[340] Montfaucon, _praef. ad Euseb. Comm. in Psalm._, cap. x. See also aesch. Prom. V. v. 289.
[341] St. Luke xvii. 9. So St. Mark x. 42. St. Luke viii. 18. St. John v. 39.
[342] Comp. 1 Cor. iv. 9: Gal. ii. 9: Heb. iv. 1.
[343] ?? ?? a?t??? ??e?a ???st??.--1 St. Pet. i. 11.
[344] ?p? ??e?at?? ????? fe??e??? ?????sa? ?? ????? Te??
?????p??.--2 St. Pet. i. 21. (_lit._ "impelled,"--like a ship before the wind.)
[345] p??e?pe t? ??e?a t? ????? d?? st?at?? ?a?d.--Acts i. 16.
[346] ?a??? ???e? t? ??e?a t? ?????.--Heb. iii. 7.
[347] ?p? t?? Te??.--Heb. v. 10.
[348] ?a?d e?pe? ?? t? ??e?at? t? ????.--St. Mark xii. 36.
[349] ? Te?? ? p???sa? t?? ???a??? ?a? t?? ??? ?a? t?? ???a.s.sa? ?a?
p??ta t? ?? a?t???, ? d?? st?at?? ?a?d t?? pa?d?? s?? e?p??.--Acts iv. 24, 25.
[350] t? ??e?a t? ????? ?????se d?? ?sa??? t?? p??f?t??.--Acts xxviii. 25.
[351] a?t??e? d? ??? ?a? t? ??e?a t? ?????--Heb. x. 15, quoting Jer. x.x.xi. 33, 34.
[352] ? d? Te?? ... p???at???e??e d?? st?at?? p??t?? t?? p??f?t??
a?t?? pa?e?? t?? ???st??.--Acts iii. 18.
[353] ?????? ? Te?? t?? ?s?a?? ... ?????se d?? st?at?? t?? ????? t??
?p" a????? p??f?t?? a?t??.--St. Luke i. 68, 70.
[354] t??t? d?????t?? t?? ??e?at?? t?? ?????.--Heb. ix. 8.
[355] ?? ??? ?ste ?e?? ?? ?a????te?, ???? t? ??e?a t? ?????.--St.
Mark xiii. 11.
[356] ?? ??? ?e?? ?ste ?? ?a????te?, ???? t? ??e?a t?? ?at??? ??? t?
?a???? ?? ???.--St. Matth. x. 20.
[357] ?pe? d????? ??te?te t?? ?? ??? ?a????t?? ???st??.--2 Cor.
xiii. 3.
[358] Rev. B. Jowett, in _E. and R._,--p. 345. Yet see Acts iii. 18, 21.
[359] Dr. Temple, in _Essays and Reviews_, p. 25.
[360] _Contra Marcion_, sect. I. p. 9.
[361] See the first foot-note, p. 53. [Our 330]
[362] St. John xix. 14.
[363] St. Mark xv. 25.
[364] The pa.s.sage may be seen in John Bois" _Vet. Interpretis c.u.m Beza aliisque recentioribus collatio_, (1655,) p. 333.
[365] See a Dissertation by Dr. Townson at the end of his admirable book on the Gospels.
[366] Viz. St. John i. 39: iv. 6, 52: xix. 14.
[367] And yet, we hear it a.s.serted that we cannot "suppose the Spirit of absolute Truth" "to suggest accounts _only to be reconciled in the way of hypothesis and conjecture_."--_E. and R._, p. 179.
[368] E.g. Gen. xxiv. 2-8, compared with ver. 37-41; and again, ver.
12-14, compared with ver. 42-44. Again, Gen. xlii. 10-13, compared with ver. 31, 32: and again, ver. 14-16, compared with ver. 33, 34. Again, Gen. xlii. 36-8, compared with xliv. 27-29, &c., &c., &c.
[369] Instances of this will be very familiar to every attentive student of the Gospels. Thus St. Matth. xxvi. 68 implies acquaintance with a minute circ.u.mstance which is stated in St. Luke xxii. 64:--St. Matth. x.
13 _implies_ what is _expressed_ in St. Luke x. 5, &c., &c., &c.
[370] St. Matth. xxvii. 9.
[371] E.g. St. Jude ver. 14, 15.
[372] Is. lii. 7, and Nahum i. 15.--Is. ii. 2, 3, 4, and Micah iv. 1, 2, 3.--Micah iv. 6, and Zeph. iii. 19.--Is. xi. 9, and Hab. ii. 14.--Micah iii. 12, and Jer. xxvi. 18, &c., &c.
[373] E.g. Jer. xxiii. 5 and Zech. vi. 13.
[374] See Appendix (C).
[375] See Appendix (D).
[376] See Appendix (E).
[377] The Rev. H. Alford, Dean of Canterbury.
[378] Ezek. iii. 2, 3.
[379] Hooker, _Serm._ v. -- 4. (_Works_, vol. iii. p. 663.)
[380] St. Matth. v. 5.
[381] Professor Kingsley"s Sermon,--"_Why should we pray for fair Weather?_"
[382] See at the foot of p. 53, note (a). [Our 330]
[383] Jer. iv. 19.
[384] The complaint is a very old one. See Pearson"s _Minor Works_, vol.
i. pp. 429-30.