The world had long been used to such regular poetry. The form of Whitman"s verse came as a distinct shock to the majority.
Sometimes what he said was a greater shock, as, for instance, the line:--
"I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world."
For a considerable time many people knew Whitman by this one line alone.
They concluded that he was a barbarian and that all that he said was "yawp." Although much of his work certainly deserved this characterization, yet those who persisted in reading him soon discovered that their condemnation was too sweeping, as most were willing to admit after they had read, for instance, _When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom"d_, a poem that Swinburne called "the most sonorous nocturn yet chanted in the church of the world." The three _motifs_ of this song are the lilac, the evening star, and the hermit thrush:--
"Lilac and star and bird twined with the chant of my soul, There in the fragrant pines and the cedars dusk and dim."
In the same cla.s.s we may place such poems as _Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking_, where we listen to a song as if from
"Out of the mocking-bird"s throat, the musical shuttle."
Whitman also wrote in almost regular meter his dirge on Lincoln, the greatest dirge of the Civil War:--
"O Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is done, The ship has weather"d every rack, the prize we sought is won, The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting."
In 1888 Whitman wrote that "from a worldly and business point of view, _Leaves of Gra.s.s_ has been worse than a failure--that public criticism on the book and myself as author of it yet shows mark"d anger and contempt more than anything else." But he says that he had comfort in "a small band of the dearest friends and upholders ever vouchsafed to man or cause." He was also well received in England. He met with cordial appreciation from Tennyson. John Addington Symonds (1840-1893), a graduate of Oxford and an authority on Greek poetry and the Renaissance, wrote, "_Leaves of Gra.s.s_, which I first read at the age of twenty-five, influenced me more, perhaps, than any other book has done except the _Bible_; more than Plato, more than Goethe." Had Whitman lived until 1908, he would probably have been satisfied with the following statement from his biographer, Bliss Perry, formerly professor of English at Princeton, "These primal and ultimate things Whitman felt as few men have ever felt them, and he expressed them, at his best, with a n.o.bility and beauty such as only the world"s very greatest poets have surpa.s.sed."
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS. His most p.r.o.nounced single characteristic is his presentation of democracy:--
"Stuff"d with the stuff that is coa.r.s.e and stuff"d with the stuff that is fine."
He said emphatically, "Without yielding an inch, the working man and working woman were to be in my pages from first to last." He is the only American poet of his rank who remained through life the close companion of day laborers. Yet, although he is the poet of democracy, his poetry is too difficult to be read by the ma.s.ses, who are for the most part ignorant of the fact that he is their greatest representative poet.
He not only preached democracy, but he also showed in practical ways his intense feeling of comradeship and his sympathy with all. One of his favorite verses was
"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own funeral drest in his shroud."
His Civil War experiences still further intensified this feeling. He looked on the lifeless face of a son of the South, and wrote:--
"... my enemy is dead, a man divine as myself is dead."
Like Th.o.r.eau, Whitman welcomed the return to nature. He says:--
"I am enamour"d of growing out-doors, Of men that live among cattle or taste of the ocean or woods."
He is the poet of nature as well as of man. He tells us how nature educated him:--
"The early lilacs became part of this child, And gra.s.s and white and red morning-glories, and white and red clover, and the song of the phoebe-bird, And the Third-month lambs and the sow"s pink-faint litter, and the mare"s foal and the cow"s calf."
He delights us
"... with meadows, rippling tides and trees and flowers and gra.s.s, And the low hum of living breeze--and in the midst G.o.d"s beautiful eternal right hand."
No American poet was more fond of the ocean. Its aspect and music, more than any other object of nature, influenced his verse. He addresses the sea in lines like these:--
"With husky-haughty lips, O sea!
Where day and night I wend thy surf-beat sh.o.r.e, Imaging to my sense thy varied strange suggestions, (I see and plainly list thy talk and conference here,) Thy troops of white-maned racers racing to the goal, Thy ample, smiling face, dash"d with the sparkling dimples of the sun."
He especially loves motion in nature. His poetry abounds in the so-called motor images. [Footnote: For a discussion of the various types of images of the different poets, see the author"s _Education of the Central Nervous System_, Chaps. VII., VIII., IX., X.] He takes pleasure in picturing a scene
"Where the heifers browse, where geese nip their food with short jerks,"
or in watching
"The white arms out in the breakers tirelessly tossing."
While his verse is fortunately not without idealistic touches, his poetic theory is uncompromisingly realistic, as may be seen in his critical prose essays, some of which deserve to rank only a little below those of Lowell and Poe. Whitman says:--
"For grounds for _Leaves of Gra.s.s_, as a poem, I abandoned the conventional themes, which do not appear in it: none of the stock ornamentation, or choice plots of love or war, or high exceptional personages of Old-World song; nothing, as I may say, for beauty"s sake--no legend or myth or romance, nor euphemism, nor rhyme."
His unbalanced desire for realism led him into two mistakes. In the first place, his determination to avoid ornamentation often caused him to insert in his poems mere catalogues of names, which are not bound together by a particle of poetic cement. The following from his _Song of Myself_ is an instance:--
"Land of coal and iron! land of gold! land of cotton, sugar, rice!
Land of wheat, beef, pork! land of wool and hemp! land of the apple and the grape!"
In the second place, he thought that genuine realism forbade his being selective and commanded him to put everything in his verse. He accordingly included some offensive material which was outside the pale of poetic treatment. Had he followed the same rule with his cooking, his chickens would have been served to him without removing the feathers. His refusal to eliminate unpoetic material from his verse has cost him very many readers.
He further concluded that it was unfitting for a democratic poet to be hampered by the verse forms of the Old World. He discarded rhyme almost entirely, but he did employ rhythm, which is determined by the tone of the ideas, not by the number of syllables. This rhythm is often not evident in a single line, but usually becomes manifest as the thought is developed.
His verse was intended to be read aloud or chanted. He himself says that his verse construction is "apparently lawless at first perusal, although on closer examination a certain regularity appears, like the recurrence of lesser and larger waves on the seash.o.r.e, rolling in without intermission, and fitfully rising and falling." There is little doubt that he carried in his ear the music of the waves and endeavored to make his verse in some measure conform to that. He says specifically that while he was listening to the call of a seabird
"... on Paumanok"s [Footnote: The Indian name for Long Island.] gray beach, With the thousand responsive songs at random, My own songs awaked from that hour, And with them the key, the word up from the waves."
In ideals he is most like Emerson. Critics have called Whitman a concrete translation of Emerson, and have noticed that he practiced the independence which Emerson preached in the famous lecture on _The American Scholar_ (p.
185). In 1855 Emerson wrote to Whitman: "I am not blind to the worth of the wonderful gift of _Leaves of Gra.s.s_. I find it the most extraordinary piece of wit and wisdom that America has yet contributed."
Whitman is America"s strangest compound of unfiltered realism, alloyed with rich veins of n.o.ble idealism. No students of American democracy, its ideals and social spirit, can afford to leave him unread. He sings, "unwarped by any influence save democracy,"
"Of Life, immense in pa.s.sion, pulse, and power, Cheerful, for freest action form"d under the laws divine."
Intelligent sympathy with the humblest, the power to see himself "in prison shaped like another man and feel the dull unintermitted pain," prompts him to exclaim:--
"I seize the descending man and raise him with resistless will."
An elemental poet of democracy, embodying its faults as well as its virtues, Whitman is noteworthy for voicing the new social spirit on which the twentieth century is relying for the regeneration of the ma.s.ses.
SUMMARY
American fiction had for the most part been romantic from its beginning until the last part of the nineteenth century. Charles Brockden Brown, Irving, Cooper, Hawthorne, Poe, Bret Harte, and Mark Twain were all tinged with romanticism. In the latter part of the last century, there arose a school of realists who insisted that life should be painted as it is, without any addition to or subtraction from reality. This school did not ask, "Is the matter interesting or exciting?" but, "Is it true to life?"
Howells and James were the leaders of the realists. Howells uses everyday incidents and conversations. James not infrequently takes unusual situations, so long as they conform to reality, and subjects them to the most searching psychological a.n.a.lysis. Mary Wilkins Freeman, a pupil of Howells, shows exceptional skill in depicting with realistic interest the humble life of provincial New England. While this school did not turn all writers into extreme realists, its influence was felt on the ma.s.s of contemporary fiction.
Walt Whitman brings excessive realism into the form and matter of verse.
For fear of using stock poetic ornaments, he sometimes introduces mere catalogues of names, uninvested with a single poetic touch. He is America"s greatest poet of democracy. His work is characterized by altruism, by all-embracing sympathy, by emphasis on the social side of democracy, and by love of nature and the sea.