On the other hand, should I say _a_ star shines, _a_ lion roars, _an_ Indian is abused, _a_ wind blows, _a_ cloud appears, you would understand me to allude very _definitely_ to _one_ "particular" object, as separate and distinguished from others of its kind.
But what is the wonderful peculiarity in the meaning and use of these two little words that makes them so unlike every thing else, as to demand a separate "part of speech?" You may be surprised when I tell you that there are other words in our language derived from the same source and possessed of the same meaning; but such is the fact, as will soon appear. Let us ask for the etymology of these important words. _A_ signifies _one_, never more, never less. In this respect it is always _definite_. It is sometimes applied to a single thing, sometimes to a whole cla.s.s of things, to a [one] man, or to a [one] hundred men. It may be traced thro other languages, ancient and modern, with little modification in spelling; Greek _eis_, ein; Latin _unus_; Armoric _unan_; Spanish and Italian _uno_; Portuguese _hum_; French _un_; German _ein_; Danish _een_, _en_; Dutch _een_; Swedish _en_; Saxon, _an_, _aen_, _one_--from which ours is directly derived--old English _ane_; and more modernly _one_, _an_, _a_. In all languages it defines a thing to be _one_, a united or congregated whole, and the word _one_ may always be subst.i.tuted without affecting the sense. From it is derived our word _once_, which signifies _oned_, _united_, _joined_, as we shall see when we come to speak of "contractions." In some languages _a_ is styled an article, in others it is not. The Latin, for instance, has no article, and the Greek has no _indefinite_. But all languages have words which are like ours, pure adjectives, employed to specify certain things. The argument drawn from the fact that some other languages have _articles_, and therefore ours should, is fallacious. The Latin, which was surpa.s.sed for beauty of style or power in deliverance by few, if any others, never suffered from the lack of articles. Nor is there any reason why we should honor two small adjectives with that high rank to the exclusion of others quite as worthy.
_The_ is always used as a definitive word, tho it is the least definite of the defining adjectives. In fact when we desire to "_ascertain particularly_ what thing is meant," we select some more definite word.
"Give me _the_ books." Which? "Those with red covers, that in calf, and this in Russia binding." _The_ nations are at peace. What nations?
_Those_ which were at war. You perceive how we employ words which are more definite, that is, better understood, to "_point out_" the object of conversation, especially when there is any doubt in the case. What occasion, then, is there to give these [the?] words a separate "part of speech," since in character they do not differ from others in the language?
We will notice another frivolous distinction made by Mr. Murray, merely to show how learned men may be mistaken, and the folly of trusting to special rules in the general application of words. He says, "Thou art _a_ man," is a very general and _harmless_ expression; but, thou art _the_ man, (as Nathan said to David,) is an a.s.sertion capable of striking terror and remorse into the heart." The distinction in meaning here, on which he insists, attaches to the articles _a_ and _the_. It is a sufficient refutation of this definition to make a counter statement.
Suppose we say, "Murray is _the_ best grammarian in the world; or, he is _a_ fool, _a_ knave, and _a_ liar." Which, think you, would be considered the most _harmless_ expression? Suppose it had been said to Aaron Burr, thou art _a_ traitor, or to General William Hull, thou art _a_ coward, would they regard the phrase as "_harmless!_" On the other hand, suppose a beautiful, accomplished, and talented young lady, should observe to one of her suitors, "I have received offers of marriage from several gentlemen besides yourself, but thou art =the= man of my choice;" would it, think you, _strike_ terror and remorse into his heart? I should pity the young student of Murray whose feelings had become so stoical from the false teaching of his author as to be filled with "terror and remorse" under such favorable circ.u.mstances, while fair prospects of future happiness were thus rapidly brightening before him.
I speak as to the wise, judge ye what I say.
The adjective _that_ has obtained a very extensive application in language. However, it may seem to vary in its different positions, it still retains its primitive meaning. It is comprised of _the_ and _it_, thait, theat, thaet (Saxon,) thata (Gothic,) dat (Dutch.) It is the most decided definitive in our language. It is by use applied to things in the singular, or to a mult.i.tude of things regarded as a whole. By use, it applies to a collection of ideas expressed in a sentence; as, it was resolved, _that_. What? Then follows _that fact_ which was resolved.
"Provided _that_, in case he does" so and so. "It was agreed _that_,"
_that fact_ was agreed to which is about to be made known. I wish you to understand, all thro these lectures, _that_ I shall honestly endeavor to expose error and establish truth. Wish you to understand _what_? _that fact_, afterwards stated, "I shall endeavor," &c. You can not mistake my meaning: _that_ would be impossible. What would be impossible? Why, to mistake my meaning.
You can not fail to observe the true character of this word called by our grammarians "adjective p.r.o.noun," "relative p.r.o.noun," and "conjunction." They did not think to look for its meaning. Had that (duty) been done, it would have stood forth in its true character, an important defining word.
The only difficulty in the explanation of this word, originates in the fact, that it was formerly applied to the plural as well as singular number. It is now applied to the singular only when referring directly to an object; as, _that man_. And it never should be used otherwise. But we often see phrases like this; "These are the men _that_ rebeled." It should be, "these are the men _who_ rebeled." This difficulty can not be overcome in existing grammars on any other ground. In modern writings, such instances are rare. _This_ and _that_ are applied to the singular; _these_ and _those_ to the plural.
=What= is a compound of two original words, and often retains the meaning of both, when employed as a compound relative, "having in itself both the antecedent and the relative," as our authors tell us. But when it is dissected, it will readily enough be understood to be an adjective, defining things under particular relations.
But I shall weary your patience, I fear, if I stay longer in this place to examine the etymology of small words. I intended to have shown the meaning and use of many words included in the list of conjunctions, which are truly adjectives, such as _both_, _as_, _so_, _neither_, _and_, etc.; but I let them pa.s.s for the present, to be resumed under the head of contractions.
From the view we have given of this cla.s.s of words, we are saved the tediousness of studying the grammatical distinctions made in the books, where no real distinctions exist. In character these words are like adjectives; their meaning, like the meaning of all other words, is peculiar to themselves. Let that be known, and there will be little difficulty in cla.s.sing them. We need not confuse the learner with "adjective p.r.o.nouns, possessive adjective p.r.o.nouns, distributive adjective p.r.o.nouns, demonstrative adjective p.r.o.nouns, _indefinite_ adjective p.r.o.nouns," nor any other adjective p.r.o.nouns, which can never be understood nor explained. Children will be slow to apprehend the propriety of a union of _adjectives_ and _p.r.o.nouns_, when told that the former is always used _with_ a noun, and never _for_ one; and the latter always _for_ a noun, but never _with_ one; and yet, that there is such a strange combination as a "_distributive or indefinite adjective p.r.o.noun_,"--"confusion worse confounded."
In the french language, the gender of adjectives is varied so as to agree with the nouns to which they belong. "Possessive p.r.o.nouns," as they are called, come under the same rule, which proves them to be in character, and formation, adjectives; else the person using them must change gender. The father says, _ma_ (feminine) _fille_, my daughter; and the mother, _mon_ (masculine) _fils_, my son; the same as they would say, _bon pere_, good father; _bonne mere_, good mother; or, in Latin, _bonus pater_, or _bona mater_; or, in Spanish, _bueno padre_, _buena madre_. In the two last languages, as well as all others, where the adjectives vary the termination so as to agree with the noun, the same fact may be observed in reference to their "p.r.o.nouns." If it is a fact that these words are _p.r.o.nouns_, that is, stand for other _nouns_, then the father is _feminine_, and the mother is _masculine_; and whoever uses them in reference to the opposite s.e.x must change gender to do so.
Describing adjectives admit of variation to express different degrees of comparison. The regular degrees have been reckoned three; positive, comparative, and superlative. These are usually marked by changing the termination. The _positive_ is determined by a comparison with other things; as, a great house, a small book, compared with others of their kind. This is truly a comparative degree. The _comparative_ adds _er_; as, a great_er_ house, a small_er_ book. The _superlative_, _est_; as, the great_est_ house, the small_est_ book.
Several adjectives express a comparison less than the positive, others increase or diminish the regular degrees; as, whit_ish_ white, _very_ white, _pure_ white; whit_er_, _considerable_ whiter, _much_ whiter; whit_est_, the _very_ whitest, _much_ the whitest _beyond all comparison_, so that there can be none _whiter_, nor _so white_.
We make an aukward use of the words _great_ and _good_, in the comparison of things; as, a _good deal_, or _great deal_ whiter; a _good_ many men, or a _great_ many men. As we never hear of a _small_ deal, or a _bad_ deal whiter, nor of a _bad many_, nor _little many_, it would be well to avoid such phrases.
The words which are added to other adjectives, to increase or diminish the comparison, or a.s.sist in their definition, may properly be called _secondary adjectives_, for such is their character. They do not refer to the thing to be _defined_ or _described_, but to the adjective which is affected, in some way, by them. They are easily distinguished from the rest by noticing this fact. Take for example: "A _very dark red_ raw silk lady"s dress handkerchief." The resolution of this sentence would stand thus:
_A_ ( ) handkerchief.
A ( ) _red_ ( ) handkerchief.
A ( ) _dark_ red ( ) handkerchief.
A _very_ dark red ( ) handkerchief.
A very dark red ( ) _silk_ ( ) handkerchief.
A very dark red _raw_ silk ( ) handkerchief.
A very dark red raw silk ( ) _dress_ handkerchief.
A very dark red raw silk _lady"s_ dress handkerchief.
We might also observe that _hand_ is an adjective, compounded by use with _kerchief_. It is derived from the french word _couvrir_, to cover, and _chef_, the head. It means a head dress, a cloth to cover, a neck cloth, a napkin. By habit we apply it to a single article, and speak of _neck_ handkerchief.
The nice shade of meaning, and the appropriate use of adjectives, is more distinctly marked in distinguishing colors than in any thing else, for the simple reason, that there is nothing in nature so closely observed. For instance, take the word _green_, derived from _grain_, because it is grain color, or the color of the fair carpet of nature in spring and summer. But this hue changes from the _deep gra.s.s green_, to the light olive, and words are chosen to express the thousand varying tints produced by as many different objects. In the adaptation of language to the expression of ideas, we do not separate these shades of color from the things in which such colors are supposed to reside. Hence we talk of _gra.s.s_, _pea_, _olive_, _leek_, _verdigris_, _emerald_, _sea_, and _bottle_ green; also, of _light_, _dark_, _medium_; _very_ light, or dark gra.s.s, pea, olive, or _invisible_ green.
_Red_, as a word, means _rayed_. It describes the appearance or substance produced when _rayed_, reddened, or radiated by the morning beams of the sun, or any other _radiating_ cause.
_Wh_ is used for _qu_, in white, which means _quite_, _quited_, _quitted_, _cleared_, _cleansed_ of all _color_, _spot_, or _stain_.
_Blue_ is another spelling for _blew_. Applied to color, it describes something in appearance to the sky, when the clouds and mists are _blown_ away, and the clear _blue ether_ appears.
You will be pleased with the following extract from an eloquent writer of the last century,[9] who, tho somewhat extravagant in some of his speculations, was, nevertheless, a close observer of nature, which he studied as it is, without the aid of human theories. The beauty of the style, and the correctness of the sentiment, will be a sufficient apology for its length.
"We shall employ a method, not quite so learned, to convey an idea of the generation of colors, and the decomposition of the solar ray.
Instead of examining them in a prism of gla.s.s, we shall consider them in the heavens, and there we shall behold the five primordial colours _unfold themselves_ in the order which we have indicated.
"In a fine summer"s night, when the sky is loaded only with some light vapours, sufficient to stop and to refract the rays of the sun, walk out into an open plain, where the first fires of Aurora may be perceptible.
You will first observe the horizon _whiten_ at the spot where she is to make her appearance; and this radiance, from its colour, has procured for it, in the French language, the name of _aube_, (the dawn,) from the Latin word _alba_, white. This whiteness insensibly ascends in the heavens, _a.s.suming_ a tint of yellow some degrees above the horizon; the yellow as it rises pa.s.ses into orange; and this shade of orange rises upward into the lively vermilion, which extends as far as the zenith.
From that point you will perceive in the heavens behind you the violet succeeding the vermilion, then the azure, after it the deep blue or indigo colour, and, last of all, the black, quite to the westward.
"Though this display of colours presents a mult.i.tude of intermediate shades, which rapidly succeed each other, yet at the moment the sun is going to exhibit his disk, the dazzling white is visible in the horizon, the pure yellow at an elevation of forty-five degrees; the fire color in the zenith; the pure blue forty-five degrees under it, toward the west; and in the very west the dark veil of night still lingering on the horizon. I think I have remarked this progression between the tropics, where there is scarcely any horizontal refraction to make the light prematurely encroach on the darkness, as in our climates.
"Sometimes the trade-winds, from the north-east or south-east, blow there, card the clouds through each other, then sweep them to the west, crossing and recrossing them over one another, like the osiers interwoven in a transparent basket. They throw over the sides of this chequered work the clouds which are not employed in the contexture, roll them up into enormous ma.s.ses, as white as snow, draw them out along their extremities in the form of a crupper, and pile them upon each other, moulding them into the shape of mountains, caverns, and rocks; afterwards, as evening approaches, they grow somewhat calm, as if afraid of deranging their own workmanship. When the sun sets behind this magnificent netting, a mult.i.tude of luminous rays are transmitted through the interstices, which produce such an effect, that the two sides of the lozenge illuminated by them have the appearance of being girt with gold, and the other two in the shade seem tinged with _ruddy_ orange. Four or five divergent streams of light, emanated from the setting sun up to the zenith, _clothe_ with fringes of gold the undeterminate summits of this celestial barrier, and strike with the reflexes of their fires the pyramids of the collateral aerial mountains, which then appear to consist of _silver_ and _vermilion_. At this moment of the evening are perceptible, amidst their redoubled ridges, a mult.i.tude of valleys extending into infinity, and distinguishing themselves at their opening by some shade of flesh or of rose colour.
"These celestial valleys present in their different contours inimitable tints of white, melting away into white, or shades lengthening themselves out without mixing over other shades. You see, here and there, issuing from the cavernous sides of those mountains, tides of _light_ precipitating themselves, in ingots of gold and silver, over rocks of coral. Here it is a gloomy rock, pierced through and through, disclosing, beyond the aperture, the pure azure of the firmament; there it is an extensive strand, covered with sands of gold, stretching over the rich ground of heaven; _poppy-coloured_, _scarlet_, and _green_ as the emerald.
"The reverberation of those western colours diffuses itself over the sea, whose azure billows it _glazes_ with saffron and purple. The mariners, leaning over the gunwale of the ship, admire in silence those aerial landscapes. Sometimes this sublime spectacle presents itself to them at the hour of prayer, and seems to invite them to lift up their hearts with their voices to the heavens. It changes every instant into forms as variable as the shades, presenting celestial colors and forms which no pencil can pretend to imitate, and no language can describe.
"Travellers who have, at various seasons, ascended to the summits of the highest mountains on the globe, never could perceive, in the clouds below them, any thing but a gray and lead-colored surface, similar to that of a lake. The sun, notwithstanding, illuminated them with his whole light; and his rays might there combine all the laws of refraction to which our systems of physics have subjected them. Hence not a single shade of color is employed in vain, through the universe; those celestial decorations being made for the level of the earth, their magnificent point of view taken from the habitation of man.
"These admirable concerts of lights and forms, manifest only in the lower region of the clouds the least illuminated by the sun, are produced by laws with which I am totally unacquainted. But the whole are reducible to five colors: yellow, a generation from white; red, a deeper shade of yellow; blue, a strong tint of red; and black, the extreme tint of blue. This progression cannot be doubted, on observing in the morning the expansion of the light in the heavens. You there see those five colors, with their intermediate shades, generating each other nearly in this order: white, sulphur yellow, lemon yellow, yolk of egg yellow, orange, aurora color, poppy red, full red, carmine red, purple, violet, azure, indigo, and black. Each color seems to be only a strong tint of that which precedes it, and a faint tint of that which follows; thus the whole together appear to be only modulations of a progression, of which white is the first term, and black the last.
"Indeed trade cannot be carried on to any advantage, with the Negroes, Tartars, Americans, and East-Indians, but through the medium of red cloths. The testimonies of travellers are unanimous respecting the preference universally given to this color. I have indicated the universality of this taste, merely to demonstrate the falsehood of the philosophic axiom, that tastes are arbitrary, or that there are in Nature no laws for beauty, and that our tastes are the effects of prejudice. The direct contrary of this is the truth; prejudice corrupts our natural tastes, otherwise the same over the whole earth.
"With red Nature heightens the brilliant parts of the most beautiful flowers. She has given a complete clothing of it to the rose, the queen of the garden: and bestowed this tint on the blood, the principle of life in animals: she invests most of the feathered race, in India, with a plumage of this color, especially in the season of love; and there are few birds without some shades, at least, of this rich hue. Some preserve entirely the gray or brown ground of their plumage, but glazed over with red, as if they had been rolled in carmine; others are besprinkled with red, as if you had blown a scarlet powder over them.
"The red (or _rayed_) color, in the midst of the five primordial colors, is the harmonic expression of them by way of excellence; and the result of the union of two contraries, light and darkness. There are, besides, agreeable tints, compounded of the oppositions of extremes. For example, of the second and fourth color, that is, of yellow and blue, is formed green, which const.i.tutes a very beautiful harmony, and ought, perhaps, to possess the second rank in beauty, among colors, as it possesses the second in their generation. Nay, green appears to many, if not the most beautiful tint, at least the most lovely, because it is less dazzling than red, and more congenial to the eye."
Many words come under the example previously given to ill.u.s.trate the secondary character of adjectives, which should be carefully noticed by the learner, to distinguish whether they define or describe things, or are added to increase the distinction made by the adjectives themselves, for both defining and describing adjectives admit of this addition; as, _old_ English coin, New England rebelion; a mounted whip, and a _gold_ mounted sword--not a gold sword; a _very fine_ Latin scholar.
Secondary adjectives, also, admit of comparison in various ways; as, _dearly_ beloved, a _more_ beloved, the _best_ beloved, the _very_ best beloved brother.
Words formerly called "prepositions," admit of comparison, as I have before observed. "Benhadad fled into an _inner_ chamber." The in_ner_ temple. The in_most_ recesses of the heart. The _out_ fit of a squadron.
The out_er_ coating of a vessel, or house. The ut_most_ reach of grammar. The _up_ and _down_ hill side of a field. The up_per_ end of the lot. The upper_most_ seats. A part _of_ the book. Take it _farther off_. The _off_ cast. India _beyond_ the Ganges. Far beyond the boundaries of the nation. I shall go _to_ the city. I am _near to_ the town. _Near_ does not _qualify the verb_, for it has nothing to do with it. I can exist in one place as well as another. It is _below_ the surface; _very far_ below it. It is above the earth--"high above all height."
Such expressions frequently occur in the expression of ideas, and are correctly understood; as difficult as it may have been to describe them with the theories learned in the books--sometimes calling them one thing, sometimes another--when their character and meaning was unchanged, or, according to old systems, had "no meaning at all of their own!"
But I fear I have gone _far_ beyond your patience, and, perhaps, entered _deeper_ into this subject than was necessary, to enable you to discover my meaning. I desired to make the subject _as_ distinct _as_ possible, that all might see the important improvement suggested. I am apprehensive even now, that some will be compelled to _think_ many _profound thoughts_ before they will see the end of the obscurity under which they have long been shrouded, in reference to the false rules which they have been taught. But we have one consolation--those who are not bewildered by the grammars they have tried in vain to understand, will not be very likely to make a wrong use of adjectives, especially if they have ideas to express; for there is no more danger of mistaking an adjective for a noun, or verb, than there is of mistaking a _horse_ chestnut for a _chestnut_ horse.
In our next we shall commence the consideration of Verbs, the most important department in the science of language, and particularly so in the system we are defending. I hope you have not been uninterested thus far in the prosecution of the subject of language, and I am confident you will not be in what remains to be said upon it. The science, so long regarded _dry_ and uninteresting, becomes delightful and easy; new and valuable truths burst upon us at each advancing step, and we feel to bless G.o.d for the ample means afforded us for obtaining knowledge from, and communicating it to others, on the most important affairs of time and eternity.