The presentation of the Copley Medal is of interest in another way, inasmuch as it led to Sir C. Lyell making, in his after-dinner speech, a "confession of faith as to the "Origin."" He wrote to my father ("Life,"
vol. ii. page 384), "I said I had been forced to give up my old faith without thoroughly seeing my way to a new one. But I think you would have been satisfied with the length I went."]
CHARLES DARWIN TO T.H. HUXLEY. Down, October 3 [1864].
My dear Huxley,
If I do not pour out my admiration of your article ("Criticisms on the Origin of Species," "Nat. Hist. Review," 1864. Republished in "Lay Sermons," 1870, page 328. The work of Professor Kolliker referred to is "Ueber die Darwin"sche Schopfungstheorie" (Leipzig, 1864). Toward Professor Kolliker my father felt not only the respect due to so distinguished a naturalist (a sentiment well expressed in Professor Huxley"s review), but he had also a personal regard for him, and often alluded with satisfaction to the visit which Professor Kolliker paid at Down.) on Kolliker, I shall explode. I never read anything better done.
I had much wished his article answered, and indeed thought of doing so myself, so that I considered several points. You have hit on all, and on some in addition, and oh! by Jove, how well you have done it. As I read on and came to point after point on which I had thought, I could not help jeering and scoffing at myself, to see how infinitely better you had done it than I could have done. Well, if any one, who does not understand Natural Selection, will read this, he will be a blockhead if it is not as clear as daylight. Old Flourens ("Examen du livre de M.
Darwin sur l"origine des especes." Par P. Flourens. 8vo. Paris, 1864.) was hardly worth the powder and shot; but how capitally you bring in about the Academician, and your metaphor of the sea-sand is INIMITABLE.
It is a marvel to me how you can resist becoming a regular reviewer.
Well, I have exploded now, and it has done me a deal of good...
[In the same article in the "Natural History Review," Mr. Huxley speaks of the book above alluded to by Flourens, the Secretaire Perpetuel of the Academie des Sciences, as one of the two "most elaborate criticisms"
of the "Origin of Species" of the year. He quotes the following pa.s.sage:--
"M. Darwin continue: "Aucune distinction absolue n"a ete et ne peut etre entre les especes et les varietes!" Je vous ai deja dit que vous vous trompiez; une distinction absolue separe les varietes d"avec les especes." Mr. Huxley remarks on this, "Being devoid of the blessings of an Academy in England, we are unaccustomed to see our ablest men treated in this way even by a Perpetual Secretary." After demonstrating M.
Flourens" misapprehension of Natural Selection, Mr. Huxley says, "How one knows it all by heart, and with what relief one reads at page 65 "Je laisse M. Darwin.""
On the same subject my father wrote to Mr. Wallace:--
"A great gun, Flourens, has written a little dull book against me which pleases me much, for it is plain that our good work is spreading in France. He speaks of the "engouement" about this book [the "Origin"] "so full of empty and presumptuous thoughts." The pa.s.sage here alluded to is as follows:--
"Enfin l"ouvrage de M. Darwin a paru. On ne peut qu"etre frappe du talent de l"auteur. Mais que d"idees obscures, que d"idees fausses! Quel jargon metaphysique jete mal a propos dans l"histoire naturelle, qui tombe dans le galimatias des qu"elle sort des idees claires, des idees justes. Quel langage pretentieux et vide! Quelles personifications pueriles et surannees! O lucidite! O solidite de l"esprit francais, que devene-vous?"]
1865.
[This was again a time of much ill-health, but towards the close of the year he began to recover under the care of the late Dr. Bence-Jones, who dieted him severely, and as he expressed it, "half-starved him to death." He was able to work at "Animals and Plants" until nearly the end of April, and from that time until December he did practically no work, with the exception of looking over the "Origin of Species" for a second French edition. He wrote to Sir J.D. Hooker:--"I am, as it were, reading the "Origin" for the first time, for I am correcting for a second French edition: and upon my life, my dear fellow, it is a very good book, but oh! my gracious, it is tough reading, and I wish it were done." (Towards the end of the year my father received the news of a new convert to his views, in the person of the distinguished American naturalist Lesquereux. He wrote to Sir J.D. Hooker: "I have had an enormous letter from Leo Lesquereux (after doubts, I did not think it worth sending you) on Coal Flora. He wrote some excellent articles in "Silliman" against "Origin" views; but he says now, after repeated reading of the book, he is a convert!")
The following letter refers to the Duke of Argyll"s address to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, December 5th, 1864, in which he criticises the "Origin of Species." My father seems to have read the Duke"s address as reported in the "Scotsman" of December 6th, 1865. In a letter to my father (January 16, 1865, "Life," vol. ii. page 385), Lyell wrote, "The address is a great step towards your views--far greater, I believe, than it seems when read merely with reference to criticisms and objections."]
CHARLES DARWIN TO C. LYELL. Down, January 22, [1865].
My dear Lyell,
I thank you for your very interesting letter. I have the true English instinctive reverence for rank, and therefore liked to hear about the Princess Royal. ("I had... an animated conversation on Darwinism with the Princess Royal, who is a worthy daughter of her father, in the reading of good books, and thinking of what she reads. She was very much au fait at the "Origin," and Huxley"s book, the "Antiquity," etc."--(Lyell"s "Life," vol. ii. page 385.) You ask what I think of the Duke"s address, and I shall be glad to tell you. It seems to me EXTREMELY clever, like everything I have read of his; but I am not shaken--perhaps you will say that neither G.o.ds nor men could shake me. I demur to the Duke reiterating his objection that the brilliant plumage of the male humming-bird could not have been acquired through selection, at the same time entirely ignoring my discussion (page 93, 3rd edition) on beautiful plumage being acquired through s.e.xUAL selection. The duke may think this insufficient, but that is another question. All a.n.a.logy makes me quite disagree with the Duke that the difference in the beak, wing and tail, are not of importance to the several species. In the only two species which I have watched, the difference in flight and in the use of the tail was conspicuously great.
The Duke, who knows my Orchid book so well, might have learnt a lesson of caution from it, with respect to his doctrine of differences for mere variety or beauty. It may be confidently said that no tribe of plants presents such grotesque and beautiful differences, which no one until lately, conjectured were of any use; but now in almost every case I have been able to show their important service. It should be remembered that with humming birds or orchids, a modification in one part will cause correlated changes in other parts. I agree with what you say about beauty. I formerly thought a good deal on the subject, and was led quite to repudiate the doctrine of beauty being created for beauty"s sake. I demur also to the Duke"s expression of "new births." That may be a very good theory, but it is not mine, unless indeed he calls a bird born with a beak 1/100th of an inch longer than usual "a new birth;" but this is not the sense in which the term would usually be understood. The more I work the more I feel convinced that it is by the acc.u.mulation of such extremely slight variations that new species arise. I do not plead guilty to the Duke"s charge that I forget that natural selection means only the preservation of variations which independently arise.
("Strictly speaking, therefore, Mr. Darwin"s theory is not a theory on the Origin of Species at all, but only a theory on the causes which lead to the relative success and failure of such new forms as may be born into the world."--"Scotsman", December 6, 1864.) I have expressed this in as strong language as I could use, but it would have been infinitely tedious had I on every occasion thus guarded myself. I will cry "peccavi" when I hear of the Duke or you attacking breeders for saying that man has made his improved shorthorns, or pouter pigeons, or bantams. And I could quote still stronger expressions used by agriculturists. Man does make his artificial breeds, for his selective power is of such importance relatively to that of the slight spontaneous variations. But no one will attack breeders for using such expressions, and the rising generation will not blame me.
Many thanks for your offer of sending me the "Elements." (Sixth edition in one volume.) I hope to read it all, but unfortunately reading makes my head whiz more than anything else. I am able most days to work for two or three hours, and this makes all the difference in my happiness.
I have resolved not to be tempted astray, and to publish nothing till my volume on Variation is completed. You gave me excellent advice about the footnotes in my Dog chapter, but their alteration gave me infinite trouble, and I often wished all the dogs, and I fear sometimes you yourself, in the nether regions.
We (dictator and writer) send our best love to Lady Lyell.
Yours affectionately, CHARLES DARWIN.
P.S.--If ever you should speak with the Duke on the subject, please say how much interested I was with his address.
[In his autobiographical sketch my father has remarked that owing to certain early memories he felt the honour of being elected to the Royal and Royal Medical Societies of Edinburgh "more than any similar honour."
The following extract from a letter to Sir Joseph Hooker refers to his election to the former of these societies. The latter part of the extract refers to the Berlin Academy, to which he was elected in 1878:--
"Here is a really curious thing, considering that Brewster is President and Balfour Secretary. I have been elected Honorary Member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. And this leads me to a third question. Does the Berlin Academy of Sciences send their Proceedings to Honorary Members?
I want to know, to ascertain whether I am a member; I suppose not, for I think it would have made some impression on me; yet I distinctly remember receiving some diploma signed by Ehrenberg. I have been so careless; I have lost several diplomas, and now I want to know what Societies I belong to, as I observe every [one] tacks their t.i.tles to their names in the catalogue of the Royal Soc."]
CHARLES DARWIN TO C. LYELL. Down, February 21 [1865].
My dear Lyell,
I have taken a long time to thank you very much for your present of the "Elements."
I am going through it all, reading what is new, and what I have forgotten, and this is a good deal.
I am simply astonished at the amount of labour, knowledge, and clear thought condensed in this work. The whole strikes me as something quite grand. I have been particularly interested by your account of Heer"s work and your discussion on the Atlantic Continent. I am particularly delighted at the view which you take on this subject; for I have long thought Forbes did an ill service in so freely making continents.
I have also been very glad to read your argument on the denudation of the Weald, and your excellent resume on the Purbeck Beds; and this is the point at which I have at present arrived in your book. I cannot say that I am quite convinced that there is no connection beyond that pointed out by you, between glacial action and the formation of lake basins; but you will not much value my opinion on this head, as I have already changed my mind some half-dozen times.
I want to make a suggestion to you. I found the weight of your volume intolerable, especially when lying down, so with great boldness cut it into two pieces, and took it out of its cover; now could not Murray without any other change add to his advertis.e.m.e.nt a line saying, "if bound in two volumes, one shilling or one shilling and sixpence extra."
You thus might originate a change which would be a blessing to all weak-handed readers.
Believe me, my dear Lyell, Yours most sincerely, CHARLES DARWIN.
Originate a second REAL BLESSING and have the edges of the sheets cut like a bound book. (This was a favourite reform of my father"s. He wrote to the "Athenaeum" on the subject, February 5, 1867, pointing out how that a book cut, even carefully, with a paper knife collects dust on its edges far more than a machine-cut book. He goes on to quote the case of a lady of his acquaintance who was in the habit of cutting books with her thumb, and finally appeals to the "Athenaeum" to earn the grat.i.tude of children "who have to cut through dry and pictureless books for the benefit of their elders." He tried to introduce the reform in the case of his own books, but found the conservatism of booksellers too strong for him. The presentation copies, however, of all his later books were sent out with the edges cut.)
CHARLES DARWIN TO JOHN LUBBOCK. Down, June 11 [1865].
My dear Lubbock,
The latter half of your book ("Prehistoric Times," 1865.) has been read aloud to me, and the style is so clear and easy (we both think it perfection) that I am now beginning at the beginning. I cannot resist telling you how excellently well, in my opinion, you have done the very interesting chapter on savage life. Though you have necessarily only compiled the materials the general result is most original. But I ought to keep the term original for your last chapter, which has struck me as an admirable and profound discussion. It has quite delighted me, for now the public will see what kind of man you are, which I am proud to think I discovered a dozen years ago.
I do sincerely wish you all success in your election and in politics; but after reading this last chapter, you must let me say: oh, dear! oh, dear! oh dear!
Yours affectionately, CH. DARWIN.
P.S.--You pay me a superb compliment ("Prehistoric Times," page 487, where the words, "the discoveries of a Newton or a Darwin," occur.), but I fear you will be quizzed for it by some of your friends as too exaggerated.
[The following letter refers to Fritz Muller"s book, "Fur Darwin," which was afterwards translated, at my father"s suggestion, by Mr. Dallas. It is of interest as being the first of the long series of letters which my father wrote to this distinguished naturalist. They never met, but the correspondence with Muller, which continued to the close of my father"s life, was a source of very great pleasure to him. My impression is that of all his unseen friends Fritz Muller was the one for whom he had the strongest regard. Fritz Muller is the brother of another distinguished man, the late Hermann Muller, the author of "Die Befruchtung der Blumen," and of much other valuable work:]