"Were not _the_ ten"--all of them, the ten who stood there but a minute since--"cleansed? but where are the nine?" Gone off with their gift, and with no spark of thankfulness in their selfish hearts. "Were there none found that returned to give glory to G.o.d, save this stranger?" The numbers of the thankless far surpa.s.s those of the thankful. The fewness of the latter surprises and saddens Jesus still. Even a dog knows and will lick the hand that feeds it, but "Israel doth not know, My people doth not consider." We increase the sweetness of our gifts by thankfulness for them. We taste them twice when we ruminate on them in grat.i.tude. They live after their death when we bless G.o.d and thank Jesus for them all. We impoverish ourselves still more than we dishonour Him by the ingrat.i.tude which is so crying a fault. One sorrow hides many joys. A single crumpled rose-leaf made the fairy princess"s bed uncomfortable. Some of us can see no blue in our sky if one small cloud is there. Both in regard to earthly and spiritual blessings we are all sinners by unthankfulness, and we all lose much thereby.
Jesus rejoiced over "this stranger," and gave him a greater gift at last than he had received when the leprosy was cleared from his flesh. Christ"s raising of him up, and sending him on his way to resume his interrupted journey to the priest, was but a prelude to "Thy faith hath made thee whole," or, as the Revised Version margin reads, "saved thee." Surely we may take that word in its deepest meaning, and believe that a more fatal leprosy melted out of this man"s spirit, and that the faith which had begun in a confidence that Jesus could heal, and had been increased by obedience to the command which tried it, and had become more awed and enlightened by experience of bodily healing, and been deepened by finding a tongue to express itself in thankfulness, rose at last to such apprehension of Jesus, and such clinging to Him in grateful love, as availed to save "this stranger" with a salvation that healed his spirit, and was perfected when the once leprous body was left behind, to crumble into dust.
THREE KINDS OP PRAYING
"And He spake a parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint; 2. Saying, There was in a city a judge, which feared not G.o.d, neither regarded man: 3. And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary. 4. And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not G.o.d, nor regard man; 5. Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me. 6. And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith. 7. And shall not G.o.d avenge His own elect, which cry day and night unto Him, though He bear long with them! 8. I tell you that He will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?
9. And He spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others: 10. Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
11. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, G.o.d, I thank thee, that I am not as Other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 11. I fast twice in the week, I give t.i.thes of all that I possess. 13. And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, G.o.d be merciful to me a sinner. 14. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted."
--LUKE xviii. 1-14.
The two parables in this pa.s.sage are each prefaced by Luke"s explanation of their purpose. They are also connected by being both concerned with aspects of prayer. But the second was apparently not spoken at the same time as the first, but is put here by Luke as in an appropriate place.
I. The wearisome widow and the unrighteous judge. The similarities and dissimilarities between this parable and that in chapter xi. 5-8 are equally instructive. Both take a very unlovely character as open to the influence of persistent entreaty; both strongly underscore the unworthiness and selfishness of the motive for yielding. Both expect the hearers to use common-sense enough to take the sleepy friend and the worried judge as contrasts to, not parables, of Him to whom Christians pray. But the judge is a much worse man than the owner of the loaves, and his denial of the justice which it was his office to dispense is a crime; the widow"s need is greater than the man"s, and the judge"s cynical soliloquy, in its unabashed avowal of caring for neither G.o.d nor man, and being guided only by regard to comfort, touches a deep depth of selfishness. The worse he was, the more emphatic is the exhortation to persistence. If the continual dropping of the widow"s plea could wear away such a stone as that, its like could wear away anything. Yes, and suppose that the judge were as righteous and as full of love and wish to help as this judge was of their opposites; suppose that instead of the cry being a weariness it was a delight; suppose, in short, that, to go back to chapter xi., we "call on Him as Father who, without respect of persons, judgeth": then our "continual coming" will surely not be less effectual than hers was.
But we must note the spiritual experience supposed by the parable to belong to the Christian life. That forlorn figure of the widow, with all its suggestions of helplessness and oppression, is Christ"s picture of His Church left on earth without Him. And though of course it is a very incomplete representation, it is a true presentation of one side and aspect of the devout life on earth. "In the world ye shall have tribulation," and the truer His servants are to Him, and the more their hearts are with Christ in G.o.d, the more they will feel out of touch with the world, and the more it will instinctively be their "adversary." If the widow does not feel the world"s enmity, it will generally be because she is not a "widow indeed."
And another notable fact of Christian experience underlies the parable; namely that the Church"s cry for protection from the adversary is often apparently unheard. In chapter xi. the prayer was for supply of necessities, here it is for the specific blessing of protection from the adversary. Whether that is referred to the needs of the Church or of the individual, it is true that usually the help sought is long delayed. It is not only "souls under the altar" that have to cry "How long, O Lord, dost Thou not avenge?" One thinks of years of persecution for whole communities, or of long, weary days of hara.s.sment and suffering for individuals, of mult.i.tudes of prayers and groans sent up into a heaven that, for all the answers sent down, might as well be empty, and one feels it hard to hold by the faith that "verily, there is a G.o.d that" heareth.
We have all had times when our faith has staggered, and we have found no answer to our heart"s question: "Why tarry the wheels of His chariot?" Many of us have felt what Mary and Martha felt when "Jesus abode still two days in the place where He was" after He had received their message, in which they had been so sure of His coming at once when He heard that "he whom Thou lovest is sick," that they did not ask Him to come. The delays of G.o.d"s help are a constant feature in His providence, and, as Jesus says here, they are but too likely to take the life out of faith.
But over against these we have to place Jesus" triumphant a.s.surance here: "He will avenge them speedily." Yes, the longest delay may yet be "right early," for heaven"s clock does not beat at the same rate as our little chronometers. G.o.d is "the G.o.d of patience," and He has waited for millenniums for the establishment of His kingdom on earth; His "own elect" may learn long-suffering from Him, and need to take to heart the old exhortation, "If the vision tarry, wait for it, for it will surely come, and will not tarry." Yes, G.o.d"s delays are not delays, but are for our profit that we may always pray and not faint, and may keep alight the flame of the sure hope that the Son of man cometh, and that in His coming all adversaries shall be destroyed, and the widow, no longer a widow, but the bride, go in to the feast and forget her foes, and "the days of her mourning be ended."
II. The Pharisee and the publican.
Luke"s label on this parable tells us that it was spoken to a group of the very people who were personated in it by the Pharisee. One can fancy their faces as they listened, and how they would love the speaker! Their two characteristics are self-righteousness and depreciation of every one else, which is the natural result of such trust in self. The self-adulation was absolute, the contempt was all-embracing, for the Revised Version rightly renders "set _all_ others at nought." That may sound exaggerated, but the way to judge of moral characteristics is to take them in their fullest development and to see what they lead to then. The two pictures heighten each other. The one needs many strokes to bring out the features, the other needs but one. Self-righteousness takes many shapes, penitence has but one emotion to express, one cry to utter.
Every word in the Pharisee"s prayer is reeking with self-complacency.
Even the expression "prayed with himself" is significant, for it suggests that the prayer was less addressed to G.o.d than to himself, and also that his words could scarcely be spoken in the hearing of others, both because of their arrogant self-praise and of their insolent calumnies of "all the rest." It was not prayer to G.o.d, but soliloquy in his own praise, and it was in equal parts adulation of himself and slander of other men. So it never went higher than the inner roof of the temple court, and was, in a very fatal sense, "to himself."
G.o.d is complimented with being named formally at first, and in the first two words, "I thank thee," but that is only formal introduction, and in all the rest of his prayer there is not a trace of praying. Such a self-satisfied gentleman had no need to ask for anything, so he brought no pet.i.tions. He uses the conventional language of thanksgiving, but his real meaning is to praise himself to G.o.d, not to thank G.o.d for himself. G.o.d is named once. All the rest is I, I, I. He had no longing for communion, no aspiration, no emotion.
His conception of righteousness was mean and shallow. And as St.
Bernard notes, he was not so much thankful for being righteous as for being alone in his goodness. No doubt he was warranted in disclaiming gross sins, but he was glad to be free from them, not because they were sins, but because they were vulgar. He had no right to fling mud either on "all the rest" or on "this publican,"
and if he had been really praying or giving thanks he would have had enough to think of in G.o.d and himself without casting sidelong and depreciatory glances at his neighbours. He who truly prays "sees no man any more," or if he does, sees men only as subjects for intercession, not for contempt. The Pharisee"s notion of righteousness was primarily negative, as consisting in abstinence from flagrant sins, and, in so far as it was positive, it dealt entirely with ceremonial acts. Such a starved and surface conception of righteousness is essential to self-righteousness, for no man who sees the law of duty in its depth and inwardness can flatter himself that he has kept it. To fast twice a week and to give t.i.thes of all that one acquired were acts of supererogation, and are proudly recounted as if G.o.d should feel much indebted to the doer for paying Him more than was required. The Pharisee makes no pet.i.tions. He states his claims, and tacitly expects that G.o.d will meet them.
Few words are needed to paint the publican; for his estimate of himself is simple and one, and what he wants from G.o.d is one thing, and one only. His att.i.tude expresses his emotions, for he does not venture to go near the shining example of all respectability and righteousness, nor to lift his eyes to heaven. Like the penitent psalmist, his iniquities have taken hold on him, so that he is "not able to look up." Keen consciousness of sin, true sorrow for sin, earnest desire to shake off the burden of sin, lowly trust in G.o.d"s pardoning mercy, are all crowded into his brief pet.i.tion. The arrow thus feathered goes straight up to the throne; the Pharisee"s prayer cannot rise above his own lips.
Jesus does not leave His hearers to apply the "parable," but drives its application home to them, since He knew how keen a thrust was needed to pierce the triple breastplate of self-righteousness. The publican was "justified"; that is, accounted as righteous. In the judgment of heaven, which is the judgment of truth, sin forsaken is sin pa.s.sed away. The Pharisee condensed his contempt into "_this_ publican"; Jesus takes up the "this" and turns it into a distinction, when He says, "_this man_ went down to his house justified." G.o.d"s condemnation of the Pharisee and acceptance of the publican are no anomalous aberration of divine justice, for it is a universal law, which has abundant exemplifications, that he that exalteth himself is likely to be humbled, and he that humbles himself to be exalted. Daily life does not always yield examples thereof, but in the inner life and as concerns our relations to G.o.d, that law is absolutely and always true.
ENTERING THE KINGDOM
"And they brought unto Him also infants, that He would touch them: but when His disciples saw it, they rebuked them. 16. But Jesus called them unto Him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto Me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of G.o.d.
17. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of G.o.d as a little child shall in no wise enter therein. 18. And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 19. And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou Me good? none is good, save one, that is, G.o.d.
20. Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. 21. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. 22. Now when Jesus heard these things, He said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow Me. 23. And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.
24. And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful He said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of G.o.d? 25. For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle"s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of G.o.d. 26. And they that heard it said, Who then can be saved? 27. And He said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with G.o.d. 28. Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed Thee. 29. And He said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of G.o.d"s sake, 30. Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in world to come life everlasting."--LUKE xviii. 15-30.
In this section Luke rejoins the other two Evangelists, from whom his narrative has diverged since Luke ix. 51. All three bring together these two incidents of the children in Christ"s arms and the young ruler. Probably they were connected in time as well as in subject. Both set forth the conditions of entering the kingdom, which the one declares to be lowliness and trust, and the other to be self-renunciation.
I. We have the child-likeness of the subjects of the kingdom. No doubt there was a dash of superst.i.tion in the impulse that moved the parents to bring their children to Jesus, but it was an eminently natural desire to win a good man"s blessing, and one to which every parent"s heart will respond. It was not the superst.i.tion, but the intrusive familiarity, that provoked the disciples" rebuke. A great man"s hangers-on are always more careful of his dignity than he is, for it increases their own importance.
The tender age of the children is to be noted. They were "babes,"
and had to be brought, being too young to walk, and so having scarcely yet arrived at conscious, voluntary life. It is "of such"
that the subjects of the kingdom are composed. What, then, are the qualities which, by this comparison, Jesus requires? Certainly not innocence, which would be to contradict all his teaching and to shut out the prodigals and publicans, and clean contrary to the whole spirit of Luke"s Gospel. Besides, these scarcely conscious infants were not "innocent," for they had not come to the age of which either innocence or guilt can be predicated. What, then, had they which the children of the kingdom must have?
Perhaps the sweet and meek little 131st Psalm puts us best on the track of the answer. It may have been in our Lord"s mind; it certainly corresponds to His thought. "My heart is not haughty, nor mine eyes lofty.... I have stilled and quieted my soul; like a weaned child with his mother." The infant"s lowliness is not yet humility; for it is instinct rather than virtue. It makes no claims, thinks no lofty thoughts of self; in fact, has scarcely begun to know that there is a self at all. On the other hand, clinging trust is the infant"s life. It, too, is rudimentary and instinctive, but the impulse which makes the babe nestle in its mother"s bosom may well stand for a picture of the conscious trust which the children of the kingdom must have. The child"s instinct is the man"s virtue.
We have
"To travel back And tread again that ancient track,"
regaining as the conscious temper of our spirits those excellences of humility and trust of which the first faint types may be seen in the infant in arms. The entrance gate is very low, and, if we hold our heads high, we shall not get through it. It must be on our hands and knees that we go in. There is no place in the kingdom for those who trust in themselves. We must rely wholly on G.o.d manifest in His Son.
So intent is Luke in pointing the lesson that he pa.s.ses by in silence the infinitely beautiful and touching incident which the world perhaps knows better than any other in our Lord"s life--that of His taking the infants in His arms and blessing them. In many ways that incident would have been peculiarly suitable for this Gospel, which delights to bring out the manhood and universal beneficence of Jesus. But if Luke knew of it, he did not care to bring in anything which would weaken the lesson of the conditions of entering the kingdom.
II. We have self-renunciation as the condition of entering the kingdom. The conversation with the ruler (vs. 18-23) sets forth its necessity; the sad exclamation to the bystanders (vs. 24-27) teaches its difficulty; and the dialogue with Peter as representing the twelve (vs. 28-30), its reward.
(1) The necessity of self-renunciation. The ruler"s question has much blended good and evil. It expresses a true earnestness, a dissatisfaction with self, a consciousness of unattained bliss and a longing for it, a felt readiness to take any pains to secure it, a confidence in Christ"s guidance--in short, much of the child spirit.
But it has also a too light estimate of what good is, a mistaken notion that "eternal life" can be won by external deeds, which implies fatal error as to its nature and his own power to do these.
This superficial estimate of goodness, and this over confidence in his ability to do good acts, are the twin mistakes against which Christ"s treatment of him is directed.
Adopting Luke"s version of our Lord"s answer, the counter-question, which begins it, lays hold of the polite address, which had slipped from the ruler"s lips as mere form, and bids him widen out his conceptions of "good." Jesus does not deny that He has a right to the t.i.tle, but questions this man"s right to give it Him. The ruler thought of Jesus only as a man, and, so thinking, was too ready with his adjective. Conventional phrases of compliment may indicate much of the low notions from which they spring. He who is so liberal with his ascriptions of goodness needs to have his notions of what it is elevated. Jesus lays down the great truth which this man, in his confidence that he by his own power could do any good needed for eternal life, was perilously forgetting. G.o.d is the only good, and therefore all human goodness must come from Him; and if the ruler is to do "good," he must first be good, by receiving goodness from G.o.d.
But the saying has an important bearing on Christ"s character. The world calls Him good. Why? There is none good but G.o.d. So we are face to face with this dilemma--Either Jesus Christ is G.o.d manifest in the flesh, or He is not good.
Having thus tried to deepen his conceptions, and awaken his consciousness of imperfection, our Lord meets the man on his own ground by referring him to the Law, which abundantly answered his inquiry. The second half of the commandments are alone quoted by Him; for they have especially to do with conduct, and the infractions of them are more easily recognised than those of the first. The ruler expected that some exceptional and brilliant deeds would be pointed out and he is relegated to the old homely duties, which it is gross crime not to do.
A shade of disappointment and impatience is in his protestation that he had done all these ever since he was a lad. No doubt he had, and his coming to Jesus confessed that though he had, the doing had not brought him "eternal life." Are there not many youthful hearts which would have to say the same, if they would be frank with themselves?
They have some longings after a bliss and calm which they feel is not theirs. They have kept within the lines of that second half of the Decalogue, but that amount and sort of "good thing" has not brought peace. Jesus looks on all such as He did on this young man, "loves" them, and speaks further to them as He did to him. What was lacking? The soul of goodness, without which these other things were "dead works." And what is that soul? Absolute self-renunciation and following Christ. For this man the former took the shape of parting with his wealth, but that external renunciation in itself was as "dead" and impotent to bring eternal life as all his other good acts had been. It was precious as a means to an end--the entrance into the number of Christ"s disciples; and as an expression of that inward self-surrender which is essential for discipleship.
The real stress of the condition is in its second half, "Follow me."
He who enters the company of Christ"s followers enters the kingdom, and has eternal life. If he does not do that, he may give his goods to feed the poor, and it profiteth him nothing. Eternal life is not the external wages for external acts, but the outcome and consequence of yielding self to Jesus, through whom goodness, which keeps the law, flows into the soul.
The requirement pierced to the quick. The man loved the world more than eternal life, after all. But though he went away, he went sorrowful; and that was perhaps the presage that he would come back.
(2) Jesus follows him with sad yearning, and, we may be sure, still sought to draw him back. His exclamation is full of the charity which makes allowance for temptation. It speaks a universal truth, never more needed than in our days, when wealth has flung its golden chains round so many professing Christians. How few of us believe that it gets harder for us to be disciples as we grow richer! There are mult.i.tudes in our churches who would be far nearer Christ than they are ever likely to be, if they would literally obey the injunction to get rid of their wealth.
We are too apt to take such commands as applicable only to the individuals who received them, whereas, though, no doubt, the spirit, and not the letter, is the universal element in them, there are far more of us than we are willing to confess, who need to obey the letter in order to keep the spirit. What a depth of vulgar adoration of the power of money is in the disciples" exclamation, "If rich men cannot get into the kingdom, who can get in!" Or perhaps it rather means, If self-renunciation is the condition, who can fulfil it? The answer points us all to the only power by which we can do good, and overcome self; namely by G.o.d"s help. G.o.d is "good," and we can be good too, if we look to Him. G.o.d will fill our souls with such sweetness that earth will not be hard to part with.
(3) The last paragraph of this pa.s.sage teaches the reward of self-renunciation. Peter shoves his oar in, after his fashion. It would have been better if he had not boasted of their surrender, but yet it was true that they had given up all. Only a fishing-boat and a parcel of old nets, indeed, but these were all they had to give; and G.o.d"s store, which holds His children"s surrendered valuables, has many things of small value in it--cups of cold water and widows" mites lying side by side with crowns and jewels.
So Jesus does not rebuke the almost innocent self-congratulation, but recognises in it an appeal to his faithfulness. It was really a prayer, though it sounded like a vaunt, and it is answered by renewed a.s.surances. To part with outward things for Christ"s sake or for the kingdom"s sake--which is the same thing--is to win them again with all their sweetness a hundred-fold sweeter. Gifts given to Him come back to the giver mended by His touch and hallowed by lying on His altar. The present world yields its full riches only to the man who surrenders all to Jesus. And the "eternal life," which the ruler thought was to be found by outward deeds, flows necessarily into the heart which is emptied of self, that it may be filled with Him who is the life, and will be perfected yonder.