The people at Antioch had no doubt who was right, and I think they were right in so deciding. So let us learn that G.o.d treats His renegades as Paul treated Mark, and not as Barnabas would have treated him, He is ready, even infinitely ready, to forgive and to restore, but desires to see the consciousness of the sin first, and desires, before large tasks are re-committed to hands that once have dropped them, to have some kind of evidence that the hands have grown stronger and the heart purified from its cowardice and its selfishness. Forgiveness does not mean impunity. The infinite mercy of G.o.d is not mere weak indulgence which so deals with a man"s failures and sins as to convey the impression that these are of no moment whatsoever. And Paul"s severity which said: "No, such work is not fit for such hands until the heart has been "broken and healed,"" is of a piece with G.o.d"s severity which is love. "Thou wast a G.o.d that forgavest them, though Thou tookest vengeance of their inventions." Let us learn the difference between a weak charity which loves too foolishly, and therefore too selfishly, to let a man inherit the fruit of his doings, and the large mercy which knows how to take the bitterness out of the chastis.e.m.e.nt, and yet knows how to chastise.
And still further, this which I have called Mark"s eclipse may teach us another lesson, viz., that the punishment for shirking work is to be denied work, just as the converse is true, that in G.o.d"s administration of the world and of His Church, the reward for faithful work is to get more to do, and the filling a narrower sphere is the sure way to have a wider sphere to fill. So if a man abandons plain duties, then he will get no work to do. And that is why so many Christian men and women are idle in this world; and stand in the market-place, saying, with a certain degree of truth, "No man hath hired us." No; because so often in the past tasks have been presented to you, forced upon you, almost pressed into your unwilling hands, that you have refused to take; and you are not going to get any more. You have been asked to work,--I speak now to professing Christians--duties have been pressed upon you, fields of service have opened plainly before you, and you have not had the heart to go into them. And so you stand idle all the day now, and the work goes to other people that will do it. Thus G.o.d honours them, and pa.s.ses you by.
Mark sails away to Cyprus, he does not go back to Jerusalem; he and Barnabas try to get up some little schismatic sort of mission of their own. Nothing comes of it; nothing ought to have come of it. He drops out of the story; he has no share in the joyful conflicts and sacrifices and successes of the Apostle. When he heard how Paul, by G.o.d"s help, was flaming like a meteor from East to West, do you not think he wished that he had not been such a coward? When the Lord was opening doors, and he saw how the work was prospering in the hands of ancient companions, and Silas filled the place that he might have filled, if he had been faithful to G.o.d, do you not think the bitter thought occupied his mind, of how he had flung away what never could come back to him now? The punishment of indolence is absolute idleness.
So, my friends, let us learn this lesson, that the largest reward that G.o.d can give to him that has been faithful in a few things, is to give him many things to be faithful over. Beware, all of you professing Christians, lest to you should come the fate of the slothful servant with his one burled talent, to whom the punishment of burying it unused was to lose it altogether; according to that solemn word which was fulfilled in the temporal sphere in this story on which I am commenting: "To him that hath shall be given, and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away."
III. Again consider the process of recovery.
Concerning it we read nothing indeed in Scripture; but concerning it we know enough to be able at least to determine what its outline must have been. The silent and obscure years of compulsory inactivity had their fruit, no doubt. There is only one road, with well-marked stages, by which a backsliding or apostate Christian can return to his Master. And that road has three halting-places upon it, through which the heart must pa.s.s if it have wandered from its early faith, and falsified its first professions. The first of them is the consciousness of the fall, the second is the resort to the Master for forgiveness; and the last is the deepened consecration to Him.
The patriarch Abraham, in a momentary lapse from faith to sense, thought himself compelled to leave the land to which G.o.d had sent him, because a famine threatened; and when he came back from Egypt, as the narrative tells us with deep significance, he went to the "place where he had pitched his tent at the beginning; to the altar which lie had reared at the first." Yes, my friends, we must begin over again, tread all the old path, enter by the old wicket-gate, once more take the place of the penitent, once more make acquaintance with the pardoning Christ, once more devote ourselves in renewed consecration to His service. No man that wanders into the wilderness but comes back by the King"s highway, if he comes back at all.
IV. And so lastly, notice the reinstatement of the penitent renegade.
If you turn at your leisure to the remaining notices of John Mark in Scripture, you will find, in two of Paul"s Epistles of the captivity, viz., those to the Colossians and Philemon, references to him; and these references are of a very interesting and beautiful nature. Paul says that in Rome Mark was one of the four born Jews who had been a cordial and a comfort to him in his imprisonment. He commends him, in the view of a probable journey, to the loving reception of the church at Colosse, as if they knew something derogatory to his character, the impression of which the Apostle desired to remove. He sends to Philemon the greetings of the repentant renegade in strange juxtaposition with the greetings of two other men, one who was an apostate at the end of his career instead of at the beginning, and of whom we do not read that he ever came back, and one who all his life long is the type of a faithful friend and companion, "Mark, Demas, Luke" are bracketed as greeting Philemon; the first a runaway that came back, the second a fugitive who, so far as we know, never returned, and the last the faithful friend throughout.
And then in Paul"s final Epistle, and in almost the last words of it, we read his request to Timothy. "Take Mark, and bring him with thee, for he is profitable to me for the ministry." The first notice of him was: "They had John to their minister"; the last word about him is: "he is profitable for the ministry." The Greek words in the original are not identical, but their meaning is substantially the same. So notwithstanding the failure, notwithstanding the wise refusal of Paul years before to have anything more to do with him, he is now reinstated in his old office, and the aged Apostle, before he dies, would like to have the comfort of his presence once more at his side. Is not the lesson out of that, this eternal Gospel that even early failures, recognised and repented of, may make a man better fitted for the tasks from which once he fled? Just as they tell us--I do not know whether it is true or not, it will do for an ill.u.s.tration--just as they tell us that a broken bone renewed is stronger at the point of fracture than it ever was before, so the very sin that we commit, when once we know it for a sin, and have brought it to Christ for forgiveness, may minister to our future efficiency and strength. The Israelites fought twice upon one battlefield. On the first occasion they were shamefully defeated; on the second, on the same ground, and against the same enemies, they victoriously emerged from the conflict, and reared the stone which said, "Ebenezer!" "Hitherto the Lord hath helped us."
And so the temptations which have been sorest may be overcome, the sins into which we most naturally fall we may put our foot upon; the past is no specimen of what the future may be. The page that is yet to be written need have none of the blots of the page that we have turned over shining through it. Sin which we have learned to know for sin and to hate, teaches us humility, dependence, shows us where our weak places are. Sin which is forgiven knits us to Christ with deeper and more fervid love, and results in a larger consecration. Think of the two ends of this man"s life--flying like a frightened hare from the very first suspicion of danger or of difficulty, sulking in his solitude, apart from all the joyful stir of consecration and of service; and at last made an evangelist to proclaim to the whole world the story of the Gospel of the Servant. G.o.d works with broken reeds, and through them breathes His sweetest music.
So, dear brethren, "Take with you words, and return unto the Lord; say unto Him, Take away all iniquity, and receive us graciously," and the answer will surely be:--"I will heal their backsliding; I will love them freely; I will be as the dew unto Israel."
THE FIRST PREACHING IN ASIA MINOR
"Men and brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whosoever among you feareth G.o.d, to you is the word of this salvation sent. 27.
For they that dwell at Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they knew Him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read every Sabbath day, they have fulfilled them in condemning Him. 28. And though they found no cause of death in Him, yet desired they Pilate that he should be slain. 29. And when they had fulfilled all that was written of Him, they took Him down from the tree, and laid Him in a sepulchre.
30. But G.o.d raised Him from the dead: 31. And He was seen many days of them which came up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who are His witnesses unto the people. 32. And we declare unto you glad tidings, how that the promise which was made unto the fathers, 33. G.o.d hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that He hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm. Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee. 34. And as concerning that He raised Him up from the dead, now no more to return to corruption, He said on this wise, I will give you the sure mercies of David. 35.
Wherefore He saith also in another psalm, Thou shalt not suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. 36. For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of G.o.d, fell on sleep, and was laid unto his fathers, and saw corruption: 37. But He, whom G.o.d raised again, saw no corruption. 38. Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this Man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39. And by Him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses."--ACTS xiii. 26-39.
The extended report of Paul"s sermon in the synagogue at Antioch of Pisidia marks it, in accordance with Luke"s method, as the first of a series. It was so because, though the composition of the audience was identical with that of those in the synagogues of Cyprus, this was the beginning of the special work of the tour, the preaching in the cities of Asia Minor. The part of the address contained in the pa.s.sage falls into three sections,--the condensed narrative of the Gospel facts (vs.
26-31), the proof that the resurrection was prophesied (vs. 32-37), and the pungent personal application (v. 38 to end).
I. The substance of the narrative coincides, as it could not but do, with Peter"s sermons, but yet with differences, partly due to the different audience, partly to Paul"s idiosyncrasy. After the preceding historical _resume_, he girds himself to his proper work of proclaiming the Gospel, and he marks the transition in verse 26 by reiterating his introductory words.
His audience comprised the two familiar cla.s.ses of Jews and Gentile proselytes, and he seeks to win the ears of both. His heart goes out in his address to them all as "brethren," and in his cla.s.sing himself and Barnabas among them as receivers of the message which he has to proclaim. What skill, if it were not something much more sacred, even humility and warm love, lies in that "to _us_ is the word of this salvation sent"! He will not stand above them as if he had any other possession of his message than they might have. He, too, has received it, and what he is about to say is not his word, but G.o.d"s message to them and him. That is the way to preach.
Notice, too, how skilfully he introduces the narrative of the rejection of Jesus as the reason why the message has now come to them his hearers away in Antioch. It is "sent forth" "to us," Asiatic Jews, _for_ the people in the sacred city would not have it. Paul does not p.r.i.c.k his hearers" consciences, as Peter did, by charging home the guilt of the rejection of Jesus on them. They had no share in that initial crime.
There is a faint purpose of dissociating himself and his hearers from the people of Jerusalem, to whom the Dispersion were accustomed to look up, in the designation, "they that dwell in Jerusalem, and _their_ rulers." Thus far the Antioch Jews had had hands clean from that crime; they had now to choose whether they would mix themselves up with it.
We may further note that Paul says nothing about Christ"s life of gentle goodness, His miracles or teaching, but concentrates attention on His death and resurrection. From the beginning of his ministry these were the main elements of his "Gospel" (1 Cor. xv. 3, 4). The full significance of that death is not declared here. Probably it was reserved for subsequent instruction. But it and the Resurrection, which interpreted it, are set in the forefront, as they should always be. The main point insisted on is that the men of Jerusalem were fulfilling prophecy in slaying Jesus. With tragic deafness, they knew not the voices of the prophets, clear and unanimous as they were, though they heard them every Sabbath of their lives, and yet they fulfilled them. A prophet"s words had just been read in the synagogue; Paul"s words might set some hearer asking whether a veil had been over his heart while his ears had heard the sound of the word.
The Resurrection is established by the only evidence for a historical fact, the testimony of competent eyewitnesses. Their competence is established by their familiar companionship with Jesus during His whole career; their opportunities for testing the reality of the fact, by the "many days" of His appearances.
Paul does not put forward his own testimony to the Resurrection, though we know, from 1 Corinthians xv. 8, that he regarded Christ"s appearance to him as being equally valid evidence with that afforded by the other appearances; but he distinguishes between the work of the Apostles, as "witnesses unto the people"--that is, the Jews of Palestine--and that of Barnabas and himself. They had to bear the message to the regions beyond. The Apostles and he had the same work, but different spheres.
II. The second part turns with more personal address to his hearers.
Its purport is not so much to preach the Resurrection, which could only be proved by testimony, as to establish the fact that it was the fulfilment of the promises to the fathers. Note how the idea of fulfilled prophecy runs in Paul"s head. The Jews had _fulfilled_ it by their crime; G.o.d _fulfilled_ it by the Resurrection. This reiteration of a key-word is a mark of Paul"s style in his Epistles, and its appearance here attests the accuracy of the report of his speech.
The second Psalm, from which Paul"s first quotation is made, is prophetic of Christ, inasmuch as it represents in vivid lyrical language the vain rebellion of earthly rulers against Messiah, and Jehovah"s establishing Him and His kingdom by a steadfast decree. Peter quoted its picture of the rebels, as fulfilled in the coalition of Herod, Pilate, and the Jewish rulers against Christ. The Messianic reference of the Psalm, then, was already seen; and we may not be going too far if we a.s.sume that Jesus Himself had included it among things written in the Psalms "concerning Himself," which He had explained to the disciples after the Resurrection. It depicts Jehovah speaking to Messiah, _after_ the futile attempts of the rebels: "This day have I begotten Thee." That day is a definite point in time. The Resurrection was a birth from the dead; so Paul, in Colossians i. 18, calls Jesus "the first begotten from the dead." Romans i. 4,"declared to be the Son of G.o.d ... by the resurrection from the dead," is the best commentary on Paul"s words here.
The second and third quotations must apparently be combined, for the second does not specifically refer to resurrection, but it promises to "you," that is to those who obey the call to partake in the Messianic blessings, a share in the "sure" and enduring "mercies of David"; and the third quotation shows that not "to see corruption" was one of these "mercies." That implies that the speaker in the Psalm was, in Paul"s view, David, and that his words were his believing answer to a divine promise. But David was dead. Had the "sure mercy" proved, then, a broken reed? Not so: for Jesus, who is Messiah, and is G.o.d"s "Holy One"
in a deeper sense than David was, has not seen corruption. The Psalmist"s hopes are fulfilled in Him, and through Him, in all who will "eat" that their "souls may live,"
III. But Paul"s yearning for his brethren"s salvation is not content with proclaiming the fact of Christ"s resurrection, nor with pointing to it as fulfilling prophecy; he gathers all up into a loving, urgent offer of salvation for every believing soul, and solemn warning to despisers. Here the whole man flames out. Here the characteristic evangelical teaching, which is sometimes ticketed as "Pauline" by way of stigma, is heard. Already had he grasped the great ant.i.thesis between Law and Gospel. Already his great word "justified" has taken its place in his terminology. The essence of the Epistles to Romans and Galatians is here. Justification is the being p.r.o.nounced and treated as not guilty. Law cannot justify. "In Him" we are justified. Observe that this is an advance on the previous statement that "through Him" we receive remission of sins.
"In Him" points, thought but incidentally and slightly, to the great truth of incorporation with Jesus, of which Paul had afterwards so much to write. The justifying in Christ is complete and absolute. And the sole sufficient condition of receiving it is faith. But the greater the glory of the light the darker the shadow which it casts. The broad offer of complete salvation has ever to be accompanied with the plain warning of the dread issue of rejecting it. Just because it is so free and full, and to be had on such terms, the warning has to be rung into deaf ears, "Beware _therefore_!" Hope and fear are legitimately appealed to by the Christian evangelist. They are like the two wings which may lift the soul to soar to its safe shelter in the Rock of Ages.
LUTHER--A STONE ON THE CAIRN
"For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of G.o.d, fell on sleep, and was laid unto his fathers, and saw corruption: 37.
But He, whom G.o.d raised again, saw no corruption."--ACTS xiii. 36, 37.
I take these words as a motto rather than as a text. You will have antic.i.p.ated the use which I purpose to make of them in connection with the Luther Commemoration. They set before us, in clear sharp contrast, the distinction between the limited, transient work of the servants and the unbounded, eternal influence of the Master. The former are servants, and that but for a time; they do their work, they are laid in the grave, and as their bodies resolve into their elements, so their influence, their teaching, the inst.i.tutions which they may have founded, disintegrate and decay. He lives. His relation to the world is not as theirs; He is "not for an age, but for all time." Death is not the end of His work. His Cross is the eternal foundation of the world"s hope. His life is the ultimate, perfect revelation of the divine Nature which can never be surpa.s.sed, or fathomed, or antiquated. Therefore the last thought, in all commemorations of departed teachers and guides, should be of Him who gave them all the force that they had; and the final word should be: "They were not suffered to continue by reason of death, this Man continueth ever."
In the same spirit then as the words of my text, and taking them as giving me little more than a starting-point and a framework, I draw from them some thoughts appropriate to the occasion.
I. First, we have to think about the limited and transient work of this great servant of G.o.d.
The miner"s son, who was born in that little Saxon village four hundred years ago, presents at first sight a character singularly unlike the traditional type of mediaeval Church fathers and saints. Their ascetic habits, and the repressive system under which they were trained, withdraw them from our sympathy; but this st.u.r.dy peasant, with his full-blooded humanity, unmistakably a man, and a man all round, is a new type, and looks strangely out of place amongst doctors and mediaeval saints.
His character, though not complex, is many-sided and in some respects contradictory. The face and figure that look out upon us from the best portraits of Luther tell us a great deal about the man. Strong, ma.s.sive, not at all elegant; he stands there, firm and resolute, on his own legs, grasping a _Bible_ in a muscular hand. There is plenty of animalism--a source of power as well as of weakness--in the thick neck; an iron will in the square chin; eloquence on the full, loose lips; a mystic, dreamy tenderness and sadness in the steadfast eyes--altogether a true king and a leader of men!
The first things that strike one in the character are the iron will that would not waver, the indomitable courage that knew no fear, the splendid audacity that, single-handed, sprang into the arena for a contest to the death with Pope, Emperors, superst.i.tions, and devils; the insight that saw the things that were "hid from the wise and prudent," and the answering sincerity that would not hide what he saw, nor say that he saw what he did not.
But there was a great deal more than that in the man. He was no mere brave revolutionary, he was a cultured scholar, abreast of all the learning of his age, capable of logic-chopping and scholastic disputation on occasion, and but too often the victim of his own over-subtle refinements. He was a poet, with a poet"s dreaminess and waywardness, fierce alternations of light and shade, sorrow and joy.
All living things whispered and spoke to him, and he walked in communion with them all. Little children gathered round his feet, and he had a big heart of love for all the weary and the sorrowful.
Everybody knows how he could write and speak. He made the German language, as we may say, lifting it up from a dialect of boors to become the rich, flexible, cultured speech that it is. And his Bible, his single-handed work, is one of the colossal achievements of man; like Stonehenge or the Pyramids. "His words were half-battles," "they were living creatures that had hands and feet"; his speech, direct, strong, homely, ready to borrow words from the kitchen or the gutter, is unmatched for popular eloquence and impression. There was music in the man. His flute solaced his lonely hours in his home at Wittemberg; and the Ma.r.s.eillaise of the Reformation, as that grand hymn of his has been called, came, words and music, from his heart. There was humour in him, coa.r.s.e horseplay often; an honest, hearty, broad laugh frequently, like that of a Norse G.o.d. There were coa.r.s.e tastes in him, tastes of the peasant folk from whom he came, which clung to him through life, and kept him in sympathy with the common people, and intelligible to them. And withal there was a const.i.tutional melancholy, aggravated by his weary toils, perilous fightings, and fierce throes, which led him down often into the deep mire where there was no standing; and which sighs through all his life. The penitential Psalms and Paul"s wail: "O wretched man that I am," perhaps never woke more plaintive echo in any human heart than they did in Martin Luther"s.
Faults he had, gross and plain as the heroic mould in which he was cast. He was vehement and fierce often; he was coa.r.s.e and violent often. He saw what he did see so clearly, that he was slow to believe that there was anything that he did not see. He was oblivious of counterbalancing considerations, and given to exaggerated, incautious, unguarded statements of precious truths. He too often aspired to be a driver rather than a leader of men; and his strength of will became obstinacy and tyranny. It was too often true that he had dethroned the pope of Rome to set up a pope at Wittemberg. And foul personalities came from his lips, according to the bad controversial fashion of his day, which permitted a licence to scholars that we now forbid to fishwives.
All that has to be admitted; and when it is all admitted, what then?
This is a fastidious generation; Erasmus is its heroic type a great deal more than Luther--I mean among the cultivated cla.s.ses of our day--and that very largely because in Erasmus there is no quick sensibility to religious emotion as there is in Luther, and no inconvenient fervour. The faults are there--coa.r.s.e, plain, palpable--and perhaps more than enough has been made of them. Let us remember, as to his violence, that he was following the fashion of the day; that he was fighting for his life; that when a man is at death-grips with a tiger he may be pardoned if he strikes without considering whether he is going to spoil the skin or not; and that on the whole you cannot throttle snakes in a graceful att.i.tude. Men fought then with bludgeons; they fight now with dainty polished daggers, dipped in cold, colourless poison of sarcasm. Perhaps there was less malice in the rougher old way than in the new.
The faults are there, and n.o.body who is not a fool would think of painting that homely Saxon peasant-monk"s face without the warts and the wrinkles. But it is quite as unhistorical, and a great deal more wicked, to paint nothing but the warts and wrinkles; to rake all the faults together and make the most of them; and present them in answer to the question: "What sort of a man was Martin Luther?"
As to the work that he did, like the work of all of us, it had its limitations, and it will have its end. The impulse that he communicated, like all impulses that are given from men, will wear out its force. New questions will arise of which the dead leaders never dreamed, and in which they can give no counsel. The perspective of theological thought will alter, the centre of interest will change, a new dialect will begin to be spoken. So it comes to pa.s.s that all religious teachers and thinkers are left behind, and that their words are preserved and read rather for their antiquarian and historical interest than because of any impulse or direction for the present which may linger in them; and if they founded inst.i.tutions, these too, in their time, will crumble and disappear.
But I do not mean to say that the truths which Luther rescued from the dust of centuries, and impressed upon the conscience of Teutonic Europe, are getting antiquated. I only mean that his connection with them and his way of putting them, had its limitations and will have its end: "This man, having served his own generation by the will of G.o.d, was gathered to his fathers, and saw corruption."
What _were_ the truths, what was his contribution to the illumination of Europe, and to the Church? Three great principles--which perhaps closer a.n.a.lysis might reduce to one; but which for popular use, on such an occasion as the present, had better be kept apart--will state his service to the world.
There were three men in the past who, as it seems to me, reach out their hands to one another across the centuries--Paul, St. Augustine, and Martin Luther, The three very like each other, all three of them joining the same subtle speculative power with the same capacity of religious fervour, and of flaming up at the contemplation of divine truth; all of them gifted with the same exuberant, and to fastidious eyes, incorrect eloquence; all three trained in a school of religious thought of which each respectively was destined to be the antagonist and all but the destroyer.