BOSWELL. "But surely, Sir, you will allow that there are men of merit at the bar, who never get practice." JOHNSON. "Sir, you are sure that practice is got from an opinion that the person employed deserves it best; so that if a man of merit at the bar does not get practice, it is from errour, not from injustice. He is not neglected. A horse that is brought to market may not be bought, though he is a very good horse: but that is from ignorance, not from intention[534]."
There was in this discourse much novelty, ingenuity, and discrimination, such as is seldom to be found. Yet I cannot help thinking that men of merit, who have no success in life, may be forgiven for _lamenting_, if they are not allowed to _complain_. They may consider it as _hard_ that their merit should not have its suitable distinction. Though there is no intentional injustice towards them on the part of the world, their merit not having been perceived, they may yet repine against _fortune_, or _fate_, or by whatever name they choose to call the supposed mythological power of _Destiny_. It has, however, occurred to me, as a consolatory thought, that men of merit should consider thus:-How much harder would it be if the same persons had both all the merit and all the prosperity. Would not this be a miserable distribution for the poor dunces? Would men of merit exchange their intellectual superiority, and the enjoyments arising from it, for external distinction and the pleasures of wealth? If they would not, let them not envy others, who are poor where they are rich, a compensation which is made to them. Let them look inwards and be satisfied; recollecting with conscious pride what Virgil finely says of the _Corycius Senex_, and which I have, in another place[535], with truth and sincerity applied to Mr. Burke:--
"_Regum aequabat opes animis[536]."_
On the subject of the right employment of wealth, Johnson observed, "A man cannot make a bad use of his money, so far as regards Society, if he does not h.o.a.rd it; for if he either spends it or lends it out, Society has the benefit. It is in general better to spend money than to give it away; for industry is more promoted by spending money than by giving it away. A man who spends his money is sure he is doing good with it: he is not so sure when he gives it away. A man who spends ten thousand a year will do more good than a man who spends two thousand and gives away eight[537]."
In the evening I came to him again. He was somewhat fretful from his illness. A gentleman[538] asked him, whether he had been abroad to-day.
"Don"t talk so childishly, (said he.) You may as well ask if I hanged myself to-day." I mentioned politicks. JOHNSON. "Sir, I"d as soon have a man to break my bones as talk to me of publick affairs, internal or external. I have lived to see things all as bad as they can be."
Having mentioned his friend the second Lord Southwell, he said, "Lord Southwell was the highest-bred man without insolence that I ever was in company with; the most _qualified_ I ever saw. Lord Orrery[539] was not dignified: Lord Chesterfield was, but he was insolent[540]. Lord ----[541] is a man of coa.r.s.e manners, but a man of abilities and information. I don"t say he is a man I would set at the head of a nation, though perhaps he may be as good as the next Prime Minister that comes; but he is a man to be at the head of a Club; I don"t say _our_ CLUB; for there"s no such Club." BOSWELL. "But, Sir, was he not once a factious man?" JOHNSON. "O yes, Sir; as factious a fellow as could be found: one who was for sinking us all into the mob[542]." BOSWELL. "How then, Sir, did he get into favour with the King?" JOHNSON. "Because, Sir, I suppose he promised the King to do whatever the King pleased."
He said, "Goldsmith"s blundering speech to Lord Shelburne, which has been so often mentioned, and which he really did make to him, was only a blunder in emphasis: "I wonder they should call your Lordship _Malagrida_[543], for Malagrida was a very good man;" meant, I wonder they should use _Malagrida_ as a term of reproach[544]."
Soon after this time I had an opportunity of seeing, by means of one of his friends[545], a proof that his talents, as well as his obliging service to authours, were ready as ever. He had revised _The Village_, an admirable poem, by the Reverend Mr. Crabbe. Its sentiments as to the false notions of rustick happiness and rustick virtue were quite congenial with his own[546]; and he had taken the trouble not only to suggest slight corrections and variations, but to furnish some lines, when he thought he could give the writer"s meaning better than in the words of the ma.n.u.script[547].
On Sunday, March 30, I found him at home in the evening, and had the pleasure to meet with Dr. Brocklesby[548], whose reading, and knowledge of life, and good spirits, supply him with a never-failing source of conversation. He mentioned a respectable gentleman, who became extremely penurious near the close of his life. Johnson said there must have been a degree of madness about him. "Not at all, Sir, (said Dr. Brocklesby,) his judgement was entire." Unluckily, however, he mentioned that although he had a fortune of twenty-seven thousand pounds, he denied himself many comforts, from an apprehension that he could not afford them. "Nay, Sir, (cried Johnson,) when the judgement is so disturbed that a man cannot count, that is pretty well."
I shall here insert a few of Johnson"s sayings, without the formality of dates, as they have no reference to any particular time or place.
"The more a man extends and varies his acquaintance the better." This, however, was meant with a just restriction; for, he on another occasion said to me, "Sir, a man may be so much of every thing, that he is nothing of any thing."
"Raising the wages of day-labourers is wrong[549]; for it does not make them live better, but only makes them idler, and idleness is a very bad thing for human nature."
"It is a very good custom to keep a journal[550] for a man"s own use; he may write upon a card a day all that is necessary to be written, after he has had experience of life. At first there is a great deal to be written, because there is a great deal of novelty; but when once a man has settled his opinions, there is seldom much to be set down."
"There is nothing wonderful in the journal which we see Swift kept in London, for it contains slight topicks, and it might soon be written[551]."
I praised the accuracy of an account-book of a lady whom I mentioned.
JOHNSON. "Keeping accounts, Sir, is of no use when a man is spending his own money, and has n.o.body to whom he is to account. You won"t eat less beef to-day, because you have written down what it cost yesterday." I mentioned another lady who thought as he did, so that her husband could not get her to keep an account of the expence of the family, as she thought it enough that she never exceeded the sum allowed her. JOHNSON.
"Sir, it is fit she should keep an account, because her husband wishes it; but I do not see its use[552]." I maintained that keeping an account has this advantage, that it satisfies a man that his money has not been lost or stolen, which he might sometimes be apt to imagine, were there no written state of his expence; and beside, a calculation of oeconomy so as not to exceed one"s income, cannot be made without a view of the different articles in figures, that one may see how to retrench in some particulars less necessary than others. This he did not attempt to answer.
Talking of an acquaintance of ours[553], whose narratives, which abounded in curious and interesting topicks, were unhappily found to be very fabulous; I mentioned Lord Mansfield"s having said to me, "Suppose we believe one _half_ of what he tells." JOHNSON. "Ay; but we don"t know _which_ half to believe. By his lying we lose not only our reverence for him, but all comfort in his conversation." BOSWELL. "May we not take it as amusing fiction?" JOHNSON. "Sir, the misfortune is, that you will insensibly believe as much of it as you incline to believe."
It is remarkable, that notwithstanding their congeniality in politicks, he never was acquainted with a late eminent n.o.ble judge[554], whom I have heard speak of him as a writer, with great respect[555]. Johnson, I know not upon what degree of investigation, entertained no exalted opinion of his Lordship"s intellectual character[556]. Talking of him to me one day, he said, "It is wonderful, Sir, with how little real superiority of mind men can make an eminent figure in publick life." He expressed himself to the same purpose concerning another law-Lord, who, it seems, once took a fancy to a.s.sociate with the wits of London; but with so little success, that Foote said, "What can he mean by coming among us? He is not only dull himself, but the cause of dullness in others[557]." Trying him by the test of his colloquial powers, Johnson had found him very defective. He once said to Sir Joshua Reynolds, "This man now has been ten years about town, and has made nothing of it;"
meaning as a companion[558]. He said to me, "I never heard any thing from him in company that was at all striking; and depend upon it, Sir, it is when you come close to a man in conversation, that you discover what his real abilities are; to make a speech in a publick a.s.sembly is a knack. Now I honour Thurlow, Sir; Thurlow is a fine fellow; he fairly puts his mind to yours[559]."
After repeating to him some of his pointed, lively sayings, I said, "It is a pity, Sir, you don"t always remember your own good things, that you may have a laugh when you will." JOHNSON. "Nay, Sir, it is better that I forget them, that I may be reminded of them, and have a laugh on their being brought to my recollection."
When I recalled to him his having said as we sailed up Loch-lomond[560], "That if he wore any thing fine, it should be _very_ fine;" I observed that all his thoughts were upon a great scale. JOHNSON. "Depend upon it, Sir, every man will have as fine a thing as he can get; as a large diamond for his ring." BOSWELL. "Pardon me, Sir: a man of a narrow mind will not think of it, a slight trinket will satisfy him:
"_Nee sufferre queat majoris pondera gemmae_[561].""
I told him I should send him some Essays which I had written[562], which I hoped he would be so good as to read, and pick out the good ones.
JOHNSON. "Nay, Sir, send me only the good ones; don"t make _me_ pick them."
I heard him once say, "Though the proverb _Nullum numen abest, si sit prudentia[563], does not always prove true, we may be certain of the converse of it, _Nullum numen adest, si sit imprudentia_."
Once, when Mr. Seward was going to Bath, and asked his commands, he said, "Tell Dr. Harrington that I wish he would publish another volume of the _Nugae antiquae_[564]; it is a very pretty book[565]." Mr. Seward seconded this wish, and recommended to Dr. Harrington to dedicate it to Johnson, and take for his motto, what Catullus says to Cornelius Nepos:--
"----_namque tu solebas, Meas esse aliquid putare_ NUGAS[566]."
As a small proof of his kindliness and delicacy of feeling, the following circ.u.mstance may be mentioned: One evening when we were in the street together, and I told him I was going to sup at Mr. Beauclerk"s, he said, "I"ll go with you." After having walked part of the way, seeming to recollect something, he suddenly stopped and said, "I cannot go,--but _I do not love Beauclerk the less_."
On the frame of his portrait, Mr. Beauclerk had inscribed,--
"----_Ingenium ingens Inculto latet hoc sub corpore_[567]."
After Mr. Beauclerk"s death, when it became Mr. Langton"s property, he made the inscription be defaced. Johnson said complacently, "It was kind in you to take it off;" and then after a short pause, added, "and not unkind in him to put it on."
He said, "How few of his friends" houses would a man choose to be at when he is sick." He mentioned one or two. I recollect only Thrale"s[568].
He observed, "There is a wicked inclination in most people to suppose an old man decayed in his intellects. If a young or middle-aged man, when leaving a company, does not recollect where he laid his hat, it is nothing; but if the same inattention is discovered in an old man, people will shrug up their shoulders, and say, "His memory is going[569]."
When I once talked to him of some of the sayings which every body repeats, but n.o.body knows where to find, such as _Quos DEUS vult perdere, prius dementat_[570]; he told me that he was once offered ten guineas to point out from whence _Semel insanivimus omnes_ was taken. He could not do it; but many years afterwards met with it by chance in _Johannes Baptista Mantua.n.u.s_[571].
I am very sorry that I did not take a note of an eloquent argument in which he maintained that the situation of Prince of Wales was the happiest of any person"s in the kingdom, even beyond that of the Sovereign. I recollect only--the enjoyment of hope[572],--the high superiority of rank, without the anxious cares of government,--and a great degree of power, both from natural influence wisely used, and from the sanguine expectations of those who look forward to the chance of future favour.
Sir Joshua Reynolds communicated to me the following particulars:--
Johnson thought the poems published as translations from Ossian had so little merit, that he said, "Sir, a man might write such stuff for ever, if he would _abandon_ his mind to it[573]."
He said, "A man should pa.s.s a part of his time with _the laughers_, by which means any thing ridiculous or particular about him might be presented to his view, and corrected." I observed, he must have been a bold laugher who would have ventured to tell Dr. Johnson of any of his particularities[574].
Having observed the vain ostentatious importance of many people in quoting the authority of Dukes and Lords, as having been in their company, he said, he went to the other extreme, and did not mention his authority when he should have done it, had it not been that of a Duke or a Lord[575].
Dr. Goldsmith said once to Dr. Johnson, that he wished for some additional members to the LITERARY CLUB, to give it an agreeable variety; for (said he,) there can now be nothing new among us: we have travelled over one another"s minds. Johnson seemed a little angry, and said, "Sir, you have not travelled over _my_ mind, I promise you." Sir Joshua, however, thought Goldsmith right; observing, that "when people have lived a great deal together, they know what each of them will say on every subject. A new understanding, therefore, is desirable; because though it may only furnish the same sense upon a question which would have been furnished by those with whom we are accustomed to live, yet this sense will have a different colouring; and colouring is of much effect in every thing else as well as in painting."
Johnson used to say that he made it a constant rule to talk as well as he could both as to sentiment and expression, by which means, what had been originally effort became familiar and easy[576]. The consequence of this, Sir Joshua observed, was, that his common conversation in all companies was such as to secure him universal attention, as something above the usual colloquial style was expected[577].
Yet, though Johnson had this habit in company, when another mode was necessary, in order to investigate truth, he could descend to a language intelligible to the meanest capacity. An instance of this was witnessed by Sir Joshua Reynolds, when they were present at an examination of a little blackguard boy, by Mr. Saunders Welch[578], the late Westminster Justice. Welch, who imagined that he was exalting himself in Dr.
Johnson"s eyes by using big words, spoke in a manner that was utterly unintelligible to the boy; Dr. Johnson perceiving it, addressed himself to the boy, and changed the pompous phraseology into colloquial language. Sir Joshua Reynolds, who was much amused by this procedure, which seemed a kind of reversing of what might have been expected from the two men, took notice of it to Dr. Johnson, as they walked away by themselves. Johnson said, that it was continually the case; and that he was always obliged to _translate_ the Justice"s swelling diction, (smiling,) so as that his meaning might be understood by the vulgar, from whom information was to be obtained[579].
Sir Joshua once observed to him, that he had talked above the capacity of some people with whom they had been in company together. "No matter, Sir, (said Johnson); they consider it as a compliment to be talked to, as if they were wiser than they are. So true is this, Sir, that Baxter made it a rule in every sermon that he preached, to say something that was above the capacity of his audience[580]."
Johnson"s dexterity in retort, when he seemed to be driven to an extremity by his adversary, was very remarkable. Of his power in this respect, our common friend, Mr. Windham, of Norfolk, has been pleased to furnish me with an eminent instance. However unfavourable to Scotland, he uniformly gave liberal praise to George Buchanan[581], as a writer.
In a conversation concerning the literary merits of the two countries, in which Buchanan was introduced, a Scotchman, imagining that on this ground he should have an undoubted triumph over him, exclaimed, "Ah, Dr.
Johnson, what would you have said of Buchanan, had he been an Englishman?" "Why, Sir, (said Johnson, after a little pause,) I should _not_ have said of Buchanan, had he been an _Englishman_, what I will now say of him as a _Scotchman_,--that he was the only man of genius his country ever produced."
And this brings to my recollection another instance of the same nature.
I once reminded him that when Dr. Adam Smith was expatiating on the beauty of Glasgow, he had cut him short by saying, "Pray, Sir, have you ever seen Brentford?" and I took the liberty to add, "My dear Sir, surely that was _shocking_." "Why, then, Sir, (he replied,) YOU have never seen Brentford."
Though his usual phrase for conversation was _talk_[582], yet he made a distinction; for when he once told me that he dined the day before at a friend"s house, with "a very pretty company;" and I asked him if there was good conversation, he answered, "No, Sir; we had _talk_ enough, but no _conversation_; there was nothing _discussed_."
Talking of the success of the Scotch in London, he imputed it In a considerable degree to their spirit of nationality. "You know, Sir, (said he,) that no Scotchman publishes a book, or has a play brought upon the stage, but there are five hundred people ready to applaud him.[583]"
He gave much praise to his friend, Dr. Burney"s elegant and entertaining travels[584], and told Mr. Seward that he had them in his eye, when writing his _Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland_.
Such was his sensibility, and so much was he affected by pathetick poetry, that, when he was reading Dr. Beattie"s _Hermit_ in my presence, it brought tears into his eyes[585].