CHRIST"S NEED OF US AND OURS
"... Say ye that the Lord hath need of him; and straightway he will send him hither."--Mark xi. 3.
You will remember that Jesus Christ sent two of His disciples into the village that looked down on the road from Bethany to Jerusalem, with minute instructions and information as to what they were to do and find there. The instructions may have one of two explanations--they suggest either superhuman knowledge or a previous arrangement.
Perhaps, although it is less familiar to our thoughts, the latter is the explanation. There is a remarkable resemblance, in that respect, to another incident which lies close beside this one in time, when our Lord again sent two disciples to make preparation for the Pa.s.sover, and, with similar minuteness, told them that they would find, at a certain point, a man bearing a pitcher of water. Him they were to accost, and he would take them to the room that had been prepared. Now the old explanation of both these incidents is that Jesus Christ knew what was going to happen. Another possible explanation, and in my view more probable and quite as instructive, is, that Jesus Christ had settled with the two owners what was to happen. Clearly, the owner of the colt was a disciple, because at once he gave up his property when the message was repeated, "the _Lord_ hath need of him." Probably he had been one of the guests at the modest festival that had been held the night before, in the village close by, in Simon"s house, and had seen how Mary had expended her most precious possession on the Lord, and, under the influence of the resurrection of Lazarus, he, too, perhaps, was touched, and was glad to arrange with Jesus Christ to have his colt waiting there at the cross-road for his Master"s convenience. But, be that as it may, it seems to me that this incident, and especially these words that I have read for a text, carry very striking and important lessons for us, whether we look at them in connection with the incident itself, or whether we venture to give them a somewhat wider application. Let me take these two points in turn.
I. Now, what strikes one about our Lord"s requisitioning the colt is this, that here is a piece of conduct on His part singularly unlike all the rest of His life. All through it, up to this last moment, His one care was to damp down popular enthusiasm, to put on the drag whenever there came to be the least symptom of it, to discourage any reference to Him as the Messiah-King of Israel, to shrink back from the coa.r.s.e adulation of the crowd, and to glide quietly through the world, blessing and doing good. But now, at the end, He flings off all disguise. He deliberately sets Himself, at a time when popular enthusiasm ran highest and was most turbid and difficult to manage, at the gathering of the nation for the Pa.s.sover in Jerusalem, to cast an effervescing element into the caldron. If He had planned to create a popular rising, He could not have done anything more certain to bring it about than what He did that morning when He made arrangements for a triumphal procession into the city, amidst the excited crowds gathered from every quarter of the land. Why did He do that? What was the meaning of it?
Then there is another point in this requisitioning of the colt. He not only deliberately set Himself to stir up popular excitement, but He consciously did what would be an outward fulfilment of a great Messianic prophecy. I hope you are wiser than to fancy that Zechariah"s prophecy of the peaceful monarch who was to come to Zion, meek and victorious, and riding upon a "colt the foal of an a.s.s," was fulfilled by the outward fact of Christ being mounted on this colt "whereon never man sat." That is only the sh.e.l.l, and if there had been no such triumphal entry, our Lord would as completely have fulfilled Zechariah"s prophecy. The fulfilment of it did not depend on the petty detail of the animal upon which He sat when He entered the city, nor even on that entrance. The meaning of the prophecy was that to Zion, wherever and whatever it is, there should come that Messianic King, whose reign owed nothing to chariots and horses and weapons of war for its establishment, but who, meek and patient, pacing upon the humble animal used only for peaceful services, and not mounted on the prancing steed of the warrior, should inaugurate the reign of majesty and of meekness. Our Lord uses the external fact just as the prophet had used it, as of no value in itself, but as a picturesque emblem of the very spirit of His kingdom. The literal fulfilment was a kind of finger-post for inattentive onlookers, which might induce them to look more closely, and so see that He was indeed the King Messiah, because of more important correspondences with prophecy than His once riding on an a.s.s. Do not so degrade these Old Testament prophecies as to fancy that their literal fulfilment is of chief importance. That is the sh.e.l.l: the kernel is the all-important thing, and Jesus Christ would have fulfilled the _role,_ that was sketched for Him by the prophets of old, just as completely if there never had been this entrance into Jerusalem.
But, further, the fact that He had to borrow the colt was as significant as the choice of it. For so we see blended two things, the blending of which makes the unique peculiarity and sublimity of Christ"s life: absolute authority, and meekness of poverty and lowliness. A King, and yet a pauper-King! A King claiming His dominion, and yet obliged to borrow another man"s colt in order that He might do it! A strange kind of monarch!--and yet that remarkable combination runs through all His life. He had to be obliged to a couple of fishermen for a boat, but He sat in it, to speak words of divine wisdom. He had to be obliged to a lad in the crowd for barley loaves and fishes, but when He took them into His hands they were multiplied. He had to be obliged for a grave, and yet He rose from the borrowed grave the Lord of life and death. And so when He would pose as a King, He has to borrow the regalia, and to be obliged to this anonymous friend for the colt which made the emphasis of His claim.
"Who, though He was rich, yet for our sakes became poor, that we through His poverty might be rich."
II. And now turn for a moment to the wider application of these words.
"The Lord hath need of him." That opens the door to thoughts, that I cannot crowd into the few minutes that I have at my disposal, as to that great and wonderful truth that Christ cannot a.s.sume His kingdom in this world without your help, and that of the other people whose hearts are touched by His love. "The Lord hath need" of them. Though upon that Cross of Calvary He did all that was necessary for the redemption of the world and the salvation of humanity as a whole, yet for the bearing of that blessing into individual hearts, and for the application of the full powers that are stored in the Gospel and in Jesus, to their work in the world, the missing link is man. We "are fellow-labourers with G.o.d." We are Christ"s tools. The instruments by which He builds His kingdom are the souls that have already accepted His authority. "The Lord hath need of him," though, as the psalmist sings, "If I were hungry I would not tell thee, for all the beasts of the forest are Mine." Yes, and when the Word was made flesh, He had need of one of the humblest of the beasts. The Christ that redeemed the world needs us, to carry out and to bring into effect His redemption. "G.o.d mend all," said one, and the answer was, "We must help Him to mend it."
Notice again the authoritative demand, which does not contemplate the possibility of reluctance or refusal. "The Lord hath need of him."
That is all. There is no explanation or motive alleged to induce surrender to the demand. This is a royal style of speech. It is the way in which, in despotic countries, kings lay their demands upon a poor man"s whole plenishing and possession, and sweep away all.
Jesus Christ comes to us in like fashion, and brushes aside all our convenience and everything else, and says, "I want you, and that is enough." Is it not enough? Should it not be enough? If He demands, He has the right to demand. For we are His, "bought with a price." All the slave"s possessions are his owner"s property. The slave is given a little patch of garden ground, and perhaps allowed to keep a fowl or two, but the master can come and say, "Now _I_ want them," and the slave has nothing for it but to give them up.
"The Lord hath need of him" is in the autocratic tone of One who has absolute power over us and ours. And that power, where does it come from? It comes from His absolute surrender of Himself to us, and because He has wholly given Himself for us. He does not expect us to say one contrary word when He sends and says, "I have need of you, or of yours."
Here, again, we have an instance of glad surrender. The last words of my text are susceptible of a double meaning. "Straightway he will send him hither"--who is "he"? It is usually understood to be the owner of the colt, and the clause is supposed to be Christ"s a.s.surance to the two messengers of the success of their errand. So understood, the words suggest the great truth that Love loosens the hand that grasps possessions, and unlocks our treasure-houses. There is nothing more blessed than to give in response to the requirement of love. And so, to Christ"s authoritative demand, the only proper answer is obedience swift and glad, because it is loving. Many possibilities of joy and blessing are lost by us through not yielding on the instant to Christ"s demands. Hesitation and delay are dangerous. In "straightway"
complying are security and joy. If the owner had begun to say to himself that he very much needed the colt, or that he saw no reason why some one else"s beast should not have been taken, or that he would send the animal very soon, but must have the use of him for an hour or two first, he would probably never have sent him at all, and so would have missed the greatest honour of his life. As soon as I know what Christ wants from me, without delay let me do it; for if I begin with delaying I shall probably end with declining. The Psalmist was wise when he laid emphasis on the swiftness of his obedience, and said, "I made haste and delayed not, but made haste to keep Thy commandments."
But another view of the words makes them part of the message to the owner of the colt, and not of the a.s.surance to the disciples. "Say ye that the Lord hath need of him, and that straightway (when He has done with him) He will send him back again." That is a possible rendering, and I am disposed to think it is the proper one. By it the owner is told that he is not parting with his property for good and all, that Jesus only wishes to borrow the animal for the morning, and that it will be returned in the afternoon. What does that view of the words suggest to us? Do you not think that that colt, when it did come back--for of course it came back some time or other,--was a great deal more precious to its owner than it ever had been before, or ever could have been if it had not been lent to Christ, and Christ had not made His royal entry upon it? Can you not fancy that the man, if he was, as he evidently was, a disciple and lover of the Lord, would look at it, especially after the Crucifixion and the Ascension, and think, "What an honour to me, that I provided the mount for that triumphal entry!"?
It is always so. If you wish anything to become precious, lend it to Jesus Christ, and when it comes back again, as it will come back, there will be a fragrance about it, a touch of His fingers will be left upon it, a memory that He has used it. If you desire to own yourselves, and to make yourselves worth owning, give yourselves to Christ. If you wish to get the greatest possible blessing and good out of possessions, lay them at His feet. If you wish love to be hallowed, joy to be calmed, perpetuated, and deepened, carry it to Him. "If the house be worthy, your peace shall rest upon it; if not," like the dove to the ark when it could find no footing in the turbid and drowned world, "it shall come back to you again. Straightway He will "send him back again," and that which I give to Jesus He will return enhanced, and it will be more truly and more blessedly mine, because I have laid it in His hands. This "altar" sanctifies the giver and the gift.
NOTHING BUT LEAVES
"And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, He came, if haply He might find any thing thereon: and when He came to it, He found nothing but leaves; ... 14. And Jesus ... said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever."--Mark xi. 13, 14.
The date of this miracle has an important bearing on its meaning and purpose. It occurred on the Monday morning of the last week of Christ"s ministry. That week saw His last coming to Israel, "if haply He might find any thing thereon." And if you remember the foot-to-foot duel with the rulers and representatives of the nation, and the words, weighty with coming doom, which He spoke in the Temple on the subsequent days, you will not doubt that the explanation of this strange and anomalous miracle is that it is an acted parable, a symbol of Israel in its fruitlessness and in its consequent barrenness to all coming time.
This is the only point of view, as it seems to me, from which the peculiarities of the miracle can either be warranted or explained. It is our Lord"s only destructive act. The fig-tree grew by the wayside; probably, therefore, it belonged to n.o.body, and there was no right of property affected by its loss. He saw it from afar, "having leaves,"
and that was why, three months before the time, He went to look if there were figs on it. For experts tell us that in the fig-tree the leaves accompany, and do not precede, the fruit. And so this one tree, brave in its show of foliage amidst leafless companions, was a hypocrite unless there were figs below the leaves. Therefore Jesus came, if haply He might find anything thereon, and finding nothing, perpetuated the condition which He found, and made the sin its own punishment.
Now all that is plain symbol, and so I ask you to look with me, for a few moments, at these three things--(1) What Christ sought and seeks; (2) What He found and often finds; (3) What He did when He found it.
I. What Christ sought and seeks.
He came "seeking fruit." Now I may just notice, in pa.s.sing, how pathetically and beautifully this incident suggests to us the true, dependent, weak manhood of that great Lord. In all probability He had just come from the home of Mary and Martha, and it is strange that having left their hospitable abode He should be "an hungered." But so it was. And even with all the weight of the coming crisis pressing upon His soul, He was conscious of physical necessities, as one of us might have been, and perhaps felt the more need for sustenance because so terrible a conflict was waiting Him. Nor, I think, need we shrink from recognising another of the characteristics of humanity here, in the limitations of His knowledge and in the real expectation, which was disappointed, that He might find fruit where there were leaves. I do not want to plunge into depths far too deep for any man to find sure footing in, nor seek to define the undefinable, nor to explain how the divine inosculates with the human, but sure I am that Jesus Christ was not getting up a scene in order to make a parable out of His miracle; and that the hunger and the expectancy and the disappointment were all real, however they afterwards may have been turned by Him to a symbolical purpose. And so here we may see the weak Christ, the limited Christ, the true human Christ. But side by side, as is ever the case, with this manifestation of weakness, there comes an apocalypse of power. Wherever you have, in the history of our Lord, some signal exemplification of human infirmity, you have flashed out through "the veil, that is, His flesh," some beam of His glory. Thus this hungry Man could say, "No fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever"; and His bare word, the mere forth-putting and manifestation of His will, had power on material things. That is the sign and impress of divinity.
But I pa.s.s from that, which is not my special point now. What did Christ seek? "Fruit." And what is fruit in contradistinction to leaves? Character and conduct like His. That is our fruit. All else is leaf.a.ge. As the Apostle says, "Love, joy, hope, peace, righteousness in the Holy Ghost"; or, to put it into one word, Christ-likeness in our inmost heart and nature, and Christ-likeness, so far as it may be possible for us, in our daily life, that is the one thing that our Lord seeks from us.
O brethren! we do not realise enough for ourselves, day by day, that it was for this end that Jesus Christ came. The cradle in Bethlehem, the weary life, the gracious words, the mighty deeds, the Cross on Calvary, the open grave, Olivet with His last footprints; His place on the throne, Pentecost, they were all meant for this, to make you and me good men, righteous people, bearing the fruits of holy living and conduct corresponding to His own pattern. Emotions of the selectest kind, religious experience of the profoundest and truest nature, these are blessed and good. They are the blossom which sets into fruit. And they come for this end, that by the help of them we may be made like Jesus Christ. He has yet to learn what is the purpose and the meaning of the Gospel who fixes upon anything else as its ultimate design than the production in us, as the results of the life of Christ dwelling in our hearts, of character and conduct like to His.
I suppose I ought to apologise for talking such commonplace plat.i.tudes as these, but, brethren, the most commonplace truths are usually the most important and the most impotent. And no "plat.i.tude" is a plat.i.tude until you have brought it so completely into your lives that there is no room for a fuller working of it out. So I come to you, Christian men and women, real and nominal, now with this for my message, that Jesus Christ seeks from you this first and foremost, that you shall be good men and women "according to the pattern that has been showed us in the Mount," according to the likeness of His own stainless perfection.
And do not forget that Jesus Christ hungers for that goodness. That is a strange, and infinitely touching, and absolutely true thing. He is only "satisfied," and the hunger of His heart appeased, when "He sees of the travail of His soul" in the righteousness of His servants. I pa.s.sed a day or two ago, in a country place, a great field on which there was stuck up a board that said, "----"s trial ground for seeds."
This world is _Christ"s_ trial ground for seeds, where He is testing you and me to see whether it is worth while cultivating us any more, and whether we can bring forth any "fruit to perfection" fit for the lips and the refreshment of the Owner and Lord of the vineyard Christ longs for fruit from us. And--strange and wonderful, and yet true--the "bread" that He eats is the service of His servants. That, amongst other things, is what is meant by the ancient inst.i.tution of sacrifice, "the food of the G.o.ds." Christ"s food is the holiness and obedience of His children. He comes to us, as He came to that fig-tree, seeking from _us_ this fruit which He delights in receiving.
Brethren, we cannot think too much of Christ"s unspeakable gift in itself and in its consequences; but we may easily think too little, and I am sure that a great many of us do think too little, of Christ"s demands. He is not an austere man, "reaping where He did not sow"; but having sowed so much, He does look for the harvest. He comes to us with the heart-moving appeal, "I have given all to thee; what givest thou to Me?" "My well-beloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill; and he fenced it and planted it, and built a tower and a wine-press in it"--and what then?--"and he looked that it should bring forth grapes." Christ comes to each of you professing Christians, and asks, "What fruit hast thou borne after all My sedulous husbandry?"
II. Now note, in the next place, what Christ found.
"Nothing but leaves." I have already said that we are told that the habit of growth of these trees is that the fruit accompanies, and sometimes precedes, the leaves. Whether it is so or no, let me remind you that leaves are an outcome of the life as well as fruit, and that they benefit the tree, and a.s.sist in the production of the fruit which it ought to bear. And so the symbol suggests things that are good in themselves, ancillary and subsidiary to the production of fruit, but which sometimes tend to such disproportionate exuberance of growth as that all the life of the tree runs to leaf, and there is riot a berry to be found on it.
And if you want to know what such things are, remember the condition of the rulers of Israel at that time. They prided themselves upon their nominal, external, hereditary connection with a system of revelation, they trusted in mere ritualisms, they had ossified religion into theology, and degraded morality into casuistry. They thought that because they had been born Jews, and circ.u.mcised, and because there was a daily sacrifice going on in the Temple, and because they had Rabbis who could split hairs _ad infinitum_, therefore they were the "temple of the Lord," and G.o.d"s chosen.
And that is exactly what hosts of pagans, masquerading as Christians, are doing in all our so-called Christian lands, and in all our so-called Christian congregations. In any community of so-called Christian people there is a little nucleus of real, earnest, G.o.d-fearing folk, and a great fringe of people whose Christianity is mostly from the teeth outward, who have a nominal and external connection with religion, who have been "baptized" and are "communicants," who think that religion lies mainly in coming on a Sunday, and with more or less toleration and interest listening to a preacher"s words and joining in external worship, and all the while the "weightier matters of the law"--righteousness, justice, and the love of G.o.d--they leave untouched. What describes such a type of religion with more piercing accuracy than "nothing but leaves"?
External connection with G.o.d"s Church is a good thing. It is meant to make us better men and women. If it does not, it is a bad thing. Acts of worship, more or less elaborate--for it is not the elaboration of ceremonial, but the mistaken view of it, that does the harm--acts of worship may be helpful, or may be absolute barriers to real religious life. They are becoming so largely to-day. The drift and trend of opinion in some parts of so-called Christendom is in the direction of outward ceremonial. And I, for one, believe that there are few things doing more harm to the Christian character of England to-day than the preposterous recurrence to a reliance on the mere externals of worship. Of course we Dissenters pride ourselves on having no complicity with the sacramentarian errors which underlie these. But there may be quite as much of a barrier between the soul and Christ, reared by the bare worship of Nonconformists, or by the no-worship of the Society of Friends. If the absence of form be converted into a form, as it often is, there may be as lofty and wide a barrier raised by these as by the most elaborate ritual of the highest ceremonial that exists in Christendom. And so I say to you, dear brethren, seeing that we are all in danger of cleaving to externals and subst.i.tuting these which are intended to be helps to the production of G.o.dly life and character, it becomes us all to listen to the solemn word of exhortation that comes out of my text, and to beware lest our religion runs to leaf instead of setting into fruit.
It does so with many of us; that is a certainty. I am thinking about no individual, about no individuals, but I am only speaking common sense when I say that amongst as many people as I am now addressing there will be an appreciable proportion who have no notion of religion as anything beyond a more or less imperative and more or less unwelcome set of external observances.
III. And so, lastly, let me ask you to notice what Christ did.
I do not need to trouble myself nor you with vindicating the morality of this miracle against the fantastic objections that often have been made against it; nor need I say a word more than I have already said about its symbolical meaning. Israel was in that week being asked for the last time to "bring forth fruit" to the Lord of the vineyard. The refusal bound barrenness on the synagogue and on the nation, if not absolutely for ever, at all events until "it shall turn to the Lord,"
and partake again of "the root and fatness" from which it has been broken off. What thirsty lips since that week have ever got any good out of Rabbinism and Judaism? No "figs" have grown on that "thistle."
The world has pa.s.sed it by, and left all its subtle casuistries and painfully microscopic studies of the letter of Scripture--with utter oblivion of its spirit--left them all severely and wisely alone.
Judaism is a dead tree.
And is there nothing else in this incident? "No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever"; the punishment of that fruitlessness was confirmed and eternal barrenness. _There_ is the lesson that the punishment of any Bin is to bind the sin upon the doer of it.
But, further, the church or the individual whose religion runs to leaf is useless to the world. What does the world care about the ceremonials and the externals of worship, and a painful orthodoxy, and the study of the letter of Scripture? Nothing. A useless church or a Christian, from whom no man gets any fruit to cool a thirsty, parched lip, is only fit for what comes after the barrenness, and that is, that every tree that bringeth "not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire." The churches of England, and we, as integral parts of these, have solemn duties lying upon us to-day; and if we cannot help our brethren, and feed and nourish the hungry and thirsty hearts and souls of mankind, then--then! the sooner we are plucked up and pitched over the vineyard wall, which is the fate of the barren vine, the better for the world and the better for the vineyard.
The fate of Judaism teaches, to all of us professing Christians, very solemn lessons. "If G.o.d spared not the natural branches, take heed lest He also spare not thee." What has become of the seven churches of Asia Minor? They hardened into chattering theological "orthodoxy," and all the blood of them went to the surface, so to speak. And so down came the Mohammedan power--which was strong then because it did believe in a G.o.d, and not in its own belief about a G.o.d--and wiped them off the face of the earth. And so, brethren, we have, in this miracle, a warning and a prophecy which it becomes all the Christian communities of this day, and the individual members of such, to lay very earnestly to heart.
But do not let us forget that the Evangelist who does not tell us the story of the blasted fig-tree does tell us its a.n.a.logue, the parable of the barren fig-tree, and that in it we read that when the fiat of destruction had gone forth, there was one who said, "Let it alone this year also that I may dig about it, ... and if it bear fruit, well! If not, after that thou shalt cut it down." So the barren tree may become a fruitful tree, though it has. .h.i.therto borne nothing but leaves. Your religion may have been all on the surface and in form, but you can come into touch with Him in whom is our life and from whom comes our fruitfulness. He has said to each of us, "As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine, no more can ye, except ye abide in Me."
DISHONEST TENANTS
"And He began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set an hedge about it, and digged a place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country. 2. And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the vineyard. 3. And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty. 4. And again he sent unto them another servant; and at him they cast stones, and wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully handled. 5. And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some 6. Having yet therefore one son, his well beloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son. 7. But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours. 8. And they took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard. 9. What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others. 10. And have ye not read this scripture: The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: 11. This was the Lord"s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? 12. And they sought to lay hold on Him, but feared the people: for they knew that He had spoken the parable against them; and they left Him, and went their way."--Mark xii. 1-12.
The ecclesiastical rulers had just been questioning Jesus as to the authority by which He acted. His answer, a counter-question as to John"s authority, was not an evasion. If they decided whence John came, they would not be at any loss as to whence Jesus came. If they steeled themselves against acknowledging the Forerunner, they would not be receptive of Christ"s message. That keen-edged retort plainly indicates Christ"s conviction of the rulers" insincerity, and in this parable He charges home on these solemn hypocrites their share in the hereditary rejection of messengers whose authority was unquestionable.
Much they cared for even divine authority, as they and their predecessors had shown through centuries! The veil of parable is transparent here. Jesus increased in severity and bold attack as the end drew near.