And again He went away, and prayed, and spake the same words. 40. And when He returned, He found them asleep again, (for their eyes were heavy,) neither wist they what to answer Him. 41. And He cometh the third time, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest, it is enough, the hour is come; behold, the Son of Man is betrayed into the hands of sinners. 42. Rise up, let us go; lo, he that betrayeth Me is at hand.--Mark xiv. 32-42.
The three who saw Christ"s agony in Gethsemane were so little affected that they slept. We have to beware of being so little affected that we speculate and seek to a.n.a.lyse rather than to bow adoringly before that mysterious and heart-subduing sight. Let us remember that the place is "holy ground." It was meant that we should look on the Christ who prayed "with strong crying and tears," else the three sleepers would not have accompanied Him so far; but it was meant that our gaze should be reverent and from a distance, else they would have gone with Him into the shadow of the olives.
"Gethsemane" means "an oil-press." It was an enclosed piece of ground, according to Matthew and Mark; a garden, according to John. Jesus, by some means, had access to it, and had "oft-times resorted thither with His disciples." To this familiar spot, with its many happy a.s.sociations, Jesus led the disciples, who would simply expect to pa.s.s the night there, as many Pa.s.sover visitors were accustomed to bivouac in the open air.
The triumphant tone of spirit which animated His a.s.suring words to His disciples, "I have overcome the world," changed as they pa.s.sed through the moonlight down to the valley, and when they reached the garden deep gloom lay upon Him. His agitation is pathetically and most naturally indicated by the conflict of feeling as to companionship. He leaves the other disciples at the entrance, for He would fain be alone in His prayer. Then, a moment after, He bids the three, who had been on the Mount of Transfiguration and with Him at many other special times, accompany Him into the recesses of the garden. But again need of solitude overcomes longing for companionship, and He bids them stay where they were, while He plunges still further into the shadow. How human it is! How well all of us, who have been down into the depths of sorrow, know the drawing of these two opposite longings!
Scripture seldom undertakes to tell Christ"s emotions. Still seldomer does He speak of them. But at this tremendous hour the veil is lifted by one corner, and He Himself is fain to relieve His bursting heart by pathetic self-revelation, which is in fact an appeal to the three for sympathy, as well as an evidence of His sharing the common need of lightening the burdened spirit by speech. Mark"s description of Christ"s feelings lays stress first on their beginning, and then on their nature as being astonishment and anguish. A wave of emotion swept over Him, and was in marked contrast with His previous demeanour.
The three had never seen their calm Master so moved. We feel that such agitation is profoundly unlike the serenity of the rest of His life, and especially remarkable if contrasted with the tone of John"s account of His discourse in the upper room; and, if we are wise, we shall gaze on that picture drawn for us by Mark with reverent grat.i.tude, and feel that we look at something more sacred than human trembling at the thought of death.
Our Lord"s own infinitely touching words heighten the impression of the Evangelist"s "My soul is exceeding sorrowful," or, as the word literally means, "ringed round with sorrow." A dark orb of distress encompa.s.sed Him, and there was nowhere a break in the gloom which shut Him in. And this is He who, but an hour before, had bequeathed His "joy" to His servants, and had bidden them "be of good cheer," since He had "conquered the world."
Dare we ask what were the elements of that all-enveloping horror of great darkness? Reverently we may. That astonishment and distress no doubt were partly due to the recoil of flesh from death. But if that was their sole cause, Jesus has been surpa.s.sed in heroism, not only by many a martyr who drew his strength from Him, but by many a rude soldier and by many a criminal. No! The waters of the baptism with which He was baptized had other sources than that, though it poured a tributary stream into them.
We shall not understand Gethsemane at all, nor will it touch our hearts and wills as it is meant to do, unless, as we look, we say in adoring wonder, "The Lord hath made to meet on Him the iniquity of us all." It was the weight of the world"s sin which He took on Him by willing identification of Himself with men, that pressed Him to the ground. Nothing else than the atoning character of Christ"s sufferings explains so far as it can be explained, the agony which we are permitted to behold afar off.
How nearly that agony was fatal is taught us by His own word "unto death," A little more, and He would have died. Can we retain reverence for Jesus as a perfect and pattern man, in view of His paroxysm of anguish in Gethsemane, if we refuse to accept that explanation? Truly was the place named "The Olive-press," for in it His whole being was as if in the press, and another turn of the screw would have crushed Him.
Darkness ringed Him round, but there was a rift in it right overhead.
Prayer was His refuge, as it must be ours. The soul that can cry, "Abba, Father!" does not walk in unbroken night. His example teaches us what our own sorrows should also teach us--to betake ourselves to prayer when the spirit is desolate. In that wonderful prayer we reverently note three things: there is unbroken consciousness of the Father"s love; there is the instinctive recoil of flesh and the sensitive nature from the suffering imposed; and there is the absolute submission of the will, which silences the remonstrance of flesh.
Whatever the weight laid on Jesus by His bearing of the sins of the world, it did not take from Him the sense of sonship. But, on the other hand, that sense did not take from Him the consciousness that the world"s sin lay upon Him. In like manner His cry on the Cross mysteriously blended the sense of communion with G.o.d and of abandonment by G.o.d. Into these depths we see but a little way, and adoration is better than speculation.
Jesus shrank from "this cup," in which so many bitter ingredients besides death were mingled, such as treachery, desertion, mocking, rejection, exposure to "the contradiction of sinners." There was no failure of purpose in that recoil, for the cry for exemption was immediately followed by complete submission to the Father"s will. No perturbation in the lower nature ever caused His fixed resolve to waver. The needle always pointed to the pole, however the ship might pitch and roll. A prayer in which "remove this from me" is followed by that yielding "nevertheless" is always heard. Christ"s was heard, for calmness came back, and His flesh was stilled and made ready for the sacrifice.
So He could rejoin the three, in whose sympathy and watchfulness He had trusted--and they all were asleep! Surely that was one ingredient of bitterness in His cup. We wonder at their insensibility; and how they must have wondered at it too, when after years taught them what they had lost, and how faithless they had been! Think of men who could have seen and heard that scene, which has drawn the worshipping regard of the world ever since, missing it all because they fell asleep! They had kept awake long enough to see Him fall on the ground and to hear His prayer, but, worn out by a long day of emotion and sorrow, they slept.
Jesus was probably rapt in prayer for a considerable time, perhaps for a literal "hour." He was specially touched by Peter"s failure, so sadly contrasted with his confident professions in the upper room; but no word of blame escaped Him. Rather He warned them of swift-coming temptation, which they could only overcome by watchfulness and prayer.
It was indeed near, for the soldiers would burst in, before many minutes had pa.s.sed, polluting the moonlight with their torches and disturbing the quiet night with their shouts. What gracious allowance for their weakness and loving recognition of the disciples" imperfect good lie in His words, which are at once an excuse for their fault and an enforcement of His command to watch and pray! "The flesh is weak,"
and hinders the willing spirit from doing what it wills. It was an apology for the slumber of the three; it is a merciful statement of the condition under which all discipleship has to be carried on. "He knoweth our frame." Therefore we all need to watch and pray, since only by such means can weak flesh be strengthened and strong flesh weakened, or the spirit preserved in willingness.
The words were not spoken in reference to Himself, but in a measure were true of Him. His second withdrawal for prayer seems to witness that the victory won by the first supplication was not permanent.
Again the anguish swept over His spirit in another foaming breaker, and again He sought solitude, and again He found tranquillity--and again returned to find the disciples asleep. "They knew not what to answer Him" in extenuation of their renewed dereliction.
Yet a third time the struggle was renewed. And after that, He had no need to return to the seclusion, where He had fought, and now had conclusively conquered by prayer and submission. We too may, by the same means, win partial victories over self, which may be interrupted by uprisings of flesh; but let us persevere. Twice Jesus" calm was broken by recrudescence of horror and shrinking; the third time it came back, to abide through all the trying scenes of the pa.s.sion, but for that one cry on the Cross, "Why hast Thou forsaken Me?" So it may be with us.
The last words to the three have given commentators much trouble.
"Sleep on now, and take your rest," is not so much irony as "spoken with a kind of permissive force, and in tones in which merciful reproach was blended with calm resignation." So far as He was concerned, there was no reason for their waking. But they had lost an opportunity, never to return, of helping Him in His hour of deepest agony. He needed them no more. And do not we in like manner often lose the brightest opportunities of service by untimely slumber of soul, and is not "the irrevocable past" saying to many of us, "Sleep on now since you can no more do what you have let slip from your drowsy hands"?
"It is enough" is obscure, but probably refers to the disciples"
sleep, and prepares for the transition to the next words, which summon them to arise, not to help Him by watching, but to meet the traitor.
They had slept long enough, He sadly says. That which will effectually end their sleepiness is at hand. How completely our Lord had regained His calm superiority to the horror which had shaken Him is witnessed by that majestic "Let us be going." He will go out to meet the traitor, and, after one flash of power, which smote the soldiers to the ground, will yield Himself to the hands of sinners.
The Man who lay p.r.o.ne in anguish beneath the olive-trees comes forth in serene tranquillity, and gives Himself up to the death for us all.
His agony was endured for us, and needs for its explanation the fact that it was so. His victory through prayer was for us, that we too might conquer by the same weapons. His voluntary surrender was for us, that "by His stripes we might be healed." Surely we shall not sleep, as did these others, but, moved by His sorrows and animated by His victory, watch and pray that we may share in the virtue of His sufferings and imitate the example of His submission.
THE SLEEPING APOSTLE
"Simon, sleepest thou!"--Mark xiv. 37
It is a very old Christian tradition that this Gospel is in some sense the Apostle Peter"s. There are not many features in the Gospel itself which can be relied on as confirming this idea. Perhaps one such may be found in this plaintive remonstrance, which is only preserved for us here. Matthew"s Gospel, indeed, tells us that the rebuke was addressed to Peter, but blunts the sharp point of it as directed to him, by throwing it into the plural, as if spoken to all the three slumberers: "What, could ye not watch with Me one hour?" To Matthew, the special direction of the words was unimportant, but Peter could never forget how the Master had come out from the shadow of the olives to him lying there in the moonlight, and stood before him worn with His solitary agony, and in a voice yet tremulous from His awful conflict, had said to _him_, so lately loud in his professions of fidelity, "Sleepest _thou_?"
It was but an hour or two since he had been saying, and meaning, "I will lay down my life for Thy sake," and this was what all that fervour had come to. No wonder if there is almost a tone of surprise discernible in our Lord"s word, as if He who "marvelled at the unbelief" of those who were not His followers, marvelled still more at the imperfect sympathy of those who were, and marvelled most of all at such a sudden ebb of such a flood of devotion. Surprise and sorrow, the pain of a loving heart thrown back upon itself, the sharp pang of feeling how much less one is loved than one loves, the pleading with His forgetful servant, rebuke without anger, all breathe through the question, so pathetic in its simplicity, so powerful to bow in contrition by reason of its very gentleness and self-restraint.
The record of this Evangelist proves how deep it sank into the impulsive, loving heart of the apostle, and yet the denials in the high priest"s palace, which followed so soon, show how much less power it had on him on the day when it was spoken, than it gained as he looked back on it through the long vista of years that had pa.s.sed, when he told the story to Mark.
The first lesson to be gathered from these words is drawn from the name by which our Lord here addresses the apostle: "_Simon_, sleepest thou?"
Now the usage of Mark"s Gospel in reference to this apostle"s name is remarkably uniform and precise. Both his names occur in Mark"s catalogue of the Apostles: "Simon he surnamed Peter." He is never called by both again, but before that point he is always Simon, and after it he is always Peter, except in this verse. The other Evangelists show similar purpose, for the most part, in their interchange of the names. Luke, for instance, always calls him Simon up to the same point as Mark, except once where he uses the form "Simon Peter," and thereafter always Peter, except in Christ"s solemn warning, "Simon, Simon, Satan hath desired to have you," and in the report of the tidings that met the disciples on their return from Emmaus, "The Lord hath appeared to Simon." So Matthew calls him Simon in the story of the first miraculous draught of fishes, and in the catalogue of Apostles, and afterwards uniformly Peter, except in Christ"s answer to the apostle"s great confession, where He names him "Simon Bar Jona," in order, as would appear, to bring into more solemn relief the significance of the immediately following words, "Thou art Peter." In John"s Gospel, again, we find the two forms "Simon Peter"
and the simple "Peter" used throughout with almost equal frequency, while "Simon" is only employed at the very beginning, and in the heart-piercing triple question at the end, "Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou Me?"
The conclusion seems a fair one from these details that, on the whole, the name Simon brings into prominence the natural unrenewed humanity, and the name Peter suggests the Apostolic office, the bold confessor, the impulsive, warm-hearted lover and follower of the Lord. And it is worth noticing that, with one exception, the instances in which he is called by his former name, after his designation to the apostolate, occur in words addressed to him by our Lord.
He had given the name, and surely His withdrawal of it was meant to be significant, and must have struck with boding, rebuking emphasis on the ear and conscience of the apostle. "Simon, Simon, Satan hath desired to have you": "Remember thy human weakness, and in the sore conflict that is before thee, trust not to thine own power." "Simon, sleepest thou?" "Can I call thee Peter now, when thou hast not cared for My sorrow enough to wake while I wrestled? Is this thy fervid love?" "Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou Me?" "Thou wast Peter because thou didst confess Me; thou hast fallen back to thine old level by denying Me. It is not enough that in secret I should have restored thee to My love. Here before thy brethren, thou must win back thy forfeited name and place by a confession as open as the denial, and thrice repeated like it. Once thou hast answered, but still thou art "Simon." Twice thou hast answered, but not yet can I call thee "Peter." Thrice thou hast answered, by each reply effacing a former denial, and now I ask no more. Take back thine office; henceforth thou shalt be called "Cephas" as before."
And so it was. In the Acts of the Apostles, and in Paul"s letters, "Peter" or "Cephas" entirely obliterates "Simon." Only for ease in finding him, the messengers of Cornelius are to ask for him in Joppa by the name by which he would be known outside the Church, and his old companion James begins his speech to the council at Jerusalem by referring with approbation to what "Simeon" had said, as if he liked to use the old name, that brought back memories of the far-off days in Galilee, before they had known the Master.
Very touching, too, is it to notice how the apostle himself, while using the name by which he was best known in the Church, in the introduction to his first Epistle, calls himself "Simon Peter" in his second, as if to the end he felt that the old nature clung to him, and was not yet, "so long as he was in this tabernacle," wholly subdued under the dominion of the better self, which his Master had breathed into him.
So we see that a bit of biography and an ill.u.s.tration of a large truth are wrapped up for us in so small a matter as the apparently fortuitous use of one or other of these names. I do not suppose that in every instance where either of them occur, we can explain their occurrence by a reference to such thoughts. But still there is an unmistakable propriety in several instances in the employment of one rather than the other, and we may fairly suggest the lesson as put hero in a picturesque form, which Paul gives us in definite words, "The flesh l.u.s.teth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh." The better and the worse nature contend in all Christian souls, or, as our Lord says with such merciful leniency in this very context, "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." However real and deep the change which pa.s.ses over us when "Christ is formed in us," it is only by degrees that the transformation spreads through our being. The renewing process follows upon the bestowment of the new life, and works from its deep inward centre outwards and upwards to the circ.u.mference and surface of our being, on condition of our own constant diligence and conflict.
True, "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature"; but also, and precisely because he is, therefore the daily and hourly exhortation is, "Put on the new man." The leaven is buried in the dough, and must be well kneaded up with it if the whole is to be leavened. Peter is still Simon, and sometimes seems to be so completely Simon that he has ceased to be Peter. He continues Simon Peter to his own consciousness to the very end, however his brethren call him. The struggle between the two elements in his nature makes the undying interest of his story, and brings him nearer to us than any of the other disciples are. We, too, have to wage the conflict between the old nature and the new; for us, too, the worse part seems too often to be the stronger, if not the only part. The Master has often to speak to us, as if His merciful all-seeing eye could discern in us nothing of our better selves which are in truth Himself, and has to question our love. We, too, have often to feel how little those who think best of us know what we are. But let us take heart and remember that from every fall it is possible to rise by penitence and secret converse with Him, and that if only we remember to the end our lingering weakness, and "giving all diligence," cleave to Him, "an entrance shall be ministered unto us abundantly into His everlasting kingdom."
We may briefly notice, too, some other lessons from this slumbering apostle.
Let us learn, for instance, to distrust our own resolutions. An hour or two at the most had pa.s.sed since the eager protestation, "Though all should deny Thee, yet will not I. I will lay down my life for Thy sake." It had been most honestly said, at the dictate of a very loving heart, which in its enthusiasm was over-estimating its own power of resistance, and taking no due account of obstacles. The very utterance of the rash vow made him weaker, for some of his force was expended in making it. The uncalculating, impulsive nature of the man makes him a favourite with all readers, and we sympathise with him, as a true brother, when we hear him blurting out his big words, followed so soon by such a contradiction in deeds. He is the same man all through his story, always ready to push himself into dangers, always full of rash confidence, which pa.s.ses at once into abject fear when the dangers which he had not thought about appear.
His sleep in the garden, following close on his bold words in the upper chamber, is just like his eager wish to come to Christ on the water, followed by his terror. He desires to be singled out from the others; he desires to be beside his Master, and then as soon as he feels a dash of spray on his cheek, and the heaving of that uneasy floor beneath him, all his confidence collapses and he shrieks to Christ to save him. It is just like his thrusting himself into the high priest"s palace--no safe place, and bad company for him by the coal fire--and then his courage oozing out at his fingers" ends as soon as a maidservant"s sharp tongue questioned him. It is just like his hearty welcome of the heathen converts at Antioch, and his ready breaking through Jewish restrictions, and then his shrinking back into his old sh.e.l.l again, as soon as "certain came down from Jerusalem."
And in it all, he is one of ourselves. We have to learn to distrust all our own resolutions, and to be chary of our vows. "Better is it that thou shouldest not vow, than that thou shouldest vow and not pay." So, aware of our own weakness, and the flutterings of our own hearts, let us not mortgage the future, nor lightly say "I will"--but rather let us turn our vows into prayers,
"Nor confidently say, "I never will deny Thee, Lord"
But, "Grant I never may.""
Let us note, too, the slight value of even genuine emotion. The very exhaustion following on the strained emotions which these disciples had been experiencing had sent them to sleep. Luke, in his physician-like way, tells us this, when he says that they "slept for sorrow." We all know how some great emotion which we might have expected would have held our eyes waking, lulls to slumber. Men sleep soundly on the night before their execution. A widow leaves her husband"s deathbed as soon as he has pa.s.sed away, and sleeps a dreamless sleep for hours. The strong current of emotion sweeps through us, and leaves us dry. Sheer exhaustion and collapse follow its intenser forms. And even in its milder, nothing takes so much out of a man as emotion. Reaction always follows, and people are in some degree unfitted for sober work by it. Peter, for example, was all the less ready for keeping awake, and for bold confession, because of the vehement emotions which had agitated him in the upper chamber. We have, therefore, to be chary, in our religious life, of feeding the flames of mere feeling. An unemotional Christianity is a very poor thing, and most probably a spurious and unreal thing. But a merely emotional Christianity is closely related to practical unholiness, and leads by a very short straight road to windy wordy insincerity and conscious hypocrisy. Emotion which is firmly based upon an intelligent grasp of G.o.d"s truth, and which is at once translated into action, is good. But unless these two conditions be rigidly observed, it darkens the understanding and enfeebles the soul.
Lastly, notice how much easier it is to purpose and to do great things than small ones.
I have little doubt that if the Roman soldiers had called on Peter to have made good his boast, and to give up his life to rescue his Master, he would have been ready to do it. We know that he was ready to fight for Him, and in fact did draw a sword and offer resistance.
He could die for Him, but he could not keep awake for Him. The great thing he could have done, the little thing he could not do.
Brethren, it is far easier once in a way, by a dead lift, to screw ourselves up to some great crisis which seems worthy of a supreme effort of enthusiasm and sacrifice, than it is to keep on persistently doing the small monotonies of daily duty. Many a soldier will bravely rush to the a.s.sault in a storming-party, who would tremble in the trenches. Many a martyr has gone unblenching to the stake for Christ, who had found it far harder to serve Him in common duties. It is easier to die for Him than to watch with Him. So let us listen to His gentle voice, as He speaks to us, not as of old in the pauses of His agony, and His locks wet with the dews of the night, but bending from His throne, and crowned with many crowns: "Sleepest them? Watch and pray, lest ye enter into temptation."
THE CAPTIVE CHRIST AND THE CIRCLE ROUND HIM