"And as the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts of John, whether he were the Christ, or not; 16. John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: 17. Whose fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly purge His floor, and will gather the wheat into His garner; but the chaff He will burn with fire unquenchable. 18. And many other things, in his exhortation, preached he unto the people. 19. But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip"s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done, 20. Added yet this above all, that he shut up John in prison. 21. Now, when all the people were baptized, it came to pa.s.s, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened, 22. And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape, like a dove, upon Him; and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art My beloved Son; in Thee I am well pleased."--LUKE iii. 15-22.
This pa.s.sage falls into three parts: John"s witness to the coming Messiah (vs. 15-17); John"s undaunted rebuke of sin in high places, and its penalty (vs. 18-20); and G.o.d"s witness to Jesus (vs. 21, 22).
I. Luke sharply parts off the Baptist"s work as a preacher of repentance and plain morality from his work as the herald who preceded the king. The former is delineated in verses 7-14, and its effect was to set light to the always smouldering expectation of the Messiah. The people were ready to rally round him if he would say that he was the coming deliverer. It was a real temptation, but his unmoved humility, which lay side by side with his boldness, brushed it aside, and poured an effectual stream of cold water on the excitement. "John answered" the popular questionings, of which he was fully aware, and his answer crushed them.
In less acute fashion, the same temptation comes to all who move the general conscience. Disciples always seek to hoist their teacher higher than is fitting. Adherence to him takes the place of obedience to his message, and, if he is a true man, he has to damp down misdirected enthusiasm.
Mark John"s clear apprehension of the limitations of his work. He baptized with water, the symbol and means of outward cleansing. He does not depreciate his position or the importance of his baptism, but his whole soul bows in reverence before the coming Messiah, whose great office was to transcend his, as the wide Mediterranean surpa.s.sed the little lake of Galilee. His outline of that work is grand, though incomplete. It is largely based upon Malachi"s closing prophecy, and the connection witnesses to John"s consciousness that he was the Elijah foretold there. He saw that the Messiah would surpa.s.s him in his special endowment. Strong as he was, that other was to be stronger. Probably he did not dream that that other was to wield the divine might, nor that His perfect strength was to be manifested in weakness, and to work its wonders by the might of gentle, self-sacrificing love. But, though he dimly saw, he perfectly adored. He felt himself unworthy (literally, insufficient) to be the slave who untied (or, according to Matthew, "bore") his lord"s sandals. How beautiful is the lowliness of that strong nature! He stood erect in the face of priests and tetrarchs, and furious women, and the headsman with his sword, but he lay prostrate before his King.
Strength and royal authority were not all that he had to proclaim of Messiah. "He shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire." We observe that the construction here is different from that in verse 16 ("with water"), inasmuch as the preposition "in" is inserted, which, though it is often used "instrumentaly," is here, therefore, more probably to be taken as meaning simply "in." The two nouns are coupled under one preposition, which suggests that they are fused together in the speaker"s mind as reality and symbol.
Fire is a frequently recurrent emblem of the Holy Spirit, both in the Old and New Testament. It is not the destructive, but the vitalising, glowing, transforming, energy of fire, which is expressed. The fervour of holy enthusiasm, the warmth of ardent love, the melting of hard hearts, the change of cold, damp material into its own ruddy likeness, are all set forth in this great symbol.
John"s water baptism was poor beside Messiah"s immersion into that cleansing fire. Fire turns what it touches into kindred flame. The refiner"s fire melts metal, and the sc.u.m carries away impurities.
Water washes the surface, fire pierces to the centre.
But while that cleansing by the Spirit"s fire was to be Messiah"s primary office, man"s freedom to accept or reject such blessing necessarily made His work selective, even while its destination was universal. So John saw that His coming would part men into two cla.s.ses, according as they submitted to His baptism of fire or not.
The homely image of the threshing-floor, on some exposed, windy height, carries a solemn truth. The Lord of the harvest has an instrument in His hand, which sets up a current of air, and the wheat falls in one heap, while the husks are blown farther, and lie at the edge of the floor. Mark the majestic emphasis on the Christ"s ownership in the two phrases, "_His_ floor" and "_His_ garner."
Notice, too, the fact which determines whether a man is chaff or wheat--namely, his yielding to or rejecting the fiery baptism which Christ offers. Ponder that awful emblem of an empty, rootless, fruitless, worthless life, which John caught up from Psalm I.
Thankfully think of the care and safe keeping and calm repose shadowed in that picture of the wheat stored in the garner after the separating act. And let us lay on awed hearts the terrible doom of the chaff. There are two fires, to one or other of which we must be delivered. Either we shall gladly accept the purging fire of the Spirit which burns sin out of us, or we shall have to meet the punitive fire which burns up us and our sins together. To be cleansed by the one or to be consumed by the other is the choice before each of us.
II. Verses 18-20 show John as the preacher and martyr of righteousness. Luke tells his fate out of its proper place, in order to finish with him, and, as it were, clear the stage for Jesus.
Similarly the Baptist"s desert life is told by antic.i.p.ation in chapter i. 80. That treatment of his story marks his subordination.
His martyrdom is not narrated by Luke, though he knew of it (Luke ix. 7-9), and this brief summary is all that is said of his heroic vehemence of rebuke to sin in high places, and of his suffering for righteousness" sake. John"s message had two sides to it, as every gospel of G.o.d"s has. To the people he spoke good tidings and exhortations; to lordly sinners he pealed out stern rebukes.
It needs some courage to tell a prince to his face that he is foul with corruption, and, still more, to put a finger on his actual sins. But he is no prophet who does not lift up his voice like a trumpet, and speak to hardened consciences. King Demos is quite as impatient of close dealing with his immorality as Herod was. London and New York get as angry with the Christian men who fight against their l.u.s.t and drunkenness as ever he did, and would not be sorry if they could silence these persistent "fanatics" as conveniently as he could. The need for courage like John"s, and plain speech like his, is not past yet. The "good tidings" has rebuke as part of its substance. The sword is two-edged.
III. The narrative now turns to Jesus, and does not even name John as having baptized Him. The peculiarities of Luke"s account of the baptism are instructive. He omits the conversation between Jesus and John, and the fact of John"s seeing the dove and hearing the voice.
Like Mark, he makes the divine voice speak directly to Jesus, whereas Matthew represents it as spoken _concerning_ Him. The baptism itself is disposed of in an incidental clause (_having been baptized_). The general result of these characteristics is that this account lays emphasis on the bearing of the divine witness as borne to Jesus Himself. It does not deny, but simply ignores, its aspect as a witness borne to John.
Another striking point is Luke"s mention of Christ"s prayer, which is thus represented as answered by the opened heavens, the descending dove, and the attesting voice. We owe most of our knowledge of Christ"s prayers to this Evangelist, whose mission was to tell of the Son of man. Mysteries beyond our plummets are contained in this story; but however unique it is, it has this which may be reproduced, that prayer unveiled heaven, and brought down the dove to abide on the bowed head, and the divine attestation of sonship to fill the waiting heart.
We need not dwell on the beautiful significance of the emblem of the dove. It symbolised both the nature of that gracious, gentle Spirit, and the perpetuity and completeness of its abode on Jesus. Others receive portions of that celestial fullness, but itself, as if embodied in visible form, settled down on Him, and, with meekly folded wings, tarried there unscared. "G.o.d giveth not the Spirit by measure unto Him."
Our Evangelist does not venture into the deep waters, nor attempt to tell what was the relation between the Incarnate Word, as it dwelt in Jesus before that descent, and the Spirit which came upon Him. We shall be wise if we refrain from speculating on such points, and content ourselves with knowing that there has been one manhood capable of receiving and retaining uninterruptedly the whole Spirit of G.o.d; and that He will fill us with the Spirit which dwelt in Him, in measure and manner corresponding to our need and our faith.
The heavenly voice spoke to the heart of the man Jesus. What was His need of it, and what were its effects on Him, we do not presume to affirm. But probably it originated an increased cert.i.tude of the consciousness which dawned, in His answer to Mary, of His unique divine sonship. To us it declares that He stands in an altogether unexampled relation of kindred to the Father, and that His whole nature and acts are the objects of G.o.d"s complacency. But He has nothing for Himself alone, and in Him we may become G.o.d"s beloved sons, well pleasing to the Father.
THE TEMPTATION
4 And Jesus, being full of the Holy Ghost, returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, 2. Being forty days tempted of the devil.
And in those days He did eat nothing: and when they were ended, He afterward hungered. 3. And the devil said unto Him, If Thou be the Son of G.o.d, command this stone that it be made bread, 4. And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of G.o.d. 5. And the devil, taking Him up into an high mountain, showed unto Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. 6. And the devil said unto Him, All this power will I give Thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
7. If Thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be Thine. 8. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind Me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy G.o.d, and Him only shalt thou serve. 9. And he brought Him to Jerusalem and set Him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto Him, If Thou be the Son of G.o.d, cast Thyself down from hence: 10. For it is written, He shall give His angels charge over Thee, to keep Thee; 11. And in their hands they shall bear Thee up, lest at any time Thou dash Thy foot against a stone. 12. And Jesus answering, said unto Him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord Thy G.o.d. 13. And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from Him for a season."
--LUKE iv. 1-13.
If we adopt the Revised Version"s reading and rendering, the whole of the forty days in the desert were one long a.s.sault of Jesus by Satan, during which the consciousness of bodily needs was suspended by the intensity of spiritual conflict. Exhaustion followed this terrible tension, and the enemy chose that moment of physical weakness to bring up his strongest battalions. What a contrast these days made with the hour of the baptism! And yet both the opened heavens and the grim fight were needful parts of Christ"s preparation. As true man, He could be truly tempted; as perfect man, suggestions of evil could not arise within, but must be presented from without. He must know our temptations if He is to help us in them, and He must "first bind the strong man" if He is afterwards "to spoil his house." It is useless to discuss whether the tempter appeared in visible form, or carried Jesus from place to place. The presence and voice were real, though probably if any eye had looked on, nothing would have been seen but the solitary Jesus, sitting still in the wilderness.
I. The first temptation is that of the Son of man tempted to distrust G.o.d. Long experience had taught the tempter that his most taking baits were those which appealed to the appet.i.tes and needs of the body, and so he tries these first. The run of men are drawn to sin by some form or other of these, and the hunger of Jesus laid Him open to their power--if not on the side of delights of sense, yet on the side of wants. The tempter quotes the divine voice at the baptism with almost a sneer, as if the hungry, fainting Man before him were a strange "Son of G.o.d." The suggestion sounds innocent enough; for there would have been no necessary harm in working a miracle to feed Himself. But its evil is betrayed by the words, "If Thou art the Son of G.o.d," and the answer of our Lord, which begins emphatically with "man," puts us on the right track to understand why He repelled the insidious proposal even while He was faint with hunger. To yield to it would have been to shake off for His own sake the human conditions which He had taken for our sakes, and to seek to cease to be Son of man in acting as Son of G.o.d. He takes no notice of the t.i.tle given by Satan, but falls back on His brotherhood with man, and accepts the laws under which they live as His conditions.
The quotation from Deuteronomy, which Luke gives in a less complete form than Matthew, implies, even in that incomplete form, that bread is not the only means of keeping a man in life, but that G.o.d can feed Him, as He did Israel in its desert life, with manna; or, if manna fails, by the bare exercise of His divine will. Therefore Jesus will not use His power as Son of G.o.d, because to do so would at once take Him out of His fellowship with man, and would betray His distrust of G.o.d"s power to feed Him there in the desert. How soon His confidence was vindicated Matthew tells us. As soon as the devil departed from Him, "angels came and ministered unto Him." The soft rush of their wings brought solace to His spirit, wearied with struggle, and once again "man did eat angels" food."
This first temptation teaches us much. It makes the manhood of our Lord pathetically true, as showing Him bearing the prosaic but terrible pinch of hunger, carried almost to its fatal point. It teaches us how innocent and necessary wants may be the devil"s levers to overturn our souls. It warns us against severing ourselves from our fellows by the use of distinctive powers for our own behoof. It sets forth humble reliance on G.o.d"s sustaining will as best for us, even if we are in the desert, where, according to sense, we must starve; and it magnifies the Brother"s love, who for our sakes waived the prerogatives of the Son of G.o.d, that He might be the brother of the poor and needy.
II. The second temptation is that of the Messiah, tempted to grasp His dominion by false means. The devil finds that he must try a subtler way. Foiled on the side of the physical nature, he begins to apprehend that he has to deal with One loftier than the ma.s.s of men; and so he brings out the glittering bait, which catches the more finely organised natures. Where sense fails, ambition may succeed.
There is nothing said now about "Son of G.o.d." The relation of Jesus to G.o.d is not now the point of attack, but His hoped--for relation to the world. Did Satan actually transport the body of Jesus to some eminence? Probably not. It would not have made the vision of all the kingdoms any more natural if he had. The remarkable language "showed ... all ... in a moment of time" describes a physical impossibility, and most likely is meant to indicate some sort of diabolic phantasmagoria, flashed before Christ"s consciousness, while His eyes were fixed on the silent, sandy waste.
There is much in Scripture that seems to bear out the boast that the kingdoms are at Satan"s disposal. But he is "the father of lies" as well as the "prince of this world," and we may be very sure that his authority loses nothing in his telling. If we think how many thrones have been built on violence and sustained by crime, how seldom in the world"s history the right has been uppermost, and how little of the fear of G.o.d goes to the organisation of society, even to-day, in so-called Christian countries, we shall be ready to feel that in this boast the devil told more truth than we like to believe. Note that he acknowledges that the power has been "given," and on the fact of the delegation of it rests the temptation to worship. He knew that Jesus looked forward to becoming the world"s King, and he offers easy terms of winning the dignity. Very cunning he thought himself, but he had made one mistake. He did not know what kind of kingdom Jesus wished to establish. If it had been one of the bad old pattern, like Nebuchadnezzar"s or Caesar"s, his offer would have been tempting, but it had no bearing on One who meant to reign by love, and to win love by loving to the death.
Worshipping the devil could only help to set up a devil"s kingdom.
Jesus wanted nothing of the "glory" which had been "given" him. His answer, again taken from Deuteronomy, is His declaration that His kingdom is a kingdom of obedience, and that He will only reign as G.o.d"s representative. It defines His own position and the genius of His dominion. It would come to the tempter"s ears as the broken law, which makes his misery and turns all his "glory" into ashes. This is our Lord"s decisive choice, at the outset of His public work, of the path of suffering and death. He renounces all aid from such arts and methods as have built up the kingdoms of earth, and presents Himself as the antagonist of Satan and his dominion. Henceforth it is war to the knife.
For us the lessons are plain. We have to learn what sort of kingdom Jesus sets up. We have to beware, in our own little lives, of ever seeking to accomplish good things by questionable means, of trying to carry on Christ"s work with the devil"s weapons. When churches lower the standard of Christian morality, because keeping it up would alienate wealthy or powerful men, when they wink hard at sin which pays, when they enlist envy, jealousy, emulation of the baser sort in the service of religious movements, are they not worshipping Satan? And will not their gains be such as he can give, and not such as Christ"s kingdom grows by? Let us learn, too, to adore and be thankful for the calm and fixed decisiveness with which Jesus chose from the beginning, and trod until the end, with bleeding but unreluctant feet, the path of suffering on His road to His throne.
III. The third temptation tempts the worshipping Son to tempt G.o.d.
Luke arranges the temptations partly from a consideration of locality, the desert and the mountain being near each other, and partly in order to bring out a certain sequence in them. First comes the appeal to the physical nature, then that to the finer desires of the mind; and these having been repelled, and the resolve to worship G.o.d having been spoken by Jesus, Luke"s third temptation is addressed to the devout soul, as it looks to the cunning but shallow eyes of the tempter. Matthew, on the other hand, in accordance with his point of view, puts the specially Messianic temptation last. The actual order is as undiscoverable as unimportant. In Luke"s order there is substantially but one change of place--from the solitude of the wilderness to the Temple. As we have said, the change was probably not one of the Lord"s body, but only of the scenes flashed before His mind"s eye. "The pinnacle of the Temple" may have been the summit that looked down into the deep valley where the enormous stones of the lofty wall still stand, and which must have been at a dizzy height above the narrow glen on the one side and the Temple courts on the other. There is immense, suppressed rage and malignity in the recurrence of the sneer, "If Thou art the Son of G.o.d" and in the use of Christ"s own weapon of defence, the quotation of Scripture.
What was wrong in the act suggested? There is no reference to the effect on the beholders, as has often been supposed; and if we are correct in supposing that the whole temptation was transacted in the desert, there could be none. But plainly the point of it was the suggestion that Jesus should, of His own accord and needlessly, put Himself in danger, expecting G.o.d to deliver Him. It looked like devout confidence; it was really "tempting G.o.d". It looked like the very perfection of the trust with which, in the first round of this duel, Christ had conquered; it was really distrust, as putting G.o.d to proof whether He would keep His promises or no. It looked like the very perfection of that worship with which He had overcome in the second round of the fight; it wag really self-will in the mask of devoutness. It tempted G.o.d, because it sought to draw Him to fulfil to a man on self-chosen paths His promises to those who walk in ways which He has appointed.
We trust G.o.d when we look to Him to deliver us in perils met in meek acceptance of His will. We tempt Him when we expect Him to save us from those encountered on roads that we have picked oat for ourselves. Such presumption disguised as filial trust is the temptation besetting the higher regions of experience, to which the fumes of animal pa.s.sions and the less gross but more dangerous airs from the desires of the mind do not ascend. Religious men who have conquered these have still this foe to meet. Spiritual pride, the belief that we may venture into dangers either to our natural or to our religious life, where no call of duty takes us, the thrusting ourselves, unbidden, into circ.u.mstances where nothing but a miracle can save us-these are the snares which Satan lays for souls that have broken his coa.r.s.er nets. The three answers with which Jesus overcame are the mottoes by which we shall conquer. Trust G.o.d, by whose will we live. Worship G.o.d, in whose service we get all of this world that is good for us. Tempt not G.o.d, whose angels keep us in our ways, when they are His ways, and who reckons trust that is not submission to His ways to be tempting G.o.d, and not trusting Him.
"All the temptation" was ended. So these three made a complete whole, and the quiver of the enemy was for the time empty. He departed "for a season," or rather, until an opportunity. He was foiled when he tried to tempt by addressing desires. His next a.s.sault will be at Gethsemane and Calvary, when dread and the shrinking from pain and death will be a.s.sailed as vainly.
PREACHING AT NAZARETH
"And He began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled In your ears."--LUKE iv. 21.
This first appearance of our Lord, in His public work at Nazareth, the home of His childhood, was preceded, as we learn from John"s Gospel, by a somewhat extended ministry in Jerusalem. In the course of it, He cast the money-changers out of the Temple, did many miracles, had His conversation with Nicodemus, and on His return towards Galilee met the woman of Samaria at the well. The report of these things, no doubt, had preceded Him, and kindled the Nazarenes"
curiosity to see their old companion who had suddenly shot up into a person of importance, and had even made a sensation in the metropolis. A great man"s neighbours are keen critics of, and slow believers in, his greatness. So it was natural and very prudent that Jesus should not begin His ministry in Nazareth.
We can easily imagine the scene that morning in the little village, nestling among the hills. How many memories would occupy Christ as He entered the synagogue, where He had so often sat a silent worshipper! How Mary"s eyes would fill with tears if she was there, and how the companions of His boyhood, who used to play with Him, would watch Him; all curious, some sympathetic, some jealous, some contemptuous!
The synagogue service began with prayer and praise. Then followed two readings, one from the Law, one from the Prophets. When the latter point was reached, in accordance with usage, Jesus rose, thereby signifying His desire to be reader of the Prophetic portion.
We can understand how there would be a movement of quickened attention as the roll was handed to Him and He turned its sheets. He "found the place"; that looks as if He sought for it; that is to say, that it was not the appointed lesson for the day--if there was such--but that it was a pa.s.sage selected by Himself.
I need not enter upon the divergences between Luke"s quotation as given in our English version and the Hebrew. They are partly due to the fact that he is quoting from memory the Greek version of the LXX. He inserts, for instance, one clause which is not found in that place in Isaiah, but in another part of the same prophet. Having read standing, as was the usage, in token of reverence for the Scripture, Jesus resumed His seat, not as having finished, but, as was the usage, taking the att.i.tude of the teacher, which signified authority. And then, His very first sentence was the most unlimited a.s.sertion that the great words which He had been reading had reached their full accomplishment in Himself. They are very familiar to our ears. If we would understand their startling audacity we must listen to them with the ears of the Nazarenes, who had known Him ever since He was a child. "This day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears."
Now, it seems to me that this first sermon of our Lord"s to His old fellow-townsmen brings into striking prominence some characteristics of His whole teaching, to which I desire briefly to direct attention.
I. I note Christ"s self-a.s.sertion.
To begin in Nazareth with such words as these in my text was startling enough, but it is in full accord with the whole tone of our Lord"s teaching. If you will carefully search for the most essential characteristics and outstanding differentia of the words of Jesus Christ, even if you make all allowance that some make for the non-historical character of the Gospels, you have this left as the residuum, that the impression which He made upon the men that were nearest to Him, and that caught up most fully the spirit of His teaching, was that the great thing that differentiated it from all other was His unhesitating persistence in pushing into the very forefront, His testimony about Himself. I do not think that there is anything parallel to that anywhere else amongst the men whom the world recognises as being great religious geniuses or great moral teachers. What characterises as perfectly unique our Lord"s teaching is not only the blessed things that He said about G.o.d or the deep truths that He said about men and their duty, or the sad things that He said about men and their destiny, or the radiant hopes that He unveiled as to men and their possibility, but what He said about Himself. His message was not so much "Believe in G.o.d and do right,"
as it was "Believe in Me and follow Me."