There certainly are authentic accounts of persons having slept for an extraordinary length of time, but I shall not mention any, as I believe the legend we are considering, not to have been an exaggeration of facts, but a Christianized myth of paganism. The fact of the number seven being so prominent in many of the tales, seems to lead to this conclusion. Barbarossa changes his position every seven years. Charlemagne starts in his chair at similar intervals. Olger Dansk stamps his iron mace on the floor once every seven years. Olaf Redbeard in Sweden uncloses his eyes at precisely the same distances of time.
I believe that the mythological core of this picturesque legend is the repose of the earth through the seven winter months. In the North, Frederic and Charlemagne certainly replace Odin.
The German and Scandinavian still heathen legends represent the heroes as about to issue forth for the defence of Fatherland in the hour of direst need. The converted and Christianized tale brings the martyr youths forth in the hour when a heresy is afflicting the Church, that they may destroy the heresy by their witness to the truth of the Resurrection.
If there is something majestic in the heathen myth, there are singular grace and beauty in the Christian tale, teaching, as it does, such a glorious doctrine; but it is surpa.s.sed in delicacy by the modern form which the same myth has a.s.sumed--a form which is a real transformation, leaving the doctrine taught the same. It has been made into a romance by Hoffman, and is versified by Trinius. I may perhaps be allowed to translate with some freedom the poem of the latter:--
In an ancient shaft of Falun Year by year a body lay, G.o.d-preserved, as though a treasure, Kept unto the waking day.
Not the turmoil, nor the pa.s.sions, Of the busy world o"erhead, Sounds of war, or peace rejoicings, Could disturb the placid dead.
Once a youthful miner, whistling, Hewed the chamber, now his tomb: Crash! the rocky fragments tumbled, Closed him in abysmal gloom.
Sixty years pa.s.sed by, ere miners Toiling, hundred fathoms deep, Broke upon the shaft where rested That poor miner in his sleep.
As the gold-grains lie untarnished In the dingy soil and sand, Till they gleam and flicker, stainless, In the digger"s sifting hand;--
As the gem in virgin brilliance Rests, till ushered into day;-- So uninjured, uncorrupted, Fresh and fair the body lay.
And the miners bore it upward, Laid it in the yellow sun; Up, from out the neighboring houses, Fast the curious peasants run.
"Who is he?" with eyes they question; "Who is he?" they ask aloud; Hush! a wizened hag comes hobbling, Panting, through the wondering crowd.
O! the cry,--half joy, half sorrow,-- As she flings her at his side: "John! the sweetheart of my girlhood, Here am I, am I, thy bride.
"Time on thee has left no traces, Death from wear has shielded thee; I am aged, worn, and wasted, O! what life has done to me!"
Then his smooth, unfurrowed forehead Kissed that ancient withered crone; And the Death which had divided Now united them in one.
FOOTNOTE:
[25] This calculation is sadly inaccurate.
William Tell.
I suppose that most people regard William Tell, the hero of Switzerland, as an historical character, and visit the scenes made memorable by his exploits, with corresponding interest, when they undertake the regular Swiss round.
It is one of the painful duties of the antiquarian to dispel many a popular belief, and to probe the groundlessness of many an historical statement. The antiquarian is sometimes disposed to ask with Pilate, "What is truth?" when he finds historical facts crumbling beneath his touch into mythological fables; and he soon learns to doubt and question the most emphatic declarations of, and claims to, reliability.
Sir Walter Raleigh, in his prison, was composing the second volume of his History of the World. Leaning on the sill of his window, he meditated on the duties of the historian to mankind, when suddenly his attention was attracted by a disturbance in the court-yard before his cell. He saw one man strike another whom he supposed by his dress to be an officer; the latter at once drew his sword, and ran the former through the body. The wounded man felled his adversary with a stick, and then sank upon the pavement. At this juncture the guard came up, and carried off the officer insensible, and then the corpse of the man who had been run through.
Next day Raleigh was visited by an intimate friend, to whom he related the circ.u.mstances of the quarrel and its issue. To his astonishment, his friend unhesitatingly declared that the prisoner had mistaken the whole series of incidents which had pa.s.sed before his eyes.
The supposed officer was not an officer at all, but the servant of a foreign amba.s.sador; it was he who had dealt the first blow; he had not drawn his sword, but the other had s.n.a.t.c.hed it from his side, and had run _him_ through the body before any one could interfere; whereupon a stranger from among the crowd knocked the murderer down with his stick, and some of the foreigners belonging to the amba.s.sador"s retinue carried off the corpse. The friend of Raleigh added that government had ordered the arrest and immediate trial of the murderer, as the man a.s.sa.s.sinated was one of the princ.i.p.al servants of the Spanish amba.s.sador.
"Excuse me," said Raleigh, "but I cannot have been deceived as you suppose, for I was eye-witness to the events which took place under my own window, and the man fell there on that spot where you see a paving-stone standing up above the rest."
"My dear Raleigh," replied his friend, "I was sitting on that stone when the fray took place, and I received this slight scratch on my cheek in s.n.a.t.c.hing the sword from the murderer; and upon my word of honor, you have been deceived upon every particular."
Sir Walter, when alone, took up the second volume of his History, which was in MS., and contemplating it, thought--"If I cannot believe my own eyes, how can I be a.s.sured of the truth of a t.i.the of the events which happened ages before I was born?" and he flung the ma.n.u.script into the fire.[26]
Now, I think that I can show that the story of William Tell is as fabulous as--what shall I say? any other historical event.
It is almost too well known to need repet.i.tion.
In the year 1307, Gessler, Vogt of the Emperor Albert of Hapsburg, set a hat on a pole, as symbol of imperial power, and ordered every one who pa.s.sed by to do obeisance towards it. A mountaineer of the name of Tell boldly traversed the s.p.a.ce before it without saluting the abhorred symbol. By Gessler"s command he was at once seized and brought before him. As Tell was known to be an expert archer, he was ordered, by way of punishment, to shoot an apple off the head of his own son. Finding remonstrance vain, he submitted. The apple was placed on the child"s head, Tell bent his bow, the arrow sped, and apple and arrow fell together to the ground. But the Vogt noticed that Tell, before shooting, had stuck another arrow into his belt, and he inquired the reason.
"It was for you," replied the st.u.r.dy archer. "Had I shot my child, know that it would not have missed your heart."
This event, observe, took place in the beginning of the fourteenth century. But Saxo Grammaticus, a Danish writer of the twelfth century, tells the story of a hero of his own country, who lived in the tenth century. He relates the incident in horrible style as follows:--
"Nor ought what follows to be enveloped in silence. Toki, who had for some time been in the king"s service, had, by his deeds, surpa.s.sing those of his comrades, made enemies of his virtues. One day, when he had drunk too much, he boasted to those who sat at table with him, that his skill in archery was such, that with the first shot of an arrow he could hit the smallest apple set on the top of a stick at a considerable distance. His detractors, hearing this, lost no time in conveying what he had said to the king (Harald Bluetooth). But the wickedness of this monarch soon transformed the confidence of the father to the jeopardy of the son, for he ordered the dearest pledge of his life to stand in place of the stick, from whom, if the utterer of the boast did not at his first shot strike down the apple, he should with his head pay the penalty of having made an idle boast. The command of the king urged the soldier to do this, which was so much more than he had undertaken, the detracting artifices of the others having taken advantage of words spoken when he was hardly sober. As soon as the boy was led forth, Toki carefully admonished him to receive the whir of the arrow as calmly as possible, with attentive ears, and without moving his head, lest by a slight motion of the body he should frustrate the experience of his well-tried skill. He also made him stand with his back towards him, lest he should be frightened at the sight of the arrow. Then he drew three arrows from his quiver, and the very first he shot struck the proposed mark. Toki being asked by the king why he had taken so many more arrows out of his quiver, when he was to make but one trial with his bow, "That I might avenge on thee," he replied, "the error of the first, by the points of the others, lest my innocence might happen to be afflicted, and thy injustice go unpunished.""
The same incident is told of Egil, brother of the mythical Velundr, in the Saga of Thidrik.
In Norwegian history also it appears with variations again and again.
It is told of King Olaf the Saint (d. 1030), that, desiring the conversion of a brave heathen named Eindridi, he competed with him in various athletic sports; he swam with him, wrestled, and then shot with him. The king dared Eindridi to strike a writing-tablet from off his son"s head with an arrow. Eindridi prepared to attempt the difficult shot. The king bade two men bind the eyes of the child and hold the napkin, so that he might not move when he heard the whistle of the arrow. The king aimed first, and the arrow grazed the lad"s head. Eindridi then prepared to shoot; but the mother of the boy interfered, and persuaded the king to abandon this dangerous test of skill. In this version, also, Eindridi is prepared to revenge himself on the king, should the child be injured.
But a closer approximation still to the Tell myth is found in the life of Hemingr, another Norse archer, who was challenged by King Harald, Sigurd"s son (d. 1066). The story is thus told:--
"The island was densely overgrown with wood, and the people went into the forest. The king took a spear and set it with its point in the soil, then he laid an arrow on the string and shot up into the air.
The arrow turned in the air and came down upon the spear-shaft and stood up in it. Hemingr took another arrow and shot up; his was lost to sight for some while, but it came back and pierced the nick of the king"s arrow.... Then the king took a knife and stuck it into an oak; he next drew his bow and planted an arrow in the haft of the knife.
Thereupon Hemingr took his arrows. The king stood by him and said, "They are all inlaid with gold; you are a capital workman." Hemingr answered, "They are not my manufacture, but are presents." He shot, and his arrow cleft the haft, and the point entered the socket of the blade.
""We must have a keener contest," said the king, taking an arrow and flushing with anger; then he laid the arrow on the string and drew his bow to the farthest, so that the horns were nearly brought to meet.
Away flashed the arrow, and pierced a tender twig. All said that this was a most astonishing feat of dexterity. But Hemingr shot from a greater distance, and split a hazel nut. All were astonished to see this. Then said the king, "Take a nut and set it on the head of your brother Bjorn, and aim at it from precisely the same distance. If you miss the mark, then your life goes."
"Hemingr answered, "Sire, my life is at your disposal, but I will not adventure that shot." Then out spake Bjorn--"Shoot, brother, rather than die yourself." Hemingr said, "Have you the pluck to stand quite still without shrinking?" "I will do my best," said Bjorn. "Then let the king stand by," said Hemingr, "and let him see whether I touch the nut."
"The king agreed, and bade Oddr Ufeigs" son stand by Bjorn, and see that the shot was fair. Hemingr then went to the spot fixed for him by the king, and signed himself with the cross, saying, "G.o.d be my witness that I had rather die myself than injure my brother Bjorn; let all the blame rest on King Harald."
"Then Hemingr flung his spear. The spear went straight to the mark, and pa.s.sed between the nut and the crown of the lad, who was not in the least injured. It flew farther, and stopped not till it fell.
"Then the king came up and asked Oddr what he thought about the shot."
Years after, this risk was revenged upon the hard-hearted monarch. In the battle of Stamfordbridge an arrow from a skilled archer penetrated the windpipe of the king, and it is supposed to have sped, observes the Saga writer, from the bow of Hemingr, then in the service of the English monarch.
The story is related somewhat differently in the Faroe Isles, and is told of Geyti, Aslak"s son. The same Harald asks his men if they know who is his match in strength. "Yes," they reply; "there is a peasant"s son in the uplands, Geyti, son of Aslak, who is the strongest of men."
Forth goes the king, and at last rides up to the house of Aslak. "And where is your youngest son?"
"Alas! alas! he lies under the green sod of Kolrin kirkgarth." "Come, then, and show me his corpse, old man, that I may judge whether he was as stout of limb as men say."
The father puts the king off with the excuse that among so many dead it would be hard to find his boy. So the king rides away over the heath. He meets a stately man returning from the chase, with a bow over his shoulder. "And who art thou, friend?" "Geyti, Aslak"s son."
The dead man, in short, alive and well. The king tells him he has heard of his prowess, and is come to match his strength with him. So Geyti and the king try a swimming-match.