The membership of the club included many of the foremost men in the land--great n.o.blemen, advocates, men of letters, together with a number of spirited county gentlemen on both sides of politics, who cried that they had a militia of their own before the Union, and must have a militia of their own again. Dr. Carlyle says most of the members of the Select Society belonged to it, the exceptions consisting of a few who disapproved of the militia scheme, and of others, like the judges, who scrupled, on account of their official position, to take any part in a political movement. Carlyle gives a list of the members in 1774, containing among other names those of the Duke of Buccleugh, Lords Haddington, Glasgow, Glencairn, Elibank, and Mountstuart; Henry Dundas, Lord Advocate; Baron Mure, Hume, Adam Smith, Robertson, Black, Adam Ferguson, John Home, Dr. Blair, Sir James Steuart the economist, Dempster, Islay Campbell, afterwards Lord President; and John Clerk of Eldin. The first secretary of the club was William Johnstone (Sir William Pulteney), and, as has been frequently told, David Hume was jocularly appointed to a sinecure office created for him, the office of a.s.sa.s.sin, and lest Hume"s good-nature should unfit him for the duties, Andrew Crosbie, advocate (the original of Scott"s "Pleydell"), was made his a.s.sistant. The club met at first in Tom Nicholson"s tavern, the Diversorium, at the Cross, and subsequently removed to more fashionable quarters at the famous Fortune"s in the Stamp Office Close, where the Lord High Commissioner to the General a.s.sembly held his levees, and the members dined every Friday at two and sat till six. However the club may have pulled wires in private, their public activity seems to have been very little; so far at least as literary advocacy of their cause went, nothing proceeded from it except a pamphlet by Dr. Carlyle, and a much-overlauded squib by Adam Ferguson, ent.i.tled "A History of the Proceedings in the Case of Margaret, commonly called Sister Peg."
Smith was, as I have said, one of the original members of the club, and from Carlyle"s list would appear to have continued a member till 1774; but he was not a member of the Younger Poker Club, established in 1786. In the interval he had expressed in the _Wealth of Nations_ a strong preference for a standing army over a national militia,[101]
after inst.i.tuting a very careful examination of the whole subject.
Whether his views had changed since 1762, or whether he had joined in the agitation for a militia merely as a measure of justice to Scotland or as an expedient of temporary necessity, without committing himself to any abstract admiration for the inst.i.tution in general, I have no means of deciding; but we can hardly think he ever shared that kind of belief in the principle of a militia which animated men like Ferguson and Carlyle, and which, according to them, animated the other members of the club also at its birth. Ferguson says the club was founded "upon the principle of zeal for a militia and a conviction that there could be no lasting security for the freedom and independence of these islands but in the valour and patriotism of an armed people";[102]
and when, during his travels in Switzerland in 1775, he saw for the first time in his life a real militia--the object of his dreams--actually moving before him in the flesh, and going through their drill, his heart came to his mouth, and he wrote his friend Carlyle: "As they were the only body of men I ever saw under arms on the true principle for which arms should be carried, I felt much secret emotion, and could have shed tears."[103] He was deeply disappointed a year later with Smith"s apostasy on this question, or at least opposition, for Ferguson makes no accusation of apostasy.
After reading the _Wealth of Nations_, he wrote Smith on the 18th of April 1776: "You have provoked, too, so far the Church, the universities, and the merchants, against all of whom I am willing to take your part; but you have likewise provoked the militia, and there I must be against you. The gentlemen and peasants of this country do not need the authority of philosophers to make them supine and negligent of every resource they might have in themselves in the case of certain extremities, of which the pressure, G.o.d knows, may be at no great distance. But of this more at Philippi."[104]
But many others besides Smith had in this interval either found their zeal for a militia grown cool or their opinion of its value modified, and when Lord Mountstuart introduced his new Scotch Militia Bill in 1776, it received little support from Scotch members, and its rejection excited nothing like the feeling roused by the rejection of its predecessor in 1760, although it was attended this time with the galling aggravation that what was refused to the Scotch was in the same hour granted to the Irish, then the less disliked and distrusted nation of the two. Opinions had grown divided. Old Fletcher of Saltoun"s idea of a citizen army with universal compulsory service was still much discussed, but many now objected to the compulsion, and others, among whom was Lord Kames, to the universality of the compulsion, rallying to the idea of Fencibles--_i.e._ regiments to be raised compulsorily by the landed proprietors, each furnishing a number of men proportioned to their valued rent.[105] Smith said a militia formed in this way, like the old Highland militia, was the best of all militias, but he held that the day was past for militias of men with one hand on the sword and the other on the plough, and that nothing could now answer for what he calls "the n.o.blest of all arts," the art of war, but the division of labour, which answered best for the arts of peace, and a standing army of soldiers by exclusive occupation.
Divided counsels and diminished zeal supply, no doubt, the main reason for the decay of the Poker Club, but other causes combined. Dr.
Carlyle, who was an active member of the club, says it began to decline when it transferred itself to more elegant quarters at Fortune"s, because its dinners became too expensive for the members; and Lord Campbell attributes its dissolution definitely to the new taxes imposed on French wines to pay the cost of the American War. His statement is very explicit: "To punish the Government they agreed to dissolve the "Poker," and to form another society which should exist without consumption of any excisable commodity."[106] But he gives no authority for the statement, and they are at least not likely to have been such fools as to think of punishing the Government by what was after all only an excellent way of punishing themselves. The wine duty was no doubt a real enough grievance; it was raised five or six times during the club"s existence, and many a man who enjoyed his quart of Burgundy when the duty was less than half-a-crown a gallon, was obliged to do without it when the duty rose to seven shillings. It may be worth adding, however, that the Poker Club was revived as the Younger Poker Club in the very year, 1786, when the duty on Burgundy was reduced again by the new Commercial Treaty with France.
FOOTNOTES:
[75] Southey"s Life of A. Bell, i. 23.
[76] Oswald had just been appointed commissioner for trade and plantations.
[77] _Correspondence of James Oswald_, p. 124.
[78] Burton"s _Life of Hume_, i. 375.
[79] Mr. Burton thinks the Society mentioned in this paragraph to be "evidently the Philosophical Society" of Edinburgh, but it seems much more likely to have been the Literary Society of Glasgow, of which Hume was also a member. Of the Philosophical Society he was himself Secretary, and would therefore have been in the position of giving warning rather than receiving it; nor would he have spoken of sending that Society a paper which he would be on the spot to read himself.
Whether Smith was Secretary of the Glasgow Literary Society I do not know, but even if he were not it would be nothing strange though the communications of the Society with Hume were carried on through Smith, his chief friend among the members, and his regular correspondent.
[80] Burton"s _Life of Hume_, i. 417.
[81] Carlyle"s _Autobiography_, p. 275.
[82] Burton"s Scot Abroad, ii. 340.
[83] Minutes of Select Society, Advocates" Library, Edinburgh.
[84] Ibid.
[85] _Scots Magazine_, xix. 163.
[86] Burton"s _Scot Abroad_, ii. 343.
[87] _Scots Magazine_ for year 1755, p. 126.
[88] Lord Campbell"s _Lives of the Chancellors_, vi. 32.
[89] _Scots Magazine_, xxvi. 229.
[90] The _Bee_ for June 1791.
[91] Tytler"s _Life of Lord Kames_, i. 233.
[92] _Life of John Home_, p. 24.
[93] Burton"s _Scot Abroad_, ii. 343.
[94] Douglas"s _Select Works_, p. 23.
[95] The _Bee_ for 1791.
[96] Burton"s _Life of Hume_, ii. 16.
[97] Professor of Logic.
[98] Burton"s _Life of Hume_, ii. 45.
[99] Fraser"s _The Lennox_, p. xliv.
[100] _Carlyle Correspondence_, Edinburgh University Library.
[101] _Wealth of Nations_, Book V. chap. i.
[102] "Memoirs of Black," _Transactions,_ R.S.E., v. 113.
[103] _Carlyle Correspondence,_ Edinburgh University.
[104] Small, _Sketch of A. Ferguson,_ p. 23.
[105] Kames, _Sketches of Man_, Book II. chap. ix.
[106] Campbell"s _Lives of the Lord Chancellors_, vi. 28.
CHAPTER IX
THE "THEORY OF MORAL SENTIMENTS"
1759. _Aet._ 36
Smith enjoyed a very high Scotch reputation long before his name was known to the great public by any contribution to literature. But in 1759 he gave his _Theory of Moral Sentiments_ to the press, and took his place, by almost immediate and universal recognition, in the first rank of contemporary writers. The book is an essay supporting and ill.u.s.trating the doctrine that moral approbation and disapprobation are in the last a.n.a.lysis expressions of sympathy with the feelings of an imaginary and impartial spectator, and its substance had already been given from year to year in his ordinary lectures to his students, though after the publication he thought it no longer necessary to dwell at the same length on this branch of his course, giving more time, no doubt, to jurisprudence and political economy. The book was published in London by Andrew Millar in two vols. 8vo. It was from the first well received, its ingenuity, eloquence, and great copiousness of effective ill.u.s.tration being universally acknowledged and admired.
Smith sent a copy to Hume in London, and received the following reply, which contains some interesting particulars of the reception of the book there:--
LONDON, _12th April 1759_.
DEAR SIR--I give you thanks for the agreeable present of your _Theory_. Wedderburn and I made presents of our copies to such of our acquaintances as we thought good judges and proper to spread the reputation of the book. I sent one to the Duke of Argyle, to Lord Lyttelton, Horace Walpole, Soame Jenyns, and Burke, an Irish gentleman who wrote lately a very pretty treatise on the Sublime. Millar desired my permission to send one in your name to Dr. Warburton.
I have delayed writing you till I could tell you something of the success of the book, and could prognosticate with some probability whether it should be finally d.a.m.ned to oblivion or should be registered in the temple of immortality. Though it has been published only a few weeks, I think there appear already such strong symptoms that I can almost venture to foretell its fate. It is, in short, this--