Nothing shows better the effect on art of the long continental wars at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth century than the fact that Mozart"s two greatest works, written for Vienna and Prague immediately before the French Revolution, did not become known in England and France until about a quarter of a century after their production. Fortunate Austria, before the great break up of European territories and dynasties, possessed the two first musical capitals in Europe. Opera had already declined in Berlin, and its history, even under the direction of the flute-playing Frederic, possesses little interest for English readers after the departure or rather flight of Madame Mara. Italy was still the great nursery of music, but her maestri composed their greatest works for foreign theatres, and many of them were attached to foreign courts. Thus, Paisiello wrote his _Barbiere di Siviglia_ for St. Petersburgh, whither he had been invited by the Empress Catherine, and where he was succeeded by Cimarosa. Cimarosa, again, on his return from St. Petersburgh, wrote his masterpiece, _Il Matrimonio Segretto_, for the Emperor Leopold II., at Vienna. Of the Opera at Stockholm, we have heard nothing since the time of Queen Christina. The Dresden Opera, which, in the days of Handel, was the first in Europe, still maintained its pre-eminence at the beginning of the second half of the eighteenth century, when Rousseau published his "Musical Dictionary," and described at length the composition of its admirable orchestra. But the state and the resources of the kings of Saxony declined with the power of Poland, and the Dresden Opera, though, thanks to the taste which presided at the court, its performances were still excellent, had quite lost its peculiar celebrity long before Napoleon came, and carried away its last remaining glories in the shape of the composer, Paer, and Madame Paer and Brizzi, its two princ.i.p.al singers.
[Sidenote: PAISIELLO IN RUSSIA.]
The first great musical work produced in Russia, Paisiello"s _Barbiere di Siviglia_, was performed for the first time at St. Petersburgh, in 1780. In this opera work, of which the success soon became European, the composer entered thoroughly into the spirit of all Beaumarchais"s best scenes, so admirably adapted for musical ill.u.s.tration. Of the solos, the three most admired were Almaviva"s opening romance, Don Basil"s _La Calomnia_, and the air for Don Bartholo; the other favourite pieces being a comic trio, in which La Jeunesse sneezes, and L"Eveille yawns in the presence of the tutor (I need scarcely remark that the personages just named belong to Beaumarchais"s comedy, and that they are not introduced in Rossini"s opera), another trio, in which Rosina gives the letter to Figaro, a duet for the entry of the tenor in the a.s.sumed character of Don Alonzo, and a quintett, in which Don Basil is sent to bed, and in which the phrase _buona sera_ is treated with great felicity.
Pergolese rendered a still greater service to Russia than did Paisiello by writing one of his masterpieces for its capital, when he took the young Bortnianski with him from St. Petersburgh to Italy, and there educated the greatest religious composer that Russia, not by any means deficient in composers, has yet known.
[Sidenote: A SINGER"S INDISPOSITION.]
We have seen that Paisiello, some years after his return to Italy, was engaged by Napoleon as chapel-master, and that the services of Paer were soon afterwards claimed and secured by the emperor as composer of his chamber music. This was not the first time that Paer had been forced to alter his own private arrangements in consequence of the very despotic patronage accorded to music by the victorious leaders of the French army. In 1799 he was at Udine, where his wife was engaged as _prima donna_. Portogallo"s _la Donna di genio volubile_ was about to be represented before a large number of the officers under the command of Bernadotte, when suddenly it appeared impossible to continue the performance owing to the very determined indisposition of the _primo ba.s.so_. This gentleman had gone to bed in the middle of the day disguised as an invalid. He declared himself seriously unwell in the afternoon, and in the evening sent a message to the theatre to excuse himself from appearing in Portogallo"s opera. Paer and his wife understood what this meant. The performance was for Madame Paer"s benefit; and Olivieri, the perfidious ba.s.so, from private pique, had determined, if possible, to prevent it taking place. Paer"s spirit was roused by the att.i.tude of the _primo buffo_, which was still that of a man confined to his bed; and he resolved to frustrate his infamous scheme, which, though simple, appeared certain of success, inasmuch as no other comic _ba.s.so_ was to be found anywhere near Udine. The audience was impatient, Madame Paer in tears, the manager in despair, when Paer desired that the performance might begin; saying, that Providence would send them a ba.s.so who would at least know his part, and that in any case Madame Paer must get ready for the first scene. Madame Paer obeyed the marital injunction, but in a state of great trepidation; for she had no confidence in the capabilities of the promised ba.s.so, and was not by any means sure that he even existed. The curtain was about to rise, when the singer who was to have fallen from the clouds walked quietly on to the stage, perfectly dressed for the part he was about to undertake, and without any sign of hesitation on his countenance. The _prima donna_ uttered a cry of surprise, burst into a fit of laughter, and then rushed weeping into the arms of her husband,--for it was Paer himself who had undertaken to replace the treacherous Olivieri.
"No," said Madame Paer; "this is impossible! It shall never be said that I allowed you, a great composer, who will one day be known throughout Europe, to act the buffoon. No! the performance must be stopped!"
At this moment the final chords of the overture were heard. Poor Madame Paer resigned herself to her fate, and went weeping on to the stage to begin a comic duet with her husband, who seemed in excellent spirits, and commenced his part with so much _verve_ and humour, that the audience rewarded his exertions with a storm of applause. Paer"s gaiety soon communicated itself to his wife. If Paer was to perform at all, it was necessary that his performance should outshine that of all possible rivals, and especially that of the miscreant Olivieri, who was now laughing between his sheets at the success which he fancied must have already attended his masterly device. The _prima donna_ had never sung so charmingly before, but the greatest triumph of the evening was gained by the new _ba.s.so_. Olivieri, who previously had been p.r.o.nounced unapproachable in Portogallo"s opera, was now looked upon as quite an inferior singer compared to the _buffo caricato_ who had so unexpectedly presented himself before the Udine public. Paer, in addition to his great, natural histrionic ability, knew every note of _la Donna_. Olivieri had studied only his own part. Paer, in directing the rehearsals, had made himself thoroughly acquainted with all of them, and gave a significance to some portions of the music which had never been expressed or apprehended by his now defeated, routed, utterly confounded rival.
[Sidenote: A SINGER"S INDISPOSITION.]
At present comes the dark side of the picture. Olivieri, dangerously ill the night before, was perfectly well the next morning, and quite ready to resume his part in _la Donna di genio volubile_. Paer, on the other hand, was quite willing to give it up to him; but both reckoned without the military connoisseurs of Udine, and above all without Bernadotte, who arrived the day after Paer"s great success, when all the officers of the staff were talking of nothing else. Olivieri was announced to appear in his old character; but when the bill was shown to the General, he declared that the original representative might go back to bed, for that the only buffo he would listen to was the ill.u.s.trious Paer. In vain the director explained that the composer was not engaged as a singer, and that nothing but the sudden indisposition of Olivieri would have induced him to appear on the stage at all. Bernadotte swore he would have Paer, and no one else; and as the unfortunate _impresario_ continued his objections, he was ordered into arrest, and informed that he should remain in prison until the _maestro_ Paer undertook once more the part of "Pippo" in Portogallo"s opera.
The General then sent a company of grenadiers to surround Paer"s house; but the composer had heard of what had befallen the manager, and, foreseeing his own probable fate, if he remained openly in Udine, had concealed himself, and spread a report that he was in the country.
Lancers and hussars were dispatched in search of him, but naturally without effect. In the supposed absence of Paer, the army was obliged to accept Olivieri; and when six or seven representations of the popular opera had taken place and the military public had become accustomed to Olivieri"s performance of the part of "Pippo," Paer came forth from his hiding place and suffered no more from the warlike dilettanti-ism of Bernadotte.
[Sidenote: MADAME FODOR AND THE COW.]
There would be no end to my anecdotes if I were to attempt to give a complete list of all those in which musicians and singers have been made to figure in connection with all sorts of events during the last great continental war. The great vocalists, and many of the great composers of the day, continued to travel about from city to city, and from court to court, as though Europe were still in a state of profound peace.
Sometimes, as happened once to Paer, and was nearly happening to him a second time, they were taken prisoners; or they found themselves shut up in a besieged town; and a great _cantatrice_, Madame Fodor, who chanced to be engaged at the Hamburg opera when Hamburg was invested, was actually the cause of a _sortie_ being made in her favour. On one occasion, while she was singing, the audience was disturbed by a cannon ball coming through the roof of the theatre and taking its place in the gallery; but the performances continued nevertheless, and the officers and soldiers of the garrison continued to be delighted with their favourite vocalist. Madame Fodor, however, on her side, was beginning to get tired of her position; not that she cared much about the bombardment which was renewed from time to time, but because the supply of milk had failed, cows and oxen having been alike slaughtered for the sustenance of the beleaguered garrison. Without milk, Madame Fodor was scarcely able to sing; at least, she had so accustomed herself to drink it every evening during the intervals of performance, that she found it inconvenient and painful to do without it. Hearing in what a painful situation their beloved vocalist found herself, the French army gallantly resolved to remedy it without delay. The next evening a _sortie_ was effected, and a cow brought back in triumph. This cow was kept in the property and painting room in the theatre, above the stage, and was lowered like a drop scene, to be milked whenever Madame Fodor was thirsty. So, at least, says the operatic anecdote on the subject, though it would perhaps have been a more convenient proceeding to have sent some trustworthy person to perform the milking operation up stairs.
In any case, the cow was kept carefully shut up and under guard.
Otherwise the animal"s life would not have been safe, so great was the scarcity of provision in Hamburg at the time, and so great the general hunger for beef of any kind.
[Sidenote: THE D"ENTRAIGUES" MURDER.]
Madame Huberti, after flying from Paris during the Reign of Terror, married the Count d"Entraigues, and would seem to have terminated her operatic career happily and honourably; but she was destined some years afterwards to die a horrible death. The countess always wore the order of St. Michael, which had been given to her by the then unacknowledged Louis XVIII., in token of the services she had rendered to the royalist party, by enabling her husband to escape from prison and preserving his portfolio which contained a number of political papers of great importance. The Count afterwards entered the service of Russia, and was entrusted by the government with several confidential missions. Hitherto he had been working in the interest of the Bourbons against Napoleon; but when the French emperor and the emperor Alexander formed an alliance, after the battles of Eylau and Friedland, he seems to have thought that his connexion with Russia ought to terminate. However this may have been, he found means to obtain a copy of the secret articles contained in the treaty of Tilsit[73] and hastened to London to communicate them to the English government. For this service he is said to have received a pension, and he now established himself in England, where he appears to have had continual relations with the foreign office. The French police heard how the Count d"Entraigues was employed in London, and Fouche sent over two agents to watch him and intercept his letters. These emissaries employed an Italian refugee, to get acquainted with and bribe Lorenzo, the Count"s servant, who allowed his compatriot to read and even to take copies of the despatches frequently entrusted to him by his master to take to Mr. Canning. He, moreover, gave him a number of the Count"s letters to and from other persons. One evening a letter was brought to M. d"Entraigues which obliged him to go early the next morning from his residence at Barnes to London. Lorenzo had observed the seal of the foreign office on the envelope, and saw that his treachery would soon be discovered. Everything was ready for the journey, when he stabbed his master, who fell to the ground mortally wounded. The Countess was getting into the carriage. To prevent her charging him with her husband"s death, the servant also stabbed her, and a few moments afterwards, in confusion and despair, blew his own brains out with a pistol which he in the first instance appears to have intended for M. d"Entraigues. This horrible affair occurred on the 22nd of July, 1812.
Nothing fatal happened to Madame Colbran, though she was deeply mixed up with politics, her name being at one time quite a party word among the royalists at Naples. Those who admired the king made a point of admiring his favourite singer. A gentleman from England asked a friend one night at the Naples theatre how he liked the vocalist in question.
"Like her? I am a royalist," was the reply.
When the revolutionists gained the upper hand, Madame Colbran was hissed; but the discomfiture of the popular party was always followed by renewed triumphs for the singer.
Madame Colbran must not lead us on to her future husband, Rossini, whose epoch has not yet arrived. The mention of Paer"s wife has already taken us far away from the composers in vogue at the end of the eighteenth century.
[Sidenote: IL MATRIMONIO SEGRETTO.]
Two of the three best comic operas ever produced, _Le Nozze di Figaro_ and _Il Matrimonio Segretto_ (I need scarcely name Rossini"s _Il Barbiere di Siviglia_ as the third), were written for Vienna within six years (1786-1792), and at the special request of emperors of Germany.
Cimarosa was returning from St. Petersburgh when Leopold II., Joseph the Second"s successor, detained him at Vienna, and invited him to compose something for his theatre. The _maestro_ had not much time, but he did his best, and the result was, _Il Matrimonio Segretto_. The Emperor was delighted with the work, which seemed almost to have been improvised, and gave the composer twelve thousand francs, or, as some say, twelve thousand florins; in either case, a very liberal sum for the period when Cimarosa, Paisiello and Gughelmi had mutually agreed, whatever more they might receive for their operas, never to take less than two thousand four hundred francs.
The libretto of _Il Matrimonio Segretto_, by Bertatti, is imitated from that of a forgotten French operetta, _Sophie ou le Mariage Cache_, which is again founded on Garrick and Coleman"s _Clandestine Marriage_. The Emperor Leopold was unable to be present at the first performance of Cimarosa"s new work, but he heard of its enormous success, and determined not to miss a note at the second representation. He was in his box before the commencement of the overture, and listened to the performance throughout with the greatest attention, but without manifesting any opinion as to the merits of the music. As the Sovereign did not applaud, the brilliant audience who had a.s.sembled to hear _Il Matrimonio_ a second time, were obliged, by court etiquette, to remain silent without giving the slightest expression to the delight the music afforded them. This icy reception was very different to the one obtained by the opera the night before, when the marks of approbation from all parts of the house had been of the most enthusiastic kind. However, when the piece was at an end, the Emperor rose and said aloud--
"Bravo, Cimarosa, bravissimo! The whole opera is admirable, delightful, enchanting. I did not applaud that I might not lose a single note of this masterpiece. You have heard it twice, and I must have the same pleasure before I go to bed. Singers and musicians, pa.s.s into the next room! Cimarosa will come too, and will preside at the banquet prepared for you. When you have had sufficient rest we will begin again. I _encore_ the whole opera, and, in the mean while, let us applaud it as it deserves." Leopold clapped his hands, and for some minutes the whole theatre resounded with plaudits. After the banquet, the entire opera was repeated.
The only other example of such an occurrence as the above is to be found in the career of Terence, whose _Eunuchus_ on its first production, was performed twice the same day, or, rather, once in the morning, and once in the evening.
A similar amount of success obtained by Paer"s _Laodicea_ had quite an opposite result; for, as nearly the whole opera was encored, piece by piece, it was found impossible to conclude it the same evening, and the performance of the last act was postponed until the next night.
Mozart"s _Nozze di Figaro_, produced six years before the _Matrimonio Segretto_, was far less justly appreciated,--indeed, at Vienna, was not appreciated at all. This admirable work, so full of fresh spontaneous melody, and of rich, varied harmony was actually hissed by the Viennese!
They even hissed _Non piu andrai_, which seems equally calculated to delight the educated and the most uneducated ear. Mozart has made allusion to this almost incredible instance of bad taste very happily and ingeniously in the supper scene of _Don Giovanni_.
[Sidenote: MOZART AND JOSEPH II.]
Joseph II. cared only for Italian music, and never gave his entire approbation to anything Mozart produced, though the musicians of the period acknowledged him to be the greatest composer in Europe.
"It is too fine for our ears," said the presumptuous Joseph, speaking to Mozart of the _Seraglio_. "Seriously, I think there are too many notes."
"Precisely the proper number," replied the composer.
The Emperor rewarded his frankness by giving him only fifty ducats for his opera.[74]
Nevertheless, the _Seraglio_ had caused the success of one of the emperor"s favourite enterprises. It was the first work produced at the German Opera, established by Joseph II., at Vienna. Until that time, Italian opera predominated everywhere; indeed, German opera, that is to say, lyric dramas in the German language, set to music by German composers, and sung by German singers, could not be said to exist. There were a number of Italian musicians living at Vienna who were quite aware of Mozart"s superiority, and hated him for it; the more so, as by taking such an important part in the establishment of the German Opera, he threatened to diminish the reputation of the Italian school. The _Entfuhrung aus dem Serail_ was the first blow to the supremacy of Italian opera. Der _Schauspieldirector_ was the second, and when, after the production of this latter work at the new German theatre of Vienna, Mozart proceeded to write the _Nozze di Figaro_ for the Italians, he simply placed himself in the hands of his enemies. At the first representation, the two first acts of the _Nozze_ were so shamefully executed, that the composer went in despair to the emperor to denounce the treachery of which he was being made the victim. Joseph had detected the conspiracy and was nearly as indignant as Mozart himself. He sent a severe message round to the stage, but the harm was now done, and the remainder of the opera was listened to very coldly. _Le Nozze di Figaro_ failed at Vienna, and was not appreciated, did not even get a fair hearing, until it was produced some months afterwards at Prague. The Slavonians of Bohemia showed infinitely more good taste and intelligence than the Germans (led away and demoralized, however, by an Italian clique) at Vienna. At Prague, _le Nozze di Figaro_ caused the greatest enthusiasm, and Mozart replied n.o.bly to the sympathy and admiration of the Bohemians. "These good people," he said, "have avenged me. They know how to do me justice, I must write something to please them." He kept his word, and the year afterwards gave them the immortal _Don Giovanni_.
[Sidenote: MOZART AND SALIERI.]
At the head of the clique which had sworn eternal enmity to Mozart, was Salieri, a musician with a sort of Pontius Pilate reputation, owing his infamous celebrity to the fact that his name is now inseparably coupled with that of the sublime composer whom he would have destroyed. Salieri (whom we have met with before in Paris as the would-be successor of Gluck) was the most learned of the Italian composers at that time residing in Vienna; and, therefore, must have felt the greatness of Mozart"s genius more profoundly than any of the others. When _Don Giovanni_, after its success at Prague, was produced at Vienna, it was badly put on the stage, imperfectly rehea.r.s.ed, and represented altogether in a very unsatisfactory manner. Nor, with improved execution did the audience show any disposition to appreciate its manifold beauties. Mozart"s _Don Giovanni_ was quite eclipsed by the _a.s.sur_ of his envious and malignant rival.
"I will leave it to psychologists to determine," says M.
Oulibicheff,[75] "whether the day on which Salieri triumphed publicly over Mozart, was the happiest or the most painful of his life. He triumphed, indeed, thanks to the ignorance of the Viennese, to his own skill as a director, (which enabled him to render the work of his rival scarcely recognisable), and to the entire devotion of his subordinates.
He must have been pleased; but Salieri was not only envious, he was also a great musician. He had read the score of _Don Giovanni_, and you know that the works one reads with the greatest attention are those of one"s enemies. With what admiration and despair it must have filled the heart of an artist who was even more ambitious of true glory than of mere renown! What must he have felt in his inmost soul! And what serpents must again have crawled and hissed in the wreath of laurel which was placed on his head! In spite of the fiasco of his opera, which he seems to have foreseen, and to which, at all events, he resigned himself with great calmness, Mozart, doubtless, more happy than his conqueror, added a few "numbers," each a masterpiece to his score. Four new pieces were written for it, at the request of the Viennese singers."
M. Oulibicheff"s compatriot Poushkin has written an admirable study on the subject presented above in a few suggestive phrases by Mozart"s biographer. Unfortunately, it is impossible in these volumes to find a place for the Russian poet"s "Mozart and Salieri."
After the failure of _Don Giovanni_ at Vienna, a number of persons were speaking of it in a room where Haydn and the princ.i.p.al connoisseurs of the place were a.s.sembled. Every one agreed in p.r.o.nouncing it a most estimable work, but, also, every one had something to say against it. At last, Haydn, who, hitherto, had not spoken a word, was asked to give his opinion.
"I do not feel myself in a position to decide this dispute," he answered. "All I know and can a.s.sure you of is that Mozart is the greatest composer of our time."
[Sidenote: DON GIOVANNI.]
As Salieri"s _a.s.sur_ completely eclipsed _Don Giovanni_, so, previously, did Martini"s _Cosa Rara_, the _Nozze di Figaro_. Both these phenomena manifested themselves at Vienna, and the reader has already been reminded that the fate of the _Nozze di Figaro_ is alluded to in _Don Giovanni_. All the airs played by the hero"s musicians in the supper scene are taken from the operas which were most in vogue when Mozart produced his great work; such as _La Cosa Rara_, _Fra due Litiganti terzo G.o.de_, and _I Pretendenti Burlati_. Leporello calls attention to the melodies as the orchestra on the stage plays them, and when, to terminate the series, the clarionets strike up _Non piu andrai_, he exclaims _Questo lo conosco pur troppo!_ "I know this one only too well!" With the exception of _Non piu andrai_, which the Viennese could not tolerate the first time they heard it, none of the airs introduced in the _Don Giovanni_ supper scene would be known in the present day, but for _Don Giovanni_.
_Don Giovanni_, composed by Mozart to _Da Ponte"s_ libretto (which is founded on Moliere"s _Festin de Pierre_, which is imitated from Tirso di Molina"s _El Burlador di Siviglia_, which seems to have had its origin in a very ancient legend[76]), was produced at Prague, on the 4th of November, 1787. The subject had already been treated in a ballet, in four acts, for which Gluck wrote the music (produced at Parma in 1758; and long before the production of Mozart"s _Don Giovanni_, it had been dramatised in some shape or other in almost every country in Europe, and especially in Spain, Italy, and France, where several versions of the Italian _Il Convitato di Pietra_ were being played, when Moliere first brought out his so-called _Festin de Pierre_. The original cast of _Don Giovanni_ at Prague was as follows:--
_Donna Anna_, Teresa Saporiti.
_Elvira_, Catarina Micelli.
_Zerlina_, Madame Bondini (Catarina Saporiti).
_Don Giovanni_, Ba.s.si (Luigi).
_Ottavio_, Baglioni (Antonio).
_Leporello_, Ponziani (Felice).