Murphy"s _Garrick_, p. 302. Johnson wrote to Mrs. Thrale from Lichfield, "Lucy [his step-daughter] thinks nothing of my prologue for Kelly, and says she has always disowned it." _Piozzi Letters_, i. 352.
[336] It was composed at a time when Savage was generally without lodging, and often without meat. Much of it was written with pen and ink that were borrowed, on paper that had been picked up in the streets. The unhappy poet "was obliged to submit himself wholly to the players, and admit with whatever reluctance the emendations of Mr. Cibber, which he always considered as the disgrace of his performance." When it was brought out, he himself took the part of Overbury. "He was so much ashamed of having been reduced to appear as a player, that he always blotted out his name from the list when a copy of his tragedy was to be shown to his friends." Johnson"s _Works_, viii. 110-112.
[337] It was not at Drury-lane, but at Covent Garden theatre, that it was acted. MALONE.
[338] Part First, Chap 4. BOSWELL. See _ante_ ii. 225.
[339] _Life of Richard Savage_, by Dr. Johnson. BOSWELL.
[340] See _ante_, i. 387, and _post_, May 17, 1783.
[341] Sheridan joined the Literary Club in March, 1777. _The Rivals_ and _The Duenna_ were brought out in 1775; _The Trip to Scarborough_ on Feb. 24, 1777, and _The School for Scandal_ in the following May.
Moore (_Life of Sheridan_, i. 168), speaking of _The Duenna_, says, "The run of this opera has, I believe, no parallel in the annals of the drama. Sixty-three nights was the career of _The Beggar"s Opera_; but _The Duenna_ was acted no less than seventy-five times during the season." _The Trip to Scarborough_ was a failure. Johnson, therefore, doubtless referred to _The Rivals_ and _The Duenna_.
[342] The date is wrongly given. Boswell says that he wrote again on June 23 (_post_, p. 120), and Johnson"s letter of June 28 is in answer to both letters. The right date is perhaps June 9.
[343] See Boswell"s _Hebrides_, under Nov. 11, 1773.
[344] See pp. 29, 30, of this volume. BOSWELL.
[345] Johnson, describing "the fond intimacy" of Quin and Thomson, says (_Works_, viii. 374):--"The commencement of this benevolence is very honourable to Quin, who is reported to have delivered Thomson, then known to him only for his genius, from an arrest by a very considerable present; and its continuance is honourable to both, for friendship is not always the sequel of obligation."
[346] See _ante_, ii. 63, and _post_, June 18, 1778.
[347] Formerly Sub-preceptor to his present Majesty, and afterwards a Commissioner of Excise. MALONE.
[348] The physician and poet. He died in 1779.
[349] Boswell nine years earlier (_ante_, ii. 63) had heard Johnson accuse Thomson of gross sensuality.
[350] "Savage, who lived much with Thomson, once told me he heard a lady remarking that she could gather from his works three parts of his character, that he was a great lover, a great swimmer, and rigorously abstinent; but, said Savage, he knows not any love but that of the s.e.x; he was perhaps never in cold water in his life; and he indulges himself in all the luxury that comes within his reach." Johnson"s _Works_, viii.
377.
[351] Dr. Johnson was not the _editor_ of this Collection of _The English Poets_; he merely furnished the biographical prefaces. MALONE.
See _post_, Sept. 14, 1777.
[352] See _ante_, under April 18, 1775.
[353] One letter he seems to have sent to him from this spot. See _ante_, ii. 3, note 1.
[354] Dr. Johnson had himself talked of our seeing Carlisle together.
_High_ was a favourite word of his to denote a person of rank. He said to me, "Sir, I believe we may at the house of a Roman Catholick lady in c.u.mberland; a high lady, Sir." I afterwards discovered he meant Mrs.
Strickland, sister of Charles Townley, Esq., whose very n.o.ble collection of pictures is not more to be admired, than his extraordinary and polite readiness in shewing it, which I and several of my friends have agreeably experienced. They who are possessed of valuable stores of gratification to persons of taste, should exercise their benevolence in imparting the pleasure. Grateful acknowledgments are due to Welbore Ellis Agar, Esq., for the liberal access which he is pleased to allow to his exquisite collection of pictures. BOSWELL.
[355] See Boswell"s _Hebrides_, Sept. 11, 1773.
[356] It is no doubt, on account of its brevity that Boswell in speaking of it writes:--"What is called _The Life_."
[357] See Boswell"s _Hebrides_, Oct, 29, 1773.
[358] See _ante_, under Feb. 7, 1775.
[359] See post, p. 139.
[360] See _ante_, i. 494.
[361] From Prior"s imitation of _Gualterus Danistonus ad Amicos_; the poem mentioned by Boswell in his _Hebrides_, Aug. 18, 1773.
[362] _Copy_ is _ma.n.u.script for printing_.
[363] Hawkins (_Life_, p. 521) says that the jury did not at the trial recommend Dodd to mercy. To one of the pet.i.tions "Mrs. Dodd first got the hands of the jury that found the bill against her husband, and after that, as it is supposed, of the jury that tried him." Ib. p. 527. He says that the public were at first very little interested in his fate, "but by various artifices, and particularly the insertion of his name in public papers, with such palliatives as he and his friends could invent, never with the epithet of _unfortunate_, they were betrayed into such an enthusiastic commiseration of his case as would have led a stranger to believe that himself had been no accessory to his distresses, but that they were the inflictions of Providence." Ib. p. 520. Johnson wrote to Dr. Taylor on May 19:--"Poor Dodd was sentenced last week.... I am afraid he will suffer. The clergy seem not to be his friends. The populace, that was extremely clamorous against him, begins to pity him.
_Notes and Queries_, 6th S., v. 423.
[364] Horace Walpole says "the criminal was raised to the dignity of a confessor in the eyes of the people--but an inexorable judge had already p.r.o.nounced his doom. Lord Mansfield, who never felt pity, and never relented unless terrified, had indecently declared for execution even before the judges had given their opinion. An incident that seemed favourable weighed down the vigorous [qu. rigorous] scale. The Common Council had presented a pet.i.tion for mercy to the king. Lord Mansfield, who hated the popular party as much as he loved severity, was not likely to be moved by such intercessors. At Court it grew the language that the king must discountenance such interposition." Walpole adds that "as an attempt to rescue Dodd might be apprehended, two thousand men were ordered to be reviewed in Hyde Park during the execution." _Journal of the Reign of George III_, ii. 125.
[365] Johnson, in the "_Observations_ inserted in the newspapers"
(_post_, p. 142), said "that though the people cannot judge of the administration of justice so well as their governors, yet their voice has always been regarded. That if the people now commit an error, their error is on the part of mercy; and that perhaps history cannot shew a time in which the life of a criminal, guilty of nothing above fraud, was refused to the cry of nations, to the joint supplication of three and twenty thousand pet.i.tioners." Hawkins"s _Johnson_, p. 528. Johnson"s earnestness as a pet.i.tioner contrasts with the scornful way in which he had spoken of pet.i.tions. "There must be no yielding to encourage this,"
the minister might have answered in his own words. _Ante_, ii. 90.
[366] The king signs no sentences or death warrants; but out of respect to the Royal perogative of mercy, expressed by the old adage, "_The King"s face gives grace_," the cases of criminals convicted in London, where the king is supposed to be resident, were reported to him by the recorder, that his Majesty might have an option of pardoning. Hence it was seriously doubted whether a recorder"s report need or, indeed, could be made at Windsor. All his Majesty did on these occasions was, to express verbally his a.s.sent or dissent to or from the execution of the sentence; and, though the King was on such occasions attended by his Ministers and the great legal Privy Councillors, the business was not technically a council business, but the individual act of the King.
On the accession of Queen Victoria, the nature of some cases that it might be necessary to report to her Majesty occasioned the abrogation of a practice which was certainly so far unreasonable that it made a difference between London and all the rest of the kingdom. CROKER. "I was exceedingly shocked," said Lord Eldon, "the first time I attended to hear the Recorder"s report, at the careless manner in which, as it appeared to me, it was conducted. We were called upon to decide on sentences affecting no less than the lives of men, and yet there was nothing laid before us to enable us to judge whether there had or had not been any extenuating circ.u.mstances; it was merely a recapitulation of the judge"s opinion and the sentence. I resolved that I never would attend another report, without having read and duly considered the whole of the evidence of each case, and I never did." Twiss"s _Eldon_, i.
398.
[367] Under-Secretary of State and a member of the Literary Club.
_Ante_, i. 478.
[368] Johnson does not here let Boswell know that he had written this address (_post_, p. 141). Wesley, two days before Dodd"s execution, records (_Journal_, iv. 99):--"I saw Dr. Dodd for the last time. He was in exactly such a temper as I wished. He never at any time expressed the least murmuring or resentment at any one; but entirely and calmly gave himself up to the will of G.o.d. Such a prisoner I scarce ever saw before; much less such a condemned malefactor. I should think none could converse with him without acknowledging that G.o.d is with him." In earlier years Wesley was more than once refused admittance to a man under sentence of death who was "earnestly desirous" to speak with him.
Wesley"s _Journal_, ed. 1827, i. 255, 292, 378.
[369] Between the Methodists and the Moravians there was no good-will.
In 1749 the Moravians published a declaration that "whosoever reckons that those persons in England who are usually called Moravians, and those who are called Methodists, are the same, he is mistaken."
Thereupon Wesley recorded in his _Journal_, ii. l20:--"The Methodists, so called, heartily thank Brother Louis for his Declaration; as they count it no honour to be in any connexion either with him or his Brethren."
[370] Since they have been so much honoured by Dr. Johnson I shall here insert them:
"TO MR. SAMUEL JOHNSON.
"MY EVER DEAR AND MUCH-RESPECTED SIR,
"You know my solemn enthusiasm of mind. You love me for it, and I respect myself for it, because in so far I resemble Mr. Johnson. You will be agreeably surprized when you learn the reason of my writing this letter. I am at Wittemberg in Saxony. I am in the old church where the Reformation was first preached, and where some of the reformers lie interred. I cannot resist the serious pleasure of writing to Mr. Johnson from the Tomb of Melancthon. My paper rests upon the gravestone of that great and good man, who was undoubtedly the worthiest of all the reformers. He wished to reform abuses which had been introduced into the Church; but had no private resentment to gratify. So mild was he, that when his aged mother consulted him with anxiety on the perplexing disputes of the times, he advised her "to keep to the old religion." At this tomb, then, my ever dear and respected friend! I vow to thee an eternal attachment. It shall be my study to do what I can to render your life happy: and, if you die before me, I shall endeavour to do honour to your memory; and, elevated by the remembrance of you, persist in n.o.ble piety. May G.o.d, the Father of all beings, ever bless you! and may you continue to love,
"Your most affectionate friend, and devoted servant, "JAMES BOSWELL."
"Sunday, Sept. 30, 1764."
"To DR. SAMUEL JOHNSON.
"Wilton-house, April 22, 1775.
"My DEAR SIR,
"Every scene of my life confirms the truth of what you have told me, "there is no certain happiness in this state of being."--I am here, amidst all that you know is at Lord Pembroke"s; and yet I am weary and gloomy. I am just setting out for the house of an old friend in Devonshire, and shall not get back to London for a week yet. You said to me last Good-Friday, with a cordiality that warmed my heart, that if I came to settle in London, we should have a day fixed every week, to meet by ourselves and talk freely. To be thought worthy of such a privilege cannot but exalt me. During my present absence from you, while, notwithstanding the gaiety which you allow me to possess, I am darkened by temporary clouds, I beg to have a few lines from you; a few lines merely of kindness, as--a _viatic.u.m_ till I see you again. In your _Vanity of Human Wishes_, and in Parnell"s _Contentment_, I find the only sure means of enjoying happiness; or, at least, the hopes of happiness. I ever am, with reverence and affection,