(The decision referred to is as follows:)
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT.
White-Smith Music Publishing Company, appellant, against Apollo Company, respondent.
Judges Lacombe, c.o.xe, and Townsend.
These causes come here upon appeal from a decree of the United States circuit court for the southern district of New York dismissing bill alleging infringement of copyright. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court below. (139 Fed. 427.)
Per curiam: The questions raised in these cases are of vast importance and involve far-reaching results. They have been exhaustively discussed in the clear and forcible briefs and arguments of counsel. We are of the opinion that the rights sought to be protected by these suits belong to the same cla.s.s as those covered by the specific provisions of the copyright statutes, and that the reasons which led to the pa.s.sage of said statutes apply with great force to the protection of rights of copyright against such an appropriation of the fruits of an author"s conception as results from the acts of defendant.
But in view of the fact that the law of copyright is a creature of statute and is not declaratory of the common law and that it confers distinctive and limited rights, which did not exist at the common law, we are constrained to hold that it must be strictly construed and that we are not at liberty to extend its provisions, either by resort to equitable considerations or to a strained interpretation of the terms of the statute.
We are therefore of the opinion that a perforated paper roll, such as is manufactured by defendant, is not a copy of complainant"s staff notation, for the following reasons:
It is not a copy in fact; it is not designed to be read or actually used in reading music as the original staff notation is; and the claim that it may be read, which is practically disproved by the great preponderance of evidence, even if true, would establish merely a theory or possibility of use, as distinguished from an actual use. The argument that because the roll is a notation or record of the music, it is, therefore, a copy, would apply to the disk of the phonograph or the barrel of the organ, which, it must be admitted, are not copies of the sheet music. The perforation in the rolls are not a varied form of symbols subst.i.tuted for the symbols used by the author. They are mere adjuncts of a valve mechanism in a machine. In fact, the machine, or musical playing device, is the thing which appropriates the author"s property and publishes it by producing the musical sounds, thus conveying the author"s composition to the public.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Mr. OLIN. The second extension or modification of the present rights of the copyright proprietor as against the public are those instances mentioned yesterday by the chairman of the House committee in regard to the exceptions to the prohibition of importation. As the law stands to-day the importation into this country of a book which is copyrighted here is prohibited, and there are certain exceptions, in the first case, of certain libraries and colleges who may import not exceeding two copies in one invoice, and individuals who may import not exceeding two copies in one invoice. This bill makes a modification of the present rule.
I would like to call the attention of the committee to the reason why the present law is as it is, and the reason why this suggestion of amendment is made. Of course, prior to 1891 there was nothing like this in the law. The law was perfectly simple, and had been perfectly simple for a hundred years. There could be no importation of the copyrighted article from abroad without the consent of the copyright proprietor.
With his consent it could be freely imported. So far as I know there had never been the slightest dissatisfaction on the part of copyright proprietors or of the public with the working of that rule. As a matter of fact, it was to the interest of the copyright proprietor to bring in, I will say, the English edition of the book which he was publishing here, and to sell it--and so far as the public wanted it they always got it--at his shop or at other shops, through the regular channels of trade, so that the public and he alike were perfectly satisfied.
Mr. CURRIER. Were there any importations before 1881?
Mr. OLIN. Before 1891? I think there were.
Mr. CURRIER. With the consent of the copyright proprietor?
Mr. OLIN. I think, as a matter of fact, if you went into a bookstore you always found and could buy, at a somewhat higher price----
Mr. CURRIER. That is not the question. Were there any importations of such books?
Mr. OLIN. There were, by the copyright proprietors, who put them on sale and sold them through the trade.
Mr. CURRIER. Importations solely by the proprietor of the copyright--not by individuals?
Mr. OLIN. Yes, sir; not by individuals. Congress undertook in 1891 to do two things: First, to admit to the privileges of copyright the foreigners resident in certain countries; and, second, to require that the manufacture of copyrighted books should be by American typesetters and plate makers here in this country. And they undertook to do these things with the minimum changes in the language of the statute. They inserted a few words in one section, and then a few words in another, and both of the desired results were brought about, just as they exist to-day. Then, in the last part of the discussion in Congress, as I remember it--and I am open to correction as to the historical account--it became apparent that the typesetter was not duly protected if only those changes were made, for the reason that the copyright proprietor, having the free right to import books from abroad, might perhaps comply with the typesetting clause colorably only, in an imperfect way, and might satisfy the public demand for his books by importation of those set up and printed abroad. Therefore, at the typesetters" request, there was imposed a prohibition of importation which affected the whole world, including the copyright proprietor.
n.o.body could import books.
Mr. CURRIER. That was a perfectly satisfactory provision.
Mr. OLIN. That was a perfectly satisfactory provision, both to the copyright owner and to the typesetter; but then the general public were heard, and they said "no;" an English edition may be better than an American edition, for one reason or another, and you must not deprive us of the privilege of getting the best books. Libraries were heard, and individuals were heard. And Congress then hit upon this expedient, which was very simple and on the whole has been very effectual.
Congress said:
But this prohibition shall not apply in the cases mentioned in certain specified sections referred to of the tariff act.
The sections of the tariff act referred to enumerated a certain number of cla.s.ses which Congress had thought were worthy of benefit from the Government to the extent of allowing them to import books in limited numbers free from duty. So there was ready-made for the hands of Congress a certain list of people who import books who might be allowed to benefit at the expense of the copyright proprietor, just as they had been theretofore benefited at the expense of the customs.
That is the law as it stands to-day.
Then Congress added this further provision, that any individual also shall be allowed to import not exceeding two copies in one invoice on payment of the duty thereon, for use, and not for sale.
Like every other provision of a law after it has been duly tested by use, it is fair to bring it before the legislature again and to call attention to its results, and that is especially true where the provision of law was necessarily adopted with haste and was obviously a mere expedient for arriving at a wished-for result. And when this conference convened the publishers said: "To some extent this section has worked badly in certain ways," which I shall now point out. The librarians in libraries and the colleges have generally availed themselves of this privilege, being coupled with the privilege to import without the payment of duty, and have imported copyrighted books in those ways in large numbers. How far individuals have availed themselves of their privilege it is impossible, or at all events would be difficult, to tell; probably not to any great extent. The number of men who care so much for an English edition of a book that they are willing to write for it to a London bookseller and import it themselves is not very large.
So far as it goes, the privilege of importation is an inroad on the rights given to the copyright proprietor. It is an inconsiderable inroad so far as most popular books--novels and the like--which have circulation are concerned. The few hundred books that come to individuals here amount to not a very substantial burden upon the proprietor of such copyrights. But there are certain cla.s.ses of books, expensive to produce, and with a very limited circulation--books of a scientific character, books ill.u.s.trated with plates--and they circulate among the precise cla.s.ses; that is, the libraries and the colleges and these individuals who are particular about their libraries, the precise individuals who import books under these exceptions; and there were instances brought before the conference where publishers here had declined to undertake a book which would have been valuable to the public, which would have been valuable to the typesetter to set up, and the American publisher to bring out, and to the American bookseller to sell, for the reason that the very limited public which these books addressed would all, in the natural course of events, have their demands filled through these exceptions to the prohibition of importations.
That did not hurt the libraries or the individuals who habitually get English editions. It did hurt, we maintain, the American public, the reading public, and a great many individuals among the American producing cla.s.ses. So that there was a modification requested of the present rules, and the modification in regard to the libraries is this: There is to be not exceeding one copy to be introduced on an invoice, the privilege is not to relate to books which have their origin here in America. With your permission, I will briefly explain those two points. In the first place, ordinarily a library or a college needs only one book at a time. If it needs another copy of the same book it is not too much to ask that it make another importation to bring it in. Under the present rule, while delicate and careful men would not take advantage of it, it is constantly a temptation to a librarian who can import free of duty and free of the copyright proprietor"s claims, two copies of a book from England, to import one for the legitimate use of the library and one for some other use. The effect of that influence can not be particularly measured.
The other point is one which can be clearly understood. It is now the right of colleges and libraries, an important right, that in case of an English book they should be able to get the English edition, which in some instances is more complete or for other reasons better than the American edition. But it can almost never be an important right to obtain the English edition of an American book since the American edition is almost always more complete, or equally complete. So that the right to import the foreign edition of an American book, a book of American origin, would ordinarily be confined to the Tauchnitz and the like editions with which the gentlemen of the committee are all familiar, where a continental publisher publishes English and American books for the benefit of travelers, and they are not allowed to be reimported into England or America. It seems to the publishers fair that the same rule which applies to every Englishman and every American as to such Tauchnitz editions should be applied to libraries; that is, that they should get the American edition, and not the other, of which the only advantage is cheapness, arising from its special purpose.
Whether or not these are reasonable changes has been very largely pa.s.sed upon, it seems to me, in the controversy that has gone on with the American Library a.s.sociation, which is a very powerful and very diligent and active a.s.sociation, and which has been very much interested in these matters; and in laying before you their approval of the bill in its present shape, it seems to me that as to this clause it must establish in the minds of the committee a clear prima facie case, at least, that this compromise that is agreed upon is a reasonable compromise. There are gentlemen here who represent certain libraries who, I understand, think that it is not a reasonable compromise.
Mr. CURRIER. That minority is a very strong one, is it not?
Mr. OLIN. I think it is a strong one; and they undoubtedly will be heard. They object that this compromise goes too far; and all that we can reasonably ask the committee at this moment is that if it occurs--if it seems to the committee that what this minority of librarians have to say overcomes the presumption of fairness that arises from a compromise satisfactory to the majority--that then the publishers may have their opportunity of showing to the committee that it is a fair compromise and a reasonable disposition of the matter.
Now, we come to the next clause of these exceptions.
Mr. CURRIER. Just an instant. Would the people you represent object seriously to an amendment to subdivision 3, on page 16, which would strike out all after the words "United States" where they occur?
Mr. OLIN. On page 16?
Mr. CURRIER. In the tenth line of subdivision 3.
Mr. OLIN. Are you reading from the printed form of the bill?
Mr. CURRIER. The library print.
Mr. CHANEY. Section 21?
Mr. CURRIER. I have not compared them. I have been using the library print all the time.
Mr. CHANEY. Just take the other bill.
Mr. PUTNAM. Section 30 of the bill.
Mr. CHANEY. Page 24 of the Senate bill.
Mr. CURRIER. Now, strike out all after the words "United States," in the twenty-fifth line, down to the fourth section.
Mr. OLIN. I am now speaking merely for the publishers, whom I do represent generally, and not for these other a.s.sociations.
Mr. CURRIER. I was simply asking if the people whom you represent would make serious objection to that amendment.
Mr. OLIN. Speaking only for the publishers, I think they would. I think they would wish to be heard fully on that before any such change was made.
Mr. CURRIER. Right in that connection, let me call your attention to the first subdivision, beginning on line 13, which deals with the importation for an individual.