In 1968 the Grand National a.s.sembly enacted a law establishing a system of judicial commissions to function as courts of special jurisdiction in the state economic enterprises and in localities. These commissions were designed as "an expression of socialist democracy" to provide for the increased partic.i.p.ation of working people in the settlement of problems involving minor local disputes and local economic issues. Functioning under the direction of enterprise management or munic.i.p.al executive committees, the judicial commissions are a.s.signed such matters as labor disputes, misdemeanors, property disputes, and violations of proper social conduct, a category that appears to provide broad lat.i.tude for prosecution. As a rule, the commissions consist of five members elected for a term of two years; however, in labor disputes two additional members are added to the commission, one representing the enterprise management and one representing the labor union committee.
General supervision over the application of the law and the initiation of criminal proceedings is exercised by the Office of the Prosecutor General. Headed by the prosecutor general, the office exercises supervisory powers that extend to all levels of the society, from the government ministries down to the ordinary citizen. Subunits of the Office of the Prosecutor General are hierarchically organized and include offices in each judicial district plus the prosecutor"s military bureau. The prosecutor general is elected by the Grand National a.s.sembly for a four-year term and is responsible to the a.s.sembly or, between a.s.sembly sessions, to the Council of State for the activities of his office. Three deputy prosecutors a.s.sist the prosecutor general in carrying out his official duties.
An important part of the prosecutor general"s responsibilities consists of supervising the activities of the courts to ensure the uniform application of the law. Prosecutors on the _judet_ level have a consultative vote in the meetings of local government agencies when important legal questions are being decided. The prosecutor general partic.i.p.ates in those plenary sessions of the Supreme Court at which guidance decisions are made. In the event the prosecutor does not agree with a decision, he may appeal to the county people"s council or to its executive committee for a review of the decision. On the national level, the Office of the Prosecutor General may appeal alleged violations of the law to the Council of Ministers.
Local Government
Local government bodies, known as people"s councils, exist on the _judet_, town, and commune levels. The 1965 Const.i.tution had also provided for subunits of state administration on regional and district levels, but a territorial-administrative reorganization voted by the Grand National a.s.sembly in 1968 replaced the existing sixteen regions and 150 intermediate districts with a system of thirty-nine counties and forty-four independent munic.i.p.al administrations. The expressed purpose of the change was the provision of more efficient administration.
In addition to the establishment of county and munic.i.p.al people"s councils, local councils were also set up in 142 smaller towns, and communal councils were formed in rural areas. A number of the smaller communes were combined in order to give them a larger population base.
Boundaries of each of the new _judete_ were drawn to include about fifty communes consisting of some 4,000 to 5,000 persons.
Along with the territorial reorganization, the decision was also made to combine party and government functions of the _judet_ level so that the same person acted both as party committee first secretary and people"s council chairman. In explaining this fusion of party and state authority, Ceausescu stated that there were many instances in which offices in both the party and the government dealt with the same areas of interest, a practice that resulted in inefficiency and the unnecessary duplication of party and state machinery. He a.s.serted that the consolidation of these administrative positions would serve to eliminate this overlapping. At the same time, Ceausescu declared that, inasmuch as the government was responsible for the implementation of the PCR"s economic decisions, there was no justification for the continued existence of the numerous economic sections of the party Central Committee and that future economic policy would be implemented within the structure of the government (see ch. 9).
According to the Const.i.tution and the 1968 Grand National a.s.sembly"s Law on the Organization and Operation of People"s Councils, the people"s councils are responsible for the implementation of central government decisions and the economic, social, and cultural administration of their particular jurisdictions. Deputies to the people"s councils are elected to four-year terms--except for the communes where the term is two years--from single-member const.i.tuencies of equal population. Based on population, the _judet_ people"s councils may have a maximum of 231, or a minimum of 141, deputies. The membership of the Bucharest People"s Council is fixed at 369, and there are 151 deputies on the councils of each of its subdistricts. City people"s councils range from eighty-one to 221 deputies, and those of the towns consist of from thirty-five to ninety-one deputies. Commune council memberships range from twenty-five to seventy-one persons.
Organized on the basis of highly centralized control, the people"s councils function under the general supervision of the Grand National a.s.sembly; and between a.s.sembly sessions the councils function under the direction of the Council of State. The Law on the Organization and Operation of People"s Councils specifically places the people"s councils under the overall leadership of the PCR as the leading political force of the society.
To expedite its work, each people"s council established an executive committee as its chief administrative organ and a number of permanent committees to which it a.s.signs specific responsibilities. The executive committee, consisting of a chairman, two or more deputy chairmen, and an unspecified number of other members, functions for the duration of the council"s term of office. Each of the people"s council executive committees also has a secretary, who is appointed with the approval of the next higher ranking council and is considered an employee of the central government rather than of the local executive committee itself.
The chairman of executive committees in the cities, towns, and communes are officially considered the mayors of these units. The executive committees are responsible to the people"s council that elected them as well as to the executive committee of the next higher council.
The executive committee meets whenever necessary and is required to convene at least once a month; full council sessions are held every two months on the city, town, and commune level and every three months on the county level. Responsibilities of the executive committees include the implementation of laws, decrees, and decisions of the central government, the carrying out of the decisions made by the people"s councils, the working out of the local budget, and the drafting of the local economic plan. The executive committee is also charged with the direction and control of the economic enterprises within its area of jurisdiction and with the exercising of supervision over the executive committees of the councils inferior to it. The executive committees are also responsible for the organization and functioning of public services, educational inst.i.tutions, medical programs, and the militia.
THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM
According to the 1965 Const.i.tution, all power belongs to the working people joined in a worker-peasant alliance; power is exercised through the people"s representative bodies--the Grand National a.s.sembly and the several levels of people"s councils. Theoretically, these bodies are elected by, controlled by, and responsible to the working people.
Emphasis is placed on the direct partic.i.p.ation of the citizens through their local people"s councils, party units, and chapters of the ma.s.s organizations (see ch. 9).
Although the Const.i.tution a.s.serts the right of all citizens eighteen years of age and older to partic.i.p.ate in the election of all representative bodies on the basis of a universal, direct, equal, and secret vote, it does not determine how elections are to be organized or specify who is responsible for conducting them. The Const.i.tution does declare, however, that the right to nominate candidates belongs to the PCR, as well as to all labor unions, cooperatives, youth and women"s leagues, cultural a.s.sociations, and other ma.s.s organizations. Citizens who have reached the age of twenty-three are eligible to be candidates for elective office.
Separate legislation provides for general elections to be held every four years and local communal elections to be conducted every two years.
Elections are organized under the direction of the Socialist Unity Front, the national ent.i.ty that incorporates the country"s numerous ma.s.s organizations under the leadership of the PCR (see ch. 9). All candidates for elective office must have the approval of the front in order to be placed on the ballot, a requirement that ensures that no candidate unacceptable to the front"s leadership will be placed in nomination.
The Socialist Unity Front was officially established in November 1968 as a replacement for the People"s Democratic Front, which had existed since the Communists began to organize effectively in the country during World War II. The Socialist Unity Front lists among its member organizations, in addition to the PCR, the labor unions; cooperative farm organizations; consumer cooperatives; professional, scientific, and cultural a.s.sociations; student, youth, women"s, and veterans"
organizations; religious bodies; and representatives of the Hungarian, German, Serbian, and Ukrainian minorities. At the time of its formation, Ceausescu was elected as the front"s chairman, and Ion Gheorghe Maurer, the prime minister, was named as first vice chairman. Both continued in these positions in early 1972.
General elections were conducted by the Socialist Unity Front in March 1969. Official results indicated that ballots were cast by 99.96 percent of the country"s 13,582,249 eligible voters. Of the votes cast, a reported 99.75 percent were marked in favor of the single list of Socialist Unity Front candidates. Although the great majority of the candidates for the Grand National a.s.sembly who were placed on the ballot belonged to the PCR, some non-members gained front approval and were elected. Nearly half of the candidates elected were newcomers to the a.s.sembly and included forty-one Hungarian, twelve German, and nine other minority representatives. The front has scheduled the next general elections for 1973.
CHAPTER 9
POLITICAL DYNAMICS AND VALUES
At the beginning of 1972 the country"s political system continued to be based on the leading position of the Romanian Communist Party (Partidul Communist Roman--PCR). Within the party, political power was centralized in a small group of men who occupied the leading party and government offices. Political authority was particularly concentrated in the hands of the general secretary of the PCR, Nicolae Ceausescu, who was also the head of state.
Regarding itself as the leading force of the society, the PCR has made the government apparatus an instrument of party policy and, through a broad network of subordinate ma.s.s organizations, has mobilized all elements of the society in support of its programs and goals. Individual and group partic.i.p.ation in the political process was limited to the forms and means permitted by the PCR.
The concentration of all political authority in the central bodies of the party has effectively precluded the emergence of any open opposition to the PCR leadership as well as the a.s.sertion of any particular group interests. Under Ceausescu"s leadership the party has sought to strengthen its role in all spheres of social, economic, and political life and, at the same time, to broaden its base of support by taking steps to increase its membership. Although the party leaders have periodically demonstrated a cautious relaxation of the highly centralized system of control, the PCR has continued to be extremely sensitive to any potential threats or challenges to its position.
In attempting to build a broad base of popular support the party has drawn upon the symbols of nationalism and has made extensive use of Romanian history and tradition. Its independent stance in relation to Soviet domination has served to enhance its image among the general population; at the same time, the fact that membership in the party has been made relatively easy has helped the PCR become one of the largest communist parties of Eastern Europe.
In mid-1971 Ceausescu initiated a campaign to strengthen ideological and cultural orthodoxy and, for the first time in the six years since he had come to power, some political observers believed they were able to detect opposition to his proposals both within and outside the party.
There was no indication, however, that the resistance was organized or was strong enough to affect Ceausescu"s position. Throughout the period of Ceausescu"s control there have never been any recognizable factions in the party in opposition to his leadership.
MAJOR POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS, 1965 TO 1970
The leadership of the PCR changed hands in March 1965 when Nicolae Ceausescu became first secretary after the death of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, who had headed the party almost continually since 1944 (see ch. 2). Ceausescu"s emergence as head of the party came in the midst of a period of growing Romanian nationalism that had begun in the early 1960s. Initiated by Gheorghiu-Dej, the policy of greater national autonomy was given additional form and substance by Ceausescu, who sought to cast himself in the role of the restorer of Romanian history and the country"s national traditions.
As Gheorghiu-Dej"s successor, Ceausescu was confronted with the necessity of consolidating his power. No member of the party Secretariat owed his position to Ceausescu, and he found particular challenges to his authority from three men who had been among Gheorghiu-Dej"s closest a.s.sociates: Chivu Stoica, a veteran party leader; Gheorghe Apostol, first deputy premier and a former PCR secretary; and Alexandru Draghici, minister of internal affairs and, as such, head of the powerful state security apparatus.
A temporary solution to the problem was found in a system of collective leadership by which Ceausescu became head of the party and Stoica took over Gheorghiu-Dej"s other leading position as president of the Council of State and, as such, head of state. Apostol continued as first deputy prime minister, and Draghici remained as minister of internal affairs.
Ion Gheorghe Maurer, who had served as prime minister under Gheorghiu-Dej, continued in that position. At the same time, changes were made in the party statutes to prevent one man from holding dual party and government offices as Gheorghiu-Dej had done.
In April, just one month after taking over as head of the PCR, Ceausescu announced that a party congress would be convened in July. During the month of June, while preparations were being made for the congress, he revealed plans to redefine the character and structure of the party and announced that its name would no longer be the Romanian Workers" Party, as it had been known since 1948, but would again be the Romanian Communist Party. Observers of East European political affairs saw the change of name as an a.s.sertion of the equality of Romanian communism with the communist parties of the Soviet Union and other communist states. During the same month the new PCR leaders also proclaimed that the official designation of the state would be the Socialist Republic of Romania rather than the Romanian People"s Republic as it had previously been known (see ch. 8).
At the July party congress Ceausescu was successful in adding a number of his supporters to an enlarged PCR Central Committee and in having his own t.i.tle changed to general secretary. At the same time the party structure was changed to add a new body, the Executive Committee, between the Standing Presidium (Politburo) and the Central Committee.
Although he was not able to gain full control of the Executive Committee immediately, in time this new body provided Ceausescu with the means for including his supporters in the leading organs of the PCR and for implementing his own policies.
During the party congress Ceausescu was able to turn the PCR proscription against an individual"s holding dual party and government positions to his own advantage by engineering the election of Draghici to the party Secretariat, a move that resulted in Draghici losing his power base as minister of internal affairs as well as his direct control over the state security forces. Later in the year the appointment of two additional "first deputy prime ministers" undermined the power of Apostol who had been, until that time, the only first deputy.
Simultaneously, Ceausescu was making preparations for even more definitive actions against his rivals, preparations that took the form of an unpublicized decision of the PCR Central Committee, in November 1965, to establish a commission of inquiry to reexamine the political trials conducted by the Gheorghiu-Dej regime during the 1950s. The commission was particularly directed to investigate the 1954 trial and execution of Lucretiu Patrascanu, who had been the Romanian minister of justice from 1944 to 1948 and an important member of the party hierarchy. The formation of the commission of inquiry and its findings were not announced publicly until April 1968.
Political observers identified three princ.i.p.al factions within the PCR during the 1965-67 period: Ceausescu and his supporters; the veteran party men led by Stoica, Apostol, and Draghici; and the intellectuals, of whom Maurer was perhaps the nominal representative. Those allied with Ceausescu, who was forty-seven years old when he came to power, tended to be men of his own generation and outlook, and whenever possible he engineered their appointment or promotion into important party, government, and military positions.
One of Ceausescu"s foremost concerns was what he termed the revitalization of the PCR. To achieve this end, he not only brought his own younger men into the top party organs but also sought to broaden the professional skills represented in these bodies through the recruitment of technically trained men and academicians. At the same time, increased technical and scientific contacts were permitted with Western nations, and previously banned works of foreign writers and artists were allowed to be reintroduced--moves that helped Ceausescu gain additional support among the PCR"s intellectuals.
Although the party encouraged a revival of nationalism and introduced several limited domestic reforms, it did not relax its tight political control and continued to direct the country"s economy through a highly centralized system. The maintenance of strict party control was evidenced in the congresses of the youth and labor union organizations in mid-1966, when the delegates were informed that the PCR would begin to enforce the "patriotic education" of their members.
The 1967 National Party Conference
At a specially convened National Conference of the PCR in December 1967--the first such conference in twenty-two years--Ceausescu continued to strengthen his own position. The conference was attended by the members of the Central Committee as well as by 1,150 delegates from local party organizations. Ceausescu elected to employ the technique of the party conference rather than a special party congress in order to have his proposals approved by a larger body than the Central Committee.
At the same time, he wanted to avoid the requirement of having to elect a new Central Committee, which would have been the case had a congress been held.
In his address to the conference, Ceausescu declared that in order to modernize Romania as a socialist state it was imperative to adopt new organizational and ideological forms. To achieve this end, he proposed a number of reforms in the structure and functioning of both the party and the government and defended the country"s policy of independent development. Speaking of the relationship between party and government responsibilities, Ceausescu a.s.serted the need to eliminate overlapping and duplication in party and government functions. As a remedy, he proposed that only one individual, whether in the party or in the government, should deal with a particular sector of activity. In addition, he called for a clearer delineation of the responsibilities of the government and the party. It was not necessary, he declared, for the Central Committee to decide all questions of economic affairs and continue to maintain a number of economic departments that duplicated the functions of the Council of Ministers and the economic ministries.
He proposed that the Central Committee limit itself to basic decisions of economic policy and that the specific matters of implementation be left to the government ministries.
Political and ideological activity, Ceausescu proposed, would remain under the control of the Central Committee and would be given greater emphasis and direction through the creation of an ideological commission that would work to develop an intensified program of political education. A defense council, composed of the party"s Standing Presidium and other members, would be established to deal with most military questions, but the basic questions of guidance for both the armed forces and the state security apparatus would continue to be the responsibility of the Central Committee. Major foreign policy questions would be decided by the Standing Presidium (see ch. 8).
Ceausescu also proposed reforms in the organization and responsibilities of governmental organs. In addition to proposing a reorganization of the state"s territorial subdivisions, he a.s.serted the need to broaden the activities of the Grand National a.s.sembly and to increase the responsibilities of the a.s.sembly commissions in order to give that body a greater role in the government. Ministers and other high government officials were to be more aware of their responsibilities to keep the a.s.sembly informed of the activities of their departments. Ceausescu also declared the need to strengthen the role and organization of the Council of Ministers to enable it to provide for long-term economic planning. In addition, he suggested that the heads of three of the more important ma.s.s organizations--the General Union of Trade Unions, the Union of Communist Youth, and the National Union of Agricultural Production Cooperatives--be included in the government and be given ministerial ranking.
The party conference represented a major success for Ceausescu in his drive to gain undisputed political control. All of his proposals were unanimously adopted, and the party statutes were changed to enable him to become the head of state, as president of the Council of State, as well as head of the party, a reversal of the 1965 proscription against one individual simultaneously holding prominent posts in both the party and state. The nomination of Ceausescu was made by Stoica, the inc.u.mbent president of the Council of State, on the grounds that uniting the highest offices of the party and the state would eliminate the duplication of functions and increase efficiency. Stoica was given a position in the party Secretariat and later, in 1969, was named chairman of the Central Auditing Commission, a post he continued to hold in early 1972.