THE NEW Pa.s.sOVER
"And the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the Pa.s.sover, the disciples said unto Him, Where wilt Thou that we go and prepare that Thou mayest eat the Pa.s.sover? 13. And He sendeth forth two of His disciples, and saith unto them, Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: follow him. 14. And wheresoever he shall go in, say ye to the goodman of the house, The Master saith, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the Pa.s.sover with My disciples? 15. And he will shew you a large upper room furnished and prepared: there make ready for us. 16. And His disciples went forth, and came into the city, and found as He had said unto them: and they made ready the Pa.s.sover. 17. And in the evening He cometh with the twelve. 18. And as they sat and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eateth with Me shall betray Me. 19. And they began to be sorrowful, and to say unto Him one by one, Is it I? and another said, Is it I? 20. And He answered and said unto them, It is one of the twelve, that dippeth with Me in the dish.
21. The Son of Man indeed goeth, as it is written of Him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born. 22. And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is My body. 23. And He took the cup, and when He had given thanks, He gave it to them: and they all drank of it. 24. And He said unto them, This is My blood of the new testament, which is shed for many. 25.
Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of G.o.d. 26. And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives."--Mark xiv. 12-26.
This pa.s.sage falls into three sections--the secret preparation for the Pa.s.sover (verses 12-17), the sad announcement of the betrayer (verses 18-21), and the inst.i.tution of the Lord"s Supper (verses 22-26). It may be interesting to notice that in the two former of these Mark"s account approximates to Luke"s, while in the third he is nearer Matthew"s. A comparison of the three accounts, noting the slight, but often significant, variations, should be made. Nothing in the Gospels is trivial. "The dust of that land is gold."
I. The secret preparation for the Pa.s.sover. The three Evangelists all give the disciples" question, but only Luke tells us that it was in answer to our Lord"s command to Peter and John to go and prepare the Pa.s.sover. They very naturally said "Where?" as they were all strangers in Jerusalem. Matthew may not have known of our Lord"s initiative; but if Mark were, as he is, with apparent correctness, said to have been, Peter"s mouthpiece in his Gospel, the reticence as to the prominence of that Apostle is natural, and explains the omission of all but the bare fact of the despatch of the two. The curiously roundabout way in which they are directed to the "upper room" is only explicable on the supposition that it was intended to keep them in the dark till the last moment, so that no hint might leak from them to Judas. Whether the token of the man with the waterpot was a preconcerted signal or an instance of our Lord"s supernatural knowledge and sovereign sway, his employment as a silent and probably unconscious guide testifies to Christ"s wish for that last hour to be undisturbed. A man carrying a water-pot, which was woman"s special task, would be a conspicuous figure even in the festival crowds. The message to the householder implies that he recognised "the Master" as his Master, and was ready to give up at His requisition even the chamber which he had prepared for his own family celebration of the feast.
Thus instructed, the two trusted Apostles left Bethany, early in the day, without a clue of their destination reaching Judas"s hungry watchfulness. Evidently they did not return, and in the evening Jesus led the others straight to the place. Mark says that He came "with the twelve"; but he does not mean thereby to specify the number, but to define the cla.s.s, of His attendants.
Each figure in this preparatory scene yields important lessons. Our Lord"s earnest desire to secure that still hour before pushing out into the storm speaks pathetically of His felt need of companionship and strengthening, as well as of His self-forgetting purpose to help His handful of bewildered followers and His human longing to live in faithful memories. His careful arrangements bring vividly into sight the limitations of His manhood, in that He, "by whom all things consist," had to contrive and plan in order to baffle for a moment His pursuers. And, side by side with the lowliness, as ever, is the majesty; for while He stoops to arrange, He sees with superhuman cert.i.tude what will happen, moves unconscious feet with secret and sovereign sway, and in royal tones claims possession of His servant"s possessions.
The two messengers, sent out with instructions which would only guide them half-way to their destination, and obliged, if they were to move at all, to trust absolutely to His knowledge, present specimens of the obedience still required. He sends us out still on a road full of sharp turnings round which we cannot see. We get light enough for the first stage; and when it is traversed, the second will be plainer.
The man with the water-pot reminds us how little we may be aware of the Hand which guides us, or of our uses in His plans. "I girded thee, though thou hast not known Me,"--how little the poor water-bearer knew who were following, or dreamed that he and his load would be remembered for ever!
The householder responded at once, and gladly, to the authoritative message, which does not ask a favour, but demands a right. Probably he had intended to celebrate the Pa.s.sover with his own family, in the large chamber on the roof, with the cool evening air about it, and the moonlight sleeping around. But he gladly gives it up. Are we as ready to surrender our cherished possessions for His use?
II. The sad announcement of the traitor (verses 18-21). As the Revised Version indicates more clearly than the Authorised, the purport of the announcement was not merely that the betrayer was an Apostle, but that he was to be known by his dipping his hand into the common dish at the same moment as our Lord. The prophetic psalm would have been abundantly fulfilled though Judas"s fingers had never touched Christ"s; but the minute accomplishment should teach us that Jewish prophecy was the voice of divine foreknowledge, and embraced small details as well as large tendencies. Many hands dipped with Christ"s, and so the sign was not unmistakably indicative, and hence was privately supplemented, as John tells us, by the giving of "the sop."
The uncertainty as to the indication given by the token is reflected by the reiterated questions of the Apostles, which, in the Greek, are cast in a form that antic.i.p.ates a negative answer: "Surely not I?"
Mark omits the audacious hypocrisy of Judas"s question in the same form, and Christ"s curt, sad answer which Matthew gives. His brief and vivid sketch is meant to fix attention on the unanimous shuddering horror of these faithful hearts at the thought that they could be thus guilty--a horror which was not the child of presumptuous self-confidence, but of hearty, honest love. They thought it impossible, as they felt the throbbing of their own hearts--and yet--and yet--might it not be? As they probed their hearts deeper, they became dimly aware of dark gulfs of possible unfaithfulness half visible there, and so betook themselves to their Master, and strengthened their loyalty by the question, which breathed at once detestation of the treason and humble distrust of themselves. It is well to feel and speak the strong recoil from sin of a heart loyal to Jesus. It is better to recognise the sleeping snakes, the possibilities of evil in ourselves, and to take to Christ our ignorance and self-distrust. It is wiser to cry "Is it I?" than to boast, "Although all shall be offended, yet will not I." "Hold Thou me up, and I shall be safe."
Our Lord answers the questions by a still more emphatic repet.i.tion of the distinctive mark, and then, in verse 21, speaks deep words of mingled pathos, dignity, and submission. The voluntariness of His death, and its uniqueness as His own act of return to His eternal home, are contained in that majestic "goeth," which a.s.serts the impotence of the betrayer and his employers, without the Lord"s own consent. On the other hand, the necessity to which He willingly bowed is set forth in that "as it is written of Him." And what sadness and lofty consciousness of His own sacred personality and judicial authority are blended in the awful sentence on the traitor! What was He that treachery to Him should be a crime so transcendent? What right had He thus calmly to p.r.o.nounce condemnation? Did He see into the future? Is it the voice of a Divine Judge, or of a man judging in his own cause, which speaks this pa.s.sionless sentence? Surely none of His sayings are more fully charged with His claims to pre-existence, divinity, and judicial authority, than this which He spoke at the very moment when the traitor"s plot was on the verge of success.
III. The inst.i.tution of the Lord"s Supper (verses 22-26). Mark"s account is the briefest of the three, and his version of Christ"s words the most compressed. It omits the affecting "Do this for remembering Me," which is pre-supposed by the very act of inst.i.tuting the ordinance, since it is nothing if not memorial; and it makes prominent two things--the significance of the elements, and the command to partake of them. To these must be added Christ"s att.i.tude in "blessing" the bread and cup, and His distribution of them among the disciples. The Pa.s.sover was to Israel the commemoration of their redemption from captivity and their birth as a nation. Jesus puts aside this divinely appointed and venerable festival to set in its stead the remembrance of Himself. That night, "to be much remembered of the children of Israel," is to be forgotten, and come no more into the number of the months; and its empty place is to be filled by the memory of the hours then pa.s.sing. Surely His act was either arrogance or the calm consciousness of the unique significance and power of His death. Think of any mere teacher or prophet doing the like! The world would meet the preposterous claim implied with deserved and inextinguishable laughter. Why does it not do so with Christ"s act?
Christ"s view of His death is written unmistakably on the Lord"s Supper. It is not merely that He wishes _it_ rather than His life, His miracles, or words, to be kept in thankful remembrance, but that He desires one aspect of it to be held high and clear above all others.
He is the true "Pa.s.sover Lamb," whose shed and sprinkled blood establishes new bonds of amity and new relations, with tender and wonderful reciprocal obligations, between G.o.d and the "many" who truly partake of that sacrifice. The key-words of Judaism--"sacrifice,"
"covenant," "sprinkling with blood"--are taken over into Christianity, and the ideas they represent are set in its centre, to be cherished as its life. The Lord"s Supper is the conclusive answer to the allegation that Christ did not teach the sacrificial character and atoning power of His death. What, then, did He teach when He said, "This is My blood of the covenant, which is shed for many"?
The Pa.s.sover was a family festival, and that characteristic pa.s.ses over to the Lord"s Supper. Christ is not only the food on which we feed, but the Head of the family and distributor of the banquet. He is the feast and the Governor of the feast, and all who sit at that table are "brethren." One life is in them all, and they are one as partakers of One.
The Lord"s Supper is a visible symbol of the Christian life, which should not only be all lived in remembrance of Him, but consists in partaking by faith of His life, and incorporating it in ours, until we come to the measure of perfect men, which, in one aspect, we reach when we can say, "I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me."
There is a prophetic element, as well as a commemorative and symbolic, in the Lord"s Supper, which is prominent in Christ"s closing words. He does not partake of the symbols which He gives; but there comes a time, in that perfected form of the kingdom, when perfect love shall make all the citizens perfectly conformed to the perfect will of G.o.d.
Then, whatsoever a.s.sociations of joy, of invigoration, of festal fellowship, cl.u.s.tered round the wine-cup here, shall be heightened, purified, and perpetuated in the calm raptures of the heavenly feast, in which He will be Partaker, as well as Giver and Food. "Thou shalt make them drink of the river of Thy pleasures." The King"s lips will touch the golden cup filled with un-foaming wine, ere He commends it to His guests. And from that feast they will "go no more out," neither shall the triumphant music of its great "hymn" be followed by any Olivet or Gethsemane, or any denial, or any Calvary; but there shall be "no more sorrow, nor sin, nor death"; for "the former things are pa.s.sed away," and He has made "all things new."
"IS IT I?"
"Is it I?"--Mark xiv. 19
The scene shows that Judas had not as yet drawn any suspicion on himself.
Here the Apostles seem to be higher than their ordinary stature; for they do not take to questioning one another, or even to protest, "No!"
but to questioning Christ.
I. The solemn prophecy.
It seems strange at first sight that our Lord should have introduced such thoughts then, disturbing the sweet repose of that hallowed hour.
But the terrible fact of the betrayal was naturally suggested by the emblems of His death, and still more by the very confiding familiarity of that hour. His household were gathered around Him, and the more close and confidential the intercourse, the bitterer that thought to Him, that one of the little band was soon to play the traitor. It is the cry of His wounded love, the wail of His unrequited affection, and, so regarded, is infinitely touching. It is an instance of that sad insight into man"s heart which in His divinity He possessed. What a fountain of sorrow for His manhood was that knowledge! how it increases the pathos of His tenderness! Not only did He read hearts as they thought and felt in the present, but He read their future with more than a prophet"s insight. He saw how many buds of promise would shrivel, how many would go away and walk no more with Him."
That solemn prophecy may well be pondered by all Christian a.s.semblies, and specially when gathered for the observance of the Lord"s Supper.
Perhaps never since that first inst.i.tution has a community met to celebrate it without Him who "walks amid the candlesticks," with eyes as a flame of fire marking a Judas among the disciples. There is, I think, no doubt that Judas partook of the Lord"s Supper. But be that as it may, he was among the number, and our Lord knew him to be "the traitor."
In its essence Judas"s sin can be repeated still, and the thought of that possibility may well mingle with the grateful and adoring contemplations suitable to the act of partaking of the Lord"s Supper.
In the hour of holiest Christian emotion the thought that I may betray the Lord who has died for me will be especially hateful, and to remember the possibility then will do much to prevent its ever becoming a reality.
II. The self-distrustful question, "Is it I?"
It suggests that the possibilities of the darkest sin are in each of us, and especially, that the sin of treason towards Christ is in each of us.
Think generally of the awful possibilities of sin in every soul.
All sin has one root, so it is capable of pa.s.sing from one form to another as light, heat, and motion do, or like certain diseases that are Protean in their forms. One sin is apt to draw others after it.
"None shall want her mate." Wild beasts of "the desert" meet with wild beasts of "the islands." Sins are gregarious, as it were; they "hunt in couples." "Then goeth he, and taketh with him seven other spirits more wicked than himself."
The roots of all sin are in each. Men may think that they are protected from certain forms of sin by temperament, but ident.i.ty of nature is deeper than varieties of temperament. The greatest sins are committed by yielding to very common motives. Love of money is not a rare feeling, but it led Judas to betray Jesus. Anger is thought to be scarcely a sin at all, but it often moves an arm to murder.
Temptations to each sin are round us all. We walk in a tainted atmosphere.
There is progress in evil. No man reaches the extreme of depravity at a bound. Judas"s treachery was of slow growth.
So still there is the constant operation and pressure of forces and tendencies drawing us away from Jesus Christ. We, every one of us, know that, if we allowed our nature to have its way, we should leave Him and "make shipwreck of faith and of a good conscience." The forms in which we might do it might vary, but do it we should. We are like a man desperately clutching some rocky projection on the face of a precipice, who knows that if once he lets go, he will be dashed to pieces. "There goes John Bradford, but for the grace of G.o.d!" But for this same restraining grace, to what depths might we not sink? So, in all Christian hearts there should be profound consciousness of their own weakness. The man "who fears no fall" is sure to have one. It is perilous to march through an enemy"s country in loose order, without scouts and rearguard. Rigorous control is ever necessary. Brotherly judgment, too, of others should result from our consciousness of weakness. Examples of others falling are not to make us say cynically, "We are all alike," but to set us to think humbly of ourselves, and to supplicate divine keeping," Lord, save _me_, or I perish!"
III. The safety of the self-distrustful.
When the consciousness of possible falling is brought home to us, we shall carry, if we are wise, all our doubts as to ourselves to Jesus.
There is safety in asking Him, "Is it I?" To bare our inmost selves before Him, and not to shrink, even if that piercing gaze lights on hidden meannesses and incipient treachery, may be painful, but is healing. He will keep us from yielding to the temptation of which we are aware, and which we tell frankly to Him. The lowly sense of our own liability to fall, if it drives us closer to Him, will make it certain that we shall not fall.
While the other disciples asked "Is it I?" John asked "Who is it?" The disciple who leaned on Christ"s bosom was bathed in such a consciousness of Christ"s love that treason against it was impossible.
He, alone of the Evangelists, records his question, and he tells us that he put it, "leaning back as he was, on Jesus"s breast." For the purpose of whispering his interrogation, he changed his att.i.tude for a moment so as to press still closer to Jesus. How could one who was thus nestling nearer to that heart be the betrayer? The consciousness of Christ"s love, accompanied with the effort to draw closer to Him, is our surest defence against every temptation to faithlessness or betrayal of Him.
Any other fancied ground of security is deceptive, and will sooner or later crumble beneath our deceived feet. On this very occasion, Peter built a towering fabric of profession of unalterable fidelity on such shifting ground, and saw it collapse into ruin in a few hours. Let us profit by the lesson!
That wholesome consciousness of our weakness need not shade with sadness the hours of communion, but it may well help us to turn them to their highest use in making them occasions for lowlier self-distrust and closer cleaving to Him. If we thus use our sense of weakness, the sweet security will enter our souls that belongs to those who have trusted in the great promise: "He shall not fall, for G.o.d Is able to make him stand." The blessed ones who are kept from falling and "presented faultless before the presence of His glory,"
will hear with wonder the voice of the Judge ascribing to them deeds of service to Him of which they had not been conscious, and will have to ask once more the old question, but with a new meaning: "Lord, is it I? when saw we Thee an hungered, and fed Thee?"
"STRONG CRYING AND TEARS"
"And they came to a place which was named Gethsemane: and He saith to His disciples, Sit ye here, while I shall pray. 33. And He taketh with Him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy; 34. And saith onto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch. 35. And He went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pa.s.s from Him. 36. And He said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto Thee; take away this cup from Me: nevertheless not what I will, but what Thou wilt. 37. And He cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou!
couldest not thou watch one hour? 38. Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly is ready, but the flesh is weak. 39.