And if the men of this country had been peacefully demanding for over half a century the political right or privilege to vote, and had been continuously ignored or met with evasion by successive Congresses, as have the women, you, Mr. President, as a lover of liberty, would be the first to comprehend and forgive their inevitable impatience and righteous indignation. Will not this Administration, reelected to power by the hope and faith of the women of the West, handsomely reward that faith by taking action now for the pa.s.sage of the federal suffrage amendment?
In the Port of New York, during the last four years, billions of dollars in the export and import trade of the country have been handled by the men of the customs service; their treatment of the traveling public has radically changed, their vigilance supplied the evidence of the Lusitania note; the neutrality was rigidly maintained; the great German fleet guarded, captured, and repaired-substantial economies and reforms have been concluded and my ardent industry has been given to this great office of your appointment.
But now I wish to leave these finished tasks, to return to my profession of the law, and to give all my leisure time to fight as hard for the political freedom of women as I have always fought for your liberal leadership.
It seems a long seven years, Mr. President, since I first campaigned with you when you were running for Governor of New Jersey. In every circ.u.mstance throughout those years I have served you with the most respectful affection and unshadowed devotion. It is no small sacrifice now for me, as a member of your Administration, to sever our political relationship. But I think it is high time that men in this generation, at some cost to themselves, stood up to battle for the national enfranchis.e.m.e.nt of American women. So in order effectively
{169}
to keep my promise made in the West and more freely to go into this larger field of democratic effort, I hereby resign my office as Collector of the Port of New York, to take effect at once, or at your earliest convenience.
Yours respectfully,
(Signed) DUDLEY FIELD MALONE.
The President"s answer has never before been published:
U. S. S. MAYFLOWER, 12 September, 1917.
THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON
My dear Mr. Collector:
Your letter of September 7th reached me just before I left home and I have, I am sorry to say, been unable to reply to it sooner.
I must frankly say that I cannot regard your reasons for resigning your position as Collector of Customs as convincing, but it is so evidently your wish to be relieved from the duties of the office that I do not feel at liberty to withhold my acceptance of your resignation. Indeed, I judge from your letter that any discussion of the reasons would not be acceptable to you and that it is your desire to be free of the restraints of public office. I, therefore, accept your resignation, to take effect as you have wished.
I need not say that our long a.s.sociation in public affairs makes me regret the action you have taken most sincerely.
Very truly yours, (Signed) WOODROW WILSON.
Hon. Dudley Field Malone, Collector of Customs, New York City.
To this Mr. Malone replied:
New York, N.Y., September 15th, 1917.
The President, The White House, Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr. President:
Thank you sincerely for your courtesy, for I knew you were on a well-earned holiday and I did not expect an earlier reply to my letter of September 7th, 1917.
{170}
After a most careful re-reading of my letter, I am unable to understand how you could judge that any discussion by you of my reasons for resigning would not be acceptable to me since my letter was an appeal to you on specific grounds for action now by the Administration on the Federal Suffrage amendment.
However, I am profoundly grateful to you for your prompt acceptance of my resignation.
Yours respectfully, (Signed) DUDLEY FIELD MALONE.
It may have been accidental but it is interesting to note that the first public statement of Mr. Byron Newton, appointed by the Administration to succeed Mr. Malone as Collector of the Port of New York, was a bitter denunciation of all woman suffrage whether by state or national action.
{171}
Chapter 8
The Administration Yields
Immediately after Mr. Malone"s sensational resignation the Administration sought another way to remove the persistent pickets without pa.s.sing the amendment. It yielded on a point of machinery. It gave us a report in the Senate and a committee in the House and expected us to be grateful.
The press had turned again to more sympathetic accounts of our campaign and exposed the prison regime we were undergoing. We were now for a moment the object of sympathy; the Administration was the b.u.t.t of considerable hostility. Sensing their predicament and fearing any loss of prestige, they risked a slight advance.
Senator Jones, Chairman of the Suffrage Committee, made a visit to the workhouse. Scarcely had the women recovered from the surprise of his visit when the Senator, on the following day, September 15th, filed the favorable report which had been lying with his Committee since May 15th, exactly six months.
The Report, which he had so long delayed because he wanted [he said] to make it a particularly brilliant and elaborate one, read:
"The Committee on Woman Suffrage, to which was referred the joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Const.i.tution of the United States, conferring upon women the right of suffrage, having the same under consideration, beg leave to report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that the joint resolution do pa.s.s."
{172}
This report to the Senate was immediately followed by a vote of 181 to 107 in the House of Representatives in favor of creating a Committee on Woman Suffrage in the House. This vote was indicative of the strength of the amendment in the House. The resolution was sponsored by Representative Pou, Chairman of the Rules Committee and Administration leader, himself an anti- suffragist.
It is an interesting study in psychology to consider some of the statements made in the peculiarly heated debate the day this vote was taken.
Scores of Congressmen, anxious to refute the idea that the indomitable picket had had anything to do with their action, revealed naively how surely it had.
Of the 291 men present, not one man stood squarely up for the right of the hundreds of women who pet.i.tioned for justice. Some indirectly and many, inadvertently, however, paid eloquent tribute to the suffrage picket.
From the moment Representative Pou in opening the debate spoke of the nation-wide request for the committee, and the President"s sanction of the committee, the accusations and counter- accusations concerning the wisdom of appointing it in the face of the pickets were many and animated.
Mr. Meeker of Missouri, Democrat, protested against Congress "yielding to the nagging of a certain group."
Mr. Cantrill of Kentucky, Democrat, believed that "millions of Christian women in the nation should not be denied the right of having a Committee in the House to study the problem of suffrage because of the mistakes of some few of their sisters."
"One had as well say," he went on, "that there should be no police in Washington because the police force of this city permitted daily thousands of people to obstruct the streets and impede traffic and permitted almost the mobbing of the women without arresting the offenders. There was a lawful and peaceful way in which the police of this city could have taken charge
{173}
of the banners of the pickets without permitting the women carrying them to be the objects of mob violence. To see women roughly handled by rough men on the streets of the capital of the nation is not a pleasing sight to Kentuckians and to red-blooded Americans, and let us hope the like will never again be seen here."
Mr. Walsh, an anti-suffrage Democrat from Ma.s.sachusetts, deplored taking any action which would seem to yield to the demand of the pickets who carried banners which "if used by a poor workingman in an attempt to get his rights would speedily have put him behind the bars for treason or sedition, and these poor, bewildered, deluded creatures, after their disgusting exhibition can thank their stars that because they wear skirts they are now incarcerated for misdemeanors of a minor character . . . . To supinely yield to a certain cla.s.s of women picketing the gates of the official residence,-yes, even posing with their short skirts and their short hair within the view of this "very capitol and our office buildings," with banners which would seek to lead the people to believe that because we did not take action during this war session upon suffrage, if you please, and grant them the right of the ballot that we were traitors to the American Republic, would be monstrous."
The subject of the creation of a committee on suffrage was almost entirely forgotten. The Congressmen were utterly unable to shake off the ghosts of the pickets. The pickets had not influenced their actions! The very idea was appalling to Representative Stafford of Wisconsin, anti-suffrage Republican, who joined in the Democratic protests. He said:
"If a Suffrage Committee is created the militant cla.s.s will exclaim, "Ah, see how we have driven the great House of Representatives to recognize our rights. If we keep up this sort of practices, we will compel the House, when they come to vote on the const.i.tutional amendment, to surrender obediently likewise"."
{174}