I. Note, first, the significance of the question.
"This." What is _this_? The answer will tell us what are the central essential facts, faith in which makes a Christian. Of course the form in which our Lord"s previous utterance was cast was coloured by the circ.u.mstances under which He spoke, and was so shaped as to meet the momentary exigency. But whilst thus the form is determined by the fact that He was speaking to a heart wrung by separation, and as a preliminary to a mighty act of resurrection, the essential truths which are so expressed are those which, as I believe, const.i.tute the fundamental truths of Christianity--the very core and heart of the Gospel.
Turn, then, but for a moment, to what immediately precedes my text.
Our Lord says three things. First, He a.s.serts His supernatural character and divine relation to life: "I am the Resurrection and the Life." Next, He declares that it is possible for Him to communicate to dying and to dead men a life which triumphs over death, and laughs at change, and persists through the superficial experience which we christen by the name of Death, unaffected, undiminished, as some sweet spring might gush up in the heart of a salt, solitary sea. And then He declares that the condition on which He, the Life-giver, gives of His immortal life to dying men, is their trust in Him. These three--His character and work, the gifts of which His hands are full, and the way by which the gifts may be appropriated by us men--these three are, as I take it, the central facts of Christianity. "Believest thou this?"
The question comes to us all; and in these days of unsettlement it is well to have some clear understanding of what is the "irreducible minimum" of Christian teaching. I take it that it lies here. There are two opposite errors which, like all opposite errors, are bolted together, and revolve round a common centre. The one of them is the extreme conservative tendency which regards every pin and bolt of the tabernacle as if it were equally sacred with the altar and the ark.
And the other is the tendency which christens itself "liberal and progressive," and which is always ready to exchange old lamps, though they have burnt brightly in the past, for new ones that are as yet only glittering metal and untried. In these days, when it is a presumption against any opinion, that our fathers believed it (an error into which young people are most p.r.o.ne to fall), and when, by the energy of contradiction, that error has evoked, and is evoking, the opposite exaggeration that adheres to all that is traditional, to all that has been regarded as belonging to the essentials of the Christian faith, and so is fearful, trembling for the Ark of G.o.d when there is no need, let us fall back upon these great words of the Master, and see that the things which const.i.tute the living heart of His message and gift to the world are neither more nor less than these three: the supernatural Christ, the life which He imparts, and the condition on which He bestows it. "Believest thou this?" If you do, you need take very little heed of the fluctuations of contemporary opinion as to other matters, valuable and important as these may be in their place; and may let men say what they will about disputed questions--about the method by which the vehicle of revelation has been created and preserved, about the regulation of the external forms of the Church, about a hundred other things that men often lose their tempers and spoil their Christianity by fighting for, and fall back upon the great central verity, a Christ from above, the Giver of Life to all that put their trust in Him.
Let me expand this question for you. "We all have sinned and come short of the glory of G.o.d"--"believest thou this?" "We must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ"--"believest thou this?" "G.o.d so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish"--"believest thou this?" "The Son of Man came... to give His life a ransom for many"--"believest thou this?" "Being justified by faith we have peace with G.o.d through our Lord Jesus Christ"--"believest thou this?" "Now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the first fruits of them that slept"--"believest thou this?" "I go to prepare a place for you"--"believest thou this?"
"Where I am there shall also My servant be"--"believest thou this?"
"So shall we ever be with the Lord"--"believest thou this?" That is Christianity; and not theories about inspiration, and priesthood, and sacramental efficacy, or any of the other th.o.r.n.y questions which have, in the course of ages, started up. Here is the living centre; hold fast, I beseech you, by it.
Then, again, the significance of this question is in the direction of making clear for us the way by which men lay hold of these great truths. The truths are of such a sort as that merely to say, "Oh yes, I believe it; it is quite true!" is by no means sufficient. If a man tells me that two parallel lines produced ever so far will never meet, I say, "Yes, I believe it"; and there is nothing more to be done or said. If a man says to me, "Two and two make four," I say, "Yes"; and there my a.s.sent ends. If a man says, "It is right to do right," it is quite clear that the att.i.tude of intellectual a.s.sent, which was quite enough for the other order of statements, is not enough for this one; and to merely say, "Oh yes, it is right to do right," is by no means the only att.i.tude which we ought to take in regard to such a truth.
And if G.o.d comes to me and says, "Thou art a sinful man, and Jesus Christ has died for thee; and if thou takest Him for thy Saviour thou shalt be saved in this life, and saved for ever," it is just as clear that no mere acceptance of the saying as a verity exhausts my proper att.i.tude in reference to it. Or to come to plainer words, no man will really, and out and out, and adequately, believe this gospel unless he does a great deal more than a.s.sent to it or refrain from contradicting it.
So I desire to urge this form of the question on you now. Dear brethren, do you _trust_ in "this," which you say you believe? There is no greater enemy of the Christian faith than the ordinary lazy--what the philosophers call _otiose_, which is only a grand word for lazy--a.s.sent of the understanding, because men will not take the trouble to contradict it or think about it.
That is the sort of Christianity which is the Christianity of a good many church and chapel-goers. They do not care enough about the subject to contradict the ordinary run of belief. Of all impotent things there is nothing more impotent than a creed which lies idly in a man"s head, and never has touched his heart or his will. Why, I should get on a great deal better if I were talking to people that had never heard anything about the gospel than I have any chance of getting on with you, who have been drenched with it all your days, till it goes over you and runs off like water off a duck"s back. The sh.e.l.ls that were hurled against the earthworks of Sebastopol broke away the front surface of the mounds, and then the rubbish protected the fortifications; and that is what happens with many of my hearers.
You have heard the gospel so often that the _debris_ of your old hearings is raised between you and me, and my words cannot get at you.
"Believest thou this?"--not in the fashion in which people stand up in church or chapel and look about them and rattle off the Creed every Sunday of their lives, and attach not the ghost of an idea to a single clause of it; but in the sense that the conviction of these truths is so deep in your hearts that it moves your whole nature to cast yourselves on Jesus Christ as your Saviour and your all. That is the belief to which alone the life that is promised here will come. Oh!
brethren, I have no business to ask you the question, and you have no need to answer it to me! Sometimes good, well-meaning people do a mint of harm by pushing such questions into the faces of people unprepared.
But take the question into your own hearts, and remember what belief is, and what it is that you have to believe, and answer according to its true significance, and in the light of conscience, the solemn question that I press upon you.
II. Now, secondly, let me ask you to think of what depends upon the answer.
In the case before us--if I may look back to it for an instant--there is a very illuminative instance of what did depend upon it. Martha had to believe that Christ was the Resurrection and the Life as a condition precedent to her seeing that He was so. For, as He said Himself before He spoke the mighty word which raised Lazarus, "Said I not unto thee that if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of G.o.d?" and so her faith was the condition of her being able to verify the facts which her faith grasped. Well, let me put that into plainer words. It is just this--a man gets from Christ what he trusts Christ to give him, and there is no other way of proving the truth of His promises than by accepting His promises, and then they fulfil themselves. You cannot know that a medicine will cure you till you swallow it. You must first "taste" before you "see that G.o.d is good."
Faith verifies itself by the experience it brings.
And what does it bring? I said, all for which a man trusts Christ. All is summed up in that one favourite word of our Lord as revealed in this fourth Gospel, which includes in itself everything of blessedness and of righteousness--life, life eternal. Dear brethren, you and I, apart from Jesus Christ, are dead in trespa.s.ses and sins. The life that we live in the flesh is an apparent life, which covers over the true death of separation from G.o.d. And you young people, fix this in your minds at the beginning, it will save you many a heartache, and many an error--there is nothing worth calling life, except that which comes to a quiet heart submissive and enfranchised through faith in Jesus Christ. And if you will trust yourselves to Him, and answer this question with your ringing "Yea, Lord!" then you will get a life which will quicken you out of your deadness; a life which will mould you day by day into more entire beauty of character and conformity with Himself; a life which will shed sweetness and charm over dusty commonplaces, and make sudden verdure spring in dreary, herbless deserts; a life which will bring a solemn joy into sorrow, a strength for every duty; which will bring manna in the wilderness, honey from the rock, light in darkness, and a present G.o.d for your sufficient portion; a life which will run on into the dim glories of eternity, and know no change but advancement, through the millenniums of ages.
But, dear brethren, whilst thus, on condition of their faith, the door into all divine and endless blessedness and progress is flung wide open for men, do not forget the other side of the issues which depend on this question. For if it is true that Jesus Christ is Life, and the Source of it, and that faith in Him is the way by which you and I get it, then there is no escape from the solemn conclusion that to be out of Christ, and not to be exercising faith in Him, is to be infected with death, and to be shut up in a charnel-house. I dare not suppress the plain teaching of Jesus Christ Himself: "He that hath the Son hath life; he that hath not the Son hath not life." The issues that depend upon the answer to this question of my text may be summed up, if I may venture to say so, by taking the words of our Lord Himself and converting them into their opposite. He said, "He that believeth ...
though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth on Me shall never die." That implies, He that believeth _not_ in Christ, though he were living, yet shall he die, and whosoever liveth and believeth _not_ shall never live. _These_ are the issues--the alternative issues--that depend on your answer to this question.
III. And now, lastly, let me ask you to think of the direct personal appeal to every soul that lies in this question.
I have dwelt upon two out of the three words of which the question is composed--"_believest_ thou _this_?" Let me dwell for a moment on the third of them--"believest _thou_?"
Now that suggests the thought on which I do not need to dwell, but which I seek briefly to lay upon your hearts and consciences--viz., the intensely personal act of your own faith, by which alone Jesus Christ can be of any use to you. Do not be led away by any vague notions which people have about the benefits of a Church or its ordinances. Do not suppose that any sacraments or any priest can do for you what you have to do in the awful solitude of your own determining will--put out your hand and grasp Jesus Christ. Can any person or thing be the condition or channel of spiritual blessing to you, except in so far as your own individual act of trust comes into play? You must take the bread with your own hands, you must masticate it with your own teeth, you must digest it with your own organs, before it can minister nourishment to your blood and force to your life. And there is only one way by which any man can come into any vital and life-giving connection with Jesus Christ, and that is, by the exercise of his own personal faith.
And remember, too, that as the exercise of uniting trust in Jesus Christ is exclusively your own affair, so exclusively your own affair is the responsibility of answering this question. To you alone is it addressed. You, and only you, have to answer it.
There was once a poor woman who went after Jesus Christ, and put out a pale, wasted, tremulous finger to touch the hem of His garment. His fine sensitiveness detected the light pressure of that pet.i.tioning finger, and allowed virtue to go out, though the crowd surged about Him and thronged Him. No crowds come between you and Jesus Christ. You and He, the two of you, have, so to speak, the world to yourselves, and straight to _you_ comes this question, "Believest _thou_?"
Ah! brethren, that habit of skulking into the middle of the mult.i.tude, and letting the most earnest appeal from the pulpit go diffused over the audience is the reason why you sit there quiet, complacent, perhaps wholly unaffected by what I am trying to make a pointed, individual address. Suppose all the other people in this place of worship were away but you and I, would not the word that I am trying to speak come with more force to your hearts than it does now? Well, think away the world and all its millions, and realise the fact that you stand in Christ"s presence, with all His regard concentrated upon you, and that to thee individually this question comes from a gracious, loving heart, which longs that you answer, "Yea, Lord, I believe!"
Why should you not? Suppose you said to Him, "No, Lord, I do not"; and suppose He said, "Why do you not?" what do you think you would say then? You will have to answer it one day, in very solemn circ.u.mstances, when all the crowds will fall away, as they do from a soldier called out of the ranks to go up and answer for mutiny to his commanding officer. "Every one of us shall give an account of himself," and the lips that said so lovingly at the grave of Lazarus, "Believest thou this?" and are saying it again, dear friend, to you, even through my poor words, will ask it once more. For this is the question the answer to which settles whether we shall stand at His right hand or at His left. Say now, with humble faith, "Yea, Lord!"
and you will have the blessing of them who have not seen, and yet have believed.
THE OPEN GRAVE AT BETHANY
"Now Jesus was not yet come into the town, but was in that place where Martha met Him. The Jews then which were with her in the house, and comforted her, when they saw Mary, that she rose up hastily and went out, followed her, saying, She goeth unto the grave to weep there.
Then when Mary was come where Jesus was, and saw Him, she fell down at His feet, saying unto Him, Lord, if Thou hadst been here, my brother had not died. When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews also weeping which came with her, He groaned in the spirit, and was troubled, And said, Where have ye laid him? They say unto Him, Lord, come and see. Jesus wept. Then said the Jews, Behold how He loved him!
And some of them said. Could not this Man, which opened the eyes of the blind, have caused that even this man should not have died! Jesus therefore again groaning in Himself, cometh to the grave. It was a cave, and a stone lay upon it. Jesus said, Take ye away the stone.
Martha, the sister of him that was dead, saith unto Him, Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of G.o.d? Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid. And Jesus lifted up His eyes, and said, Father, I thank Thee that Thou hast heard Me. And I know that Thou hearest Me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that Thou hast sent Me. And when He thus had spoken, He cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go. Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on Him."--JOHN xi. 30-45.
Why did Jesus stay outside Bethany and summon Martha and Mary to come to Him? Apparently that He might keep Himself apart from the noisy crowd of conventional mourners whose presence affronted the majesty and sanct.i.ty of sorrow, and that He might speak to the hearts of the two real mourners. A divine decorum forbade Him to go to the house.
The Life-bringer keeps apart. His comforts are spoken in solitude. He reverenced grief. How beautifully His sympathetic delicacy contrasts with the heartless rush of those who "were comforting" Mary when they thought that she was driven to go suddenly to the grave by a fresh burst of sorrow! If they had had any real sympathy or perception, they would have stayed where they were, and let the poor burdened heart find ease in lonely weeping. But, like all vulgar souls, they had one idea--never to leave mourners alone or let them weep.
Three stages seem discernible in the self-revelation of Jesus in this crowning miracle: His agitation and tears, His majestic confidence in His life-giving power now to be manifested, and His actual exercise of that power.
I. The repet.i.tion by Mary of Martha"s words, as her first salutation, tells a pathetic story of the one thought that had filled both sisters" hearts in these four dreary days. Why had He not come? How easily He could have come! How surely He could have prevented all this misery! Confidence in His power blends strangely with doubt as to His care. A hint of reproach is in the words, but more than a hint of faith in His might. He does not rebuke the rash judgment implied, for He knew the true love underlying it; but He does not directly answer Mary, as He had done Martha, for the two sisters needed different treatment.
We note that Mary has no such hope as Martha had expressed. Her more pa.s.sive, meditative disposition had bowed itself, and let the grief overwhelm her. So in her we see a specimen of the excess of sorrow which indulges in the monotonous repet.i.tion of what would have happened if something else that did not happen had happened, and which is too deeply dark to let a gleam of hope shine in. Words will do little to comfort such grief. Silent sharing of its weeping and helpful deeds will do most.
So a great wave of emotion swept across the usually calm soul of Jesus, which John bids us trace to its cause by "therefore" (ver. 33).
The sight of Mary"s real, and the mourners" half-real, tears, and the sound of their loud "keening," shook His spirit, and He yielded to, and even encouraged, the rush of feeling ("troubled Himself"). But not only sympathy and sorrow ruffled the clear mirror of His spirit; another disturbing element was present. He "was moved with indignation" (Rev. Ver. marg.). Anger at Providence often mingles with our grief, but that was not Christ"s indignation. The only worthy explanation of that strange ingredient in Christ"s agitation is that it was directed against the source of death,--namely, sin. He saw the cause manifested in the effects. He wept for the one, He was wroth at the other. The tears witnessed to the perfect love of the man, and of the G.o.d revealed in the man; the indignation witnessed to the recoil and aversion from sin of the perfectly righteous Man, and of the holy G.o.d manifested in Him. We get one glimpse into His heart, as on to some ocean heaving and mist-covered. The momentary sight proclaims the union in Him, as the Incarnate Word, of pity for our woes and of aversion from our sins.
His question as to the place of the tomb is not what we should have expected; but its very abruptness indicates effort to suppress emotion, and resolve to lose no time in redressing the grief. Most sweetly human are the tears that start afresh after the moment"s repression, as the little company begin to move towards the grave. And most sadly human are the unsympathetic criticisms of His sacred sorrow. Even the best affected of the bystanders are cool enough to note them as tokens of His love, at which perhaps there is a trace of wonder; while others snarl out a sarcasm which is double-barrelled, as casting doubt on the reality either of the love or of the power. "It is easy to weep, but if He had cared for him, and could work miracles, He might surely have kept him alive." How blind men are! "Jesus wept,"
and all that the lookers-on felt was astonishment that He should have cared so much for a dead man of no importance, or carping doubt as to the genuineness of His grief and the reality of His power. He shows us His pity and sorrow still--to no more effect with many.
II. The pa.s.sage to the tomb was marked by his continued agitation. But his arrival there brought calm and majesty. Now the time has come which He had in view when He left his refuge beyond Jordan; and, as is often the case with ourselves, suddenly tremor and tumult leave the spirit when face to face with a moment of crisis. There is nothing more remarkable in this narrative than the contrast between Jesus weeping and indignant, and Jesus serene and authoritative as He stands fronting the cave-sepulchre. The sudden transformation must have awed the gazers.
He points to the stone, which, probably like that of many a grave discovered in Palestine, rolled in a groove cut in the rocky floor in front of the tomb. The command accords with His continual habit of confining the miraculous within the narrowest limits. He will do nothing by miracle which can be done without it. Lazarus could have heard and emerged, though the stone had remained. If the story had been a myth, he very likely would have done so. Like "loose him, and let him go," this is a little touch that cannot have been invented, and helps to confirm the simple, historical character of the account.
Not less natural, though certainly as unlikely to have been told unless it had happened, is Martha"s interruption. She must have heard what was going on, and, with her usual activity, have joined the procession, though we left her in the house. She thinks that Jesus is going into the grave; and a certain reverence for the poor remains, as well as for Him, makes her shrink from the thought of even His loving eyes seeing them now. Clearly she has forgotten the dim hopes which had begun in her when she talked with Jesus. Therefore He gently reminds her of these; for His words (ver. 40) can scarcely refer to anything but that interview, though the precise form of expression now used is not found in the report of it (vers. 25-27).
We mark Christ"s calm confidence in His own power. His identification of its effect with the outflashing of the glory of G.o.d, and His encouragement to her to exercise faith by suspending her sight of that glory upon her faith. Does that mean that He would not raise her brother unless she believed? No; for He had determined to "awake him out of sleep" before He left Peraea. But Martha"s faith was the condition of her seeing the glory of G.o.d in the miracle. We may see a thousand emanations of that glory, and see none of it. We shall see it if we exercise faith. In the natural world, "seeing is believing"; in the spiritual, believing is seeing.
Equally remarkable, as breathing serenest confidence, is the wonderful filial prayer. Our Lord speaks as if the miracle were already accomplished, so sure is He: "Thou heardest Me." Does this thanksgiving bring Him down to the level of other servants of G.o.d who have wrought miracles by divine power granted them? Certainly not; for it is in full accord with the teaching of all this Gospel, according to which "the Son can do nothing of Himself," but yet, whatsoever things the Father doeth, "these also doeth the Son likewise." Both sides of the truth must be kept in view. The Son is not independent of the Father, but the Son is so constantly and perfectly one with the Father that He is conscious of unbroken communion, of continual wielding of the whole divine power.
But the practical purpose of the thanksgiving is to be specially noted. It suspends His whole claims on the single issue about to be decided. It summons the people to mark the event. Never before had He thus heralded a miracle. Never had He deigned to say thus solemnly, "If G.o.d does not work through Me now, reject Me as an impostor; if He does, yield to Me as Messiah." The moment stands alone in His life.
What a scene! There is the open tomb, with its dead occupant; there are the eager, sceptical crowd, the sisters pausing in their weeping to gaze, with some strange hopes beginning to creep into their hearts, the silent disciples, and, in front of them all, Jesus, with the radiance of power in the eyes that had just been swimming in tears, and a new elevation in His tones. How all would be hushed in expectance of the next moment"s act!
III. The miracle itself is told in the fewest words. What more was there to tell? The two ends, as it were, of a buried chain, appear above ground. Cause and effect were brought together. Rather, here was no chain of many links, as in physical phenomena, but here was the life-giving word, and there was the dead man living again. The "loud voice" was as needless as the rolling away of the stone. It was but the sign of Christ"s will acting. And the acting of His will, without any other cause, produces physical effects.
Lazarus was far away from that rock cave. But, wherever he was, he could hear, and he must obey. So, with graveclothes entangling his feet, and a napkin about his livid face, he came stumbling out into the light that dazed his eyes, closed for four dark days, and stood silent and motionless in that awestruck crowd. One Person there was not awestruck. Christ"s calm voice, that had just reverberated through the regions of the dead, spoke the simple command, "Loose him, and let him go." To Him it was no wonder that He should give back a life. For the Christ who wept is the Christ whose voice all that are in the graves shall hear, and shall come forth.
THE SEVENTH MIRACLE IN JOHN"S GOSPEL--THE RAISING OF LAZARUS
"And when Jesus thus had spoken, He cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, Come forth. 44. And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with grave-clothes; and his face was bound about with a napkin."--JOHN xi. 43, 44.