But now let me carry you back to the Old Testament. Do you remember the story of the father taking his boy who carried the bundle of wood and the fire, and tramping over the mountains till they reached the place where the sacrifice was to be offered? Do you remember the boy"s question that brings tears quickly to the reader"s eyes: "Here is the wood, and here is the fire, where is the lamb"? Do you not think it would be hard for the father to steady his voice and say, "My son, G.o.d will provide the lamb"? And do you remember the end of that story?
"The Angel of the Lord said unto Abraham, Because thou hast done this thing, and hast not _withheld_ thy son, _thine only son_, from Me, therefore blessing I will bless thee," etc. Remember that one of the Apostles said, using the very same word that is used in Genesis as to Abraham"s giving up his son to G.o.d, "He _spared not_ His own Son, but delivered Him up to the death for us all." Does not that point to a mysterious parallel? Somehow or other--we have no right to attempt to say how--somehow or other, G.o.d not only _sent_ His Son, as it is said in the next verse to my text, but far more tenderly, wonderfully, pathetically, G.o.d _gave_--gave up His Son, and the sacrifice was enhanced, because it was His only begotten Son.
Ah! dear brethren, do not let us be afraid of following out all that is included in that great word, "G.o.d ... _loved_ the world." For there is no love which does not delight in giving, and there is no love that does not delight in depriving itself, in some fashion, of what it gives. And I, for my part, believe that Paul"s words are to be taken in all their blessed depth and wonderfulness of meaning when he says, "He gave up"--as well as gave--"Him to the death for us all."
And now, do you not think that we are able in some measure to estimate the greatness of that little word "so"? "G.o.d _so_ loved"--_so_ deeply, so holily, _so_ perfectly--that He "gave His only begotten Son"; and the gift of that Son is, as it were, the river by which the love of G.o.d comes to every soul in the world.
Now there are a great many people who would like to put the middle part of this great text of ours into a parenthesis. They say that we should bring the first words and the last words of this text together, and never mind all that lies between. People who do not like the doctrine of the Cross would say, "G.o.d so loved the world that He gave... everlasting life"; and there an end. "If there is a G.o.d, and if He loves the world, why cannot He save the world without more ado?
There is no need for these interposed clauses. G.o.d so loved the world that everybody will go to heaven"--that is the gospel of a great many of you; and it is the gospel of a great many wise and learned people.
But it is not John"s Gospel, and it is not Christ"s Gospel. The beginning and the end of the text cannot be buckled up together in that rough-and-ready fashion. They have to be linked by a chain; and there are two links in the chain: G.o.d forges the one, and we have to forge the other. "G.o.d so loved the world that He gave"--then He has done His work. "That whosoever believeth"--that is your work. And it is in vain that G.o.d forges _His_ link, unless you will forge _yours_ and link it up to His. "G.o.d so loved the world," that is step number one in the process; "that He gave," that is step number two; and then there comes another "that"--"that whosoever believeth," that is step number three; and they are all needed before you come to number four, which is the landing-place and not a step--"should not perish, but have everlasting life."
III. The pitcher.
I come to what I called the pitcher, with which we draw the water for our own use--"that whosoever believeth." You perhaps say, "Yes, I believe. I accept every word of the Gospel, I quite believe that Jesus Christ died, as a matter of history; and I quite believe that He died for men"s sins." And what then? Is that what Jesus Christ meant by believing? To believe _about_ Him is not to believe _on_ Him; and unless you believe on Him you will get no good out of Him. There is the lake, and the river must flow past the shanties in the clearing in the forest, if the men there are to drink. But it may flow past their doors, as broad as the Mississippi, and as deep as the ocean; but they will perish with thirst, unless they dip in their hands, like Gideon"s men, and carry the water to their own lips. Dear friend, what you have to do--and your soul"s salvation, and your peace and joy and n.o.bleness in this life and in the next depend absolutely upon it--is simply to trust in Jesus Christ and His death for your sins.
I sometimes wish we had never heard that word "faith." For as soon as we begin to talk about "faith," people begin to think that we are away up in some theological region far above everyday life. Suppose we try to bring it down a little nearer to our businesses and bosoms, and instead of using a word that is kept sacred for employment in religious matters, and saying "faith," we say "trust." That is what you give to your wives and husbands, is it not? And that is exactly what you have to give to Jesus Christ, simply to lay hold of Him as a man lays hold of the heart that loves him, and leans his whole weight upon it. Lean hard on Him, hang on Him, or, to take the other metaphor that is one of the Old Testament words for trust, "flee for refuge" to Him. Fancy a man with the avenger of blood at his back, and the point of the pursuer"s spear almost p.r.i.c.king his spine--don"t you think he would make for the City of Refuge with some speed? That is what you have to do. He that believeth, and by trust lays hold of the Hand that holds him up, will never fall; and he that does not lay hold of that Hand will never stand, to say nothing of rising. And so by these two links G.o.d"s love of the world is connected with the salvation of the world.
IV. The draught.
Finally, we have here the draught of living water. Did you ever think why our text puts "should not perish" first? Is it not because, unless we put our trust in Him, we shall certainly perish, and because, therefore, that certainty of perishing must be averted before we can have "everlasting life"?
Now I am not going to enlarge on these two solemn expressions, "perishing" and "everlasting life." I only say this: men do not need to wait until they die before they "perish." There are men and women here now who are dead--dead while they live, and when they come to die, the perishing, which is condemnation and ruin, will only be the making visible, in another condition of life, of what is the fact to-day. Dear brethren, you do not need to die in order to perish in your sins, and, blessed be G.o.d, you can have everlasting life before you die. You can have it now, and there is only one way to have it, and that is to lay hold of Him who is the Life. And when you have Jesus Christ in your heart, whom you will be sure to have if you trust Him, then you will have life--life eternal, here and now, and death will only make manifest the eternal life which you had while you were alive here, and will perfect it in fashions that we do not yet know anything about.
Only remember, as I have been trying to show you, the order that runs through this text. Remember the order of these last words, and that we must first of all be delivered from eternal and utter death, before we can be invested with the eternal and absolute life.
Now, dear brethren, I dare say I have never spoken to the great majority of you before; it is quite possible I may never speak to any of you again. I have asked G.o.d to help me to speak so as that souls should be drawn to the Saviour. And I beseech you now, as my last word, that you would listen, not to me, but to Him. For it is He that says to us, "G.o.d so loved the world, that He gave His Son, that whosoever"--"whosoever," a blank cheque, like the M. or N. of the Prayer-book, or the A. B. of a schedule; you can put your own name in it--"that whosoever believeth on Him shall not perish, but have"--here, now--"everlasting life."
THE WEARIED CHRIST
"Jesus therefore, being wearied with His journey, sat thus on the well.... He said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of."--JOHN iv. 6,32.
Two pictures result from these two verses, each striking in itself, and gaining additional emphasis by the contrast. It was during a long hot day"s march that the tired band of pedestrians turned into the fertile valley. There, whilst the disciples went into the little hill-village to purchase, if they could, some food from the despised inhabitants, Jesus, apparently too exhausted to accompany them, "sat _thus_ on the well." That little word _thus_ seems to have a force difficult to reproduce in English. It is apparently intended to enhance the idea of utter weariness, either because the word "wearied"
is in thought to be supplied, "sat, being thus wearied, on the well"; or because it conveys the notion which might be expressed by our "just as He was"; as a tired man flings Himself down anywhere and anyhow, without any kind of preparation beforehand, and not much caring where it is that he rests.
Thus, utterly worn out, Jesus Christ sits on the well, whilst the western sun lengthens out the shadows on the plain. The disciples come back, and what a change they find. Hunger gone, exhaustion ended, fresh vigour in their wearied Master. What had made the difference?
The woman"s repentance and joy. And He unveils the secret of His reinvigoration when He says, "I have meat to eat that ye know not of"--the hidden manna. "My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to finish His work."
Now, I think if we take just three points of view, we shall gain the lessons of this remarkable contrast. Note, then, the wearied Christ; the devoted Christ; the reinvigorated Christ.
I. The wearied Christ.
How precious it is to us that this Gospel, which has the loftiest things to say about the manifest divinity of our Lord, and the glory that dwelt in Him, is always careful to emphasise also the manifest limitations and weaknesses of the Manhood. John never forgets either term of his great sentence in which all the gospel is condensed, "the Word became flesh." Ever he shows us "the Word"; ever "the flesh."
Thus it is he only who records the saying on the Cross, "I thirst." It is he who tells us how Jesus Christ, not merely for the sake of getting a convenient opening of a conversation, or to conciliate prejudices, but because He needed what He asked, said to the woman of Samaria, "Give Me to drink." So the weariness of the Master stands forth for us as pathetic proof that it was no shadowy invest.i.ture with an apparent Manhood to which He stooped, but a real partic.i.p.ation in our limitations and weaknesses, so that work to Him was fatigue, even though in Him dwelt the manifest glory of that divine nature which "fainteth not, neither is weary."
Not only does this pathetic incident teach us for our firmer faith, and more sympathetic and closer apprehension, the reality of the Manhood of Jesus Christ, but it supplies likewise some imperfect measure of His love, and reveals to us one condition of His power. Ah!
if He had not Himself known weariness He never could have said, "Come unto Me, all ye that are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest." It was because Himself "took our infirmities," and amongst these the weakness of tired muscles and exhausted frame, that "He giveth power to the faint, and to them that have no might He increaseth strength." The Creator must have no share in the infirmities of the creature. It must be His unwearied power that calls them all by their names; and because He is great in might "not one" of the creatures of His hand can "fail." But the Redeemer must partic.i.p.ate in that from which He redeems; and the condition of His strength being "made perfect in our weakness" is that our weakness shall have cast a shadow upon the glory of His strength. The measure of His love is seen in that, long before Calvary, He entered into the humiliation and sufferings and sorrows of humanity; a condition of His power is seen in that, forasmuch as the "children were partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise took part of the same," not only that "through death He might deliver" from death, but that in life He might redeem from the ills and sorrows of life.
Nor does that exhausted Figure, reclining on Jacob"s Well, preach to us only what _He_ was. It proclaims to us likewise what _we_ should be. For if His work was carried on to the edge of His capacity, and if He shrank not from service because it involved toil, what about the professing followers of Jesus Christ, who think that they are exempted from any form of service because they can plead that it will weary them? What about those who say that they tread in His footsteps, and have never known what it was to yield up one comfort, one moment of leisure, one thrill of enjoyment, or to encounter one sacrifice, one act of self-denial, one aching of weariness for the sake of the Lord who bore all for them? The wearied Christ proclaims His manhood, proclaims His divinity and His love, and rebukes us who consent to "walk in the way of His commandments" only on condition that it can be done without dust or heat; and who are ready to run the race that is set before us, only if we can come to the goal without perspiration or turning a hair. "Jesus, being wearied with His journey, sat thus on the well."
II. Still further, notice here the devoted Christ.
It is not often that He lets us have a glimpse into the innermost chambers of His heart, in so far as the impelling motives of His course are concerned. But here He lays them bare. "My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to finish His work."
Now, it is no mere piece of grammatical pedantry when I ask you to notice that the language of the original is so constructed as to give prominence to the idea that the aim of Christ"s life was the doing of the Father"s will; and that it is the aim rather than the actual performance and realisation of the aim which is pointed at by our Lord. The words would be literally rendered "My meat is _that I may do_ the will of Him that sent Me and finish His work"--that is to say, the very nourishment and refreshment of Christ was found in making the accomplishment of the Father"s commandment His ever-impelling motive, His ever-pursued goal. The expression carries us into the inmost heart of Jesus, dealing, as it does, with the one all-pervading motive rather than with the resulting actions, fair and holy as these were.
Brethren, the secret of our lives, if they are at all to be worthy and n.o.ble, must be the same--the recognition, not only as they say now, that we have a mission, but that there _is_ a Sender; which is a wholly different view of our position, and that He who sends is the loving Father, who has spoken to us in that dear Son, who Himself made it His aim thus to obey, in order that it might be possible for us to re-echo His voice, and to repeat His aim. The recognition of the Sender, the absolute submission of our wills to His, must run through all the life. You may do your daily work, whatever it be, with this for its motto, "the will of the Lord be done"; and they who thus can look at their trade, or profession, and see the trivialities and monotonies of their daily occupations, in the transfiguring light of that great thought, will never need to complain that life is small, ign.o.ble, wearisome, insignificant. As with pebbles in some clear brook with the sunshine on it, the water in which they are sunk glorifies and magnifies them. If you lift them out, they are but bits of dull stone; lying beneath the sunlit ripples they are jewels. Plunge the prose of your life, and all its trivialities, into that great stream, and it will magnify and glorify the smallest and the homeliest.
Absolute submission to the divine will, and the ever-present thrilling consciousness of doing it, were the secret of Christ"s life, and ought to be the secret of ours.
Note the distinction between doing the will and perfecting the work.
That implies that Jesus Christ, like us, reached forward, in each successive act of obedience to the successive manifestations of the Father"s will, to something still undone. The work will never be perfected or finished except on condition of continual fulfilment, moment by moment, of the separate behests of that divine will. For the Lord, as for His servants, this was the manner of obedience, that He "pressed towards the mark," and by individual acts of conformity secured that at last the whole "work" should have been so completely accomplished that He might be able to say upon the Cross, "It is finished." If we have any right to call ourselves His, we too have thus to live.
III. Lastly, notice the reinvigorated Christ.
I have already pointed out the lovely contrast between the two pictures, the beginning and the end of this incident; so I need not dwell upon that. The disciples wondered when they found that Christ desired and needed none of the homely sustenance that they had brought to Him. And when He answered their sympathy rather than their curiosity--for they did not ask Him any questions, but they said to Him, "Master, eat"--with "I have meat to eat that ye know not of,"
they, in their blind, blundering fashion, could only imagine that some one had brought Him something. So they gave occasion for the great words upon which we have been touching.
Notice, however, that Christ here sets forth the lofty aim at conformity to the divine will and fulfilment of the divine Work as being the meat of the soul. It is the true food for us all. The spirit which feeds upon such food will grow and be nourished. And the soul which feeds upon its own will and fancies, and not upon the plain brown bread of obedience, which is wholesome, though it be often bitter, will feed upon ashes, which will grate upon the teeth and hurt the palate. Such a soul will be like those wretched infants that are discovered sometimes at "baby-farms," starved and stunted, and not grown to half their right size. If you would have your spirits strong, robust, well nourished, live by obedience, and let the will of G.o.d be the food of your souls, and all will be well.
Souls thus fed can do without a good deal that others need. Why, enthusiasm for anything lifts a man above physical necessities and lower desires, even in its poorest forms. A regiment of soldiers making a forced march, or an athlete trying to break the record, will tramp, tramp on, not needing food, or rest, or sleep, until they have achieved their purpose, poor and ign.o.ble though it may be. In all regions of life, enthusiasm and lofty aims make the soul lord of the body and of the world.
And in the Christian life we shall be thus lords, exactly in proportion to the depth and earnestness of our desires to do the will of G.o.d. They who thus are fed can afford "to scorn delights and live laborious days." They who thus are fed can afford to do with plain living, if there be high impulses as well as high thinking. And sure I am that nothing is more certain to stamp out the enthusiasm of obedience which ought to mark the Christian life than the luxurious fashion of living which is getting so common to-day amongst professing Christians.
It is not in vain that we read the old story about the Jewish boys whose faces were radiant and whose flesh was firmer when they were fed on pulse and water than on all the wine and dainties of the Babylonish court. "Set a knife to thy throat if thou be a man given to appet.i.te,"
and let us remember that the less we use, and the less we feel that we need, of outward goods, the nearer do we approach to the condition in which holy desires and lofty aims will visit our spirits.
I commend to you, brethren, the story of our text, in its most literal application, as well as in the loftier spiritual lessons that may be drawn from it. To be near Christ, and to desire to live for Him, delivers us from dependence upon earthly things; and in those who thus do live the old word shall be fulfilled, "Better is a little that a righteous man hath, than the abundance of many wicked."
"GIVE ME TO DRINK"
"... Jesus saith unto her, Give Me to drink.... Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am He."--JOHN iv. 7, 26.
This Evangelist very significantly sets side by side our Lord"s conversations with Nicodemus and with the woman of Samaria. The persons are very different: the one a learned Rabbi of reputation, influence, and large theological knowledge of the then fashionable kind; the other an alien woman, poor--for she had to do this menial task of water-drawing in the heat of the day--and of questionable character.
The diversity of persons necessitates great differences in the form of our Lord"s address to each; but the resemblances are as striking as the divergencies. In both we have His method of gradually unveiling the truth to a susceptible soul, beginning with symbol and a hint, gradually enlarging the hint and translating the symbol; and finally unveiling Himself as the Giver and the Gift. There is another resemblance; in both the characteristic gift is that of the Spirit of Life, and, perhaps, in both the symbol is the same. For we read in one of "water and the Spirit"; and in the other of the fountain within, springing into everlasting life. However that may be, the process of teaching is all but identical in substance in both cases, though in form so various.
The words of our Lord which I have taken for our text now are His first and last utterance in this conversation. What a gulf lies between! They are linked together by the intervening sayings, and const.i.tute with these a great ladder, of which the foot is fast on earth, and the top fixed in heaven. On the one hand, He owns the lowest necessities; on the other, He makes the highest claims. Let us ponder on this remarkable juxtaposition, and try to gather the lessons that are plain in it.
I. First, then, I think we see here the mystery of the dependent Christ.
"Give Me to drink": "I am He." Try to see the thing for a moment with the woman"s eyes. She comes down from her little village, up amongst the cliffs on the hillside, across the narrow, hot valley, beneath the sweltering sunshine reflected from the bounding mountains, and she finds, in the midst of the lush vegetation round the ancient well, a solitary, weary Jew, travel-worn, evidently exhausted--for His disciples had gone away to buy food, and He was too wearied to go with them--looking into the well, but having no dipper or vessel by which to get any of its cool treasure. We lose a great deal of the meaning of Christ"s request if we suppose that it was merely a way of getting into conversation with the woman, a "breaking of the ice." It was a great deal more than that. It was the utterance of a felt and painful necessity, which He Himself could not supply without a breach of what He conceived to be His filial dependence. He could have brought water out of the well. He did not need to depend upon the pitcher that the disciples had perhaps unthinkingly carried away with them when they went to buy bread. He did not need to ask the woman to give, but He chose to do so. We lose much if we do not see in this incident far more than the woman saw, but we lose still more if we do not see what she did see. And the words which the Master spoke to her are no mere way of introducing a conversation on religious themes; but He asked for a draught which He needed, and which He had no other way of getting.
So, then, here stands, pathetically set forth before us, our Lord"s true partic.i.p.ation in two of the distinguishing characteristics of our weak humanity--subjection to physical necessities and dependence on kindly help. We find Him weary, hungry, thirsty, sometimes slumbering.
And all these instances are doc.u.ments and proofs for us that He was a true man like ourselves, and that, like ourselves, He depended on "the woman that ministered to Him" for the supply of His necessities, and so knew the limitations of our social and else helpless humanity.