"Father," returned Joe, "I know what I say and mean, well--better than you do when you hear me. I can bear with you, but I can not bear the contempt that your treating me in the way you do brings upon me from others every day. Look at other young men of my age. Have they no liberty, no will, no right to speak? Are they obliged to sit mumchance, and to be ordered about till they are the laughingstock of young and old? I am a byword all over Chigwell, and I say--and it"s fairer my saying so now, than waiting till you are dead, and I have got your money--I say, that before long I shall be driven to break such bounds, and that when I do, it won"t be me that you"ll have to blame, but your own self, and no other."
John never trusted his son, never entered into his plans, and treated even the most sacred things of Joe"s life with contempt.
Joe was about to start to London on business for his father, and he was to ride a mare that was so slow that a young man could not enjoy the prospect of riding her.
"Don"t you ride hard," said his father.
"I should be puzzled to do that, I think, father," Joe replied, casting a disconsolate look at the animal.
"None of your impudence, sir, if you please," retorted old John. "What would you ride, sir? A wild a.s.s or zebra would be too tame for you, wouldn"t he, eh, sir? You"d like to ride a roaring lion, wouldn"t you, sir, eh, sir? Hold your tongue, sir." When Mr. Willet, in his differences with his son, had exhausted all the questions that occurred to him, and Joe had said nothing at all in answer, he generally wound up by bidding him hold his tongue.
"And what does the boy mean," added Mr. Willet, after he had stared at him for a little time, in a species of stupefaction, "by c.o.c.king his hat, to such an extent! Are you going to kill the wintner, sir?"
"No," said Joe tartly; "I"m not. Now your mind"s at ease, father."
"With a military air, too!" said Mr. Willet, surveying him from top to toe; "with a swaggering, fire-eating, biling-water drinking sort of way with him! And what do you mean by pulling up the crocuses and snowdrops, eh, sir?"
"It"s only a little nosegay," said Joe, reddening. "There"s no harm in that, I hope?"
"You"re a boy of business, you are, sir!" said Mr. Willet disdainfully, "to go supposing that wintners care for nosegays."
"I don"t suppose anything of the kind," returned Joe. "Let them keep their red noses for bottles and tankards. These are going to Mr.
Varden"s house."
"And do you suppose _he_ minds such things as crocuses?" demanded John.
"I don"t know, and to say the truth, I don"t care," said Joe. "Come, father, give me the money, and in the name of patience let me go."
"There it is, sir," replied John; "and take care of it; and mind you don"t make too much haste back, but give the mare a long rest. Do you mind?"
"Ay, I mind," returned Joe. "She"ll need it, Heaven knows."
"And don"t you score up too much at the Black Lion," said John. "Mind that too."
"Then why don"t you let me have some money of my own?" retorted Joe sorrowfully; "why don"t you, father? What do you send me into London for, giving me only the right to call for my dinner at the Black Lion, which you"re to pay for next time you go, as if I was not to be trusted with a few shillings? Why do you use me like this? It"s not right of you. You can"t expect me to be quiet under it."
d.i.c.kens in this interview condemns several mistakes often made by parents in restraining instead of sympathizing with their children in the natural unfolding of their young manhood or womanhood. It was wrong for John Willet to ridicule Joe"s desire to ride a smart horse. It was wrong to bid him "hold his tongue." It was wrong to criticise his method of dressing to look his very best. It was wrong to sneer at him because his consciousness of unfolding manhood and his hope of Dolly Varden"s love made him carry himself with a "military air." What a difference it would make in the characters of young men if they all carried themselves with a military air, and walked with a consciousness of power and hope!
It was especially wrong to make fun of the nosegay Joe had pulled for Dolly Varden. What a pity it is that so few fathers or mothers can truly sympathize with their boys and girls during the period of courtship! Why should the most sacred feelings that ever stir the soul be made the subject of jest and levity by those whose hearts should most truly beat in unison with the young hearts that are aflame? If there is a time in the life of young men or women when father or mother may enter the hearts of their children as benedictions and form a blessed unity that can never be broken or undone it is surely when young hearts are hallowed by love. Yet there are few parents to whom their children can speak freely about the mysteries and the deep experiences of love that come into their lives.
It was wrong to treat Joe as if he was unworthy to be trusted with money.
Every wrong revealed by d.i.c.kens in this interview had its root in John"s feeling that it was his duty to keep Joe down, to prevent the outflow of his inner life.
Old John having long encroached a good standard inch, full measure, on the liberty of Joe, and having snipped off a Flemish ell in the matter of the parole, grew so despotic and so great, that his thirst for conquest knew no bounds. The more young Joe submitted, the more absolute old John became. The ell soon faded into nothing. Yards, furlongs, miles arose; and on went old John in the pleasantest manner possible, tr.i.m.m.i.n.g off an exuberance in this place, shearing away some liberty of speech or action in that, and conducting himself in this small way with as much high mightiness and majesty as the most glorious tyrant that ever had his statue reared in the public ways, of ancient or of modern times.
As great men are urged on to the abuse of power (when they need urging, which is not often) by their flatterers and dependents, so old John was impelled to these exercises of authority by the applause and admiration of his Maypole cronies, who, in the intervals of their nightly pipes and pots, would shake their heads and say that Mr.
Willet was a father of the good old English sort; that there were no newfangled notions or modern ways in him; that he put them in mind of what their fathers were when they were boys; that there was no mistake about him; that it would be well for the country if there were more like him, and more was the pity that there were not; with many other original remarks of that nature. Then they would condescendingly give Joe to understand that it was all for his good, and he would be thankful for it one day; and in particular, Mr. Cobb would acquaint him, that when he was his age, his father thought no more of giving him a parental kick, or a box on the ears, or a cuff on the head, or some little admonition of that sort, than he did of any other ordinary duty of life; and he would further remark, with looks of great significance, that but for this judicious bringing up, he might have never been the man he was at that present speaking; which was probable enough, as he was, beyond all question, the dullest dog of the party.
In short, between old John and old John"s friends, there never was an unfortunate young fellow so bullied, badgered, worried, fretted, and browbeaten; so constantly beset, or made so tired of his life, as poor Joe Willet.
The end came at last. One evening Mr. Cobb was more aggravating than usual, and Joe"s patience could hold out no longer. He knocked the offending Cobb into a corner among the spittoons, and ran away from the unbearable tyranny of home.
What a moral catastrophe occurs when a young man leaves home with a feeling of relief! d.i.c.kens develops this thought in the case of Tom Gradgrind. With the best of intentions, with a single desire of training his son in the best possible way, Mr. Gradgrind had repressed his natural tendencies and robbed him of the joys of childhood and youth to such an extent that when he was about to go to live with Mr. Bounderby, and his sister, Louisa, asked him "if he was pleased with his prospect?" he replied, "Well, it will be getting away from home." The boy is never to blame for such a catastrophe.
d.i.c.kens attacked another phase of the flogging mania in Barnaby Rudge, in a brief but suggestive scene. Barnaby and his mother were travelling, and were resting at the gate of a gentleman"s grounds, when the proprietor himself came along and demanded to know who they were.
"Vagrants," said the gentleman, "vagrants and vagabonds. Thee wish to be made acquainted with the cage, dost thee--the cage, the stocks, and the whipping post? Where dost come from?"
Learning that Barnaby was weak-minded, he asked how long he had been idiotic.
"From his birth," said the widow.
"I don"t believe it," cried the gentleman, "not a bit of it. It"s an excuse not to work. There"s nothing like flogging to cure that disorder. I"d make a difference in him in ten minutes, I"ll be bound."
"Heaven has made none in more than twice ten years, sir," said the widow mildly.
"Then why don"t you shut him up? We pay enough for county inst.i.tutions, d.a.m.n "em. But thou"d rather drag him about to excite charity--of course. Ay, I know thee."
Now, this gentleman had various endearing appellations among his intimate friends. By some he was called "a country gentleman of the true school," by some "a fine old country gentleman," by some "a sporting gentleman," by some "a thoroughbred Englishman," by some "a genuine John Bull"; but they all agreed in one respect, and that was, that it was a pity that there were not more like him, and that because there were not, the country was going to rack and ruin every day.
d.i.c.kens always enjoyed ridiculing the people who long for the good old times and approve of the good old customs. There are some who even yet deplore the fact that children are not repressed and coerced as they used to be, and who prophesy untold evils unless the good old customs are re-established. They long for the recurrence of the days when "lickin" and larnin" went hand in hand," when "Wallop the boy, develop the man" was the popular motto, expressive of the general faith. d.i.c.kens pictured them in John Willet and this "country gentleman of the true school." He also criticised them severely in the Chimes.
The depressing influence of another form of coercion is shown in Our Mutual Friend by the effect of Mr. Podsnap"s character on his daughter Georgiana. Mr. Podsnap was one of the absolutely positive people who know everything about everything, who never allow other people to express opinions without contradicting them, and who take every possible opportunity of expressing their own opinions in a loud, emphatic, dogmatic manner. Of course, no woman should hold opinions, according to Mr.
Podsnap"s way of thinking, although Mrs. Podsnap, in her own way, did credit to her more Podsnappery master. It was therefore not to be dreamt of for a moment that a "young person" like their daughter Georgiana could have any views of her own regarding life or any of its conditions, past, present, or future. She was a "young person" to be protected, and kept in the background, and guarded from evil, and sheltered, so that she should not even hear of anything improper, and shielded from temptation to do wrong, or to do anything, indeed, right or wrong. Her father was rich; why should she wish to do anything but listen to him, and go away when he told her to do so, if he wished to speak of subjects that he deemed it unwise to let a "young person" hear discussed?
There was a Miss Podsnap. And this young rocking-horse was being trained in her mother"s art of prancing in a stately manner without ever getting on. But the high parental action was not yet imparted to her, and in truth she was but an undersized damsel, with high shoulders, low spirits, chilled elbows, and a rasped surface of nose, who seemed to take occasional frosty peeps out of childhood into womanhood, and to shrink back again, overcome by her mother"s headdress and her father from head to foot--crushed by the mere dead weight of Podsnappery.
Georgiana explained the reason of her shyness to Mrs. Lammle, for, strange as it may seem, considering her heredity, Georgiana was shy. Podsnappery as environment is always much stronger than Podsnappery as heredity.
"What I mean is," pursued Georgiana, "that ma being so endowed with awfulness, and pa being so endowed with awfulness, and there being so much awfulness everywhere--I mean, at least, everywhere where I am--perhaps it makes me who am so deficient in awfulness, and frightened at it--I say it very badly--I don"t know whether you can understand what I mean?"
Thoughtful people need no explanation regarding the influence of Podsnappery on children.
The time will come when in normal schools character a.n.a.lysis will be the supreme qualification of those who are to decide who may and who may not teach. When that time comes, as come it must, no Podsnaps will be allowed to teach.
It was no wonder that--
Whenever Georgiana could escape from the thraldom of Podsnappery; could throw off the bedclothes of the custard-coloured phaeton, and get up; could shrink out of the range of her mother"s rocking, and (so to speak) rescue her poor little frosty toes from being rocked over; she repaired to her friend, Mrs. Alfred Lammle.
d.i.c.kens fired another thunderbolt, in Our Mutual Friend, to set the world thinking about its method of teaching children, by his brief description of Pleasant Riderhood, the daughter of Rogue Riderhood.
Show her a christening, and she saw a little heathen personage having a quite superfluous name bestowed upon it, inasmuch as it would be commonly addressed by some abusive epithet; which little personage was not in the least wanted by anybody, and would be shoved and banged out of everybody"s way, until it should grow big enough to shove and bang.
Show her a live father, and she saw but a duplicate of her own father, who from her infancy had been taken with fits and starts of discharging his duty to her, which duty was always incorporated in the form of a fist or a leather strap, and being discharged hurt her.
In Little Dorrit d.i.c.kens gives one of his most striking verbal descriptions of the effects of coercion in Arthur Clennam"s account of his own early training. He said to Mr. Meagles, when the kind old gentleman spoke of working with a will:
"I have no will. That is to say," he coloured a little, "next to none that I can put in action now. Trained by main force; broken, not bent; heavily ironed with an object on which I was never consulted and which was never mine; shipped away to the other end of the world before I was of age, and exiled there until my father"s death there, a year ago; always grinding in a mill I always hated; what is to be expected from me in middle life? Will, purpose, hope? All those lights were extinguished before I could sound the words."
"Light "em up again!" said Mr. Meagles.