CHARLES DARWIN TO A.R. WALLACE. Down, August 28, 1872.
My dear Wallace,
I have at last finished the gigantic job of reading Dr. Bastian"s book ("The Beginnings of Life." H.C. Bastian, 1872.) and have been deeply interested by it. You wished to hear my impression, but it is not worth sending.
He seems to me an extremely able man, as, indeed, I thought when I read his first essay. His general argument in favour of Archebiosis (That is to say, Spontaneous Generation. For the distinction between Archebiosis and Heterogenesis, see Bastian, chapter vi.) is wonderfully strong, though I cannot think much of some few of his arguments. The result is that I am bewildered and astonished by his statements, but am not convinced, though, on the whole, it seems to me probable that Archebiosis is true. I am not convinced, partly I think owing to the deductive cast of much of his reasoning; and I know not why, but I never feel convinced by deduction, even in the case of H. Spencer"s writings.
If Dr. Bastian"s book had been turned upside down, and he had begun with the various cases of Heterogenesis, and then gone on to organic, and afterwards to saline solutions, and had then given his general arguments, I should have been, I believe, much more influenced.
I suspect, however, that my chief difficulty is the effect of old convictions being stereotyped on my brain. I must have more evidence that germs, or the minutest fragments of the lowest forms, are always killed by 212 degrees of Fahr. Perhaps the mere reiteration of the statements given by Dr. Bastian [by] other men, whose judgment I respect, and who have worked long on the lower organisms, would suffice to convince me. Here is a fine confession of intellectual weakness; but what an inexplicable frame of mind is that of belief!
As for Rotifers and Tardigrades being spontaneously generated, my mind can no more digest such statements, whether true or false, than my stomach can digest a lump of lead. Dr. Bastian is always comparing Archebiosis, as well as growth, to crystallisation; but, on this view, a Rotifer or Tardigrade is adapted to its humble conditions of life by a happy accident, and this I cannot believe... He must have worked with very impure materials in some cases, as plenty of organisms appeared in a saline solution not containing an atom of nitrogen.
I wholly disagree with Dr. Bastian about many points in his latter chapters. Thus the frequency of generalised forms in the older strata seems to me clearly to indicate the common descent with divergence of more recent forms. Notwithstanding all his sneers, I do not strike my colours as yet about Pangenesis. I should like to live to see Archebiosis proved true, for it would be a discovery of transcendent importance; or, if false, I should like to see it disproved, and the facts otherwise explained; but I shall not live to see all this. If ever proved, Dr. Bastian will have taken a prominent part in the work. How grand is the onward rush of science; it is enough to console us for the many errors which we have committed, and for our efforts being overlaid and forgotten in the ma.s.s of new facts and new views which are daily turning up.
This is all I have to say about Dr. Bastian"s book, and it certainly has not been worth saying...
CHARLES DARWIN TO A. DE CANDOLLE. Down, December 11, 1872.
My dear Sir,
I began reading your new book ("Histoire des Sciences et des Savants."
1873.) sooner than I intended, and when I once began, I could not stop; and now you must allow me to thank you for the very great pleasure which it has given me. I have hardly ever read anything more original and interesting than your treatment of the causes which favour the development of scientific men. The whole was quite new to me, and most curious. When I began your essay I was afraid that you were going to attack the principle of inheritance in relation to mind, but I soon found myself fully content to follow you and accept your limitations. I have felt, of course, special interest in the latter part of your work, but there was here less novelty to me. In many parts you do me much honour, and everywhere more than justice. Authors generally like to hear what points most strike different readers, so I will mention that of your shorter essays, that on the future prevalence of languages, and on vaccination interested me the most, as, indeed, did that on statistics, and free will. Great liability to certain diseases, being probably liable to atavism, is quite a new idea to me. At page 322 you suggest that a young swallow ought to be separated, and then let loose in order to test the power of instinct; but nature annually performs this experiment, as old cuckoos migrate in England some weeks before the young birds of the same year. By the way, I have just used the forbidden word "nature," which, after reading your essay, I almost determined never to use again. There are very few remarks in your book to which I demur, but when you back up Asa Gray in saying that all instincts are congenital habits, I must protest.
Finally, will you permit me to ask you a question: have you yourself, or some one who can be quite trusted, observed (page 322) that the b.u.t.terflies on the Alps are tamer than those on the lowlands? Do they belong to the same species? Has this fact been observed with more than one species? Are they brightly coloured kinds? I am especially curious about their alighting on the brightly coloured parts of ladies"
dresses, more especially because I have been more than once a.s.sured that b.u.t.terflies like bright colours, for instance, in India the scarlet leaves of Poinsettia.
Once again allow me to thank you for having sent me your work, and for the very unusual amount of pleasure which I have received in reading it.
With much respect, I remain, my dear Sir,
Yours very sincerely, CHARLES DARWIN.
[The last revise of the "Expression of the Emotions" was finished on August 22nd, 1872, and he wrote in his Diary:--"Has taken me about twelve months." As usual he had no belief in the possibility of the book being generally successful. The following pa.s.sage in a letter to Haeckel gives the impression that he had felt the writing of this book as a somewhat severe strain:--
"I have finished my little book on "Expression," and when it is published in November I will of course send you a copy, in case you would like to read it for amus.e.m.e.nt. I have resumed some old botanical work, and perhaps I shall never again attempt to discuss theoretical views.
"I am growing old and weak, and no man can tell when his intellectual powers begin to fail. Long life and happiness to you for your own sake and for that of science."
It was published in the autumn. The edition consisted of 7000, and of these 5267 copies were sold at Mr. Murray"s sale in November.
Two thousand were printed at the end of the year, and this proved a misfortune, as they did not afterwards sell so rapidly, and thus a ma.s.s of notes collected by the author was never employed for a second edition during his lifetime.
Among the reviews of the "Expression of the Emotions" may be mentioned the unfavourable notices in the "Athenaeum", November 9, 1872, and the "Times", December 13, 1872. A good review by Mr. Wallace appeared in the "Quarterly Journal of Science," January 1873. Mr. Wallace truly remarks that the book exhibits certain "characteristics of the author"s mind in an eminent degree," namely, "the insatiable longing to discover the causes of the varied and complex phenomena presented by living things."
He adds that in the case of the author "the restless curiosity of the child to know the "what for?" the "why?" and the "how?" of everything"
seems "never to have abated its force."
A writer in one of the theological reviews describes the book as the most "powerful and insidious" of all the author"s works.
Professor Alexander Bain criticised the book in a postscript to the "Senses and the Intellect;" to this essay the following letter refers:]
CHARLES DARWIN TO ALEXANDER BAIN. Down, October 9, 1873.
My dear Sir,
I am particularly obliged to you for having send me your essay. Your criticisms are all written in a quite fair spirit, and indeed no one who knows you or your works would expect anything else. What you say about the vagueness of what I have called the direct action of the nervous system, is perfectly just. I felt it so at the time, and even more of late. I confess that I have never been able fully to grasp your principle of spontaneity, as well as some other of your points, so as to apply them to special cases. But as we look at everything from different points of view, it is not likely that we should agree closely.
(Professor Bain expounded his theory of Spontaneity in the essay here alluded to. It would be impossible to do justice to it within the limits of a foot-note. The following quotations may give some notion of it:--
"By Spontaneity I understand the readiness to pa.s.s into movement in the absence of all stimulation whatever; the essential requisite being that the nerve-centres and muscles shall be fresh and vigorous... The gesticulations and the carols of young and active animals are mere overflow of nervous energy; and although they are very apt to concur with pleasing emotion, they have an independent source... They are not properly movements of expression; they express nothing at all except an abundant stock of physical power.")
I have been greatly pleased by what you say about the crying expression and about blushing. Did you read a review in a late "Edinburgh?" (The review on the "Expression of the Emotions" appeared in the April number of the "Edinburgh Review," 1873. The opening sentence is a fair sample of the general tone of the article: "Mr. Darwin has added another volume of amusing stories and grotesque ill.u.s.trations to the remarkable series of works already devoted to the exposition and defence of the evolutionary hypothesis." A few other quotations may be worth giving.
"His one-sided devotion to an a priori scheme of interpretation seems thus steadily tending to impair the author"s. .h.i.therto unrivalled powers as an observer. However this may be, most impartial critics will, we think, admit that there is a marked falling off both in philosophical tone and scientific interest in the works produced since Mr. Darwin committed himself to the crude metaphysical conception so largely a.s.sociated with his name." The article is directed against Evolution as a whole, almost as much as against the doctrines of the book under discussion. We find throughout plenty of that effective style of criticism which consists in the use of such expressions as "dogmatism,"
"intolerance," "presumptuous," "arrogant." Together with accusations of such various faults a "virtual abandonment of the inductive method," and the use of slang and vulgarisms.
The part of the article which seems to have interested my father is the discussion on the use which he ought to have made of painting and sculpture.) It was magnificently contemptuous towards myself and many others.
I retain a very pleasant recollection of our sojourn together at that delightful place, Moor Park.
With my renewed thanks, I remain, my dear Sir,
Yours sincerely, CH. DARWIN.
CHARLES DARWIN TO MRS. HALIBURTON. (Mrs. Haliburton was a daughter of my father"s old friend, Mr. Owen of Woodhouse. Her husband, Judge Haliburton, was the well-known author of "Sam Slick.") Down, November 1 [1872].
My dear Mrs. Haliburton,
I dare say you will be surprised to hear from me. My object in writing now is to say that I have just published a book on the "Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals;" and it has occurred to me that you might possibly like to read some parts of it; and I can hardly think that this would have been the case with any of the books which I have already published. So I send by this post my present book. Although I have had no communication with you or the other members of your family for so long a time, no scenes in my whole life pa.s.s so frequently or so vividly before my mind as those which relate to happy old days spent at Woodhouse. I should very much like to hear a little news about yourself and the other members of your family, if you will take the trouble to write to me. Formerly I used to glean some news about you from my sisters.
I have had many years of bad health and have not been able to visit anywhere; and now I feel very old. As long as I pa.s.s a perfectly uniform life, I am able to do some daily work in Natural History, which is still my pa.s.sion, as it was in old days, when you used to laugh at me for collecting beetles with such zeal at Woodhouse. Excepting from my continued il-health, which has excluded me from society, my life has been a very happy one; the greatest drawback being that several of my children have inherited from me feeble health. I hope with all my heart that you retain, at least to a large extent, the famous "Owen const.i.tution." With sincere feelings of grat.i.tude and affection for all bearing the name of Owen, I venture to sign myself,
Yours affectionately, CHARLES DARWIN.
CHARLES DARWIN TO MRS. HALIBURTON. Down, November 6 [1872].
My dear Sarah,
I have been very much pleased by your letter, which I must call charming. I hardly ventured to think that you would have retained a friendly recollection of me for so many years. Yet I ought to have felt a.s.sured that you would remain as warm-hearted and as true-hearted as you have ever been from my earliest recollection. I know well how many grievous sorrows you have gone through; but I am very sorry to hear that your health is not good. In the spring or summer, when the weather is better, if you can summon up courage to pay us a visit here, both my wife, as she desires me to say, and myself, would be truly glad to see you, and I know that you would not care about being rather dull here. It would be a real pleasure to me to see you.--Thank you much for telling about your family,--much of which was new to me. How kind you all were to me as a boy, and you especially, and how much happiness I owe to you.
Believe me your affectionate and obliged friend,
CHARLES DARWIN.
P.S.--Perhaps you would like to see a photograph of me now that I am old.
1873.
[The only work (other than botanical) of this year was the preparation of a second edition of the "Descent of Man," the publication of which is referred to in the following chapter. This work was undertaken much against the grain, as he was at the time deeply immersed in the ma.n.u.script of "Insectivorous Plants." Thus he wrote to Mr. Wallace (November 19), "I never in my lifetime regretted an interruption so much as this new edition of the "Descent."" And later (in December) he wrote to Mr. Huxley: "The new edition of the "Descent" has turned out an awful job. It took me ten days merely to glance over letters and reviews with criticisms and new facts. It is a devil of a job."