_Original Compound_ Sulphat of Soda.
Soda 8 Sulphuric Acid
| | _Quies-_ | | _cent_ | _Result_ _Result_ Nitrat 7 _Divellent Attractions_ 6} 13 Sulphat of Soda of Lime | | | _Attrac-_ | | _tions_ |
Nitric Acid 4 Lime -- 12
_Original Compound_ Nitrat of Lime.
We here suppose that we are to decompose sulphat of soda; that is, to separate the acid from the alkali; if, for this purpose, we add some lime, in order to make it combine with the acid, we shall fail in our attempt, because the soda and the sulphuric acid attract each other by a force which is superior, and (by way of supposition) is represented by the number 8; while the lime tends to unite with this acid by an affinity equal only to the number 6. It is plain, therefore, that the sulphat of soda will not be decomposed, since a force equal to 8 cannot be overcome by a force equal only to 6.
CAROLINE.
So far, this appears very clear.
MRS. B.
If, on the other hand, we endeavour to decompose this salt by nitric acid, which tends to combine with soda, we shall be equally unsuccessful, as nitric acid tends to unite with the alkali by a force equal only to 7.
In neither of these cases of simple elective attraction, therefore, can we accomplish our purpose. But let us previously combine together the lime and nitric acid, so as to form a nitrat of lime, a compound salt, the const.i.tuents of which are united by a power equal to 4. If then we present this compound to the sulphat of soda, a decomposition will ensue, because the sum of the forces which tend to preserve the two salts in their actual state is not equal to that of the forces which tend to decompose them, and to form new combinations. The nitric acid, therefore, will combine with the soda, and the sulphuric acid with the lime.
CAROLINE.
I understand you now very well. This double effect takes place because the numbers 8 and 4, which represent the degrees of attraction of the const.i.tuents of the two original salts, make a sum less than the numbers 7 and 6, which represent the degrees of attraction of the two new compounds that will in consequence be formed.
MRS. B.
Precisely so.
CAROLINE.
But what is the meaning of _quiescent_ and _divellent_ forces, which are written in the diagram?
MRS. B.
Quiescent forces are those which tend to preserve compounds in a state of rest, or such as they actually are: divellent forces, those which tend to destroy that state of combination, and to form new compounds.
These are the princ.i.p.al circ.u.mstances relative to the doctrine of chemical attractions, which have been laid down as rules by modern chemists; a few others might be mentioned respecting the same theory, but of less importance, and such as would take us too far from our plan.
I should, however, not omit to mention that Mr. Berthollet, a celebrated French chemist, has questioned the uniform operation of elective attraction, and has advanced the opinion, that, in chemical combinations, the changes which take place depend not only upon the affinities, but also, in some degree, on the respective quant.i.ties of the substances concerned, on the heat applied during the process, and some other circ.u.mstances.
CAROLINE.
In that case, I suppose, there would hardly be two compounds exactly similar, though composed of the same materials?
MRS. B.
On the contrary, it is found that a remarkable uniformity prevails, as to proportions, between the ingredients of bodies of similar composition. Thus water, as you may recollect to have seen in a former conversation, is composed of two volumes of hydrogen gas to one of oxygen, and this is always found to be precisely the proportion of its const.i.tuents, from whatever source the water be derived. The same uniformity prevails with regard to the various salts; the acid and alkali, in each kind of salt, being always found to combine in the same proportions. Sometimes, it is true, the same acid, and the same alkali, are capable of making two distinct kinds of salts; but in all these cases it is found that one of the salts contains just twice, or in some instances, thrice as much acid, or alkali, as the other.
EMILY.
If the proportions in which bodies combine are so constant and so well defined, how can Mr. Berthollet"s remark be reconciled with this uniform system of combination?
MRS. B.
Great as that philosopher"s authority is in chemistry, it is now generally supposed that his doubts on this subject were in a great degree groundless, and that the exceptions he has observed in the laws of definite proportions, have been only apparent, and may be accounted for consistently with those laws.
CAROLINE.
Pray, Mrs. B., can you decompose a salt by means of electricity, in the same way as we decompose water?
MRS. B.
Undoubtedly; and I am glad this question occurred to you, because it gives me an opportunity of showing you some very interesting experiments on the subject.
If we dissolve a quant.i.ty, however small, of any salt in a gla.s.s of water, and if we plunge into it the extremities of the wires which proceed from the two ends of the Voltaic battery, the salt will be gradually decomposed, the acid being attracted by the positive, and the alkali by the negative wire.
EMILY.
But how can you render that decomposition perceptible?
MRS. B.
By placing in contact with the extremities of each wire, in the solution, pieces of paper stained with certain vegetable colours, which are altered by the contact of an acid or an alkali. Thus this blue vegetable preparation called litmus becomes red when touched by an acid; and the juice of violets becomes green by the contact of an alkali.
But the experiment can be made in a much more distinct manner, by receiving the extremities of the wires into two different vessels, so that the alkali shall appear in one vessel and the acid in the other.
CAROLINE.
But then the Voltaic circle will not be completed; how can any effect be produced?
MRS. B.
You are right; I ought to have added that the two vessels must be connected together by some interposed substance capable of conducting electricity. A piece of moistened cotton-wick answers this purpose very well. You see that the cotton (PLATE XIII. fig. 2. c.) has one end immersed in one gla.s.s and the other end in the other, so as to establish a communication between any fluids contained in them. We shall now put into each of the gla.s.ses a little glauber salt, or sulphat of soda, (which consists of an acid and an alkali,) and then we shall fill the gla.s.ses with water, which will dissolve the salt. Let us now connect the gla.s.ses by means of the wires (e, d,) with the two ends of the battery, thus . . . .
[Ill.u.s.tration: Plate XIII. Vol. II. page 16.
Fig. 1. Voltaic Battery of improved construction with the Plates out of the Cells.
Fig. 2. 3 & 4. Instances of Chemical decomposition by the Voltaic Battery.]
CAROLINE.
The wires are already giving out small bubbles; is this owing to the decomposition of the salt?
MRS. B.
No; these are bubbles produced by the decomposition of the water, as you saw in a former experiment. In order to render the separation of the acid from the alkali visible, I pour into the gla.s.s (a), which is connected with the positive wire, a few drops of a solution of litmus, which the least quant.i.ty of acid turns red; and into the other gla.s.s (b), which is connected with the negative wire, I pour a few drops of the juice of violets . . . .