CHAPTER XII.
Commencement of Penny Post-Postage Stamps-Prince Albert"s allowance-The _Times_ comments on the Marriage-Royal Wedding Cake-Louis Napoleon"s duel-Nelson Column-n.o.blemen"s servants-Uproar at the Italian Opera House.
The most important event in the beginning of this year was the inauguration of the Penny Post on Jan. 10. At the end of 1839, an uniform postage rate of 4d. per letter was tried on Dec. 5, which was so successful that the present penny postage was established, one feature of which, the prepayment of letters, was much appreciated by the public.
The number of letters despatched by the Mails from the Metropolis, on the 10th, was much greater than was expected, amounting to 112,000, the daily average for January, 1839, having been about 30,000 only. Out of the 112,000 letters there were only 13,000 or 14,000 unpaid, and this was probably owing to the fact that people could not get out of their old habits all at once.
The Postage Stamps, however, were not ready, for we read in the _Times_ of 17 Jan.: "The construction of the stamps is advancing with all speed, the several artists to whom they are intrusted being actively engaged upon them. In the stamp for letter paper and the adhesive stamp, a profile of the Queen is the princ.i.p.al ornament. The letter paper stamp is being engraved by Mr. Wyon, R.A., medallist to the Mint. Charles Heath is engraving the drawing taken from Wyon"s City medal, by H.
Corbould, intended for the adhesive stamp. W. Mulready, R.A., has furnished the design for the cover and envelope, which is in the hands of John Thompson for engraving."
And, now, until the Queen was married, all the talk was of that event.
First of all Prince Albert must be made a naturalised Englishman, and a bill to that effect was read for the third time in the House of Lords on 21 Jan., in the Commons on the 22nd, and received the Royal a.s.sent on the 24th. {119a} On the 23rd he was invested with the Order of the Garter at Gotha. The second reading of the Act for his naturalization was heard in the House of Lords on the 27th, but owing to some dispute as to the question of his precedence, it was adjourned until the 31st, when it was read, and on 3 Feb. it was read a third time, and it received the Royal a.s.sent on 7 Feb. But there was another thing yet to be done, which was to supply His Serene Highness with Funds, and on Jan. 22 Lord John Russell proposed the sum of 50,000 per annum. The discussion thereon was adjourned until the 24th, and re-adjourned until the 27th, when Mr.
Hume moved a reduction to 21,000, which was lost by a majority of 267.
Col. Sibthorp then proposed a sum of 30,000, which was agreed to, and the Act received the Royal a.s.sent on 7 Feb.
The feeling of the country on the subject of the Royal Marriage is, to my thinking, very fairly summarised in a leading article in the _Times_ of 10 Feb., portions of which I transcribe: "It has followed from this policy, {119b} that an English monarch should, _cteris paribus_, rather avoid than court an alliance with one of the first-rate powers of Europe, but should prefer security to aggrandizement, satisfied with a consort selected from a less prominent, and, therefore, less exposed, position.
If there be safety, therefore, in comparative weakness and insignificance, we know not that, on such a ground, any other princely house throughout Europe, could offer inducements preferable to those possessed by those of Saxe-Coburg. Objections against this individual member of the family might, perhaps, present themselves to reflecting minds, on the score of his close consanguinity to Queen Victoria, a circ.u.mstance not usually looked upon as propitious to the hope of a flourishing offspring.
"Another argument might be urged against the match, from the undoubted fact that the name of Saxe-Coburg is not popular in this country, a misfortune for which we do not undertake to account; nor shall we longer dwell upon either of the above considerations, which we have hinted at, merely to shew that they have not wholly escaped our notice. . . .
"Prince Albert has now become one of us. He is, actually, now an English subject. He is tied to us by law and self-interest. Let us bind him to us by grat.i.tude and affection. The happiness of our youthful Queen is now in his hands. He has the means of so directing and a.s.sisting her future footsteps, as to retrieve for Her Majesty (we speak with frankness, but with all respect) all she has forfeited in the hearts of the most loyal, enlightened and virtuous of her subjects, through her unhappy bias towards persons and principles which are hourly undermining the deep foundations of her Throne.
"We have said that it devolves upon Prince Albert to counteract a host of "evil influences," and to aid his Royal Consort in repairing "many very grievous errors" into which selfish and treacherous counsellors have betrayed her, and which her constant separation (contrived by them) from all but one section, or coterie of her subjects, has served to render extremely difficult of correction.
"Queen Victoria has scarcely been permitted to see the general aspect of the British aristocracy, or to become acquainted with their sentiments, their characters, or their manners. The petty, artificial world framed and got up for her deception, is no more capable of suggesting to her mind the vast moral and social creation beyond its narrow boundaries, than one or two leaves of a _hortus siccus_ exemplify the productions of a n.o.ble forest, or a varied and inimitable landscape. . . .
"Are the heads of the nation to be discovered at the Queen of England"s Court? Has the worth, or wisdom, or eminence of the nation any access to the society of the Sovereign? Have the clergy of England, or any of them-have their representatives-bishops, priests, or deacons, the opportunity of communicating personally with the temporal head of the Church of England? Are they, or any of them, ever seated at the Royal table, or received into the Royal presence, or favoured with the Royal smile? No; such a.s.sociations comport not with the policy of her ministers; the ear of the Sovereign is whispered from the choicest of her subjects-the palace doors are locked inexorably against all but a certain clique."
Let us turn from this little lecture to the Queen, honest and faithful though it be, to the all-absorbing subject of Gossip, the Royal Marriage-and first, and foremost, comes the Royal Wedding Cake, which weighed nearly 300lbs. It was three yards in circ.u.mference and about 14 inches deep. This was the cake itself, which, according to a contemporary account, "is covered with sugar of the purest white; on the top is seen the figure of Britannia in the act of blessing the ill.u.s.trious bride and bridegroom, who are dressed, somewhat incongruously, in the costume of ancient Rome. These figures are not quite a foot in height; at the feet of His Serene Highness is the effigy of a dog, said to denote fidelity; and, at the feet of the Queen is a pair of turtle doves, denoting the felicities of the marriage state. A Cupid is writing in a volume expanded on his knees, the date of the marriage, and various other Cupids are sporting and enjoying themselves as such interesting little individuals generally do. These little figures are well modelled. On the top of the cake are numerous bouquets of white flowers tied with true lover"s knots of white satin ribbon, intended for presents to the guests at the nuptial breakfast."
On 6 Feb. the Prince landed at Dover from Ostend, and on the 7th went to Canterbury; on the 8th he reached London and Buckingham Palace; and, on the 10th they were married at the Chapel Royal, St. James"; spent the honeymoon at Windsor, and made their _rentree_ into society on 26 Feb., when they went, in State, to Drury Lane Theatre.
Duelling, although on the wane, was far from dead. I could have given numerous instances of duels in the earlier part of this reign, but have refrained, as they were of no particular interest; but the following is an exception, as it relates to one who, in after years, was to make a great name in history for himself.
_Times_, 4 March:
BOW STREET.-Shortly after the opening of the court yesterday morning, and before any of the night charges had been disposed of, Prince Louis Napoleon and Le Comte Leon, who is said to be the son of Bonaparte, to whom he hears a striking resemblance, were brought before Mr. Jardine, charged by Nicholas Pearce, inspector of the A division, with having met at Wimbledon Common, and attempted to commit a breach of the peace, by fighting a duel with swords and pistols.
Lieut.-Col. Jeremiah Ratcliffe, 6th Dragoons, as second to the last defendant, and Col. Charles Parquin, second to the Prince, together with Count D"Orsay, and a servant, named Mertial Kien, with aiding and a.s.sisting the princ.i.p.als in the intended combat.
Previous to the evidence being taken, two brace of pistols, with powder flasks, and a pair of rapiers, were laid on the table for the inspection of the magistrate.
Inspector Pearce, being sworn, said, about 2 o"clock this morning he received information from Superintendent Baker, that certain parties had an intention of meeting in a hostile manner on Wimbledon Common, some of whom were to start from Fenton"s Hotel and the others from Carlton Gardens; in consequence of which I went into St. James"s Street, where I saw a post-chaise drive up to the door of the hotel, about 7 o"clock, but I could not ascertain if any person had got into it. After delaying a short time, it moved slowly on in the direction of Piccadilly, followed by Col. Ratcliffe, and stopped again at Tattersall"s, where another person followed towards Hyde Park Corner.
The chaise was then driven westward, and I followed it on horseback; but, previous to arriving at Hyde Park Corner, the defendant Ratcliffe pa.s.sed, on horseback, in Piccadilly.
Mr. Jardine: What hour might it be then?
Witness: It was then nearly 7 o"clock. On arriving at the Common, I saw the entire party collected near to the Windmill, and the post-chaise proceeding in that direction. Having dismounted, and left the horse in the care of a countryman, I proceeded to where the chaises were standing, and then I saw the defendants walking away, from them, some yards down, to a hollow part of the ground, each party apparently making arrangements about the duel. They then stopped, and as I approached Col. Parquin, seeing two letters in one hand, and the two swords produced, in the other, I took them from him. At that time, the pistols produced, in a case, were lying on the ground, near to another brace, which were wrapped up in paper.
Some conversation pa.s.sed between Count D"Orsay and Col. Parquin, which appeared to be whether the combat was to be fought with pistols or with swords, and the Count asked me what I wanted; my authority for interfering; and who it was that gave me information of the circ.u.mstance. At that moment, Inspector Partridge, accompanied by Sergt. Otway and other constables, came up, and, on Col. Ratcliffe taking the pistols from the case, he was taken into custody. I instantly went to him, and, shewing him my staff, told him I was an officer, and that I was, in duty, bound to take him into custody, for attempting to commit a breach of the peace. Count D"Orsay requested to be told who it was who had given the information, and, on being refused, the entire party were quietly conveyed to the station house.
Mr. Jardine: Have you since ascertained that the pistols contained powder and b.a.l.l.s?
Witness: Yes, Sir; there are b.a.l.l.s in them, and caps upon them.
Colonel Ratcliffe declared there was no powder in the pistols, which belonged to him, as could be seen; for it had been arranged that the duel was to be fought with swords.
Mr. Jardine inquired if any of the defendants, who were foreigners, and not sufficiently conversant with the English language, would wish to hear the evidence read over to them in French?
Le Comte Leon replied in French, that he could not sufficiently understand the evidence that had been given, but he was quite satisfied that all the proceedings were perfectly legal and correct.
Prince Louis said, he was prepared, if required, to enter into an explanation of the circ.u.mstances which gave rise to the offence with which he was charged.
Mr. Jardine did not wish to hear any statement on either side, as his duty was only to prevent a breach of the peace, and he hoped the defendants were prepared with the sureties he would require, to prevent further inconvenience.
Count D"Orsay said, he had come prepared with bail, which he thought there could be no objection to.
Prince Louis requested that the two letters, which had been taken from his friend, should be delivered up to him.
Mr. Jardine immediately delivered up the letters, saying he should require the princ.i.p.als to enter into bail, themselves in 500 each, and two sureties in 250 each, to keep the peace with all Her Majesty"s subjects, and particularly with each other, for the next 12 months.
Count D"Orsay: One surety in 500, would, perhaps, answer as well as two in 250 each, if it meets with your approbation.
Mr. Jardine said he had no objection to such a course, and, if the other defendants were prepared with bail, it might be taken.
Col. Ratcliffe said his surety was present.
Mr. Jardine: The bail I shall require is, that each of the other defendants enter into his own recognizance in 100, and two sureties in 50 each, to keep the peace for the same period, with the exception of the defendant Kien, who may put in his own recognizances in 100.
Mr. Joshua Bates, of Portland Place, having offered himself as surety for Prince Louis Napoleon and Col. Parquin, was accepted.
Mr. Fenton was accepted as bail for Le Comte Leon, and the Hon.
Francis Baring, M.P., became surety for Col. Ratcliffe and Count D"Orsay.
The Chief Clerk having conducted the parties into the Magistrate"s private room, where they were furnished with the requisite notices, returned to the Court to take directions respecting the disposal of the weapons and other articles which were found upon the defendants on their being taken into custody.
Mr. Jardine said he could make no order about them, but he thought that, as the defendants had put in bail, there could be very little apprehension of their committing a similar offence, if they were restored to their proper owners.
It appeared that the two letters had been written by the Comte Leon to his cousin, as he was styled, demanding that he would retract certain expressions respecting their relationship, which he was alleged to have made use of; and, his not complying, gave rise to the quarrel.
On the 10th of April the offer of Messrs. Grissell and Peto was accepted, to erect the Nelson Column in Trafalgar Square, within two years, for a sum of 17,860.
There is a curious police case as to the habits and customs of n.o.blemen"s servants, which may be interesting to my readers. It was brought before the Magistrate at Queen Square on 14 April, when the House Steward of the Earl of Galloway applied for summonses against the footmen attending the carriages of Viscount Melbourne, the Marquis of Normanby, the Marquis of Lansdowne and Lord Tankerville, for a.s.sault and damage.
It appeared from the statement of the applicant, that the servants attending the carriages of peers, to the House of Lords, have a waiting room, which they call their Club room, and that they have formed themselves into a society, governed by one of their body, whom they call their "Constable." They have a set of rules, dated as far back as 1759, obedience to which is strictly enforced under pain of certain fines.
On Friday evening, the coachman of the Earl of Galloway set his lordship down at the House of Lords, with orders to wait. The footman, who was, it appears, a new comer, was, on entering the club room, called upon to pay a fine, or "footing" of two shillings, to be spent in beer, but he replied that he had no money about him; and, on their insisting on its being paid, he left the room, and got on the carriage box, with the coachman, but the "members," headed by their Constable, with his staff of office, pursued him, insisted upon his coming down, and were about to pull him off the box, when the coachman told them that his fellow servant had no money with him, but, if they would go, he would be answerable that it should be paid.
They, however, insisted that it should be spent in their Club, and that the new servant should be present.
Mr. Burrell: How many were there of them?