The bill as it now stands does not provide for the registration, by means of one entry, of a great many works of literature or art which from necessity are printed on detached sheets.
Section 60 of the bill provides that several volumes of the same book or a series of photographs, drawings, etc., relating to the same subject--with variances only in pose or composition--may be registered for one fee. But a connected series of instruction carded for educational use, a series of color prints to be used on toy building blocks, sliced animals, games of authors, and other card games are protected. There is no doubt that a new game, such as pit, flinch, etc., should be copyrightable as a unit, whether with or without rules for instruction, in such a manner that all the artistic work and literary work may be fully covered by copyright, although the items of the series are not physically connected, and are not each provided with separate copyright notice.
While the experts in charge of the bill may be able to phrase this purpose in words more apt than those contained in the proposed amendment, there is no doubt that it is the intention of the framers of the bill to include the articles referred to in this letter, and also that the bill as it now stands does not cover such articles.
Respectfully,
BRIESEN & KNAUTH.
_Proposed amendments to bill S. 6330._
Section 5, page 4, after line 7 insert "(m) Miscellaneous."
Line 12, change period to colon, and add:
"_And provided, furthermore_, That a series of copyrightable works, a.s.sembled for a unitary purpose, shall be considered as the subject-matter of a single copyright registration, fee and notice should the applicant elect, whether or not the items comprising said series are actually joined by binding or otherwise."
Section 60, page 38, line 15, change period to comma, and add: "or of a series considered as the subject-matter of a single copyright registration as provided for in section 5 of this act, where the items composing it are deposited at the same time under one t.i.tle with a view to single registration."
Mr. Chairman, I ask leave to interpolate a word to the group of interests adverse to these "musical-device" provisions of the bill. I say it for the Government. And in order to avoid a syllable more than is necessary I have written it.
The reasons, gentlemen, why your group was not invited to the conferences were made plain in my opening statement. First, the conference was a conference of a.s.sociations, and your interests are not organized into an a.s.sociation. But, second, the conference was to be particularly of those interests concerned "in an affirmative way"--that is, in amplifying the copyright protection; and your interests are negative. We quite antic.i.p.ated the issue raised by these provisions, but it was not an issue which seemed appropriate to the conference nor for other reasons one likely to be settled by the conference.
Mr. Thomae represented that his interests might in one aspect be affirmative also and asked to hear the discussion. He was permitted to. He was not invited; he did not partic.i.p.ate; he uttered not a word in the course of the entire proceedings. But he asked to come and listen, and he was permitted to. On the list of the few others present as observers you will find the name of Gen. Eugene Griffin. General Griffin came to us in March saying that he understood some such provisions as these were under consideration; he had some interest in a concern which would be affected; could he attend the conference and hear what was proposed? Certainly. And he did. Mr. Thomae was to us but the maker of a particular typical device. With Mr. Thomae as a compet.i.tor among you we had no concern. What device or company General Griffin was interested in we did not know and I do not know to this day. But we took care to insert the names of both gentlemen on the printed list of those present, so that you and others might be free to make such inference as you chose from the fact of their presence. And this list was furnished freely to all requesting it.
These conferences have been going on for a year past. The fact that they were being held, their purpose, and the a.s.sociations partic.i.p.ating in them was freely published. Among these a.s.sociations were the composers and the music publishers. In the Apollo suit then pending they were trying to secure protection of this sort under existing law. There was every reason to suppose that they would urge it in the new statute. Did any of you ever inquire of us whether they were doing so? As long ago as last December the President announced to Congress, and in the most public way to the country, that the bill had already been prepared. Did you ask us for it? Did you even ask whether such a bill would be likely to include any such provisions? As long ago as January the music trade journals began to refer to the fact that it would do so. Did you then ask leave to come to the next conference? Did you ask even as to the character of the provisions?
Did you communicate with the Copyright Office in any way in the matter? You know you did not.
The fact that you did not is not to prejudice you in any way, and the fact that you did not partic.i.p.ate in the conferences I have myself emphasized to the committee to your advantage, pointing out that these provisions had been inserted without discussion at the conferences by any interest naturally adverse to them. The fact is to your advantage.
I earnestly suggest that you avoid giving it a twist such as Mr.
Cameron gave it yesterday; I mean by such expression as "star chamber proceedings." We can"t let such imputations against the Government stand uncorrected. But we hate to have to divert attention from the main issue in order to correct them. The main issue is the merit of these provisions. We are as anxious as is the committee to know your substantial objections to them. And our interest is absolutely identical with that of the committee in seeing that the objections you show shall have due value and effect.
(The following letter was subsequently written by Mr. Putnam, and by direction of the chairman made part of the record:)
JUNE 16, 1906.
Messrs. CHAIRMEN: In my remarks to the representatives of the talking machine and perforated roll interests at the hearing of June 9 I stated that Mr. Thomae had not been "invited" to the conferences. Of course he was invited or he could not have attended. What I meant was that he was not among those originally invited or in our list of those naturally ent.i.tled to be present.
I had thought the distinction sufficiently clear from the context; but I find that it was not.
The chief purpose of my reference to him and to General Griffin was not, of course, to excuse or explain their presence, but to indicate how readily access to the conference could be secured by a request to the copyright office.
Very respectfully,
HERBERT PUTNAM, _Librarian of Congress_.
The CHAIRMEN OF THE COMMITTEES ON PATENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Mr. CURRIER. I wish to say that last winter some time Mr. Griffin, who is interested in one of the perforated-roll concerns, called at the committee room and talked about this matter, and I advised him at that time to see Mr. Solberg and Mr. Putnam. The committee clerk has had some correspondence with him since that time, and other gentlemen connected with that same business, I suppose, have been into the committee room to make inquiries regarding this matter pretty nearly every week for months.
Mr. CAMERON. I would like to say that I do not even know who Mr.
Griffin is.
Mr. CURRIER. He is the vice-president of the General Electric Company.
I think he lives in Brooklyn and is connected with some perforated-roll company.
Mr. CAMERON. I wish to point out that the remarks that I made were in connection with the American Graphophone Company and the automatic talking machine, and not the perforated-roll business. That is the matter that is involved in these suits, not the talking machines.
Mr. BURKAN. Mr. Griffin represents the Edison Company, and they manufacture talking machines.
Mr. DAVIS. Mr. Griffin does not represent the Edison Company, and he is a director of the Perforated Music Roll Company, who operated under my patents. General Griffin is now in Europe, and this notice which I referred to yesterday, in which I stated that notice was given me that my license would be canceled in case this bill pa.s.sed, came from Mr.
Henderson, the acting manager of the Perforated Music Roll Company, on behalf of General Griffin and other directors.
Mr. Henderson notified me that the pa.s.sage of this act would put them out of business. He also stated to me that General Griffin had stated to him that he attended these conferences, and that he considered them logrolling proceedings, and that in time he would take action to oppose them. But at present General Griffin is in Europe. I am sure, from his remarks, that he would oppose this measure in the strongest possible way.
Mr. CURRIER. I have no doubt that he would. He gave me so to understand.
Mr. CHANEY. I think it is due to this record to say that the ultimate responsibility about this whole matter rests with Congress, and that these matters are all simply advisory, to help us to the proper conclusion and result, and that none of these gentlemen are going to be deprived of an opportunity to express themselves in whatever way they please, and to say whatever they may have to say, and that, so far as we are concerned, there is no star-chamber proceeding about it, and no logrolling business about it. We are here simply to get advice the best we can, and therefore we shall undertake to hear everybody.
The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Chaney is entirely right. The sentiments that he has expressed have been freely stated by the committee during the past three or four days that we have been in session. The committees of the Senate and the House are willing, and will be willing, to hear anyone who has objections to or who is in favor of this bill at any time within any sort of reason. It seems to me that it is to little purpose, so far as the committees are concerned, that there should be any controversy between anyone regarding the past. Who is the next witness?
Mr. CURRIER. I might say that it was for that reason that both committees decided to make no effort to report this bill at this session, but to let it go over until next winter, in order that people could have an opportunity during vacation to file briefs and such statements as they might desire to offer.
The CHAIRMAN. That is the precise purpose of the statement made by Mr.
Currier in behalf of the House committee at the first session or the second, and by myself in behalf of the Senate committee.
Who is the gentleman that desires to be heard further?
Mr. PUTNAM. Mr. Cromelin.
The CHAIRMAN. You have how many minutes?
Mr. CROMELIN. I understand that I have half an hour.
The CHAIRMAN. You were limited, two days ago, to one hour for your enterprises. Mr. O"Connell had a little over an hour, and I am told that after I was compelled to leave for the Senate yesterday somebody representing these interests had fifteen minutes. We will give you fifteen minutes, with the privilege of submitting in writing any further statement that you desire to make.
Mr. CURRIER. It is necessary to do that, for the reason that two gentlemen are on the way here from Chicago who want to be heard this morning, representing the same interests that you represent.
Mr. SERVEN. I present, Mr. Chairman, a letter from the chairman of the copyright committee of the Music Publishers" a.s.sociation, explaining how Mr. Thomae, who was criticised yesterday as being one of their delegates, came to have a seat with them in the conferences. It occurred to me that it would save time to have it read for the information of these gentlemen.
The CHAIRMAN. You may put it in the record.
(The letter referred to is as follows:)
The CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT SENATE AND HOUSE COMMITTEES ON PATENTS.
_Washington, D.C._