If suffrage were a natural right, then women should have it, and at once, but it is not like the right to have person and property protected, which every man, woman and child already possesses. It is not a natural right, but a means of government, and therefore a matter of expediency. The question is, will government by the votes of men and women together produce better results than by men alone? Suffrage means more than casting a ballot; if it means anything effectual, it means entering the field of politics. Had the proposed amendment been ratified, it would have become the duty of all women to vote systematically in all primary and regular elections. Would they have done it in justifiable numbers?
Look at Public Doc.u.ment No. 43, giving the number of a.s.sessed polls and registered voters for the Ma.s.sachusetts State election of 1914:
_a.s.sessed Polls_ 1,019,063
_Registered Voters_ 610,667
_Persons Voting_ 466,360
Also for the City and Town elections of 1914:
_a.s.sessed Polls, Male_ 1,229,641
_Registered Voters, Male_ 740,871
_Males Who Voted_ 532,241
It is evident from these figures that a larger proportion of men should fulfill their duty to the State. Government being one means to the end, of making better conditions, the indifference of so many thousand is beyond comprehension, and is a serious menace to the Commonwealth. It was Governor Curtis Guild who said: "I base my anti-suffrage position on the fact that our great failures in legislation are caused not so much by a vicious element among the voters, as by abstention from voting and emotional voting."
That granting the ballot to women would greatly increase the proportion of those who neglect to vote, is clearly shown by the results of giving women the school vote. In 1879 the Ma.s.sachusetts Legislature, a.s.suming that women were peculiarly interested in school affairs, bestowed the school franchise upon them. See how they have accepted that charge!
According to the United States Census of 1910, there were 1,074,485 women of voting age in this State. Of this number there are approximately 622,000 eligible to register and vote for School Committee. Here is the School vote for 1914:
_Women Who Registered_ 101,439
_Women Who Voted_ 45,820
Here is the school vote of the women for the city election in Lynn, 1914:
Approximate number of women of voting age in Lynn 18,000 Total registration 1,759 Number of women who voted 1,070
In a pamphlet ent.i.tled, "Women and the School Vote," Miss Alice Stone Blackwell, trying to explain away the real meaning of the situation, says:
"A woman"s name, once placed on the register, is now kept there until she dies, moves or marries. When a town or city shows a large registration of women and a small vote, it means that on some occasion, perhaps ten years ago, there was an exciting contest at the school election, and many women registered and voted. When the contest was over, many of the women ceased to vote, but their names stayed on the register."
Her conclusion is that this is "the simple explanation of the lessened proportion of women"s votes to registration." But a more striking conclusion must be drawn, namely, that it isn"t enough to vote when there is an exciting contest; that it is only well as far as it goes, but it should be kept up. The State has a right to expect it. In view of their actual record in the use of the school vote, I see no reason to think that women would vote in sufficient numbers and with sufficient regularity to improve politics or government.
The effect of woman suffrage upon the tax rate must also be considered.
If the good to be gained were to justify the expense, there would be nothing to say; but if not, then we ought to pause to give certain facts some thought. Take the expenses for the primary and state elections. The total cost to the Commonwealth in 1914, merely for the preparation, printing, and shipping of ballots, was $50,046.17 (Auditor"s Report, 1914, page 240). I am informed that if women were given the ballot, a conservative estimate would add 50% to this figure. If women become candidates for public office, there would be the further expense of handling the nomination papers. And these calculable expenses are only a fraction of the total economic loss.
The City of Lynn has the second largest voting list in the state, outside of Boston. The expense now, for the state and city election machinery and a.s.sistants, is $9,000 a year, in round numbers. The amendment would entail nearly double the expenditure. There are 53 cities and 320 towns in the state. Think it over before it is too late.
The financial side must enter into the problem some time; isn"t the present a good time?
The milk question was referred to several times in the recent campaign, the suffragists implying that the Commonwealth was ignoring the need of legislation and inspection. Here are some of the milk laws on our statute books, that are administered by the State Department of Health:
The Revised Laws, Chapter 56, provide:
Penalties for the sale of adulterated, diseased, or skimmed milk.
Penalties for sale of milk not of good standard.
For the marking of skimmed milk.
For the marking of condensed milk.
Penalty for using counterfeit seal or tampering with sample.
Penalty for connivance or obstruction.
For the sending of results of a.n.a.lysis to dealer.
That inspectors must act on information and evidence.
The following acts are also in force:
To prohibit the misuse of vessels used in the sale of milk (Acts 1906, chapter 116).
To establish a standard for cream (Acts 1907, chapter 217).
To establish the standard of milk (Acts 1908, chapter 643).
To provide for the proper marking of heated milk (Acts 1908, chapter 570).
Relative to licensing dealers in milk (Acts 1909, chapter 443).
To provide for the appointment of inspectors and collectors of milk by Boards of Health (Acts 1909, chapter 405).
Relative to the liability of producers of milk (Acts 1910, chapter 641).
To provide for the inspection and regulation of places where neat cattle, their ruminants or swine are kept (Acts 1911, chapter 381).
To authorize the incorporation of medical milk commissions (Acts 1911, chapter 506).
Relative to the establishing of milk distributing stations in cities and certain towns (Acts 1911, chapter 278).
Relative to the labelling of evaporated, concentrated, or condensed milk (Acts 1911, chapter 610).
To regulate the use of utensils for testing the composition or value of milk and cream (Acts 1912, chapter 218).
To safeguard the public health against unclean milk containers and appliances used in the treatment and mixing of milk (Acts 1913, chapter 761). Relative to the production and sale of milk (Acts 1914, chapter 744).
To prohibit charges for the inspection of live stock, dairies, or farm buildings (Acts 1915, chapter 109).
The State is divided into eight health districts, with an inspector for each in the State employ. Each city has its board of health; each town administers the laws through its selectmen. The City of Lynn has a board of health; also health inspectors, who do much of their work before we are up--from 2 to 5 o"clock. They inspect all the milk stations; take samples from milk wagons; inspect dairies that sell milk in Lynn, wherever those dairies may be, even out of the State--as, for instance, the Turner Centre Creamery in Maine. All that doesn"t look as if the milk situation was being neglected.
Ma.s.sachusetts is doing a great deal for the children. There are over 5,800 wards in the care of the State Minor Wards Department. I do not need to tell you what a great work is being done for the care and education of these little ones; it speaks for itself.
Our opponents do not say much about the work women are doing on State Boards. There are plenty of positions already held by women who are doing inconspicuous and unexciting work, yet, nevertheless, most useful to the Commonwealth. Here are some of them, with the number of women on each board:
The State Board of Health, Lunacy and Charity was organized in 1879, with 2 women on the board.