THE RICH FOOL
"And one of the company said unto Him, Master, speak to my brother, that he divide the inheritance with me.
14. And He said unto him, Man, who made Me a judge or a divider over you? 15. And He said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man"s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth. 16. And He spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: 17. And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits! 18. And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. 19. And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.
20. But G.o.d said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided! 21. So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward G.o.d. 22. And He said unto his disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.
23. The life is more than meat, and the body is more than raiment"--LUKE xii. 13-23.
What a gulf between the thoughts of Jesus and those of this unmannerly interrupter! Our Lord had been speaking solemnly as to confessing Him before men, the divine help to be given, and the blessed reward to follow, and this hearer had all the while been thinking only of the share in his father"s inheritance, out of which he considered that his brother had cheated him. Such indifference must have struck a chill into Christ"s heart, and how keenly he felt it is traceable in the curt and stern brushing aside of the man"s request. The very form of addressing him puts him at a distance. "Man" is about as frigid as can be. Our Lord knew the discouragement of seeing that His words never came near some of His hearers, and had no power to turn their thoughts even for a minute from low objects. "What do I care about being confessed before the angels, or about the Holy Spirit to teach me? What I want is my share of the paternal acres. A rabbi who will help me to these is the rabbi for me." John Bunyan"s "man with the muck-rake" had his eyes so glued to the ground and the muck that he did not see the crown hanging above him. How many of us find the sermon time a good opportunity for thinking about investments and business!
Christ"s answer is intentionally abrupt and short. It deals with part only of the man"s error, the rest of which, being an error to which we are all exposed, and which was the root of the part special to him, is dealt with in the parable that follows. Because the man was covetous, he could see in Jesus nothing more than a rabbi who might influence his brother. Our sense of want largely shapes our conception of Christ. Many to-day see in Him mainly a social (and economical) reformer, because our notion of what we and the world need most is something to set social conditions right, and so to secure earthly well-being. They who take Jesus to be first and foremost "a judge or a divider" fail to see His deepest work or their own deepest need. He will be all that they wish Him to be, if they will take Him for something else first. He will "bid" men "divide the inheritance" with their brethren after men have gone to Him for salvation.
But covetousness, or the greedy clutching at more and more of earthly good, has its roots in us all, and unless there is the most a.s.siduous weeding, it will overrun our whole nature. So Jesus puts great emphasis into the command, "Take heed, and keep yourselves,"
which implies that without much "heed" and diligent inspection of ourselves (for the original word is "see"), there will be no guarding against the subtle entrance and swift growth of the vice.
We may be enslaved by it, and never suspect that we are. Further, the correct reading is "from _all_ covetousness," for it has many shapes, besides the grossest one of greed for money. The reason for the exhortation is somewhat obscure in construction, but plain in its general meaning, and sufficiently represented by the Authorised and Revised Versions. The Revised Version margin gives the literal translation, "Not in a man"s abundance consisteth his life, from the things which he possesseth," on which we may note that the second clause is obviously to be completed from the first, and that the difference between the two seems to lie mainly in the difference of prepositions, "from" or "out of in the second clause standing instead of "in" in the first, while there may be also a distinction between "abundance" and "possessions" the former being a superfluous amount of the latter. The whole will then mean that life does not _consist in_ possessions, however abundant, nor does it _come out of_ anything that simply belongs to us in outward fashion. Not what we possess, but what we are, is the important matter.
But what does "life" mean? The parable shows that we cannot leave out the notion of physical life. No possessions keep a man alive.
Death knocks at palaces and poor men"s hovels. Millionaires and paupers are huddled together in his net. But we must not leave out the higher meaning of life, for it is eminently true that the real life of a man has little relation to what he possesses. Neither n.o.bleness nor peace nor satisfaction, nor anything in which man lives a n.o.bler life than a dog, has much dependence on property of any sort. Wealth often chokes the channels by which true life would flow into us. "We live by admiration, hope, and love," and these may be ours abundantly, whatever our portion of earth"s riches.
Covetousness is folly, because it grasps at worldly good, under the false belief that thereby it will secure the true good of life, but when it has made its pile, it finds that it is no nearer peace of heart, rest, n.o.bleness, or joy than before, and has probably lost much of both in the process of making it. The mad race after wealth, which is the sin of this luxurious, greedy, commercial age, is the consequence of a lie--that life does consist in the abundance of possessions. It consists in knowing "Thee the only true G.o.d, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent." Is there any saying of Jesus Christ"s more revolutionary, or less believed by His professed followers, than this?
The story of the rich fool is not a parable in the narrower meaning of that word--that is, a description of some event or thing in the natural sphere, transferred by a.n.a.logy to the spiritual--but an imaginary narrative exemplifying in a concrete instance the characteristics of the cla.s.s of covetous men. The first point noted is that acc.u.mulated wealth breeds anxiety rather than satisfaction.
The man is embarra.s.sed by his abundance. The trouble of knowing how to keep it is as great as the labour of acquiring it, and the enjoyment of it is still in the future. Many a rich man is more worried about his securities than he was in making his money. There are so many "bags with holes" that he is at his wits" end for investments, and the first thing he looks at in his morning"s paper is the share list, the sight of which often spoils his breakfast.
The next point is the selfish and arrogant sense of possession, as betrayed by the repet.i.tion of "my"--my fruits, my barns, my corn, and my goods. He has no thought of G.o.d, nor of his own stewardship.
He recognises no claim on his wealth. If he had looked a little beyond himself, he would have seen many places where he could have bestowed his fruits. Were there no poor at his gates? He had better have poured some riches into the laps of these than have built a new barn. Corn laid up would breed weevils; dispersed, it would bring blessings.
Again, this type of covetous men is a fool because he reckons on "many years." The goods may last, but will he? He can make sure that they will suffice for a long time, but he cannot make sure of the long time. Again, he blunders tragically in his estimate of the power of worldly goods to satisfy. "Eat, drink," might be said to his body, but to say it to his soul, and to fancy that these pleasures of sense would put it at ease, is the fatal error which gnaws like a worm at the root of every worldly life. The word here rendered "take thine ease" is cognate with Christ"s in His great promise, "Ye shall find rest unto your souls." Not in abundance of worldly goods, but in union with Him, is that rest to be found which the covetous man vainly promises himself in filled barns and luxurious idleness.
There is a grim contrast between what the rich man said and what G.o.d said. The man"s words were empty breath; G.o.d"s are powers, and what He says is a deed. The divine decree comes crashing into the abortive human plans like a thunder-clap into a wood full of singing birds, and they are all stricken silent. So little does life consist in possessions that all the abundance cannot keep the breath in a man for one moment. His life is "required of him," not only in the sense that he has to give it up, but also inasmuch as he has to answer for it. In that requirement the selfishly used wealth will be "a swift witness against" him, and instead of ministering to life or ease, will "eat his flesh as fire." Molten gold dropping on flesh burns badly. Wealth, trusted in and selfishly clutched, without recognition of G.o.d the giver or of others" claims to share it, will burn still worse.
The "parable" is declared to be of universal application. Examples of it are found wherever there are men who selfishly lay up treasures for their own delectation, and "are not rich toward G.o.d."
That expression is best understood in this connection to mean, not rich in spiritual wealth, but in worldly goods used with reference to G.o.d, or for His glory and service. So understood, the two phrases, laying up treasure for oneself and being rich towards G.o.d, are in full ant.i.thesis.
ANXIOUS ABOUT EARTH, OR EARNEST ABOUT THE KINGDOM
"And He said unto His disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on. 23. The life is more than meat, and the body is more than raiment. 24. Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and G.o.d feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls? 25. And which of you with taking thought can add to his stature one cubit? 26. If ye then be not able to do that thing which is least, why take ye thought for the rest? 27. Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 28. If then G.o.d so clothe the gra.s.s, which is to-day in the field, and to-morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will He clothe you, O ye of little faith! 29. And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.
30. For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things. 31. But rather seek ye the kingdom of G.o.d; and all these things shall he added unto you."
--LUKE xii. 22-31.
The parable of the rich fool was spoken to the mult.i.tude, but our Lord now addresses the disciples. "Therefore" connects the following with the foregoing teachings. The warnings against anxiety are another application of the prohibition of laying up treasure for self. Torturing care is the poor man"s form of worldliness, as luxurious self-indulgence is the rich man"s. There are two kinds of gout, as doctors tell us--one from high living, and one from poverty of blood. This pa.s.sage falls into two parts--the prohibition against anxious care (vs. 22-31), and the exhortation to set the affections on the true treasure (vs. 31-34).
I. The first part gives the condemnation of anxiety about earthly necessities. The precept is first stated generally, and then followed by a series of reasons enforcing it. As to the precept, we may remark that the disciples were mostly poor men, who might think that they were in no danger of the folly branded in the parable.
They had no barns bursting with plenty, and their concern was how to find food and clothing, not what to do with superfluities. Christ would have them see that the same temper may be in them, though it takes a different shape. Dives and Lazarus may be precisely alike.
The temper condemned here is "self-consuming care," the opposite of trust. Its misery is forcibly expressed by the original meaning of the Greek word, which implies being torn in pieces, and thus paints the distraction and self-inflicted harra.s.sment which are the lot of the anxious mind. Prudent foresight and strenuous work are equally outside this prohibition. Anxiety is so little akin to foresight that it disables from exercising it, and both hinders from seeing what to do to provide daily bread, and from doing it.
The disciples" danger of being thus anxious may be measured by the number and variety of reasons against it given by Jesus. The first of these is that such anxiety does not go deep enough, and forgets how we come to have lives to be fed and bodies to be clothed. We have received the greater, life and body, without our anxiety. The rich fool could keep his goods, but not his "soul" or "life." How superficial, then, after all, our anxieties are, when G.o.d may end life at any moment! Further, since the greater is given, the less which it needs will also be given. The thought of G.o.d as "a faithful creator" is implied. We must trust Him for the "more"; we may trust Him for the less.
The second reason bids us look with attention at examples of unanxious lives abundantly fed. Perhaps Elijah"s feathered providers, or the words of the Psalmist (Ps. cxlvii. 9), were in Christ"s mind. The raven was one of the "unclean" birds, and of ill omen, from Noah"s days, and yet had its meat in due season, though that meat was corpses. Notice the allusions to the preceding parable in "sow not, neither reap," and in "neither have storehouse nor barn." In these particulars the birds are inferior to us, and, so to speak, the harder to care for. If they who neither work nor store still get their living, shall not we, who can do both? Our superior value is in part expressed by the capacity to sow and reap; and these are more wholesome occupations for a man than worrying.
How lovingly Jesus looked on all creatures, and how clearly He saw everywhere G.o.d"s hand at work! As Luther said, "G.o.d spends every year in feeding sparrows more than the revenues of the King of France."
The third reason is the impotence of anxiety (ver. 25). It is difficult to decide between the two possible renderings here. That of "a cubit" to the "stature" corresponds best with the growth of the lilies, while "age" preserves an allusion to the rich fool, and avoids treating the addition of a foot and a half to an ordinary man"s height as a small thing. But age is not measured by cubits, and it is best to keep to "stature."
At first sight, the argument of verse 23 seems to be now inverted, and what was "more" to be now "least." But the supposed addition, if possible, would be of the smallest importance as regards ensuring food or clothing, and measured by the divine power required to effect it, is less than the continual providing which G.o.d does. That smaller work of His, no anxiety will enable us to do. How much less can we effect the complicated and wide-reaching arrangements needed to feed and clothe ourselves! Anxiety is impotent. It only works on our own minds, racking them in vain, but has no effect on the material world, not even on our own bodies, still less on the universe.
The fourth reason bids us look with attention at examples of unanxious existence clothed with beauty. Christ here teaches the highest use of nature, and the n.o.blest way of looking at it. The scientific botanist considers how the lilies grow, and can tell all about cells and chlorophyll and the like. The poet is in raptures with their beauty. Both teach us much, but the religious way of looking at nature includes and transcends both the others. Nature is a parable. It is a visible manifestation of G.o.d, and His ways there shadow His ways with us, and are lessons in trust.
The glorious colours of the lily come from no dyer"s vats, nor the marvellous texture of their petals from any loom. They are inferior to us in that they do not toil or spin, and in their short blossoming time. Man"s "days are as gra.s.s; as a flower of the field so he flourisheth"; but his date is longer, and therefore he has a larger claim on G.o.d. "G.o.d clothes the gra.s.s of the field" is a truth quite independent of scientific truths or hypotheses about how He does it. If the colours of flowers depend on the visits of insects, G.o.d established the dependence, and is the real cause of the resulting loveliness.
The most modern theories of the evolutionist do not in the least diminish the force of Christ"s appeal to creation"s witness to a loving Care in the heavens. But that appeal teaches us that we miss the best and plainest lesson of nature, unless we see G.o.d present and working in it all, and are thereby heartened to trust quietly in His care for us, who are better than the ravens because we have to sow and reap, or than the lilies because we must toil and spin.
Verse 29 adds to the reference to clothing a repeated prohibition as to the other half of our anxieties, and thus rounds off the whole with the same double warning as in verse 22. But it gives a striking metaphor in the new command against "being of doubtful mind." The word so rendered means to be lifted on high, and thence to be tossed from height to depth, as a ship in a storm. So it paints the wretchedness of anxiety as ever shuttlec.o.c.ked about between hopes and fears, sometimes up on the crest of a vain dream of good, sometimes down in the trough of an imaginary evil. We are sure to be thus the sport of our own fancies, unless we have our minds fixed on G.o.d in quiet trust, and therefore stable and restful.
Verse 30 gives yet another reason against not only anxiety, but against that eager desire after outward things which is the parent of anxiety. If we "seek after" them, we shall not be able to avoid being anxious and of doubtful mind. Such seeking, says Christ, is pure heathenism. The nations of the world who know not G.o.d make these their chief good, and securing them the aim of their lives. If we do the like, we drop to their level. What is the difference between a heathen and a Christian, if the Christian has the same objects and treasures as the heathen? That is a question which a good many so-called Christians at present would find it hard to answer.
But the crowning reason of all is kept for the last. Much of what precedes might be spoken by a man who had but the coldest belief in Providence. But the great and blessed faith in our Father, G.o.d, scatters all anxious care. How should we be anxious if we know that we have a Father in heaven, and that He knows our needs? He recognises our claims on Him. He made the needs, and will send the supply. That is a wide truth, stretching far beyond the mere earthly wants of food and raiment. My wants, so far as G.o.d has made me to feel them, are prophecies of G.o.d"s gifts. He has made them as doors by which He will come in and bless me. How, then, can anxious care fret the heart which feels the Father"s presence, and knows that its emptiness is the occasion for the gift of a divine fullness? Trust is the only reasonable temper for a child of such a father. Anxious care is a denial of His love or knowledge or power.
II. Verses 31-34 point out the true direction of effort and affection, and the true way of using outward good so as to secure the higher riches. It is useless to tell men not to set their longings or efforts on worldly things unless you tell them of something better. Life must have some aim, and the mind must turn to something as supremely good. The only way to drive out heathenish seeking after perishable good is to fill the heart with the love and longing for eternal and spiritual good. The ejected demon comes back with a troop at his heels unless his house be filled. To seek "the kingdom," to count it our highest good to have our wills and whole being bowed in submission to the loving will of G.o.d, to labour after entire conformity to it, to postpone all earthly delights to that, and to count them all but loss if we may win it--this is the true way to conquer worldly anxieties, and is the only course of life which will not at last earn the stern judgment, "Thou fool."
That direction of all our desires and energies to the attainment of the kingdom which is the state of being ruled by the will of G.o.d, is to be accompanied with joyous, brave confidence. How should they fear whose desires and efforts run parallel with the "Father"s good pleasure"? They are seeking as their chief good what He desires, as His chief delight, to give them. Then they may be sure that, if He gives that, He will not withhold less gifts than may be needed. He will not "spoil the ship for a ha"p"orth of tar," nor allow His children, whom He has made heirs of a kingdom, to starve on their road to their crown. If they can trust Him to give them the kingdom, they may surely trust Him for bread and clothes.
Mark, too, the tenderness of that "little flock." They might fear when they contrasted their numbers with the crowds of worldly men; but, being a flock, they have a shepherd, and that is enough to quiet anxiety.
Seeking and courage are to be crowned by surrender of outward good and the use of earthly wealth in such manner as that it will secure an unfailing treasure in heaven. The manner of obeying this command varies with circ.u.mstances. For some the literal fulfilment is best; and there are more Christian men to-day whose souls would be delivered from the snares if they would part with their possessions than we are willing to believe.
Sometimes the surrender is rather to be effected by the conscientious consecration and prayerful use of wealth. That is for each man to settle for himself. But what is not variable is the obligation to set the kingdom high above all else, and to use all outward wealth, as Christ"s servants, not for luxury and self-gratification, but as in His sight and for His glory. Let us not be afraid of believing what Jesus and His Apostles plainly teach, that wealth so spent here is treasured in heaven, and that a Christian"s place in the future life depends upon this among other conditions--how he used his money here.
STILLNESS IN STORM
"... Neither be ye of doubtful mind."--LUKE xii. 29.
I think that these words convey no very definite idea to most readers. The thing forbidden is not very sharply defined by the expression which our translators have employed, but the original term is very picturesque and precise.
The word originally means "to be elevated, to be raised as a meteor," and comes by degrees to mean to be raised in one special way--namely, as a boat is tossed by a tough sea. So there is a picture in this prohibition which the fishermen and folk dwelling by the Sea of Galilee with its sudden squalls would understand: "Be not pitched about"; now on the crest, now in the trough of the wave.
The meaning, then, is substantially identical with that of the previous words, "Take no thought for your life," with this difference, that the figures by which the thing prohibited is expressed are different, and that the latter saying is wider than the former.
The former prohibits "taking thought," by which our Lord of course means not reasonable foresight, but anxious foreboding. And the word which He uses, meaning at bottom as it does, "to be distracted or rent asunder," conveys a striking picture of the wretched state to which such anxiety brings a man. Nothing tears us to pieces like foreboding care. Then our text forbids the same anxiety, as well as other fluctuations of feeling that come from setting our hopes and hearts on aught which can change; and its figurative representation of the misery that follows on fastening ourselves to the perishable, is that of the poor little skiff, at one moment high on the crest of the billow, at the next down in the trough of the sea.