The conviction that society needs to be reconst.i.tuted on other principles is spread everywhere, and is often a.s.sociated with intense disbelief in Christ the Regenerator.
Has not the past proved that all schemes for the regeneration of society which do not grapple with the fact of sin, and which do not provide a means of infusing into human nature a new impulse and direction, will end in failure, and are only too likely to end in blood? These two requirements are met by Jesus, and by Him only, and whoever rejects Him and His gift of pardon and cleansing, and His inbreathing of a new life into the individual, will fail in his effort, however earnest and n.o.ble in many aspects, to redeem society and bring about a fair new world.
It is pitiable to see the waste of high aspiration and eager effort in so many quarters today. But that waste is sure to attend every scheme which does not start from the recognition of Christ"s work as the basis of the world"s transformation, and does not crown Him as the King, because He is the Saviour, of mankind.
AUTHORITY AND WORK
"For the Son of Man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch."--Mark xiii. 34.
Church order is not directly touched on in the Gospels, but the principles which underlie all Church order are distinctly laid down.
The whole community of Christian people is a family or household, being brethren because possessors of a new life through Christ. In that household there is one "Master," and all its members are "servants." That name suggests the purpose for which they exist; the meaning of all their offices, dignities, etc.
I. The authority with which the servants are invested.
We hear a great deal about the authority of the Church in these days, as a determiner of truth and as a prescriber of Christian action. It means generally official authority, the power of guidance and definition of the Church"s action, etc., which some people think is lodged in the hands of preachers, pastors, priests, either individually or collectively. There is nothing of that sort meant here. Whatever this authority is, it belongs to the whole body of the servants, not to individuals among them. It is the prerogative of the whole _ecclesia_, not of some handful of them. "This honour," whatever it be, "have all the saints."
Explain by reference to "the kings of the earth exercise lordship over them"; "the greatest shall be your servant." It is then but another name for capacity for service, power to bless, etc.
And this idea is still further borne out if we go back to the parable of our text. A man leaves his house in charge of his servants. To them is committed the responsibility for his goods. His honour and interests are in their hands. They have control over his possessions.
This is the a.n.a.logy which our Lord suggests as presenting a vivid likeness to our position in the world.
Christ has committed the care of His kingdom, the glory of His name, the growth of His cause in the world to His Church, and has endowed it with all "talents," _i.e._ gifts needful for that work. Or, to put it in other words, they are His representatives in the world. They have to defend His honour. His name is scandalised or glorified by their actions. They have to see to His interests. They are charged with the carrying out of His mind and purposes.
The foundation of all is laid. Henceforth building on it is all, and that is to be done by men. Human lips and Christian effort--not without the divine Spirit in the word--are to be the means.
It is as when some commander plans his battle, and from an eminence overlooks the current of the fight, and marks the plunging legions as they struggle through the smoke. He holds all the tremendous machinery in his hands. The plan and the glory are his, but the execution of the plan lies with the troops.
In a still more true sense all the glory of the Christian conquest of the world is His, but still the instruments are ourselves. The whole counsel of G.o.d is on our side. We "go not a warfare at our own charges." Note the perfect consistency of this with all that we hold of the necessity of divine influence, etc.
His servants are intrusted with all His "goods." They have authority over the gifts which He has given them, _i.e._ Christian men are stewards of Christ"s riches for others.
They have access to the free use of them all for themselves.
Thus the "authority" is all derived. It is all given for the sake of others. It is all capacity for service. Hence--
II. The authority with which the servants are invested binds every one of them to hard work for Christ.
"To every man his work"
(1) Gifts involve duties. That is the first great thought. To have received binds us to impart. "Freely ye have received, freely give."
All selfish possession of the gifts which Christ bestows is grave sin.
The price at which they were procured, that miracle and mystery of self-sacrifice, is the great pattern as well as the great motive for our service.
The purpose for which we have received them is plainly set forth: in the existence of the solidarity in which we are all bound; in the definite utterances of Scripture.
The need for their exercise is only too palpable in the condition of things around us.
(2) In this mult.i.tude of servants every one has his own task.
The universality of the great gift leads to a corresponding universality of obligation. All Christians have their gifts. Each of us has his special work marked out for him by character, relationships, circ.u.mstances, natural tastes, etc.
How solemn a divine call there is in these individual peculiarities which we so often think of as unimportant accidents, or regard mainly in their bearing on our own ease and comfort! How reverently we should regard the diversities which are thus revelations of G.o.d"s will concerning our tasks! How earnestly we should seek to know what it is that we are fitted for!
The importance of all protests against priestly a.s.sumption lies here, that they strengthen the force with which we proclaim that every man has his "work."
Ponder the variety of characters and gifts which Christ gives and desires His servants to use, and the indispensable need for them all.
The ideal Church is the "body" of Christ, in which each member has its place and function.
Our fault in this matter.
(3) The duties are to be done in the spirit of hard toil.
The servant has "his work" allotted him, and the word implies that the work calls for effort. The race is not to be run without dust and sweat. Our Christian service is not to be regarded as a "bye-product"
or _parergon_. It is, so to speak, a _vocation_, not an _avocation_.
It deserves and demands all the energy that we can put forth, continuity and constancy, plan and system. Nothing is to be done for G.o.d, any more than for ourselves, without toil. "In the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread and give it to others."
III, To do this work, watchfulness is needed.
The division of tasks between "servant" and "porter" is only part of the drapery of the parable. To show that watchfulness belongs to all, see the two following verses.
What is this watchfulness?
Not constant fidgety curiosity about the coming of the Lord; not hunting after apocalyptic dates. The modern impression seems to be that such study is "watchfulness." Christ says that the time of His coming is hidden (see previous verses). Ignorance of that is the very reason why we are to watch. Watchfulness, then, is just a profound and constant feeling of the transiency of this present. The mind is to be kept detached from it; the eye and heart are to be going out to things "unseen and eternal"; we are to be familiarising ourselves with the thought that the world is pa.s.sing away.
This watchfulness is an indispensable part of our "work." The true Christian thought of the transiency of the world sets us to work the more vigorously in it, and increases, not diminishes, our sense of the importance of time and of earthly things, and braces us to our tasks by the thought of the brevity of opportunity, as well as by guarding us against tastes and habits which eat all earnestness out of the soul.
Thus "working and watching," happy will be the servant whom his Lord will find "so doing," _i.e._ at work, not idly looking for Him. Our common duties are the best preparation for our Lord"s coming.
THE ALABASTER BOX
"And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on Me.... 8. She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint My body to the burying. 9. Verily I say unto you.
Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her."--Mark xiv. 6-9.
John"s Gospel sets this incident in its due framework of time and place, and tells us the names of the actors. The time was within a week of Calvary, the place was Bethany, where, as John significantly reminds us, Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead, thereby connecting the feast with that incident; the woman who broke the box of ointment and poured the perfume on the head and feet of Jesus was Mary; the first critic of her action was Judas. Selfishness blames love for the profusion and prodigality, which to it seem folly and waste. The disciples chimed in with the objection, not because they were superior to Mary in wisdom, but because they were inferior in consecration.
John tells us, too, that Martha was "amongst them that served." The characteristics of the two sisters are preserved. The two types of character which they respectively represent have great difficulty in understanding and doing justice to one another. Christ understands and does justice to them both. Martha, bustling, practical, utilitarian to the finger-tips, does not much care about listening to Christ"s words of wisdom. She has not any very high-strung or finely-spun emotions, but she can busy herself in getting a meal ready; she loves Him with all her heart, and she takes her own way of showing it. But she gets impatient with her sister, and thinks that her sitting at Christ"s feet is a dreamy waste of time, and not without a touch of selfishness, "taking no care for me, though I have got so much on my back." And so, in like manner, Mary is made out to be a monster of selfishness; "Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?" She could not serve, she would only have been in Martha"s road if she had tried. But she had one precious thing which was her very own, and she caught it up, and in the irrepressible burst of her thankful love, as she saw Lazarus sitting there at the table beside Jesus, she poured the liquid perfume on His head and feet. He casts His shield over the poor, unpractical woman, who did such an utterly useless thing, for which a basin of water and a towel would have served far better. There are a great many useless things which, in Heaven"s estimate, are more valuable than a great many apparently more practical ones. Christ accepts the service, and in His deep words lays down three or four principles which it would do us all good to carry with us into our daily lives. So I shall now try to gather from these utterances of our Lord"s some great truths about Christian service.
I. The first of them is the motive which hallows everything.
"She hath wrought a good work on Me." Now that is pretty nearly a definition of what a good work is, and you see it is very unlike our conventional notions of what const.i.tutes a "good work." Christ implies that anything, no matter what are its other characteristics, that is "on" Him, that is to say, directed towards Him under the impulse of simple love to Him, is a "good work"; and the converse follows, that nothing which has not that saving salt of reference to Him in it deserves the t.i.tle. Did you ever think of what an extraordinary position that is for a man to take up? "Think about Me in what you do, and you will do good. Do anything, no matter what, because you love Me, and it will be lifted up into high regions, and become transfigured; a good work." He took the best that any one could give Him, whether it was of outward possessions or of inward reverence, abject submission, and love and trust. He never said to any man, "You are going over the score. You are exaggerating about Me. Stand up, for I also am a Man." He did say once, "Why callest thou Me good?" not because it was an incorrect attribution, but because it was a mere piece of conventional politeness. And in all other cases, not only does He accept as His rightful possession the utmost of reverence that any man can do Him, and bring Him, but He here implies, if He does not, as He almost does, specifically declare, that to be done for His sake lifts a deed into the region of "good" works.