 Peter ii. 21) of righteousness." The sin of believing makes all other sins that a man can commit so much the more heinous and offensive in the sight of G.o.d, inasmuch as they are sins against light and knowledge: and "the servant who knew his Lord"s will, and did it not, he shall be beaten with many stripes." Luke xii. 47. While unbelief is not only innocent in itself, but so highly pleasing to Almighty G.o.d, that it is represented as the cause of his forgiveness of things which otherwise would not be forgiven. Thus St. Paul, who had been a blasphemer, a persecutor, and injurious, a.s.sures us that it was for this cause he obtained mercy, "because he did it ignorantly in unbelief." 1 Tim. i.
13. Had he been a believer, he would as surely have been d.a.m.ned as his name was Paul. And "tis the gist of his whole argument, and the express words of the 11th of the Epistle to the Romans, that "G.o.d included them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all." Unbelief being the essential qualification and recommendation to G.o.d"s mercy: not without good reason was it that the pious father of the boy that had the devil in him, when he had need of Christ"s mercy, and knew that unbelief would be the best t.i.tle to it, cried out and said with tears, "Lord, I believe, help thou mine unbelief!" Mark ix. 24. While the Apostles themselves, who were most immediately near and dear to Christ, no more believed the Gospel than I do; and for all they have said and preached about it, they never believed it themselves, as Christ told "em that they hadn"t so much faith as a grain of mustard seed. And the evangelist John bears them record, to their immortal honor; that "though Christ had done so many miracles among them, yet believed they not." John xii. 37.
And the same divine authority a.s.sures us that "neither did his brethren believe in him." John vii. 5. Which then is "the safe side." Sirs, on the showing of the record itself? On the unbelieving side, the Infidel stands in the glorious company of the Apostles, in the immediate family of Christ, and hath no fear; while the believer doth as well and no better than the devils in h.e.l.l, who believe and tremble."
"I."
JOSEPH BARKER.
In any work, purporting to be a true record of Freethinkers, the name of Joseph Barker cannot be omitted. We find in him, from the commencement of his public life till the present time, an ardent desire for, and a determination to achieve, freedom of thought and ex-pression on all subjects appertaining to theology, politics, and sociology. Possessing a vigorous intellect, a const.i.tution naturally strong, great oratorical ability, and an unrivalled command oi the Saxon language, he has made himself a power among each party with whom the transitory state of his mind has brought him in contact. It is seldom we find men with equal boldness, when once connected with Wesleyan Methodism, rising superior in thought to its narrow, selfish, dogmatic, unnatural, and humiliating views, and claiming for human nature a more dignified and exalted position; gradually advancing to Unitarianism; ultimately to land safely on the sh.o.r.e of Materialism. Joseph Barker has pa.s.sed, amid persecution and privation, through these different phases of theology, to arrive at "Infidelity," to be, he states, a better, wiser, and happier man. In his autobiography, we read that he was born in Bramley, an old country town in the West Riding of Yorkshire, in 1806, the _day_ of his birth being forgotten. His parents, and his ancestors, so far as is known of them, were of humble means. His grandfather was addicted to drinking freely of those beverages which meet with so much opposition from Mr. Barker himself. His aunt also was unfortunate, having married a man who was a minister, a drunkard, and a c.o.c.k-fighter. His parents appear to have been uneducated and pious; belonging to the old school of Methodists, those who look on this life merely as a state of trial and probation; always looking forward to enjoy their mansion in the skies--the house not made with hands eternal in the heavens, thinking nothing
.... Worth a thought beneath, But how _they_ may escape the death That never, never dies.
Although living _in_ this world, they were not _of it_. It was to them, all vanity and vexation of spirit. They attended their chapel, their love feasts, their cla.s.s-meetings, their prayer meetings, and their revival meetings, where they would lament over the wickedness and depravity of human nature, where they would "speak their experience,"
tell of their temptations, pray for the conversion of the world, and sing their hymns, such as the following, which was a favorite with Mr.
Barker"s family:--
"Refining fire, go through my heart, Illuminate my soul; Scatter my life through every part, And sanctify the whole."
Such being the character of Mr. Barker"s parents, it is no wonder that _he_ was "brought up" under the same influence, with the same false notions of life, of humanity, and of the world; and we cannot prize too highly the man who had the industry to investigate, the ability to discern, and the courage to expose the falsity of such doctrines and the disastrous effects of such teaching.
In the extracts we shall give from Mr. Barker"s works will be found that simplicity of style and force of argument peculiar to himself. The first extract we take shows the falsity of the orthodox doctrine of the total depravity of human nature:--
"On looking back on the earlier periods of my life, I first see proofs that the orthodox doctrine of original sin, or of natural total depravity, is a falsehood. I was _not_ born totally depraved. I never recollect the time, since I began to think and feel at all, when I had not good thoughts, and good feelings. I never recollect the time since I began to think and feel at all, when I had not many good thoughts, and strong inclinations to goodness. So far was my heart from being utterly depraved or hardened, that I sympathised, even in my childhood, with the humblest of G.o.d"s creatures, and was filled to overflowing with sorrow at the sight of distress. I recollect one Sunday, while I was searching about for something in one of the windows upstairs, I found a b.u.t.terfly that had been starved to death, as I supposed. When I laid hold of it, it crumbled to pieces. My feelings were such at the thought of the poor b.u.t.terfly"s sufferings, that I wept. And for all that day I could scarcely open my lips to say a word to any one without bursting into tears.... And I recollect well what a struggle I had when I first told a lie. A school in the neighborhood had a feast, ours had not, so I played the truant, after a serious struggle, to have an opportunity of seeing the scholars walk. I had a miserable afternoon; for I felt that I was doing wrong, and I was afraid lest my mother should find me out. My sister found me out and told my mother, but my mother was loth to believe her till she had asked me myself. When I went home my mother asked me if I had been to school, and I said yes, and my mother, as she had never found me out in a lie before, believed me. But I was sadly distressed afterwards when I thought of what I had done. That lie caused me days of remorse, and my sufferings were all the severer in consequence of my mother having so readily believed what I said."
The unhappy and unnatural effects of theology on the minds of earnest, truth-seeking men--the total prostration of manly dignity, the perversion of the mental faculties, and the debas.e.m.e.nt of human nature, is truly stated by Mr. Barker in the following extract:--
"I also recollect being very much troubled with dreadful and indescribably awful dreams, and for several months during certain parts of the year I was accustomed to rise during my sleep, and walk about the house in a state of sleep for hours together. I say in a state of sleep: but I cannot exactly describe the state in which I was. It was not _perfect_ sleep, and yet I was not properly awake. My eyes were open, and I saw, as far as I can remember, the things around me, and 1 could hear what was said to me. But neither what I saw nor what I heard seemed to have power to penetrate far enough into my soul to awake me properly.
During those occasions, I was frequently very unhappy, dreadfully unhappy, most horribly miserable. Sometimes I fancied I had been doing something wrong, and my fancied offence seemed horrible beyond all expression, and alarmed and overwhelmed me with unutterable terrors and distress. On one occasion I fancied that both I and my father had both been doing something wrong, and this seemed most horrible and distressing of all; and as I wandered about in my mysterious state, I howled most piteously, and cried and wept as if my heart would break. I never recollect being roused from that dismal state while I was walking about the house, except twice. Once when I struck my shins violently against a large earthenware bowl and hurt myself sadly; and another was when I was attempting to go up the chimney: I put my foot upon fire and burnt myself, and that awoke me. I suffered in this way for several years. After I went to bed at night I soon fell asleep, and slept perhaps an hour or nearly two. I would then begin to cry, or moan, or howl, and at times to sing. One night I sang a whole hymn of eight verses through; the hymn in Wesley"s Hymn Book, beginning
With glorious clouds encompa.s.sed round Whom angels dimly see, Will the unsearchable be found Or G.o.d appear to me?""
Few persons who have not attended the "cla.s.s-meetings" of the Wesleyan Methodists can form an adequate idea of the stereotyped phrases and absurd sayings indulged in by those who "speak their experience,"
etc., at those meetings. Certain sentences are learned, and uttered indiscriminately, without reference to time, place, or other conditions.
Mr. Barker, after speaking of the recklessness of speech thus indulged in, says:--
"In many cases this false way of speaking is the result of mere thoughtlessness perhaps, or of ignorance, joined with the notion that it is their duty to pray, or to say something in public. The parties have no _intention_ to deceive: but being called on to speak, or invited to pray, they begin, and catch hold of such words as they can find, whether right or wrong, whether true or false. And their words are oftener foolish or false, than wise or true. Their talk is at times most foolish and ridiculous. I will give an example or two. It is customary for people, when praying for preachers, to say, "Lord, bless thy servants when they stand up to declare thy word: be thou _mouth matter, and wisdom_ to them." This has some meaning in it when offered in reference to a preacher, especially a preacher about to preach. In other cases it would be most foolish and ridiculous. Yet I once heard a person in a prayer-meeting at Chester use this same form of expression in behalf of the sick and the dying. "O Lord," said he, "bless the sick and the afflicted, and those that are in the article of death;--be thou mouth, matter, and wisdom to them." At another prayer-meeting at Chester, on a _Friday_ evening, one of the leaders gave out the following lines:--
"Another six days" work is done; Another _Sabbath_ is begun." etc.
I once heard a woman say in cla.s.s, "I do thank G.o.d that he ever gave me a desire to see that _death_ that never, never _dies._""
Soon after Mr. Barker became "religious" and attended his cla.s.s-meetings, he awaited the usual "call" to preach the gospel.
Accordingly, having received the "call," he became a Methodist preacher, belonging to the Old Connexion, the New Connexion, and then advancing to Unitarianism, ultimately arriving at the climax of Freethought, in which cause he is now so distinguished an advocate. While a Methodist preacher, he was induced by a neighbor, an Atheist, to read Carlile"s "Republican." We can readily understand why Christians are taught not to read "Infidel" works. The effect the "Republican" produced on Mr.
Barker"s mind would be augmented, did those Christians investigate what they so often ignorantly denounce. In reference to the "Republican,"
Mr. Barker says:--
"I was very much struck in reading some portions of the work [Carlile"s], and agitated and shaken by its arguments on some points.
The object of many of its articles was to prove Christianity irrational and false. The princ.i.p.al doctrines which it a.s.sailed were such as the trinity--the common notion about the fall of man, and its effects upon the human race--the Calvinistic notions of eternal, universal, and absolute predestination, unconditional election and reprobation--the Calvinistic notion of G.o.d"s sovereignty or partiality--the utter depravity of every human being born into the world, and yet the obligation of those utterly depraved beings to steer clear of all evil, and to do all that is right and good, on pain of eternal d.a.m.nation. The doctrine of satisfaction to justice, was also a.s.sailed, and the doctrine of the immortality of the human soul, and the notion that because it is immaterial, it must, as a consequence, be immortal.... The consequence was, that my mind was thrown into a state of doubt and suspense. I cannot say that I doubted the truth of the Christian religion exactly, but still I doubted the truth of certain doctrines which I had been taught to regard as parts of that religion. I can briefly describe the doubts I had. I neither saw clearly that those doctrines to which he objected were no part of the Christian religion, nor could I see any way by which these doctrines could be defended and proved to be rational and true. One thing began to seem almost certain, either that Christianity was not true, or that those doctrines as generally laid down, were no parts of the Christian religion. This led to investigation. I was wishful to ascertain whether those doctrines which were a.s.sailed as irrational, were parts of Christianity or not. I began to converse on the subject with one of my religious companions, and I began to read on the subject as I had opportunity. My companion was rather troubled and alarmed at the doubts I expressed with respect to the correctness of some of the common doctrines of what was considered orthodoxy; still, what I had said had some influence on his mind, for he told me shortly after, that he wished he had never heard my doubts, for what I had said had spoiled some of his best sermons; he would never be able to preach them with comfort more.... During my residence in that [Newcastle]
circuit, my views on many subjects became anti-Methodistical to a very great extent indeed. I now no longer held the prevailing views with respect to the nature of justifying faith, the witness of the Spirit, regeneration, sanctification, and the like. In reading Wesley"s works, I was astonished at the great number of unmeaning and inconsistent pa.s.sages which I met with. In many of his views I perfectly agreed with him? but with a vast amount of what he said on other subjects, I could not help but disagree.... About this time, finding that there was little likelihood that I should be tolerated in the New Connexion unless I could allow my mind to be enslaved, and feeling that I should be obliged sooner or later to break loose from Methodistical restraint, and speak and act with freedom, I thought of visiting Mr. Turner, the Unitarian minister of Newcastle, and seeking an interview with him. I had heard something to the effect that Unitarians were great lovers of freedom--that they did not bind their ministers and members by any human creeds, but left them at liberty to investigate the whole system of Christianity thoroughly, and to judge as to what were its doctrines and duties for themselves, and to preach what they believe to be true without restraint and persecution, and I thought if this was the case, they must be a very happy people. But from other things which I had heard respecting them, I was led to regard them with something of horror--to look, on them as persons who trifled with Scripture authority, as persons who had rushed from the extremes of false orthodoxy into the extremes of Infidelity. I was in consequence prevented from visiting Mr. Turner, and I remained in comparative ignorance of the Unitarian body, in ignorance both of their principles and of their character, still shut up in the dungeons of orthodox slavery."
"The dungeons of orthodox slavery" did not long contain Mr. Barker; for he afterwards became better acquainted with the Unitarians, and formed one of their most energetic preachers. But Unitarianism, appearing to him at first true in its doctrine and free in its advocacy, shortly became insufficient for the cravings of his mind; and, at length, he found himself outside all the churches. The Bible, which at one period of his life seemed to him a perfect revelation from "G.o.d" now appeared only the production of erring and half-informed men; and having a thorough knowledge of its contents, he resolved to employ the remainder of his life in confuting the false notions of its "divine authority."
America presenting a congenial residence, he resolved to visit that country and purchase some land, upon which he might occupy his leisure from lecturing and writing. Having settled in the country, he considered something should be said on the Bible. Accordingly, in November, 1852, a Bible Convention was held at Salem, Ohio, Mr. Barker being appointed President, he extract the following from his speech, as ill.u.s.trating the uncertainty of the Bible translations, the character of the translators, and the nature of the ma.n.u.scripts from which the translations are made:--
"We say, that the Bible bears on its very face the marks of human imperfection and error. This is true of every Bible in existence.