DALKEITH HOUSE, _31st August 1776_.
DEAR SIR--As the Duke proposes to stay here till Thursday next I may not have an opportunity of seeing you before yr.
return to Ninewells. I therefore take the opportunity of discharging you and all others concerned of the Legacy which you was so good as to think might upon a certain event become due to me by your Brother"s will, but which I think could upon no event become so, viz. the legacy of two hundred pounds sterling. I hereby therefore discharge it for ever, and least this discharge should be lost I shall be careful to mention it in a note at the bottom of my will. I shall be glad to hear that you have received this letter, and hope you will believe me to be, both on yr. Brother"s account and your own, with great truth, most affectionately yours,
ADAM SMITH.
_P.S._--I do not hereby mean to discharge the other Legacy, viz. that of a copy of his works.[263]
Mr. Home answered him on the 2nd of September as follows:--
DEAR SIR--I was favoured with yours of Sat.u.r.day, and I a.s.sure you that on perusing the destination I was more of oppinion than when I saw you that the pecuniary part of it was not altered by the codicil, and that it was intended for you at all events, that my brother, knowing your liberal way of thinking, laid on you something as an equivalent, not imagining you would refuse a small gratuity from the hands it was to come from as a testimony of his friendship, and tho" I most highly esteem the motives and manner, I cannot agree to accept of your renunciation, but leave you full master to dispose of it which way is most agreeable to you.
The copys of the _Dialogues_ are finished, and of the life, and will be sent to Mr. Strahan to-morrow, and I will mention to him your intention of adding to the last something to finish so valuable a life, and will leave you at liberty to look into the correction of the first as it either answers your leisure or ideas with regard to his composition or what effects you think it may have with regard to yourself. The two copys intended for you will be left with my sister when you please to require them, and the copy of the new edition of his works you shall be sure to receive, tho" you have, no better t.i.tle to that part than the other, tho" much you have to the friendship and esteem, dr. sir, of him who is most sincerely yours,
JOHN HOME.
EDINBURGH, _2nd September 1776_.[264]
Smith"s reply was that though the legacy might be due to him in strict law, he was fully satisfied it was not due to him in justice, because it was expressly given in the will as a reward for a task which he had declined to undertake. This reply was given in a letter of the 7th October, in which he enclosed a copy of the account of Hume"s death which he proposed to add to his friend"s own account of his life.
DEAR SIR--I send you under the same cover with this letter what I propose should be added to the account which your never-to-be-forgotten brother has left of his own life. When you have read it I beg you will return it to me, and at the same time let me know if you wd. wish to have anything either added to it or taken from it. I think there is a propriety in addressing it as a letter to Mr. Strahan, to whom he has left the care of his works. If you approve of it I shall send it to him as soon as I receive it from you.
I have added at the bottom of my will the note discharging the legacy of two hundred pounds which your brother was so kind as to leave me. Upon the most mature deliberation I am fully satisfied that in justice it is not due to me. Tho" it should be due to me therefore in strict law, I cannot with honour accept of it. You will easily believe that my refusal does not proceed from any want of the highest respect for the memory of your deceased brother.--I have the honour to be, with the highest respect and esteem, dear sir, most sincerely and affectionately yours,
ADAM SMITH.
KIRKALDY, FIFESHIRE, _7th October 1776_.[265]
Mr. Home returned Smith"s ma.n.u.script to him on the 14th of October, and expressed his entire approbation of it except "that as it is to be added to what is wrote in so short and simple a manner, he would have wished that the detail had been less minutely entered into, particularly of the journey which, being of a private concern and having drawn to no consequences, does not interest the publick," but still he expressed that opinion, he said, with diffidence, and thought the piece would perhaps best stand as it was. He says, too, that instead of the words, "as my worst enemies could wish" in the remark to Dr. Dundas, he was told that the words his brother actually used were, "as my enemies, if I have any, could wish"--a correction which was adopted by Smith. And he repeats that by his interpretation of his brother"s will he considers the legacy to belong to Smith both in law and in equity.
Meanwhile Smith had also written Strahan from Dalkeith:--
MY DEAR STRAHAN--By a codicil to the will of our late most valuable friend Mr. Hume, the care of his ma.n.u.scripts is left to you. Both from his will and from his conversation I understand that there are only two which he meant should be published--an account of his life and _Dialogues concerning Natural Religion_. The latter, tho" finely written, I could have wished had remained in ma.n.u.script to be communicated only to a few people. When you read the work you will see my reasons without my giving you the trouble of reading them in a letter. But he has ordered it otherwise. In case of their not being published within three years after his decease, he has left the property of them to his nephew. Upon my objecting to this clause as unnecessary and improper, he wrote to me by his nephew"s hand in the following terms: "There is no man in whom I have a greater confidence than Mr. Strahan, yet have I left the property of that ma.n.u.script to my nephew David, in case by any accident they should not be published within three years after my decease. The only accident I could foresee was one to Mr. Strahan"s life, and without this clause my nephew would have had no right to publish it. Be so good as inform Mr. Strahan of this circ.u.mstance." Thus far this letter, which was dated on the 23rd of August. He dyed on the 25th at 4 o"clock afternoon.
I once had persuaded him to leave it entirely to my discretion either to publish them at what time I thought proper, or not to publish them at all. Had he continued of this mind the ma.n.u.script should have been most carefully preserved, and upon my decease restored to his family; but it never should have been published in my lifetime. When you have read it you will perhaps think it not unreasonable to consult some prudent friend about what you ought to do.
I propose to add to his Life a very well authenticated account of his behaviour during his last illness. I must, however, beg that his life and those _Dialogues_ may not be published together, as I am resolved for many reasons to have no concern in the publication of the _Dialogues_. His life, I think, ought to be prefixed to the next edition of his former works, upon which he has made many very proper corrections, chiefly in what concerns the language. If this edition is published while I am at London, I shall revise the sheets and authenticate its being according to his last corrections. I promised him that I would do so.
If my mother"s health will permit me to leave her, I shall be in London by the beginning of November. I shall write to Mr. Home to take my lodgings as soon as I return to Fife, which will be on Monday or Tuesday next. The Duke of Buccleugh leaves this on Sunday. Direct for me at Kirkaldy, Fifeshire, where I shall remain all the rest of the season.--I remain, my dear Strahan, most faithfully yours,
ADAM SMITH.
DALKEITH HOUSE, _5th September 1776_.
Let me hear from you soon.[266]
To this Strahan replied on the 16th of September, and then towards the end of October Smith wrote the following answer, of which the first draft, in Smith"s own handwriting, unsigned and undated and containing considerable erasures, exists in the R.S.E. Library. It shows that Smith submitted his account of Hume"s illness to the whole circle of Hume"s intimate friends, and that at the moment of writing he was waiting for the arrival of John Home, the poet, in Edinburgh, to obtain his remarks upon it.
DEAR SIR--When I received your last letter I had not begun the small addition I proposed to make to the life of our late friend. It is now more than three weeks since I finished it, and sent one copy to his brother and another to Dr. Black. That which I sent to his brother is returned with remarks, all of which I approve of and shall adopt. Dr.
Black waits for John Home, the Poet, who is expected every day in Edinburgh, whose remarks he proposes to send along with those of all our common friends. The work consists only of two sheets, in the form of a letter to you, but without one word of flattery or compliment. It will not cost my servant a forenoon to transcribe it, so that you will receive it by the first post after it is returned to me.
I am much obliged to you for so readily agreeing to print the life together with my additions separate from the _Dialogues_. I even flatter myself that this arrangement will contribute not only to my quiet but to your interest.
The clamour against the _Dialogues_, if published first, might hurt for some time the sale of the new edition of his works, and when the clamour has a little subsided the _Dialogues_ may hereafter occasion a quicker sale of another edition.
I do not propose being with you till the Christmas holidays; in the meantime I should be glad to know how things stand between us, what copies of my last book are either sold or unsold, and when the balance of our bargain is likely to be due to me. I beg my most respectful and affectionate compliments to Mr. Cadell; I should have written him, but you know the pain it gives me to write with my own hand, and I look upon writing to him and you as the same thing. I have been since I came to Scotland most exceedingly idle. It is partly in order to bring up in some measure my leeway that I propose to stay here two months longer than I once intended.
If my presence, however, was at all necessary in London, I could easily set out immediately.
I beg the favour of you to send the enclosed to Mr. Home.
The purpose of it is to bespeak my lodgings.[267]
The second and third paragraphs of this letter as they stood at first are erased entirely, but their original substance is in no way altered in their corrected form. One of the original sentences about the clamour he dreaded may perhaps be transcribed. "I am still," he says, "uneasy about the clamour which I foresee they will excite." It may also be noticed that he does not seem to have dictated his account of Hume"s illness to his amanuensis, but to have written it with his own hand and then got his amanuensis to transcribe it. The Mr. Home whom he wishes to bespeak lodgings for him must be John Home the poet, in spite of the circ.u.mstance that he speaks of John Home the poet as being expected in Edinburgh every day at the time of writing; and in the event Home does not seem to have come to Edinburgh, for in a subsequent letter to Strahan on 13th of November Smith again mentions having written Mr. Home to engage lodgings for him from Christmas.
This letter is as follows:--
DEAR SIR--The enclosed is the small addition which I propose to make to the account which our late invaluable friend left of his own life.
I have received 300 of the copy money of the first edition of my book. But as I got a good number of copies to make presents of from Mr. Cadell, I do not exactly know what balance may be due to me. I should therefore be glad he would send me the account. I shall write to him upon this subject.
With regard to the next edition, my present opinion is that it should be printed in four vol. octavo; and I would propose that it should be printed at your expense, and that we should divide the profits. Let me know if this is agreeable to you.
My mother begs to be remembered to Mrs. Strahan and Miss Strahan, and thinks herself much obliged both to you and them for being so good as to remember her.--I ever am, dear sir, most affectionately yours,
ADAM SMITH.
KIRKALDY, FIFESHIRE, _13th November 1776_.
I shall certainly be in town before the end of the Christmas holidays. I do not apprehend it can be necessary for me to come sooner. I have therefore written to Mr. Home to bespeak my lodgings from Christmas.[268]
Strahan acknowledges this letter on the 26th of November, and asks Smith"s opinion on an idea that has occurred to him of publishing the interesting series of letters from Hume to himself which he possessed, and which, after a curious and remarkable history, have been now preserved for the world through the liberality of Lord Rosebery and the learned devotion of Mr. Birkbeck Hill. To these letters Strahan, if he obtained Smith"s concurrence, would like to add those of Hume to Smith himself, to John Home, to Robertson, and other friends, which have now for the most part been lost. But Smith put his foot on this proposal decisively, on the ground apparently that it was most improper for a man"s friends to publish anything he had written which he had himself given no express direction or leave to publish either by his will or otherwise. Strahan"s letter runs thus:--
DEAR SIR--I received yours of the 13th enclosing the addition to Mr. Hume"s Life, which I like exceedingly. But as the whole put together is very short and will not make a volume even of the _smallest size_, I have been advised by some very good judges to annex some of his letters to me on political subjects. What think you of this? I will do nothing without your advice and approbation, nor would I for the world publish any letter of his but such as in yr.
opinion would do him honour. Mr. Gibbon thinks such as I have shown him would have that tendency. Now if you approve of this in any manner, you may perhaps add partly to the collection from your own cabinet and those of Mr. John Home, Dr. Robertson, and others of your mutual friends which you may pick up before you return hither. But if you wholly disapprove of this scheme say nothing of it, here let it drop, for without your concurrence I will not publish a single word of his. I should be glad, however, of your sentiments as soon as you can, and let me know at the same time as nearly as may be what day you purpose to be in London, for I must again repeat to you that without your approbation I will do nothing.
Your proposal to print the next edition of your work in 4 vols. octavo at _our_ expense and to divide the Profits is a very fair one, and therefore very agreeable to Mr. Cadell and me. Enclosed is the List of Books delivered to you of the 1st edit.
My wife and daughter join kindest compliments to your amiable Parent, who, I hope, is still able to enjoy your company, which must be her greatest comfort.--Dear sir, your faithful and affectionate humble servant,
WILL. STRAHAN.
LONDON, _26th November 1776_.[269]
The following is Smith"s reply:--
DEAR SIR--It always gives me great uneasiness whenever I am obliged to give an opinion contrary to the inclination of my friend. I am sensible that many of Mr. Hume"s letters would do him great honour, and that you would publish none but such as would. But what in this case ought princ.i.p.ally to be considered is the will of the Dead. Mr. Hume"s constant injunction was to burn all his Papers except the _Dialogues_ and the account of his own life. This injunction was even inserted in the body of his will. I know he always disliked the thought of his letters ever being published. He had been in long and intimate correspondence with a relation of his own who dyed a few years ago. When that gentleman"s health began to decline he was extremely anxious to get back his letters, least the heir should think of publishing them.
They were accordingly returned, and burnt as soon as returned. If a collection of Mr. Hume"s letters besides was to receive the public approbation, as yours certainly would, the Curls of the times would immediately set about rummaging the cabinets of all those who had ever received a sc.r.a.p of paper from him. Many things would be published not fit to see the light, to the great mortification of all those who wish well to his memory. Nothing has contributed so much to sink the value of Swift"s works as the undistinguished publication of his letters; and be a.s.sured that your publication, however select, would soon be followed by an undistinguished one. I should therefore be sorry to see any beginning given to the publication of his letters. His life will not make a volume, but it will make a small pamphlet. I shall certainly be in London by the tenth of January at furthest. I have a little business at Edinburgh which may detain me a few days about Christmas, otherwise I should be with you by the new year. I have a great deal more to say to you; but the post is just going. I shall write to Mr. Cadell by next post.--I ever am, dear sir, most affectionately yours,
ADAM SMITH.
KIRKALDY, _2nd December 1776_.[270]