He forgot beauty, preferring to it every form of truth, and beauty has revenged itself upon him, glittering miraculously out of many lines in which he wrote humbly, and leaving the darkness of a retreating shadow upon great s.p.a.ces in which a confident intellect was conscious of shining.
For, though mind be the heaven, where love may sit, Beauty a convenient type may be to figure it,
he writes, in the _Valediction to his Book_, thus giving formal expression to his heresy. "The greatest wit, though not the best poet of our nation," Dryden called him; the greatest intellect, that is, which had expressed itself in poetry. Dryden himself was not always careful to distinguish between what material was fit and what unfit for verse; so that we can now enjoy his masterly prose with more equable pleasure than his verse. But he saw clearly enough the distinction in Donne between intellect and the poetical spirit; that fatal division of two forces, which, had they pulled together instead of apart, might have achieved a result wholly splendid. Without a great intellect no man was ever a great poet; but to possess a great intellect is not even a first step in the direction of becoming a poet at all.
Compare Donne, for instance, with Herrick. Herrick has little enough of the intellect, the pa.s.sion, the weight and the magnificence of Donne; but, setting out with so much less to carry, he certainly gets first to the goal, and partly by running always in the right direction. The most limited poet in the language, he is the surest. He knows the airs that weave themselves into songs, as he knows the flowers that twine best into garlands. Words come to him in an order which no one will ever alter, and no one will ever forget. Whether they come easily or not is no matter; he knows when they have come right, and they always come right before he lets them go. But Donne is only occasionally sure of his words as airs; he sets them doggedly to the work of saying something, whether or no they step to the beat of the music. Conscious writer though he was, I suppose he was more or less unconscious of his extraordinary felicities, more conscious probably of how they came than of what they were doing. And they come chiefly through a sudden heightening of mood, which brings with it a clearer and a more exalted mode of speech, in its merely accurate expression of itself. Even then I cannot imagine him quite reconciled to beauty, at least actually doing homage to it, but rather as one who receives a gift by the way.
1899.
EMILY BRONTe
This was a woman young and pa.s.sionate, Loving the Earth, and loving most to be Where she might be alone with liberty; Loving the beasts, who are compa.s.sionate; The homeless moors, her home; the bright elate Winds of the cold dawn; rock and stone and tree; Night, bringing dreams out of eternity; And memory of Death"s unforgetting date.
She too was unforgetting: has she yet Forgotten that long agony when her breath Too fierce for living fanned the flame of death?
Earth for her heather, does she now forget What pity knew not in her love from scorn, And that it was an unjust thing to be born?
The Stoic in woman has been seen once only, and that in the only woman in whom there has been seen the paradox of pa.s.sion without sensuousness.
Emily Bronte lived with an unparalleled energy a life of outward quiet, in a loneliness which she shared only with the moors and with the animals whom she loved. She required no pa.s.sion-experience to endow her with more than a memory of pa.s.sion. Pa.s.sion was alive in her as flame is alive in the earth. And the vehemence of that inner fire fed on itself, and wore out her body before its time, because it had no respite and no outlet. We see her condemned to self-imprisonment, and dying of too much life.
Her poems are few and brief, and nothing more personal has ever been written. A few are as masterly in execution as in conception, and almost all have a direct truth of utterance, which rarely lacks at least the bare beauty of muscle and sinew, of a kind of naked strength and alertness. They are without heat or daylight, the sun is rarely in them, and then "blood-red"; light comes as starshine, or comes as
hostile light That does not warm but burn.
At times the landscape in this bare, grey, craggy verse, always a landscape of Yorkshire moors, with its touches of stern and tender memory, "The mute bird sitting on the stone," "A little and a lone green lane," has a quality more thrilling than that of Wordsworth. There is none of his observation, and none of his sense of a benignant "presence far more deeply interfused"; but there is the voice of the heart"s roots, crying out to its home in the earth.
At first this unornamented verse may seem forbidding, may seem even to be ordinary, as an actual moorland may, to those for whom it has no special attraction. But in the verse, as on the moors, there is s.p.a.ce, wind, and the smell of the earth; and there is room to be alone, that liberty which this woman cried for when she cried:
Leave the heart that now I bear, And give me liberty.
To be alone was for her to be alone with "a chainless soul," which asked of whatever powers might be only "courage to endure," constancy not to forget, and the right to leave the door wide open to those visions that came to her out of mere fixed contemplation: "the G.o.d of Visions," as she called her imagination, "my slave, my comrade, and my king." And we know that her courage was flawless, heroic, beyond praise; that she forgot nothing, not even that love for her unspeakable brother, for whom she has expressed in two of her poems a more than masculine magnanimity of pity and contempt; and that at all times she could turn inward to that world within, where her imagination waited for her,
Where thou, and I, and Liberty Have undisputed sovereignty.
Yet even imagination, though "benignant," is to her a form of "phantom bliss" to which she will not trust herself wholly. "So hopeless is the world without": but is the world within ever quite frankly accepted as a subst.i.tute, as a truer reality? She is always on her guard against imagination as against the outer world, whose "lies" she is resolved shall not "beguile" her. She has accepted reason as the final arbiter, and desires only to see clearly, to see things as they are. She really believed that
Earth reserves no blessing For the unblest of heaven;
and she had an almost Calvinistic sense of her own condemnation to unhappiness. That being so, she was suspicious of those opportunities of joy which did come to her, or at least resolute not to believe too implicitly in the good messages of the stars, which might be mere dreams, or of the earth, which was only certainly kind in preparing for her that often-thought-of grave. "No coward soul is mine" is one of her true sayings; but it was with difficulty that she trusted even that message of life which she seemed to discover in death. She has to a.s.sure herself of it, again and again: "Who once lives, never dies!" And that sense of personal ident.i.ty which aches throughout all her poems is a sense, not of the delight, but of the pain and ineradicable sting of personal ident.i.ty.
Her poems are all outcries, as her great novel, _Wuthering Heights_, is one long outcry. A soul on the rack seems to make itself heard at moments, when suffering has grown too acute for silence. Every poem is as if torn from her. Even when she does not write seemingly in her own person, the subjects are such disguises as "The Prisoner," "Honour"s Martyr," "The Outcast Mother," echoes of all the miseries and useless rebellions of the earth. She spells over the fading characters in dying faces, unflinchingly, with an austere curiosity; and looks closely into the eyes of shame, not dreading what she may find there. She is always arguing with herself, and the answers are inflexible, the answers of a clear intellect which rebels but accepts defeat. Her doubt is itself an affirmation, her defiance would be an entreaty but for the "quenchless will" of her pride. She faces every terror, and to her pained apprehension birth and death and life are alike terrible. Only Webster"s dirge might have been said over her coffin.
What my soul bore my soul alone Within itself may tell,
she says truthfully; but some of that long endurance of her life, in which exile, the body"s weakness, and a sense of some "divinest anguish"
which clung about the world and all things living, had their share, she was able to put into ascetic and pa.s.sionate verse. It is sad-coloured and desolate, but when gleams of sunlight or of starlight pierce the clouds that hang generally above it, a rare and stormy beauty comes into the bare outlines, quickening them with living splendour.
1906.
EDGAR ALLAN POE
The poems of Edgar Allan Poe are the work of a poet who thought persistently about poetry as an art, and would have reduced inspiration to a method. At their best they are perfectly defined by Baudelaire, when he says of Poe"s poetry that it is a thing "deep and shimmering as dreams, mysterious and perfect as crystal." Not all the poems, few as they are, are flawless. In a few unequal poems we have the only essential poetry which has yet come from America, Walt Whitman"s vast poetical nature having remained a nature only, not come to be an art.
Because Poe was fantastically inhuman, a conscious artist doing strange things with strange materials, not every one has realised how fine, how rare, was that beauty which this artist brought into the world. It is true that there was in the genius of Poe something meretricious; it is the flaw in his genius; but then he had genius, and Whittier and Bryant and Longfellow and Lowell had only varying degrees of talent. Let us admit, by all means, that a diamond is flawed; but need we compare it with this and that fine specimen of quartz?
Poetry Poe defined as "the rhythmical creation of beauty"; and the first element of poetry he found in "the thirst for supernal beauty." "It is not," he repeats, "the mere appreciation of the beauty before us. It is a wild effort to reach the beauty above.... Inspired with a prescient ecstasy of the beauty beyond the grave, it struggles by multiform novelty of combination among the things and thoughts of time, to antic.i.p.ate some portions of that loveliness whose very elements, perhaps, appertain solely to eternity." The poet, then, "should limit his endeavours to the creation of novel moods of beauty, in form, in colour, in sound, in sentiment." Note the emphasis upon novel: to Poe there was no beauty without strangeness. He makes his favourite quotation: ""But," says Lord Bacon (how justly!) "there is no exquisite beauty without some strangeness in the proportions." Take away this element of strangeness--of unexpectedness--of novelty--of originality--call it what we will--and all that is ethereal in loveliness is lost at once.... We lose, in short, all that a.s.similates the beauty of earth with what we dream of the beauty of heaven!" And, as another of the elements of this creation of beauty, there must be indefiniteness. "I _know_," he says, "that indefiniteness is an element of the true music--I mean of the true musical expression. Give to it any undue decision--imbue it with any very determinate tone--and you deprive it at once of its ethereal, its ideal, its intrinsic and essential character." Do we not seem to find here an antic.i.p.ation of Verlaine"s "Art Poetique": "_Pas la couleur, rien que la nuance_"? And is not the essential part of the poetical theory of Mallarme and of the French Symbolists enunciated in this definition and commendation of "that cla.s.s of composition in which there lies beneath the transparent upper current of meaning an under or _suggestive_ one"? To this "mystic or secondary impression" he attributes "the vast force of an accompaniment in music.... With each note of the lyre is heard a ghostly, and not always a distinct, but an august soul-exalting _echo_." Has anything that has been said since on that conception of poetry without which no writer of verse would, I suppose, venture to write verse, been said more subtly or more precisely?
And Poe does not end here, with what may seem generalities. "Beyond the limits of beauty," he says of poetry, "its province does not extend. Its sole arbiter is Taste. With the Intellect or with the Conscience it has only collateral relations. It has no dependence, unless incidentally, upon either Duty or Truth." And of the poet who said, not meaning anything very different from what Poe meant, "Beauty is truth, truth beauty," he says: "He is the sole British poet who has never erred in his themes." And, as if still thinking of Keats, he says: "It is chiefly amid forms of physical loveliness (we use the word _forms_ in its widest sense as embracing modifications of sound and colour) that the soul seeks the realisation of its dreams of Beauty." And, with more earnest insistence on those limits which he knew to be so much more necessary to guard in poetry than its so-called freedom ("the true artist will avail himself of no "license" whatever"), he states, with categorical precision: "A poem, in my opinion, is opposed to a work of science by having, for its _immediate_ object, pleasure, not truth; to romance, by having, for its object, an _indefinite_ instead of a _definite_ pleasure, being a poem only so far as this object is attained; romance presenting perceptible images with definite, poetry with _in_definite sensations, to which end music is an _essential_, since comprehension of sweet sound is our most indefinite conception. Music, when combined with a pleasurable idea, is poetry; music, without the idea, is simply music; the idea, without the music, is prose, from its very definiteness."
And he would set these careful limits, not only to the province of poetic pleasure, but to the form and length of actual poetry. "A long poem," he says, with more truth than most people are quite willing to see, "is a paradox." "I hold," he says elsewhere, "that a long poem does not exist. I maintain that the phrase, "a long poem," is simply a flat contradiction in terms." And, after defining his ideal, "a rhymed poem, not to exceed in length what might be perused in an hour," he says, very justly, that "within this limit alone can the highest order of true poetry exist." In another essay he narrows the duration to "half an hour, at the very utmost"; and wisely. In yet another essay he suggests "a length of about one hundred lines" as the length most likely to convey that unity of impression, with that intensity of true poetical effect, in which he found the highest merit of poetry. Remember, that of true poetry we have already had his definition; and concede, that a loftier conception of poetry as poetry, poetry as lyric essence, cannot easily be imagined. We are too ready to accept, under the general name of poetry, whatever is written eloquently in metre; to call even Wordsworth"s _Excursion_ a poem, and to accept _Paradise Lost_ as throughout a poem. But there are not thirty consecutive lines of essential poetry in the whole of _The Excursion_, and, while _Paradise Lost_ is crammed with essential poetry, that poetry is not consecutive; but the splendid workmanship comes in to fill up the gaps, and to hold our attention until the poetry returns. Essential poetry is an essence too strong for the general sense; diluted, it can be endured; and, for the most part, the poets dilute it. Poe could conceive of it only in the absolute; and his is the counsel of perfection, if of a perfection almost beyond mortal powers. He sought for it in the verse of all poets; he sought, as few have ever sought, to concentrate it in his own verse; and he has left us at least a few poems, "_ciascun distinto e di fulgore e d"arte_," in which he has found, within his own limits, the absolute.
1906.
THOMAS LOVELL BEDDOES
With the strange fortune that always accompanied him, in life and in death, Beddoes has not merely escaped the indiscriminate applause which he would never have valued, but he has remained a bibliographical rather than a literary rarity. Few except the people who collect first editions--not, as a rule, the public for a poet--have had the chance of possessing _Death"s Jest-Book_ (1850) and the _Poems_ (1851). At last Beddoes has been made accessible, the real story of his death, that suicide so much in the casual and determined manner of one of his own characters.
"The power of the man is immense and irresistible." Browning"s emphatic phrase comes first to the memory, and remains always the most appropriate word of eulogy. Beddoes has been rashly called a great poet.
I do not think he was a great poet, but he was, in every sense of the word, an astonishing one. Read these lines, and remember that they were written just at that stagnant period (1821-1826) which comes between the period of Keats, Sh.e.l.ley, and Byron, and the period of Browning and Tennyson. It is a murderer who speaks:
I am unsouled, dishumanised, uncreated; My pa.s.sions swell and grow like brutes conceived; My feet are fixing roots, and every limb Is billowy and gigantic, till I seem A wild, old, wicked mountain in the air: And the abhorred conscience of this murder, It will grow up a lion, all alone, A mighty-maned, grave-mouthed prodigy, And lair him in my caves: and other thoughts, Some will be snakes, and bears, and savage wolves, And when I lie tremendous in the desert, Or abandoned sea, murderers and idiot men Will come to live upon my rugged sides, Die, and be buried in me. Now it comes; I break, and magnify, and lose my form, And yet I shall be taken for a man, And never be discovered till I die.
How much this has of the old, splendid audacity of the Elizabethans! How unlike timid modern verse! Beddoes is always large, impressive; the greatness of his aim gives him a certain claim on respectful consideration. That his talent achieved itself, or ever could have achieved itself, he himself would have been the last to affirm. But he is a monumental failure, more interesting than many facile triumphs.
The one important work which Beddoes actually completed, _Death"s Jest-Book_, is nominally a drama in five acts. All the rest of his work, except a few lyrics and occasional poems, is also nominally dramatic.