MRS. B.
It is so, if it is required that the process should be performed rapidly, and if any considerable quant.i.ty is to be decomposed. Rust, you knew, is sometimes months in forming, and then it is only the surface of the metal that is oxydated.
EMILY.
Metals, then, that do not rust, are incapable of spontaneous oxydation, either by air or water?
MRS. B.
Yes; and this is the case with the perfect metals, which, on that account, preserve their metallic l.u.s.tre so well.
EMILY.
Are all metals capable of decomposing water, provided their temperature be sufficiently raised?
MRS. B.
No; a certain degree of attraction is requisite, besides the a.s.sistance of heat. Water, you recollect, is composed of oxygen and hydrogen; and, unless the affinity of the metal for oxygen be stronger than that of hydrogen, it is in vain that we raise its temperature, for it cannot take the oxygen from the hydrogen. Iron, zinc, tin, and antimony, have a stronger affinity for oxygen than hydrogen has, therefore these four metals are capable of decomposing water. But hydrogen having an advantage over all the other metals with respect to its affinity for oxygen, it not only withholds its oxygen from them, but is even capable, under certain circ.u.mstances, of taking the oxygen from the oxyds of these metals.
EMILY.
I confess that I do not quite understand why hydrogen can take oxygen from those metals that do not decompose water.
CAROLINE.
Now I think I do perfectly. Lead, for instance, will not decompose water, because it has not so strong an attraction for oxygen as hydrogen has. Well, then, suppose the lead to be in a state of oxyd; hydrogen will take the oxygen from the lead, and unite with it to form water, because hydrogen has a stronger attraction for oxygen, than oxygen has for lead; and it is the same with all the other metals which do not decompose water.
EMILY.
I understand your explanation, Caroline, very well; and I imagine that it is because lead cannot decompose water that it is so much employed for pipes for conveying that fluid.
MRS. B.
Certainly; lead is, on that account, particularly appropriate to such purposes; whilst, on the contrary, this metal, if it was oxydable by water, would impart to it very noxious qualities, as all oxyds of lead are more or less pernicious.
But, with regard to the oxydation of metals, the most powerful mode of effecting it is by means of acids. These, you know, contain a much greater proportion of oxygen than either air or water; and will, most of them, easily yield it to metals. Thus, you recollect, the zinc plates of the Voltaic battery are oxydated by the acid and water, much more effectually than by water alone.
CAROLINE.
And I have often observed that if I drop vinegar, lemon, or any acid on the blade of a knife, or on a pair of scissars, it will immediately produce a spot of rust.
EMILY.
Metals have, then, three ways of obtaining oxygen; from the atmosphere, from water, and from acids.
MRS. B.
The two first you have already witnessed, and I shall now show you how metals take the oxygen from an acid. This bottle contains nitric acid; I shall pour some of it over this piece of copper-leaf . . . . . . .
CAROLINE.
Oh, what a disagreeable smell!
EMILY.
And what is it that produces the effervescency and that thick yellow vapour?
MRS. B.
It is the acid, which being abandoned by the greatest part of its oxygen, is converted into a weaker acid, which escapes in the form of gas.
CAROLINE.
And whence proceeds this heat?
MRS. B.
Indeed, Caroline, I think you might now be able to answer that question yourself.
CAROLINE.
Perhaps it is that the oxygen enters into the metal in a more solid state than it existed in the acid, in consequence of which caloric is disengaged.
MRS. B.
If the combination of the oxygen and the metal results from the union of their opposite electricities, of course caloric must be given out.
EMILY.
The effervescence is over; therefore I suppose that the metal is now oxydated.
MRS. B.
Yes. But there is another important connection between metals and acids, with which I must now make you acquainted. Metals, when in the state of oxyds, are capable of being dissolved by acids. In this operation they enter into a chemical combination with the acid, and form an entirely new compound.
CAROLINE.
But what difference is there between the _oxydation_ and the _dissolution_ of the metal by an acid?
MRS. B.
In the first case, the metal merely combines with a portion of oxygen taken from the acid, which is thus partly deoxygenated, as in the instance you have just seen; in the second case, the metal, after being previously oxydated, is actually dissolved in the acid, and enters into a chemical combination with it, without producing any further decomposition or effervescence. --This complete combination of an oxyd and an acid forms a peculiar and important cla.s.s of compound salts.
EMILY.
The difference between an oxyd and a compound salt, therefore, is very obvious: the one consists of a metal and oxygen; the other of an oxyd and an acid.
MRS. B.