[Ill.u.s.tration: PLATE XVII. DONATI"S COMET
From a drawing made on October 9th, 1858, by G.P. Bond, of Harvard College Observatory, U.S.A. A good ill.u.s.tration of Bredikhine"s theory: note the straight tails of his _first_ type, and the curved tail of his _second_.
(Page 257)]
In 1846, shortly after one of its returns, Biela"s Comet divided into two portions. At its next appearance (1852) these portions had separated to a distance of about 1-1/2 millions of miles from each other. This comet, or rather its const.i.tuents, have never since been seen.
Perhaps the most remarkable comet of recent times was that of 1858, known as Donati"s, it having been discovered at Florence by the Italian astronomer, G.B. Donati. This comet, a magnificent object, was visible for more than three months with the naked eye. Its tail was then 54 millions of miles in length. It was found to revolve around the sun in a period of over 2000 years, and to go out in its journey to about 5-1/2 times the distance of Neptune. Its motion is retrograde, that is to say, in the contrary direction to the usual movement in the solar system. A number of beautiful drawings of Donati"s Comet were made by the American astronomer, G.P. Bond. One of the best of these is reproduced on Plate XVII., p. 256.
In 1861 there appeared a great comet. On the 30th of June of that year the earth and moon actually pa.s.sed through its tail; but no effects were noticed, other than a peculiar luminosity in the sky.
In the year 1881 there appeared another large comet, known as Tebb.u.t.t"s Comet, from the name of its discoverer. This was the _first comet of which a satisfactory photograph was obtained_. The photograph in question was taken by the late M. Janssen.
The comet of 1882 was of vast size and brilliance. It approached so close to the sun that it pa.s.sed through some 100,000 miles of the solar corona. Though its...o...b..t was not found to have been altered by this experience, its nucleus displayed signs of breaking up. Some very fine photographs of this comet were obtained at the Cape of Good Hope by Mr.
(now Sir David) Gill.
The comet of 1889 was followed with the telescope nearly up to the orbit of Saturn, which seems to be the greatest distance at which a comet has ever been seen.
The _first discovery of a comet by photographic means_[25] was made by Professor Barnard in 1892; and, since then, photography has been employed with marked success in the detection of small periodic comets.
The best comet seen in the Northern hemisphere since that of 1882, appears to have been Daniel"s Comet of 1907 (see Plate XVIII., p. 258).
This comet was discovered on June 9, 1907, by Mr. Z. Daniel, at Princeton Observatory, New Jersey, U.S.A. It became visible to the naked eye about mid-July of that year, and reached its greatest brilliancy about the end of August. It did not, however, attract much popular attention, as its position in the sky allowed it to be seen only just before dawn.
[24] With the exception, of course, of such an anomaly as the retrograde motion of the ninth satellite of Saturn.
[25] If we except the case of the comet which was photographed near the solar corona in the eclipse of 1882.
[Ill.u.s.tration: PLATE XVIII. DANIEL"S COMET OF 1907
From a photograph taken, on August 11th, 1907, by Dr. Max Wolf, at the Astrophysical Observatory, Heidelberg. The instrument used was a 28-inch reflecting telescope, and the time of exposure was fifteen minutes. As the telescope was guided to follow the moving comet, the stars have imprinted themselves upon the photographic plate as short trails. This is clearly the opposite to what is depicted on Plate XIII.
(Page 258)]
CHAPTER XX
REMARKABLE COMETS
If eclipses were a cause of terror in past ages, comets appear to have been doubly so. Their much longer continuance in the sight of men had no doubt something to say to this, and also the fact that they arrived without warning; it not being then possible to give even a rough prediction of their return, as in the case of eclipses. As both these phenomena were occasional, and out of the ordinary course of things, they drew exceptional attention as unusual events always do; for it must be allowed that quite as wonderful things exist, but they pa.s.s unnoticed merely because men have grown accustomed to them.
For some reason the ancients elected to cla.s.s comets along with meteors, the aurora borealis, and other phenomena of the atmosphere, rather than with the planets and the bodies of the s.p.a.ces beyond. The sudden appearance of these objects led them to be regarded as signs sent by the G.o.ds to announce remarkable events, chief among these being the deaths of monarchs. Shakespeare has reminded us of this in those celebrated lines in _Julius Caesar_:--
"When beggars die there are no comets seen, The heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes."
Numbed by fear, the men of old blindly accepted these presages of fate; and did not too closely question whether the threatened danger was to their own nation or to some other, to their ruler or to his enemy. Now and then, as in the case of the Roman Emperor Vespasian, there was a cynical attempt to apply some reasoning to the portent. That emperor, in alluding to the comet of A.D. 79, is reported to have said: "This hairy star does not concern me; it menaces rather the King of the Parthians, for he is hairy and I am bald." Vespasian, all the same, died shortly afterwards!
Pliny, in his natural history, gives several instances of the terrible significance which the ancients attached to comets. "A comet," he says, "is ordinarily a very fearful star; it announces no small effusion of blood. We have seen an example of this during the civil commotion of Octavius."
A very brilliant comet appeared in 371 B.C., and about the same time an earthquake caused Helice and Bura, two towns in Achaia, to be swallowed up by the sea. The following remark made by Seneca concerning it shows that the ancients did not consider comets merely as precursors, but even as actual _causes_ of fatal events: "This comet, so anxiously observed by every one, _because of the great catastrophe which it produced as soon as it appeared_, the submersion of Bura and Helice."
Comets are by no means rare visitors to our skies, and very few years have elapsed in historical times without such objects making their appearance. In the Dark and Middle Ages, when Europe was split up into many small kingdoms and princ.i.p.alities, it was, of course, hardly possible for a comet to appear without the death of some ruler occurring near the time. Critical situations, too, were continually arising in those disturbed days. The end of Louis le Debonnaire was hastened, as the reader will, no doubt, recollect, by the great eclipse of 840; but it was firmly believed that a comet which had appeared a year or two previously presaged his death. The comet of 1556 is reported to have _influenced_ the abdication of the Emperor Charles V.; but curiously enough, this event had already taken place before the comet made its appearance! Such beliefs, no doubt, had a very real effect upon rulers of a superst.i.tious nature, or in a weak state of health. For instance, Gian Galeazzo Visconti, Duke of Milan, was sick when the comet of 1402 appeared. After seeing it, he is said to have exclaimed: "I render thanks to G.o.d for having decreed that my death should be announced to men by this celestial sign." His malady then became worse, and he died shortly afterwards.
It is indeed not improbable that such superst.i.tious fears in monarchs were fanned by those who would profit by their deaths, and yet did not wish to stain their own hands with blood.
Evil though its effects may have been, this morbid interest which past ages took in comets has proved of the greatest service to our science.
Had it not been believed that the appearance of these objects was attended with far-reaching effects, it is very doubtful whether the old chroniclers would have given themselves the trouble of alluding to them at all; and thus the modern investigators of cometary orbits would have lacked a great deal of important material.
We will now mention a few of the most notable comets which historians have recorded.
A comet which appeared in 344 B.C. was thought to betoken the success of the expedition undertaken in that year by Timoleon of Corinth against Sicily. "The G.o.ds by an extraordinary prodigy announced his success and future greatness: a burning torch appeared in the heavens throughout the night and preceded the fleet of Timoleon until it arrived off the coast of Sicily."
The comet of 43 B.C. was generally believed to be the soul of Caesar on its way to heaven.
Josephus tells us that in A.D. 69 several prodigies, and amongst them a comet in the shape of a sword, announced the destruction of Jerusalem.
This comet is said to have remained over the city for the s.p.a.ce of a year!
A comet which appeared in A.D. 336 was considered to have announced the death of the Emperor Constantine.
But perhaps the most celebrated comet of early times was the one which appeared in A.D. 1000. That year was, in more than one way, big with portent, for there had long been a firm belief that the Christian era could not possibly run into four figures. Men, indeed, steadfastly believed that when the thousand years had ended, the millennium would immediately begin. Therefore they did not reap neither did they sow, they toiled not, neither did they spin, and the appearance of the comet strengthened their convictions. The fateful year, however, pa.s.sed by without anything remarkable taking place; but the neglect of husbandry brought great famine and pestilence over Europe in the years which followed.
In April 1066, that year fraught with such immense consequences for England, a comet appeared. No one doubted but that it was a presage of the success of the Conquest, and perhaps, indeed, it had its due weight in determining the minds and actions of the men who took part in the expedition. _Nova stella, novus rex_ ("a new star, a new sovereign") was a favourite proverb of the time. The chroniclers, with one accord, have delighted to relate that the Normans, "guided by a comet," invaded England. A representation of this object appears in the Bayeux Tapestry (see Fig. 19, p. 263).[26]
[Ill.u.s.tration: FIG. 19.--The comet of 1066, as represented in the Bayeux Tapestry.
(From the _World of Comets_.)]
We have mentioned Halley"s Comet of 1682, and how it revisits the neighbourhood of the earth at intervals of seventy-six years. The comet of 1066 has for many years been supposed to be Halley"s Comet on one of its visits. The ident.i.ty of these two, however, was only quite recently placed beyond all doubt by the investigations of Messrs Cowell and Crommelin. This comet appeared also in 1456, when John Huniades was defending Belgrade against the Turks led by Mahomet II., the conqueror of Constantinople, and is said to have paralysed both armies with fear.
The Middle Ages have left us descriptions of comets, which show only too well how the imagination will run riot under the stimulus of terror. For instance, the historian, Nicetas, thus describes the comet of the year 1182: "After the Romans were driven from Constantinople a prognostic was seen of the excesses and crimes to which Andronicus was to abandon himself. A comet appeared in the heavens similar to a writhing serpent; sometimes it extended itself, sometimes it drew itself in; sometimes, to the great terror of the spectators, it opened a huge mouth; it seemed that, as if thirsting for human blood, it was upon the point of satiating itself." And, again, the celebrated Ambrose Pare, the father of surgery, has left us the following account of the comet of 1528, which appeared in his own time: "This comet," said he, "was so horrible, so frightful, and it produced such great terror in the vulgar, that some died of fear, and others fell sick. It appeared to be of excessive length, and was of the colour of blood. At the summit of it was seen the figure of a bent arm, holding in its hand a great sword, as if about to strike. At the end of the point there were three stars. On both sides of the rays of this comet were seen a great number of axes, knives, blood-coloured swords, among which were a great number of hideous human faces, with beards and bristling hair." Pare, it is true, was no astronomer; yet this shows the effect of the phenomenon, even upon a man of great learning, as undoubtedly he was. It should here be mentioned that nothing very remarkable happened at or near the year 1528.
Concerning the comet of 1680, the extraordinary story got about that, at Rome, a hen had laid an egg on which appeared a representation of the comet!
But the superst.i.tions with regard to comets were now nearing their end.
The last blow was given by Halley, who definitely proved that they obeyed the laws of gravitation, and circulated around the sun as planets do; and further announced that the comet of 1682 had a period of seventy-six years, which would cause it to reappear in the year 1759. We have seen how this prediction was duly verified. We have seen, too, how this comet appeared again in 1835, and how it is due to return in the early part of 1910.
[26] With regard to the words "Isti mirant stella" in the figure, Mr.
W.T. Lynn suggests that they may not, after all, be the grammatically bad Latin which they appear, but that the legend is really "Isti mirantur stellam," the missing letters being supposed to be hidden by the building and the comet.
CHAPTER XXI
METEORS OR SHOOTING STARS