"I am to return you thanks for the present you were so kind as to send by me[346], and to intreat that you will be pleased to inform me by the penny-post[347], whether you resolve to print the poem. If you please to send it me by the post, with a note to Dodsley, I will go and read the lines to him, that we may have his consent to put his name in the t.i.tle-page. As to the printing, if it can be set immediately about, I will be so much the authour"s friend, as not to content myself with mere solicitations in his favour. I propose, if my calculation be near the truth, to engage for the reimburs.e.m.e.nt of all that you shall lose by an impression of 500; provided, as you very generously propose, that the profit, if any, be set aside for the authour"s use, excepting the present you made, which, if he be a gainer, it is fit he should repay. I beg that you will let one of your servants write an exact account of the expense of such an impression, and send it with the poem, that I may know what I engage for. I am very sensible, from your generosity on this occasion, of your regard to learning, even in its unhappiest state; and cannot but think such a temper deserving of the grat.i.tude of those who suffer so often from a contrary disposition. I am, Sir,
"Your most humble servant,
"SAM. JOHNSON[348]."
[Page 122: Mrs. Carter. A.D. 1738.]
"To MR. CAVE.
[No date[349].]
"SIR,
"I waited on you to take the copy to Dodsley"s: as I remember the number of lines which it contains, it will be no longer than _Eugenio_[350], with the quotations, which must be subjoined at the bottom of the page; part of the beauty of the performance (if any beauty be allowed it) consisting in adapting Juvenal"s sentiments to modern facts and persons.
It will, with those additions, very conveniently make five sheets. And since the expense will be no more, I shall contentedly insure it, as I mentioned in my last. If it be not therefore gone to Dodsley"s, I beg it may be sent me by the penny-post, that I may have it in the evening. I have composed a Greek epigram to Eliza[351], and think she ought to be celebrated in as many different languages as Lewis le Grand[352]. Pray send me word when you will begin upon the poem, for it is a long way to walk. I would leave my Epigram, but have not daylight to transcribe it[353]. I am, Sir,
"Your"s, &c.,
"SAM. JOHNSON[354]."
[Page 123: Negotiations with Dodsley. aetat 29.]
"TO MR. CAVE.
[No date.]
"SIR,
"I am extremely obliged by your kind letter, and will not fail to attend you to-morrow with _Irene_, who looks upon you as one of her best friends.
"I was to day with Mr. Dodsley, who declares very warmly in favour of the paper you sent him, which he desires to have a share in, it being, as he says, _a creditable thing to be concerned in_. I knew not what answer to make till I had consulted you, nor what to demand on the authour"s part, but am very willing that, if you please, he should have a part in it, as he will undoubtedly be more diligent to disperse and promote it. If you can send me word to-morrow what I shall say to him, I will settle matters, and bring the poem with me for the press, which, as the town empties, we cannot be too quick with. I am, Sir,
"Your"s, &c.,
"SAM. JOHNSON."
[Page 124: Payment for London. A.D. 1738.]
To us who have long known the manly force, bold spirit, and masterly versification of this poem, it is a matter of curiosity to observe the diffidence with which its authour brought it forward into publick notice, while he is so cautious as not to avow it to be his own production; and with what humility he offers to allow the printer to "alter any stroke of satire which he might dislike[355]." That any such alteration was made, we do not know. If we did, we could not but feel an indignant regret; but how painful is it to see that a writer of such vigorous powers of mind was actually in such distress, that the small profit which so short a poem, however excellent, could yield, was courted as a "relief."
It has been generally said, I know not with what truth, that Johnson offered his _London_ to several booksellers, none of whom would purchase it. To this circ.u.mstance Mr. Derrick alludes in the following lines of his _Fortune, a Rhapsody_:
"Will no kind patron JOHNSON own?
Shall JOHNSON friendless range the town?
And every publisher refuse The offspring of his happy Muse[356]?"
But we have seen that the worthy, modest, and ingenious Mr. Robert Dodsley[357] had taste enough to perceive its uncommon merit, and thought it creditable to have a share in it. The fact is, that, at a future conference, he bargained for the whole property of it, for which he gave Johnson ten guineas[358]; who told me, "I might, perhaps, have accepted of less; but that Paul Whitehead had a little before got ten guineas for a poem and I would not take less than Paul Whitehead."
[Page 125: Paul Whitehead. aetat 29.]
I may here observe, that Johnson appeared to me to undervalue Paul Whitehead upon every occasion when he was mentioned, and, in my opinion, did not do him justice; but when it is considered that Paul Whitehead was a member of a riotous and profane club[359], we may account for Johnson"s having a prejudice against him. Paul Whitehead was, indeed, unfortunate in being not only slighted by Johnson, but violently attacked by Churchill, who utters the following imprecation:
"May I (can worse disgrace on manhood fall?) Be born a Whitehead, and baptiz"d a Paul[360]!"
yet I shall never be persuaded to think meanly of the authour of so brilliant and pointed a satire as _Manners_[361].
[Page 126: Was Richard Savage Thales? A.D. 1738.]
Johnson"s _London_ was published in May, 1738[362]; and it is remarkable, that it came out on the same morning with Pope"s satire, ent.i.tled "1738[363];" so that England had at once its Juvenal and Horace[364] as poetical monitors. The Reverend Dr. Douglas, now Bishop of Salisbury, to whom I am indebted for some obliging communications, was then a student at Oxford, and remembers well the effect which _London_ produced. Every body was delighted with it; and there being no name to it, the first buz of the literary circles was "here is an unknown poet, greater even than Pope." And it is recorded in the _Gentleman s Magazine_ of that year[365], that it "got to the second edition in the course of a week."
[Page 127: General Oglethorpe. aetat 29.]
One of the warmest patrons of this poem on its first appearance was General Oglethorpe, whose "strong benevolence of soul[366]," was unabated during the course of a very long life[367]; though it is painful to think, that he had but too much reason to become cold and callous, and discontented with the world, from the neglect which he experienced of his publick and private worth, by those in whose power it was to gratify so gallant a veteran with marks of distinction. This extraordinary person was as remarkable for his learning and taste, as for his other eminent qualities; and no man was more prompt, active, and generous, in encouraging merit. I have heard Johnson gratefully acknowledge, in his presence, the kind and effectual support which he gave to his _London_, though unacquainted with its authour.
[Page 128: Pope admires _London_. A.D. 1738.]
Pope, who then filled the poetical throne without a rival, it may reasonably be presumed, must have been particularly struck by the sudden appearance of such a poet; and, to his credit, let it be remembered, that his feelings and conduct on the occasion were candid and liberal.
He requested Mr. Richardson, son of the painter[368], to endeavour to find out who this new authour was. Mr. Richardson, after some inquiry, having informed him that he had discovered only that his name was Johnson, and that he was some obscure man, Pope said, "he will soon be _deterre_[369]."
We shall presently see, from a note written by Pope, that he was himself afterwards more successful in his inquiries than his friend.
[Page 129: Johnson a "true-born Englishman." aetat 29.]
That in this justly-celebrated poem may be found a few rhymes[370] which the critical precision of English prosody at this day would disallow, cannot be denied; but with this small imperfection, which in the general blaze of its excellence is not perceived, till the mind has subsided into cool attention, it is, undoubtedly, one of the n.o.blest productions in our language, both for sentiment and expression. The nation was then in that ferment against the court and the ministry, which some years after ended in the downfall of Sir Robert Walpole; and as it has been said, that Tories are Whigs when out of place, and Whigs, Tories when in place; so, as a Whig administration ruled with what force it could, a Tory opposition had all the animation and all the eloquence of resistance to power, aided by the common topicks of patriotism, liberty, and independence! Accordingly, we find in Johnson"s _London_ the most spirited invectives against tyranny and oppression, the warmest predilection for his own country, and the purest love of virtue; interspersed with traits of his own particular character and situation, not omitting his prejudices as a "true-born Englishman[371]," not only against foreign countries, but against Ireland and Scotland[372]. On some of these topicks I shall quote a few pa.s.sages:
[Page 130: Pa.s.sages from LONDON. A.D. 1738.]
"The cheated nation"s happy fav"rites see; Mark whom the great caress, who frown on me."
"Has heaven reserv"d in pity to the poor, No pathless waste, or undiscover"d sh.o.r.e?
No secret island in the boundless main?
No peaceful desert yet unclaim"d by Spain?
Quick let us rise, the happy seats explore, And bear Oppression"s insolence no more[373]."
"How, when compet.i.tors like these contend, Can _surly Virtue_ hope to fix a friend?"
"This mournful truth is every where confess"d, SLOW RISES WORTH, BY POVERTY DEPRESS"D[374]!"
We may easily conceive with what feeling a great mind like his, cramped and galled by narrow circ.u.mstances, uttered this last line, which he marked by capitals. The whole of the poem is eminently excellent, and there are in it such proofs of a knowledge of the world, and of a mature acquaintance with life, as cannot be contemplated without wonder, when we consider that he was then only in his twenty-ninth year, and had yet been so little in the "busy haunts of men[375]."
[Page 131: Sir Robert Walpole. aetat 29.]
Yet, while we admire the poetical excellence of this poem, candour obliges us to allow, that the flame of patriotism and zeal for popular resistance with which it is fraught, had no just cause. There was, in truth, no "oppression;" the "nation" was not "cheated." Sir Robert Walpole was a wise and a benevolent minister, who thought that the happiness and prosperity of a commercial country like ours, would be best promoted by peace, which he accordingly maintained, with credit, during a very long period. Johnson himself afterwards honestly acknowledged the merit of Walpole, whom he called "a fixed star;" while he characterised his opponent, Pitt, as "a meteor[376]." But Johnson"s juvenile poem was naturally impregnated with the fire of opposition, and upon every account was universally admired.
[Page 132: Appleby School. A.D. 1738.]
Though thus elevated into fame, and conscious of uncommon powers, he had not that bustling confidence, or, I may rather say, that animated ambition, which one might have supposed would have urged him to endeavour at rising in life. But such was his inflexible dignity of character, that he could not stoop to court the great; without which, hardly any man has made his way to a high station[377]. He could not expect to produce many such works as his _London_, and he felt the hardships of writing for bread; he was, therefore, willing to resume the office of a schoolmaster, so as to have a sure, though moderate income for his life; and an offer being made to him of the mastership of a school[378], provided he could obtain the degree of Master of Arts, Dr.
Adams was applied to, by a common friend, to know whether that could be granted him as a favour from the University of Oxford. But though he had made such a figure in the literary world, it was then thought too great a favour to be asked.
Hawkins (_Life_, p. 61) says that "Johnson went to Appleby in Aug. 1738, and offered himself as a candidate for the mastership." The date of 1738 seems to be Hawkins"s inference. If Johnson went at all, it was in 1739.