"Well, do you know," our friend said, "I really did tell him something like that, and it didn"t seem to convince him, though it made me ashamed. I suppose I was thinking how he could keep close to the reading-room fire, and I did not trouble to realize that he would not be asked to draw up his chair when he came in from looking after the cattle."
"It would have been an idle compliment, anyway," we said. "You can"t draw up the reading-room chairs on shipboard; they"re riveted down."
"I remembered afterward. But still I was determined not to take his overcoat out of p.a.w.n, and he must have seen it in my eye. He put back his p.a.w.n-ticket, and did not try to produce any other credentials. I had noticed that the ticket did not bear the surname we enjoyed in common; I said to myself that the name of Smith, which it did bear, must be the euphemism of many who didn"t wish to identify themselves with their poverty even to a p.a.w.nbroker. But I said to him, "Here!" and I pulled open my table drawer, and took from it a small envelope full of English coins, which I had been left stranded with on several returns from Europe; the inhuman stewards had failed to relieve me of them; and as I always vow, when I have got through our customs, that I will never go to Europe again, I had often wondered what I should do with those coins. I now took out the largest and handsomest of them: "Do you know what that is?" "Yes," he said; "it"s two shillings and sixpence--what we call a half-crown." His promptness restored my faith in him; I saw that he must be what he said; undoubtedly he had been in the penitentiary; very likely our name was the same; an emotion of kinship stirred in my heart.
"Here!" I said, and I handed him the coin; it did not seem so bad as giving him more American money. "They can change that on the ship for you. I guess you can manage now till Monday," and my confidence in Providence diffused such a genial warmth through my steam-heated apartment that I forgot all about his overcoat. I wish I could forget about it now."
We felt that we ought to say something to comfort a man who owned his excess of beneficence. "Oh, you mustn"t mind giving him so much money.
We can"t always remember our duty to cut the unfortunate as close as we ought. Another time you will do better. Come! Cheer up!"
Our friend did not seem entirely consoled by our amiability. In fact, he seemed not to notice it. He heaved a great sigh in resuming: "He appeared to think I was hinting that it was time for him to go, for he got up from the lounge where I had thoughtlessly had the decency to make him sit down, and went out into the hall, thanking me as I followed him to the door. I was sorry to let him go; he had interested me somehow beyond anything particularly appealing in his personality; in fact, his personality was rather null than otherwise, as far as that a.s.serted any claim; such a mere man and brother! Before he put his hand on my door-k.n.o.b a belated curiosity stirred in me, which I tried, as delicately as I could, to appease. "Was your trouble something about the"--I was going to say the ladies, but that seemed too mawkish, and I boldly outed with--"women?" "Oh no," he said, meekly; "it was just cloth, a piece of cloth," "Breaking and entering?" I led on. "Well, not exactly, but--it came to grand larceny," and I might have fancied a touch of mounting self-respect in his confession of a considerable offence.
"I didn"t know exactly what to say, so I let myself off with a little philosophy: "Well, you see, it didn"t pay, exactly," "Oh no," he said, sadly enough, and he went out."
Our friend was silent at this point, and we felt that we ought to improve the occasion in his behalf. "Well, there you lost a great opportunity. You ought to have rubbed it in. You ought to have made him reflect upon the utter folly of his crime. You ought to have made him realize that for a ridiculous value of forty, or fifty, or seventy-five dollars, he had risked the loss of his liberty for two years, and not only his liberty, but his labor, for he had come out of the penitentiary after two years of hard work as dest.i.tute as he went in; he had not even the piece of cloth to show for it all. Yes, you lost a great opportunity."
Our friend rose from the dejected posture in which he had been sitting, and blazed out--we have no milder word for it--blazed out in a sort of fiery torrent which made us recoil: "Yes, I lost that great opportunity, and I lost a greater still. I lost the opportunity of telling that miserable man that, thief for thief, and robber for robber, the State which had imprisoned him for two years, and then cast him out again without a cent of pay for the wages he had been earning all that dreadful time, was a worse thief and a worse robber than he! I ought to have told him that in so far as he had been cheated of his wages by the law he was the victim, the martyr of an atrocious survival of barbarism. Oh, I have thought of it since with shame and sorrow! I was sending him out into the cold that was gathering for the Baby Blizzard without the hope of his overcoat, but since then I have comforted myself by considering how small my crime was compared with that of the State which had thrown him dest.i.tute upon the world after the two years" labor it had stolen from him. At the lowest rate of wages for unskilled labor, it owed him at least a thousand dollars, or, with half subtracted for board and lodging, five hundred. It was his delinquent debtor in that sum, and it had let him loose to prey upon society in my person because it had defrauded him of the money he had earned."
"But, our dear friend!" we entreated, "don"t you realize that this theft, this robbery, this fraud, as you call it, was part of the sanative punishment which the State had inflicted upon him?"
"And you don"t think two years" prison, two years" slavery, was sanative enough without the denial of his just compensation?"
We perceived that it would be useless to argue with a man in this truculent mood, and we silently forbore to urge that the vision of dest.i.tution which the criminal must have before his eyes, advancing hand in hand with liberty to meet him at the end of his term when his prison gates opened into the world which would not feed, or shelter, or clothe, or in any wise employ him, would be a powerful deterrent from future crime, and act as one of the most efficient agencies of virtue which the ingenuity of the law has ever invented. But our silence did not wholly avail us, for our poor misguided friend went on to say:
"Suppose he had a wife and children--he may have had several of both, for all I know--dependent on him, would it have been particularly sanative for them to be deprived of his earnings, too?"
"We cannot answer these sophistries," we were exasperated into replying.
"All that we can say is that anything else--anything like what you call justice to the criminal, the prisoner--would disrupt society," and we felt that disrupt was a word which must carry conviction to the densest understanding. It really appeared to do so in this case, for our friend went away without more words, leaving behind him a ma.n.u.script, which we mentally rejected, while seeing our way to use the material in it for the present essay; it is the well-known custom of editors to employ in this way the ideas of rejected contributors.
A few days later we met our friend, and as we strolled beside him in the maniacal hubbub of the New York streets, so favorable to philosophic communion, we said, "Well, have you met your namesake since you came to his rescue against the robber State, or did he really sail on the cattle-steamer, as he said he was going to do?"
Our friend gave a vague, embarra.s.sed laugh. "He didn"t sail, exactly, at least not on that particular steamer. The fact is, I have just parted from him at my own door--the outside of it. It appears that the authorities of that particular line wished to take advantage of him by requiring him to pay down a sum of money as a guarantee of good faith, and that he refused to do so--not having the money, for one reason. I did not understand the situation exactly, but this was not essential to his purpose, which made itself evident through a good deal of irrelevant discourse. Since I had seen him, society had emulated the State in the practice of a truly sanative att.i.tude toward him. At the place where he went to have his half-crown changed into American money they would only give him forty cents for it, but he was afterward a.s.sured by an acquaintance that the current rate was sixty cents. In fact, a half-crown is worth a little more."
"Well, what can you expect of money-changers?" we returned, consolingly.
"And what is going to become of your unhappy beneficiary now?"
"Why, according to his report, fortune has smiled, or half-smiled, as the novelists say, upon him. He has found a berth on another line of cattle-steamers, where they don"t require a deposit as a guarantee of good faith. In fact, the head steward has taken a liking to him, and he is going out as one of the table-stewards instead of one of the herdsmen; I"m not sure that herdsmen is what they call them."
We laughed sardonically. "And do you believe he is really going?"
Our friend sighed heavily. "Well, I don"t believe he"s coming back. I only gave him the loose change I had in my pocket, and I don"t think it will support him so handsomely to the end of the week that he will wish to call upon me for more."
We were both silent, just as the characters are in a novel till the author can think what to make them say next. Then we asked, "And you still think he had been in the penitentiary?"
"I don"t see why he should have said so if he wasn"t."
"Well, then," we retorted bitterly, again like a character in fiction, "you have lost another great opportunity: not a moral opportunity this time, but an aesthetic opportunity. You could have got him to tell you all about his life in prison, and perhaps his whole career leading up to it, and you could have made something interesting of it. You might have written a picaresque novel or a picaresque short story, anyway."
Our friend allowed, with a mortified air, "It was rather a break."
"You threw away the chance of a lifetime. Namesakes who have been in jail don"t turn up every day. In his intimate relation to you, he would have opened up, he would have poured out his whole heart to you. Think of the material you have lost."
We thought of it ourselves, and with mounting exasperation. When we reflected that he would probably have put it into his paper, and when we reflected that we could have given so much more color to our essay, we could not endure it. "Well, good-day," we said, coldly; "we are going down this way."
Our friend shook hands, lingeringly, absently. Then he came to himself with a mocking laugh. "Well, perhaps he wasn"t, after all, what he said."
XVIII
A NIECE"S LITERARY ADVICE TO HER UNCLE
A Veteran Novelist, who was also an intimate friend of the Easy Chair"s, sat before his desk pensively supporting his cheek in his left hand while his right toyed with the pen from which, for the moment at least, fiction refused to flow. His great-niece, who seemed such a contradiction in terms, being as little and vivid personally as she was nominally large and stately, opened the door and advanced upon him.
"Do I disturb you, uncle?" she asked; she did not call him great-uncle, because that, she rightly said, was ridiculous; and now, as part of the informality, she went on without waiting for him to answer, "Because, you know, you wanted me to tell you what I thought of your last story; and I"ve just read it."
"Oh yes!" the Veteran Novelist a.s.sented brightly, hiding his struggle to recall which story it was. "Well?"
"Well," she said, firmly but kindly, "you want me to be frank with you, don"t you?"
"By all means, my dear. It"s very good of you to read my story." By this time, he had, with the help of the rather lean volume into which his publishers had expanded a long-short story, and which she now held intensely clasped to her breast, really remembered.
"Not at all!" she said. She sat down very elastically in the chair on the other side of his desk, and as she talked she accented each of her emotions by a spring from the cushioned seat. "In the first place," she said, with the effect of coming directly to business, "I suppose you know yourself that it couldn"t be called virile."
"No?" he returned. "What is virile?"
"Well, I can"t explain, precisely; but it"s something that all the critics say of a book that is very strong, don"t you know; and masterful; and relentless; and makes you feel as if somebody had taken you by the throat; and shakes you up awfully; and seems to throw you into the air, and trample you under foot."
"Good heavens, my dear!" the Veteran Novelist exclaimed. "I hope I"m a gentleman, even when I"m writing a novel."
"Your being a gentleman has nothing to do with it, uncle!" she said, severely, for she thought she perceived a disposition in the Veteran Novelist to shuffle. "You can"t be virile and at the same time remember that you are a gentleman. Lots of _women_ write virile books."
"Ladies?" the novelist asked.
"Don"t I say that has nothing to do with it? If you wish to grip the reader"s attention you must let yourself go, whether you"re a gentleman or a lady. Of course," she relented, "your book"s very idyllic, and delightful, and all that; but," she resumed, severely, "do you think an honest critic could say there was not a dull page in it from cover to cover?"
The novelist sighed. "I"m sure I don"t know. They seem to say it--in the pa.s.sages quoted in the advertis.e.m.e.nts--of all the books published.
Except mine," he added, sadly.
"Well, we will pa.s.s that point," his great-niece relented again. "I didn"t intend to wound your feelings, uncle."
"Oh, you haven"t. I suppose I _am_ a little too easy-going at times."
"Yes, that is it. One can"t say dull; but too easy-going. No faithful critic could begin a notice of your book with such a pa.s.sage as: "Have you read it? No? Then hop, skip, and jump, and get it. Don"t wait to find your hat or drink your coffee. March! It"s going like the wind, and you must kite if you want one of the first edition of fifty thousand!"
Now that," his great-niece ended, fondly, "is what I should like every critic to say of your book, uncle."
The Veteran Novelist reflected for a moment. Then he said, more spiritedly, "I don"t believe _I_ should, my dear."