Down on your knees before Him, with all your hearts and with all your confidence, and worship, and trust, and love for evermore "the Second Man," who "is the Lord from Heaven!"
II. Now let us turn to the other aspects of these words. I think we see here, in the next place, a prophetic warning of the history of the men to whom He was speaking.
There must be a connection between the interpretation of the words which our Evangelist a.s.sures us is the correct one, and the interpretation which would naturally have occurred to a listener, that by "this Temple" our Lord really meant simply the literal building in which He spoke. There is such a connection, and though our Lord did not only mean the Temple, He _did_ mean the Temple. To say so is not forcing double meanings in any fast and loose fashion upon Scripture, nor playing with ambiguities, nor indulging in any of the vices to which spiritualising interpretation of Scripture leads, but it is simply grasping the central idea of the words of my text. Rightly understood they lead us to this: "The death of Christ was the destruction of the Jewish Temple and polity, and the raising again of Christ from the dead on the third day was the raising again of that destroyed Theocracy and Temple in a new and n.o.bler fashion." Let us then look for a moment, and it shall only be for a moment, at these two thoughts.
If any one had said to any of that howling mob that stood round Christ at the judgment-seat of the High Priest, and fancied themselves condemning Him to death, because He had blasphemed the Temple: "You, at this moment, are pulling down the holy and beautiful house in which your fathers praised; and what you are doing now is the destruction of your national worship and of yourselves," the words would have been received with incredulity; and yet they were simple truth. Christ"s death destroyed that outward Temple. The veil was "rent in twain from the top to the bottom" at the moment He died; which was the declaration indeed that henceforward the Holiest of All was patent to the foot of every man, but was also the declaration that there was no more sanct.i.ty now within those courts, and that Temple, and priesthood, and sacrifice, and altar, and ceremonial and all, were antiquated. That "which was perfect having come," Christ"s death having realised all which Temple-worship symbolised, that which was the shadow was put away when the substance appeared.
And in another fashion, it is also true that the death of our Lord Jesus Christ, inflicted by Jewish hands, was the destruction of the Jewish worship, in the way of natural sequence and of divine chastis.e.m.e.nt. When the husbandmen rejected the Son who was sent "last of all," there was nothing more for it but that they should be "cast out of the vineyard," and the firebrand which the Roman soldier, forty years afterwards, tossed into the Holiest of All, and which burned the holy and beautiful house with fire, was lit on the day when Israel cried "Crucify Him! Crucify Him!"
Oh, brethren! What a lesson it is to us all of how blind even so-called religious zeal may be; how often it is true that men in their madness and their ignorance destroy the very inst.i.tutions which they are trying to conserve! How it warns us to beware lest we, unknowing what we are about, and thinking that we are fighting for the honour of G.o.d, may really all the while be but serving ourselves and rejecting His message and His Messenger!
And then let me remind you that another thing is also true, that just as the Jewish rejection of Christ was their own rejection as the people of G.o.d, and their attempted destruction of Christ the destruction of the Jewish Temple, so the other side of the truth is also here, viz. that His rising again is the restoration of the destroyed Temple in n.o.bler and fairer form. Of course the one real Temple is the body of Jesus Christ, as we have said, where sacrifice is offered, where G.o.d dwells, where men meet with G.o.d. But in a secondary and derivative sense, in the place of the Jewish Temple has come the Christian Church, which is, in a far deeper and more inward fashion, what that ancient system aspired to be.
Christ has builded up the Church on His Resurrection. On His Resurrection, I say, for there is nothing else on which it could rest.
If men ask me what is the great evidence of Christ"s Resurrection, my answer is--the existence in the world of a Church. Where did it come from? How is it possible to conceive that without the Resurrection of Jesus Christ such a structure as the Christian society should have been built upon a dead man"s grave? It would have gone to pieces, as all similar a.s.sociations would have gone. What had happened after that moment of depression which scattered them every man to his own, and led some of them to say, with pathetic use of the past tense to describe their vanished expectations, "We _trusted_ that it had been He which should have redeemed Israel"? What was the force that instead of driving them asunder drew them together? What was the power that, instead of quenching their almost dead hopes, caused them to flame up with renewed vigour heaven-high? How came it that that band of cowardly, dispirited Jewish peasants, who scattered in selfish fear and heart-sick disappointment, were in a few days found bearding all antagonism, and convinced that their hopes had only erred by being too faint and dim? The only answer is in their own message, which explained it all: "Him hath G.o.d raised from the dead, whereof we are all witnesses."
The destroyed Temple disappears, and out of the dust and smoke of the vanishing ruins there rises, beautiful and serene, though incomplete and fragmentary and defaced with many a stain, the fairer reality, the Church of the living Christ. "Destroy this Temple, and in three days I will raise it up."
III. Lastly, we have here a foreshadowing of our Lord"s world-wide work as the Restorer of man"s destructions.
Man"s folly, G.o.dlessness, worldliness, l.u.s.t, sin, are ever working to the destruction of all that is sacred in humanity and in life, and to the desecrating of every shrine. We ourselves, in regard to our own hearts, which are made to be the temples of the "living G.o.d," are ever, by our sins, shortcomings, and selfishness, bringing pollution into the holiest of all; "breaking down the carved work thereof with axes and hammers," and setting up the abomination of desolation in the holy places of our hearts. We pollute them all--conscience, imagination, memory, will, intellect. How many a man listening to me now has his nature like the facade of some of our cathedrals, with the empty niches and broken statues proclaiming that wanton desecration and destruction have been busy there?
My brother! what have you done with your heart? "Destroy this temple."
Christ spoke to men who did not know what they were doing; and He speaks to you. It is the inmost meaning of the life of many of you.
Hour by hour, day by day, action by action, you are devastating and profaning the sanct.i.ties of your nature, and the sacred places there where G.o.d ought to live.
Listen to His confident promise. He knows that in me He is able to restore to more than pristine beauty all which I, by my sin, have destroyed; to reconsecrate all which I, by my profanity, have polluted; to cast out the evil deities that desecrate and deform the shrine; and to make my poor heart, if only I will let Him come in to the ruined chamber, a fairer temple and dwelling-place of G.o.d.
"In three days," does He do it? In one sense--Yes! Thank G.o.d! the power that hallows and restores the desecrated and cast-down temple in a man"s heart, was lodged in the world in those three days of death and resurrection. The fact that He "died for our sins," the fact that He was "raised again for our justification," are the plastic and architectonic powers which will build up any character into a temple of G.o.d.
And yet more than "forty and six years" will that temple have to be "in building." It is a lifelong task till the top-stone be brought forth. Only let us remember this: Christ, who is Architect and Builder, Foundation and Top-stone; ay! and Deity indwelling in the temple, and building it by His indwelling--this Christ is not one of those who "begin to build and are not able to finish." He realises all His plans. There are no ruined edifices in "the City"; nor any half-finished fanes of worship within the walls of that great Jerusalem whose builder and maker is Christ.
If you will put yourselves in His hands, and trust yourselves to Him, He will take away all your incompleteness, and will make you body, soul, and spirit, temples of the Lord G.o.d; as far above the loftiest beauty and whitest sanct.i.ty of any Christian character here on earth as is the building of G.o.d, "the house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens," above "the earthly house of this tabernacle."
He will perfect this restoring work at the last, when His Word to His servant Death, as He points him to us, shall be "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it up."
TEACHER OR SAVIOUR?
"The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto Him, Rabbi, we know that Thou art a Teacher come from G.o.d: for no man can do these miracles that Thou doest, except G.o.d be with him."--JOHN iii. 2.
The connection in which the Evangelist introduces the story of Nicodemus throws great light on the aspect under which we are to regard it. He has just been saying that upon our Lord"s first visit to Jerusalem at the Pa.s.sover there was a considerable amount of interest excited, and a kind of imperfect faith in Him drawn out, based solely on His miracles. He adds that this faith was regarded by Christ as unreliable; and he goes on to explain that our Lord exercised great reserve in His dealings with the persons who professed it, for the reason that "He knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man, for He knew what was in man."
Now, if you note that reiteration of the word "man," you will understand the description which is given of the person who is next introduced. "He knew what was in man. There was a _man_ of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews." It would have been enough to have said, "There was a Pharisee." When John says "a _man_ of the Pharisees," he is not merely carried away by the echo in his ears of his own last words, but it is as if he had said, "Now, here is one ill.u.s.tration of the sort of thing that I have been speaking about; one specimen of an imperfect faith built upon miracles; and one ill.u.s.tration of the way in which Jesus Christ dealt with it."
Nicodemus was "a Pharisee." That tells us the school to which he belonged, and the general drift of his thought. He was "a ruler of the Jews." That tells us that he held an official position in the supreme court of the nation, to which the Romans had left some considerable shadow of power in ecclesiastical matters. And this man comes to Christ and acknowledges Him. Christ deals with him in a very suggestive fashion. His confession, and the way in which our Lord received it, are what I desire to consider briefly in this sermon.
I. Note then, first, this imperfect confession.
Everything about it, pretty nearly, is wrong. "He came to Jesus by night," half-ashamed and wholly afraid of speaking out the conviction that was working in him. He was a man in position. He could not compromise himself in the eyes of his co-Sanhedrists. "It would be a grave thing for a man like me to be found in converse with this new Rabbi and apparent Prophet. I must go cautiously, and have regard to my reputation and my standing in the world; and shall steal to Him by night." There is something wrong with any convictions about Jesus Christ which let themselves be huddled up in secret. The true apprehension of Him is like a fire in a man"s bones, that makes him "weary of forbearing" when he locks his lips, and forces him to speak.
If Christians can be dumb, there is something dreadfully wrong with their Christianity. If they do not regard Jesus Christ in such an aspect as to oblige them to stand out in the world and say, "Whatever anybody says or thinks about it, I am Christ"s man," then be sure that they do not yet know Him as they ought to do.
Nicodemus "came to Jesus by night," and therein condemned himself. He said, "Rabbi, we know." There is more than a _soupcon_ of patronage in that. He is giving Jesus Christ a certificate, duly signed and sealed by Rabbinical authority. He evidently thinks that it is no small matter that he and some of his fellows should have been disposed to look with favour upon this new Teacher. And so he comes, if not patronising the young man, at all events extremely conscious of his own condescension in recognising Him with his "We know."
Had he the right to speak for any of his colleagues? If so, then at that very early stage of our Lord"s ministry there was a conviction beginning to work in that body of ecclesiastics which casts a very lurid light on their subsequent proceedings. It was a good long while after, when Jesus Christ"s att.i.tude towards them had been a little more clearly made out than it was at the beginning, that they said officially, "As for this fellow, we know not whence He is." They "knew" when He did not seem to be trenching on their prerogatives, or driving His Ithuriel-spear through their traditional professions of orthodoxy and punctilious casuistries. But when He trod on their toes, when He ripped up their pretensions, when He began to show His antagonism to their formalism and traditionalism, _then_ they did not know where He came from. And there are many of us who are very polite to Jesus Christ as long as He does not interfere with us, and who begin to doubt His authority when He begins to rebuke our sins.
The man that said "We know," and then proceeded to tell Christ the grounds upon which He was accepted by him, was not in the position which becomes sinful men drawing near to their Saviour. "We know that Thou art a Teacher"--contrast that, with its ring of complacency, and, if not superior, at least co-ordinate, authority, with "Jesus! Master!
have mercy on me," or with "Lord! save or I perish," and you get the difference between the way in which a formalist, conceited of his knowledge, and a poor, perishing sinner, conscious of his ignorance and need, go to the Saviour.
Further, this imperfect confession was of secondary value, because it was built altogether upon miraculous evidence. Now, there has been a great deal of exaggeration about the value of the evidence of miracle.
The undue elevation to which it was lifted in the apologetic literature of the eighteenth century, when it was almost made out as if there was no other proof that Jesus came from G.o.d than that He wrought miracles, has naturally led, in this generation and in the last one, to an equally exaggerated undervaluing of its worth. Jesus Christ did appeal to signs; He did also most distinctly place faith that rested merely upon miracle as second best; when He said, for instance, "If ye believe not Me, yet believe the works." Nicodemus says, "We know that Thou art a Teacher sent from G.o.d, because no man can do these miracles except G.o.d be with him." Ah! Nicodemus! did not the substance of the teaching reveal the source of the teaching even more completely than the miracles that accompanied it? Surely, if I may use an old ill.u.s.tration, the bell that rings in to the sermon (which is the miracles) is less conclusive as to the divine source of the teaching than is the sermon itself. Christ Himself is His own best evidence, and His words shine in their own light, and need no signs in order to authenticate their source. The signs are there, and are precious in my eyes less as credentials of His authority than as revelations of His character and His work. They are wonders; that is much. They are proofs; as I believe. But, high above both of these characteristics, they are signs of the spiritual work that He does, and manifestations of His redeeming power. And so a faith that had no ears for the ring of the divine voice in the words, and no eyes for the beauty and perfection of the character, was vulgar and low and unreliable, inasmuch as it could give no better reason for itself than that Jesus had wrought miracles,
I need not remind you of how noticeable it is that at this very early stage in our Lord"s ministry there were a sufficient number of miracles done to be qualified by the Evangelist as "many," and to have been a very powerful factor in bringing about this real, though imperfect, faith. John has only told us of one miracle prior to this; and the other Evangelists do not touch upon these early days of our Lord"s ministry at all. So that we are to think of a whole series of works of power and supernatural grace which have found no record in these short narratives. How much more Jesus Christ was, and did, and said, than any book can ever tell! These are but parts of His ways; a whisper of His power. The fulness of it remains unrevealed after all revelation.
But the central deficiency of this confession lies in the altogether inadequate conception of Jesus Christ and His work which it embodies.
"We know that Thou art a Teacher, a miracle-worker, a man sent from G.o.d, and in communion with Him." These are large recognitions, far too large to be spoken of any but a select few of the sons of men. But they fall miserably beneath the grandeur, and do not even approach within sight of the central characteristic, of Christ and of His work.
Nicodemus is the type of large numbers of men nowadays. All the people that have a kind of loose, superficial connection with Christianity re-echo substantially his words. They compliment Jesus Christ out of His divinity and out of His redeeming work, and seem to think that they are rather conferring an honour upon Christianity when they condescend to say, "We, the learned pundits of literature; we, the arbiters of taste; we, the guides of opinion; we, the writers in newspapers and magazines and periodicals; we, the leaders in social and philanthropic movements--we recognise that Thou art a Teacher."
Yes, brethren, and the recognition is utterly inadequate to the facts of the case, and is insult, and not recognition.
II. Let me ask you to look now, in the next place, at the way in which Jesus Christ deals with this imperfect confession.
It was a great thing for a young Rabbi from Nazareth, who had no certificate from the authorities, to find an opening thus into the very centre of the Sanhedrim. There is nothing in life, to an ardent young soul, at the beginning of his career--especially if he feels that he has a burden laid upon him to deliver to his fellows--half so sweet as the early recognition by some man of wisdom and weight and influence, that he too is a messenger from G.o.d. In later years praise and acknowledgment cloy. And one might have expected some pa.s.sing word from the Master that would have expressed such a feeling as that, if He had been only a young Teacher seeking for recognition. I remember that in that strange medley of beauty and absurdity, the Koran, somewhere or other, there is an outpouring of Mahomet"s heart about the blessedness of his first finding a soul that would believe in him.
And it is strange that Jesus Christ had no more welcome for this man than the story tells that He had. For He meets him without a word of encouragement; without a word that seemed to recognise even a growing and a groping confidence, and yet He would not "quench the smoking flax." Yes! sometimes the kindest way to deal with an imperfect conception is to show unsparingly why it is imperfect; and sometimes the apparent repelling of a partial faith is truly the drawing to Himself by the Christ of the man, though his faith be not approved.
So, notice how our Lord meets the imperfections of this acknowledgment. He begins by pointing out what is the deepest and universal need of men. Nicodemus had said, "Rabbi, we know that Thou art a Teacher come from G.o.d." And Christ says, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye must be born again." What has that to do with Nicodemus"s acknowledgment? Apparently nothing; really everything. For, if you will think for a moment, you will see how it meets it precisely, and forces the Rabbi to deepen his conception of the Lord. The first thing that you and I want, for our partic.i.p.ation in the Kingdom of G.o.d, is a radical out-and-out change in our whole character and nature. "Ye must be born again"; now, whatever more that means, it means, at all events, this--a thorough-going renovation and metamorphosis of a man"s nature, as the sorest need that the world and all the individuals that make up the world have.
The deepest ground of that necessity lies in the fact of sin. Brother, we can only verify our Lord"s a.s.sertion by honestly searching the depths of our own hearts, and looking at ourselves in the light of G.o.d. Think what is meant when we say, "He is Light, and in Him is no darkness at all." Think of that absolute purity, that, to us, awful aversion from all that is evil, from all that is sinful. Think of what sort of men they must be who can see the Lord. And then look at yourself. Are we fit to pa.s.s that threshold? Are we fit to gaze into that Face? Is it possible that we should have fellowship with Him? Oh, brethren, if we rightly meditate upon two facts, the holiness of G.o.d and our own characters, I think we shall feel that Jesus Christ has truly stated the case when He says, "Ye must be born again." Unless you and I can get ourselves radically changed, there is no Heaven for us; there is no fellowship with G.o.d for us. We must stand before Him, and feel that a great gulf is fixed between us and Him.
And so when a man comes with his poor little "Thou art a Teacher," no words are wanted in order to set in glaring light the utter inadequacy of such a conception as that. What the world wants is not a Teacher, it is a Life-giver. What men want is not to be told the truth; they know it already. What they want is not to be told their duty; they know that too. What they want is some power that shall turn them clean round. And what each of us wants before we can see the Lord is that, if it may be, something shall lay hold of us, and utterly change our natures, and express from our hearts the black drop that lies there tainting everything.
Now, this necessity is met in Jesus Christ. For there were two "musts"
in His talk with Nicodemus, and both of them bore directly on the one purpose of deepening Nicodemus"s inadequate conception of what He was and what He did. He said, "Ye must be born again," in order that his hearer, and we, might lay to heart this, that we need something more than a Teacher, even a Life-giver; and He said, "The Son of Man must be lifted up," in order that we might all know that in Him the necessity is met, and that the Son of Man, who came down from Heaven, and is in Heaven, even whilst He is on earth, is the sole ladder by which men can ascend into Heaven and gaze upon G.o.d.
Thus it is Christ"s work as Redeemer, Christ"s sacrifice on the Cross, Christ"s power as bringing to the world a new and holy life, and breathing it into all that trust in Him, which make the very centre of His work. Set by the side of that this other, "Thou art a Teacher sent from G.o.d." Ah, brethren, that will not do; it will not do for you and me! We want something a great deal deeper than that. The secret of Jesus is not disclosed until we have pa.s.sed into the inner shrine, where we learn that He is the Sacrifice for the world, and the Source and Fountain of a new life. I beseech you, take Christ"s way of dealing with this certificate of His character given by the Rabbi who did not know his own necessities, and ponder it.
Mark the underlying principle which is here--viz. if you want to understand Christ you must understand sin; and whoever thinks lightly of it will think meanly of Him. An underestimate of the reality, the universality, the gravity of the fact of sin lands men in the superficial and wholly impotent conception, "Rabbi! Thou art a Teacher sent from G.o.d." A true knowledge of myself as a sinful man, of my need of pardon, of my need of cleansing, of my need of a new nature, which must be given from above, and cannot be evolved from within, leads me, and I pray it may lead you, to cast yourself down before Him, with no complaisant words of intellectual recognition upon your lips, but with the old cry, "Lord! be merciful to me a sinner."
III. And now, dear friends, one last word. Notice when and where this imperfect disciple was transformed into a courageous confessor.
We do not know what came immediately of this conversation. We only know that some considerable time after, Nicodemus had not screwed himself up to the point of acknowledging out and out, like a brave man, that he was Christ"s follower; but that he timidly ventured in the Sanhedrim to slip in a remonstrance ingeniously devised to conceal his own opinions, and yet to do some benefit to Christ, when he said, "Does our law judge any man before it hear him?" And, of course, the timid remonstrance was swept aside, as it deserved to be, by the ferocious antagonism of his co-Sanhedrists.
But when the Cross came, and it had become more dangerous to avow discipleship, he plucked up courage, or rather courage flowed into him from that Cross, and he went boldly and "craved the body of Jesus,"
and got it, and buried it. No doubt when he looked at Jesus hanging on the Cross, he remembered that night in Jerusalem when the Lord had said, "The Son of Man must be lifted up," and he remembered how He had spoken about the serpent lifted in the wilderness, and a great light blazed in upon him, which for ever ended all hesitation and timidity for him. And so he was ready to be a martyr, or anything else, for the sake of Him whom he now found to be far more than a "Teacher," even the Sacrifice by whose stripes he was healed.
Dear brethren, I bring that Cross to you now, and pray you to see there Christ"s real work for us, and for the world. He has taught us, but He has done more. He has not only spoken, He has died. He has not only shown us the path on which to walk, He has made it possible for us to walk in it. He is not merely one amongst the n.o.ble band that have guided and inspired and instructed humanity, but He stands alone--not _a_ Teacher, but _the_ Redeemer, "the Lamb of G.o.d, which taketh away the sins of the world."
If He is a Teacher, take His teachings, and what are they? These, that He is the Son of G.o.d; that "He came from G.o.d"; that He "went to G.o.d"; that He "gives His life a ransom for many"; that He is to be the Judge of mankind; that if we trust in Him, our sins are forgiven and our nature is renewed. Do not go picking and choosing amongst His teachings, for these which I have named are as surely His as "Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them," or any other of the moral teachings which the world professes to admire. Take the whole teachings of the whole Christ, and you will confess Him to be the Redeemer of your souls, and the Life-giver by whom, and by whom alone, we enter the Kingdom of G.o.d.