Before the speech can begin, the baroque rituals of academic formality must be observed. Stallman"s appearance merits not one but two introductions. Mike Uretsky, codirector of the Stern School"s Center for Advanced Technology, provides the first.
"The role of a university is to foster debate and to have interesting discussions," Uretsky says. "This particular presentation, this seminar falls right into that mold. I find the discussion of open source particularly interesting."
Before Uretsky can get another sentence out, Stallman is on his feet waving him down like a stranded motorist.
"I do free software," Stallman says to rising laughter.
"Open source is a different movement."
The laughter gives way to applause. The room is stocked with Stallman partisans, people who know of his reputation for verbal exact.i.tude, not to mention his much publicized 1998 falling out with the open source software proponents. Most have come to antic.i.p.ate such outbursts the same way radio fans once waited for Jack Benny"s trademark, "Now cut that out!" phrase during each radio program.
Uretsky hastily finishes his introduction and cedes the stage to Edmond Schonberg, a professor in the NYU computer-science department. As a computer programmer and GNU Project contributor, Schonberg knows which linguistic land mines to avoid. He deftly summarizes Stallman"s career from the perspective of a modern-day programmer.
"Richard is the perfect example of somebody who, by acting locally, started thinking globally [about]
problems concerning the unavailability of source code,"
says Schonberg. "He has developed a coherent philosophy that has forced all of us to reexamine our ideas of how software is produced, of what intellectual property means, and of what the software community actually represents."
Schonberg welcomes Stallman to more applause. Stallman takes a moment to shut off his laptop, rises out of his chair, and takes the stage.
At first, Stallman"s address seems more Catskills comedy routine than political speech. "I"d like to thank Microsoft for providing me the opportunity to be on this platform," Stallman wisecracks. "For the past few weeks, I have felt like an author whose book was fortuitously banned somewhere."
For the uninitiated, Stallman dives into a quick free software warm-up a.n.a.logy. He likens a software program to a cooking recipe. Both provide useful step-by-step instructions on how to complete a desired task and can be easily modified if a user has special desires or circ.u.mstances. "You don"t have to follow a recipe exactly," Stallman notes. "You can leave out some ingredients. Add some mushrooms, "cause you like mushrooms. Put in less salt because your doctor said you should cut down on salt-whatever."
Most importantly, Stallman says, software programs and recipes are both easy to share. In giving a recipe to a dinner guest, a cook loses little more than time and the cost of the paper the recipe was written on.
Software programs require even less, usually a few mouse-clicks and a modic.u.m of electricity. In both instances, however, the person giving the information gains two things: increased friendship and the ability to borrow interesting recipes in return.
"Imagine what it would be like if recipes were packaged inside black boxes," Stallman says, shifting gears.
"You couldn"t see what ingredients they"re using, let alone change them, and imagine if you made a copy for a friend. They would call you a pirate and try to put you in prison for years. That world would create tremendous outrage from all the people who are used to sharing recipes. But that is exactly what the world of proprietary software is like. A world in which common decency towards other people is prohibited or prevented."
With this introductory a.n.a.logy out of the way, Stallman launches into a retelling of the Xerox laser-printer episode. Like the recipe a.n.a.logy, the laser-printer story is a useful rhetorical device. With its parable-like structure, it dramatizes just how quickly things can change in the software world. Drawing listeners back to an era before Amazon.com one-click shopping, Microsoft Windows, and Oracle databases, it asks the listener to examine the notion of software ownership free of its current corporate logos.
Stallman delivers the story with all the polish and practice of a local district attorney conducting a closing argument. When he gets to the part about the Carnegie Mellon professor refusing to lend him a copy of the printer source code, Stallman pauses.
"He had betrayed us," Stallman says. "But he didn"t just do it to us. Chances are he did it to you."
On the word "you," Stallman points his index finger accusingly at an unsuspecting member of the audience.
The targeted audience member"s eyebrows flinch slightly, but Stallman"s own eyes have moved on. Slowly and deliberately, Stallman picks out a second listener to nervous t.i.tters from the crowd. "And I think, mostly likely, he did it to you, too," he says, pointing at an audience member three rows behind the first.
By the time Stallman has a third audience member picked out, the t.i.tters have given away to general laughter.
The gesture seems a bit staged, because it is. Still, when it comes time to wrap up the Xerox laser-printer story, Stallman does so with a showman"s flourish. "He probably did it to most of the people here in this room-except a few, maybe, who weren"t born yet in 1980," Stallman says, drawing more laughs. "[That"s]
because he had promised to refuse to cooperate with just about the entire population of the planet Earth."
Stallman lets the comment sink in for a half-beat. "He had signed a nondisclosure agreement," Stallman adds.
Richard Matthew Stallman"s rise from frustrated academic to political leader over the last 20 years speaks to many things. It speaks to Stallman"s stubborn nature and prodigious will. It speaks to the clearly articulated vision and values of the free software movement Stallman helped build. It speaks to the high-quality software programs Stallman has built, programs that have cemented Stallman"s reputation as a programming legend. It speaks to the growing momentum of the GPL, a legal innovation that many Stallman observers see as his most momentous accomplishment.
Most importantly, it speaks to the changing nature of political power in a world increasingly beholden to computer technology and the software programs that power that technology.
Maybe that"s why, even at a time when most high-technology stars are on the wane, Stallman"s star has grown. Since launching the GNU Project in 1984,5 Stallman has been at turns ignored, satirized, vilified, and attacked-both from within and without the free software movement. Through it all, the GNU Project has managed to meet its milestones, albeit with a few notorious delays, and stay relevant in a software marketplace several orders of magnitude more complex than the one it entered 18 years ago. So too has the free software ideology, an ideology meticulously groomed by Stallman himself.
To understand the reasons behind this currency, it helps to examine Richard Stallman both in his own words and in the words of the people who have collaborated and battled with him along the way. The Richard Stallman character sketch is not a complicated one. If any person exemplifies the old adage "what you see is what you get," it"s Stallman.
"I think if you want to understand Richard Stallman the human being, you really need to see all of the parts as a consistent whole," advises Eben Moglen, legal counsel to the Free Software Foundation and professor of law at Columbia University Law School. "All those personal eccentricities that lots of people see as obstacles to getting to know Stallman really are Stallman: Richard"s strong sense of personal frustration, his enormous sense of principled ethical commitment, his inability to compromise, especially on issues he considers fundamental. These are all the very reasons Richard did what he did when he did."
Explaining how a journey that started with a laser printer would eventually lead to a sparring match with the world"s richest corporation is no easy task. It requires a thoughtful examination of the forces that have made software ownership so important in today"s society. It also requires a thoughtful examination of a man who, like many political leaders before him, understands the malleability of human memory. It requires an ability to interpret the myths and politically laden code words that have built up around Stallman over time. Finally, it requires an understanding of Stallman"s genius as a programmer and his failures and successes in translating that genius to other pursuits.
When it comes to offering his own summary of the journey, Stallman acknowledges the fusion of personality and principle observed by Moglen.
"Stubbornness is my strong suit," he says. "Most people who attempt to do anything of any great difficulty eventually get discouraged and give up. I never gave up."
He also credits blind chance. Had it not been for that run-in over the Xerox laser printer, had it not been for the personal and political conflicts that closed out his career as an MIT employee, had it not been for a half dozen other timely factors, Stallman finds it very easy to picture his life following a different career path. That being said, Stallman gives thanks to the forces and circ.u.mstances that put him in the position to make a difference.
"I had just the right skills," says Stallman, summing up his decision for launching the GNU Project to the audience. "n.o.body was there but me, so I felt like, "I"m elected. I have to work on this. If not me , who?"" Endnotes
1. Actually, the GPL"s powers are not quite that potent. According to section 10 of the GNU General Public License, Version 2 (1991), the viral nature of the license depends heavily on the Free Software Foundation"s willingness to view a program as a derivative work, not to mention the existing license the GPL would replace.
If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission.
For software that is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally.
"To compare something to a virus is very harsh," says Stallman. "A spider plant is a more accurate comparison; it goes to another place if you actively take a cutting."
For more information on the GNU General Public License, visit
[ Portrait of the Hacker as a Young Man
Richard Stallman"s mother, Alice Lippman, still remembers the moment she realized her son had a special gift.
"I think it was when he was eight," Lippman recalls.
The year was 1961, and Lippman, a recently divorced single mother, was wiling away a weekend afternoon within the family"s tiny one-bedroom apartment on Manhattan"s Upper West Side. Leafing through a copy of Scientific American, Lippman came upon her favorite section, the Martin Gardner-auth.o.r.ed column t.i.tled "Mathematical Games." A subst.i.tute art teacher, Lippman always enjoyed Gardner"s column for the brain-teasers it provided. With her son already ensconced in a book on the nearby sofa, Lippman decided to take a crack at solving the week"s feature puzzle.
"I wasn"t the best person when it came to solving the puzzles," she admits. "But as an artist, I found they really helped me work through conceptual barriers."
Lippman says her attempt to solve the puzzle met an immediate brick wall. About to throw the magazine down in disgust, Lippman was surprised by a gentle tug on her shirt sleeve.
"It was Richard," she recalls, "He wanted to know if I needed any help."
Looking back and forth, between the puzzle and her son, Lippman says she initially regarded the offer with skepticism. "I asked Richard if he"d read the magazine," she says. "He told me that, yes, he had and what"s more he"d already solved the puzzle. The next thing I know, he starts explaining to me how to solve it."
Hearing the logic of her son"s approach, Lippman"s skepticism quickly gave way to incredulity. "I mean, I always knew he was a bright boy," she says, "but this was the first time I"d seen anything that suggested how advanced he really was."
Thirty years after the fact, Lippman punctuates the memory with a laugh. "To tell you the truth, I don"t think I ever figured out how to solve that puzzle," she says. "All I remember is being amazed he knew the answer."
Seated at the dining-room table of her second Manhattan apartment-the same s.p.a.cious three-bedroom complex she and her son moved to following her 1967 marriage to Maurice Lippman, now deceased-Alice Lippman exudes a Jewish mother"s mixture of pride and bemus.e.m.e.nt when recalling her son"s early years. The nearby dining-room credenza offers an eight-by-ten photo of Stallman glowering in full beard and doctoral robes. The image dwarfs accompanying photos of Lippman"s nieces and nephews, but before a visitor can make too much of it, Lippman makes sure to balance its prominent placement with an ironic wisecrack.
"Richard insisted I have it after he received his honorary doctorate at the University of Glasgow," says Lippman. "He said to me, "Guess what, mom? It"s the first graduation I ever attended.""1
Such comments reflect the sense of humor that comes with raising a child prodigy. Make no mistake, for every story Lippman hears and reads about her son"s stubbornness and unusual behavior, she can deliver at least a dozen in return.