"Du M. thinks Vanity Fair a little Bible," "Rather an epistle by the Corinthians," says Shirley Brooks.
One night after dinner du Maurier walked home in the wet. "My carriage is waiting for Silver," he said. "My carriage is waiting for gold," answered Shirley Brooks.
Sometimes the discourse at the table is of Religion. "Du M. believes in G.o.d, and that whatever we do G.o.d will not punish us."
"A comfortable faith," adds Silver.
Once the discussion turned upon suicide. "Du M. says before he married he often felt tempted to suicide."
In heading his diary shortly after du Maurier joined the table, Silver writes "Du M." and then corrects it "(no: DU M.)." And in another place he writes, "Du Maurier says fellows write to him de Maurier: "give the devil his du.""
In 1865 the proprietors, getting old, have put their sons in their stead, and taken the Agnews into partnership. The staff talk sentimentally of old times. They drink success to the Firm. Mark Lemon, the Editor, proposes the health of Bradbury & Evans, saying, "men work well together because they are liberally treated. Thought our loss last year (death of Leech) would have seriously affected Punch, but it did not. And no single loss will." Bradbury, replying, speaks of the brotherly affection between the editor and the proprietors. "Says if you want men to serve you well treat them well, and win their sympathy and esteem.... Evans is emphatic on the Brotherhood of the Punch table." Thackeray"s "Mahogany Tree" is sung; du Maurier sings a French song, and F.C.B. also singeth a song with no words to speak of, &c. &c. &c. "So we pa.s.s a jolly evening, and bear in mind-that Sociality is the secret of the success of Punch."
On another occasion there is the paper"s "Silver Wedding." A watch and chain with eleven links-the mystic number of the Punch staff-is handed over to Mark Lemon. In the morning he has received a letter with a hundred guineas. He claims, in replying, "that the Punch Brotherhood is one of the most extraordinary literary brotherhoods the world has seen."
Shirley Brooks hands him letters written by the staff individually, testifying their gladness at the gift proposed. Du Maurier wrote the longest and Charles Keene the shortest.
We have extracted the following items from the diary, quoting exactly, except for the subst.i.tution sometimes of the full name for initials:
November 7th-Monday. "S.B., du Maurier (his debut), H.S., J.T., M.L., P.L., F.C.B., H.M., T.T.
"(The initials stand for Shirley Brooks, Henry Silver, John Tenniel, Mark Lemon, Professor Leigh, F.C. Burnand, Horace Mayhew, Tom Taylor.)
"Du Maurier tells of Whistler and Rossetti"s rage for old china, and how Rossetti once left his guests at dinner and rushed off to buy a piece before Whistler could forestall him."
May 17, 1865. "Du Maurier was presented with a son and heir on Sat.u.r.day, so we baptized the infant in a b.u.mper of Champagne."
December 20, 1865. "While the Great Cut is being hatched, Burnand, du Maurier, and Silver all make little cuts of their initials on the Punch table. Henry Silver between William Thackeray and John Leech-Burnand where a Beckett sat and du Maurier where Leech."
"Miss Bateman retired from the stage (at Her Majesty"s) on Friday-she has rather proved herself a one-part actress, and so has Sothern, whom Burnand denounces as a practical joker-most unscrupulous in tongue."
"Du M. thinks it harder to write a poem than to paint a picture. But surely there"s no comparing them. One mind expresses itself with a pen and another with a brush."
Jan. 17, 1866. "Du Maurier tells of the gas blow-up at his 91 Great Russell Street on Boxing-day. Girl dressing in the shop for Hairdressers" Ball-turned on two burners and lit one and left it burning. Du Maurier and wife dressing on top floor-bang! like a hundred pounder, and then rattle-smash-crash. "O! the children!" "D-n it! They"re all right!" first time he ever swore before his wife. Sister tried to jump from window, but Armstrong held her back. Baby crowing in his arms at the fun as he came downstairs. The nursemaids had run away of course. Lucky no one on the stairs, or they"d have been killed."
April 4, 1866. "In reference to a Ball on the Haymarket stage-"Would you like to go?" said S.B. to du Maurier. But du Maurier"s dancing days are over-only cares for dinners now! Fancy the old fogydom of thirty!"
November 7, 1868. "Du Maurier cut down to five cigarettes a day, resolves to ride daily and live frugally: frightened by his eye this summer!!"
February 24, 1868. "Tenniel has almost given up smoking! Used to smoke an ounce a day. Can eat a better breakfast now. Nearly all our Punch folk smoke less. Tom Taylor has given up cigars and only takes a pipe occasionally. Du Maurier takes cigarettes four a day in lieu of forty. H.S. never smokes at all after dinner. Only Keene and Mark and Shirley stick to their tobacco."
-- 10
Sir Francis Burnand, till recently the distinguished Editor of Punch, was du Maurier"s senior on the paper by a year or two. He has very kindly sent the writer the following impression of the artist: "That he was beloved as a cheery, witty confrere, goes without saying. Rarely did he mix himself up with politics in any shape or form. I doubt if he ever gave us any a.s.sistance in devising a political cartoon. What his politics were I am unable to say, and I do not think he troubled himself about the matter. In "the old days" he delighted in chaffing Horace Mayhew, with whom he exchanged "slang" in French. With the jovial proprietor, William Bradbury, he was always on the best of terms of friendly nonsense, being invariably his left-hand neighbour at "The Table." He was a genuine Bohemian of the artistic fraternity (as given in his Trilby) with the true polish of an English gentleman, of the kindest disposition, and of the warmest heart. All who knew him well loved him, and none missed him more than his fellow-workers on Punch."
"His religion," Sir Francis volunteered in a further note, "as that of the majority of his French confreres, you will find it in the artistic sketches of the men and women in La Boheme" "His guardian angel, humanly and socially, was his wife."
Everyone who knew du Maurier now speaks of his attractiveness and the simplicity and honesty of his nature. He was not really very fond of "Society" because of its code of insincerity. He was its satirist for the same reason that, much as he liked "to be with people," he was not at-home where manners were affected. The Victorians who survive to this day hold up their hands in horror at present-day manners; they object to our natural, comfortable ways and clothes; they define our naturalness as laziness. But just because it is so const.i.tutional to be lazy, the casual modern manners, so true to the exact shade of our enthusiasm for, or indifference to any particular person or thing, express our virtue. We are too honest to pretend. We look back with amus.e.m.e.nt to the Victorians, who put all their goods in the shop window, whose very movements were so far without freedom as to be subservient to the maintenance of uncreased clothing. A regard for "appearances" seemed to regulate action. It was an age of poseurs-the age of the "professional air." In that age came into use among doctors "the bedside manner." Shop-walkers then distinguished themselves from the rest of the race by their preposterous antics, artists endured the misery of velvet jackets; women tight-laced, men about town invented the crease in the trouser-leg to keep which in order alone demands the fealty of a lifetime. In summer men consented to be roasted alive on the London pavement rather than part with the frock-coat in which their depraved conception of beauty delighted. In those days one imagines people were only comfortable when once safely in bed, and that was never for long at a time; for the sake of appearances the Victorians got up early.
Speed the Parting Guest
(Things one would rather have left unsaid.)
"We"ve had such a pleasant evening, Mr. Jones! May I beg of you to ask one of your servants to call a Hansom?"
"With pleasure, Mrs. Smith!"
Punch, March 10, 1883.
The Royal Academy Exhibitions of the time proved that it was impossible for a Victorian to be an artist. The artists of the time did not belong to their own age. We had Rossetti ever seeking to lose himself in the illusion of another time and country, and Whistler trying to find himself in the reality of another place. Chelsea was well outside of Victorian London. Perhaps Hampstead, a place like Chelsea, that belongs to no particular time, was outside of it too. Kensington and Bayswater are Victorian to this day. Rossetti in Kensington is a vision from which imagination recoils, Whistler in Bayswater one which pa.s.ses the invention of human fancy. Du Maurier liked to come into Victorian London in a carriage from a distance, as a visitor, to be driven away again. He approached its society critically. He acknowledged the distinction of its grave self-consciousness while exposing its ridiculous airs.
Just as Chelsea is a more desirable place to live in because of its "Rossetti" a.s.sociations, so Hampstead gains from the memory of the witty and generous satirist who made it his home. New Grove House, where du Maurier lived for over twenty years, might have been designed for him; it escapes the suburban style that would have been an affliction to one so romantic.
Nearly all artists who have sustained their powers in a refined field of expression have been glad to count upon monotony in the pa.s.sage of their days. The adventurous temperament is not the artistic one. The artist values security from interruptions above everything, and interruption is of the essence of adventure. Du Maurier lived a life that was for an artist characteristic. He was at pains to preserve his days from being broken into. It is above the plane where human life is open to crude forms of calamity and the stress of elemental pa.s.sion, upon a plane where freedom from anxiety is secure that art is able to exert itself in attaining to the expression of the more valuable, because more intimate, experiences of human nature.
Du Maurier died on the 8th October 1896. His grave at Hampstead is singularly happily placed and constructed. It consists of two carved wood crosses, respectively at head and foot, connected by a panel containing, in addition to the name and dates, only the concluding lines of Trilby:-
"A little trust that when we die We reap our sowing! And so-good-bye!"
The grave is close to the pavement, and it is impossible to go that way without seeing it. We can imagine that one who was so entirely the opposite of misanthropic would wish to lie like this within sound of pa.s.sing conversation.
FOOTNOTES:
[4]
Pennell"s Life of Whistler.
[5]
Archibald Constable & Co.
V
THE ILl.u.s.tRATIONS
--1
It may be well to touch upon some of the characteristics of our ill.u.s.trations in detail before closing this book. Many of them are so obviously involved in what has already been said here of the artist"s work that we do not propose to mention them again; but others suggest remarks which would not have incorporated easily in the attempt we have made to demonstrate the significance of du Maurier"s art in general.
Sketch for Initial Letter in "The Cornhill"
October, 1883.
Taken in the order in which they are printed here, the first ill.u.s.trations show the range of effect and variety of line which the artist was afterwards to narrow into the conventions by which he is now chiefly remembered. But if such an effect as that in the picture Caution, for instance, would not have been possible with him in his last period, it was because the nature of the subjects required on the journal which absorbed most of his energies afforded no stimulus for anything so Rembrandtesque. He brought such possibilities of style over from his romantic period in The Cornhill Magazine, and it must be admitted that the effect in this drawing seems too powerful for the music-hall comedy it has to carry off.
A picture bewitching on account of the grace it contains is that called "Berkeley Square." Du Maurier had quickly perceived that the quality of grace could well survive side by side with any amount of humour. It is interesting to try and imagine what Phil May would have made of the scene. It was intended for a poignant one, but it becomes chiefly a very attractive one in du Maurier"s hands, the pathos lying with the wording rather than the picture.
The drawing affords us many characteristics of his work. The lady in white reclining in the vehicle is a very embodiment of elegance, and the discerning drawing that defines the coachman repays observation, as also the "style" with which the white horse is swiftly shaded in. It was once the custom for the carriages of people in fashion to draw up under the trees in Berkeley Square, in summer, for tea brought out from Gunter"s. Last summer one of the evening papers asked the question why the custom had lapsed. Du Maurier"s drawing of the scene was accompanied by the following lines, which perhaps provide the answer.
BERKELEY SQUARE, 5 P.M.