There was a Muslim shop next door. The little loggia of my grandmother"s shop ended against his blank wall. The man"s name was Mian. That was all that we knew of him and his family. I suppose we must have seen him, but I have no mental picture of him now. We knew nothing of Muslims. This idea of strangeness, of the thing to be kept outside, extended even to other Hindus. For example, we ate rice in the middle of the day, and wheat in the evenings. There were some extraordinary people who reversed this natural order and ate rice in the evenings. I thought of these people as strangers-you must imagine me at this time as under seven, because when I was seven all this life of my grandmother"s house in Chaguanas came to an end for me. We moved to the capital, and then to the hills to the north-west.
But the habits of mind engendered by this shut-in and shutting-out life lingered for quite a while. If it were not for the short stories my father wrote I would have known almost nothing about the general life of our Indian community. Those stories gave me more than knowledge. They gave me a kind of solidity. They gave me something to stand on in the world. I cannot imagine what my mental picture would have been without those stories.
The world outside existed in a kind of darkness; and we inquired about nothing. I was just old enough to have some idea of the Indian epics, the Ramayana Ramayana in particular. The children who came five years or so after me in our extended family didn"t have this luck. No one taught us Hindi. Sometimes someone wrote out the alphabet for us to learn, and that was that; we were expected to do the rest ourselves. So, as English penetrated, we began to lose our language. My grandmother"s house was full of religion; there were many ceremonies and readings, some of which went on for days. But no one explained or translated for us who could no longer follow the language. So our ancestral faith receded, became mysterious, not pertinent to our day-to-day life. in particular. The children who came five years or so after me in our extended family didn"t have this luck. No one taught us Hindi. Sometimes someone wrote out the alphabet for us to learn, and that was that; we were expected to do the rest ourselves. So, as English penetrated, we began to lose our language. My grandmother"s house was full of religion; there were many ceremonies and readings, some of which went on for days. But no one explained or translated for us who could no longer follow the language. So our ancestral faith receded, became mysterious, not pertinent to our day-to-day life.
We made no inquiries about India or about the families people had left behind. When our ways of thinking had changed, and we wished to know, it was too late. I know nothing of the people on my father"s side; I know only that some of them came from Nepal. Two years ago a kind Nepalese who liked my name sent me a copy of some pages from an 1872 gazetteer-like British work about India, Hindu Castes and Tribes as Represented in Benares; Hindu Castes and Tribes as Represented in Benares; the pages listed-among a mult.i.tude of names-those groups of Nepalese in the holy city of Banaras who carried the name Naipal. That is all that I have. the pages listed-among a mult.i.tude of names-those groups of Nepalese in the holy city of Banaras who carried the name Naipal. That is all that I have.
Away from this world of my grandmother"s house, where we ate rice in the middle of the day and wheat in the evenings, there was the great unknown-in this island of only 400,000 people. There were the African or African-derived people who were the majority. They were policemen; they were teachers. One of them was my very first teacher at the Chaguanas Government School; I remembered her with adoration for years. There was the capital, where very soon we would all have to go for education and jobs, and where we would settle permanently, among strangers. There were the white people, not all of them English; and the Portuguese and the Chinese, at one time also immigrants like us. And, more mysterious than these, were the people we called Spanish, "pagnols, "pagnols, mixed people of warm brown complexions who came from the Spanish time, before the island was detached from Venezuela and the Spanish empire-a kind of history absolutely beyond my child"s comprehension. mixed people of warm brown complexions who came from the Spanish time, before the island was detached from Venezuela and the Spanish empire-a kind of history absolutely beyond my child"s comprehension.
To give you this idea of my background, I have had to call on knowledge and ideas that came to me much later, princ.i.p.ally from my writing. As a child I knew almost nothing, nothing beyond what I had picked up in my grandmother"s house. All children, I suppose, come into the world like that, not knowing who they are. But for the French child, say, that knowledge is waiting. That knowledge will be all around them. It will come indirectly from the conversation of their elders. It will be in the newspapers and on the radio. And at school the work of generations of scholars, scaled down for school texts, will provide some idea of France and the French.
In Trinidad, bright boy though I was, I was surrounded by areas of darkness. School elucidated nothing for me. I was crammed with facts and formulas. Everything had to be learned by heart; everything was abstract for me. Again, I do not believe there was a plan or plot to make our courses like that. What we were getting was standard school learning. In another setting it would have made sense. And at least some of the failing would have lain in me. With my limited social background it was hard for me imaginatively to enter into other societies or societies that were far away. I loved the idea of books, but I found it hard to read them. I got on best with things like Andersen and Aesop, timeless, placeless, not excluding. And when at last in the sixth form, the highest form in the college, I got to like some of our literature texts-Moliere, Cyrano de Bergerac-I suppose it was because they had the quality of the fairytale.
When I became a writer those areas of darkness around me as a child became my subjects. The land; the aborigines; the New World; the colony; the history; India; the Muslim world, to which I also felt myself related; Africa; and then England, where I was doing my writing. That was what I meant when I said that my books stand one on the other, and that I am the sum of my books. That was what I meant when I said that my background, the source and prompting of my work, was at once exceedingly simple and exceedingly complicated. You will have seen how simple it was in the country town of Chaguanas. And I think you will understand how complicated it was for me as a writer. Especially in the beginning, when the literary models I had-the models given me by what I can only call my false learning-dealt with entirely different societies. But perhaps you might feel that the material was so rich it would have been no trouble at all to get started and to go on. What I have said about the background, however, comes from the knowledge I acquired with my writing. And you must believe me when I tell you that the pattern in my work has only become clear in the last two months or so. Pa.s.sages from old books were read to me, and I saw the connections. Until then the greatest trouble for me was to describe my writing to people, to say what I had done.
I said I was an intuitive writer. That was so, and that remains so now, when I am nearly at the end. I never had a plan. I followed no system. I worked intuitively. My aim every time was to do a book, to create something that would be easy and interesting to read. At every stage I could only work within my knowledge and sensibility and talent and world view. Those things developed book by book. And I had to do the books I did because there were no books about those subjects to give me what I wanted. I had to clear up my world, elucidate it, for myself.
I had to go to the doc.u.ments in the British Museum and elsewhere, to get the true feel of the history of the colony. I had to travel to India because there was no one to tell me what the India my grandparents had come from was like. There was the writing of Nehru and Gandhi; and strangely it was Gandhi, with his South African experience, who gave me more, but not enough. There was Kipling; there were British-Indian writers like John Masters (going very strong in the 1950s, with an announced plan, later abandoned, I fear, for thirty-five connected novels about British India); there were romances by women writers. The few Indian writers who had come up at that time were middle-cla.s.s people, town-dwellers; they didn"t know the India we had come from.
And when that Indian need was satisfied, others became apparent: Africa, South America, the Muslim world. The aim has always been to fill out my world picture, and the purpose comes from my childhood: to make me more at ease with myself. Kind people have sometimes written asking me to go and write about Germany, say, or China. But there is much good writing already about those places; I am willing to depend there on the writing that exists. And those subjects are for other people. Those were not the areas of darkness I felt about me as a child. So, just as there is a development in my work, a development in narrative skill and knowledge and sensibility, so there is a kind of unity, a focus, though I might appear to be going in many directions.
When I began I had no idea of the way ahead. I wished only to do a book. I was trying to write in England, where I stayed on after my years at the university, and it seemed to me that my experience was very thin, was not truly of the stuff of books. I could find in no book anything that came near my background. The young French or English person who wished to write would have found any number of models to set him on his way. I had none. My father"s stories about our Indian community belonged to the past. My world was quite different. It was more urban, more mixed. The simple physical details of the chaotic life of our extended family-sleeping rooms or sleeping s.p.a.ces, eating times, the sheer number of people-seemed impossible to handle. There was too much to be explained, both about my home life and about the world outside. And at the same time there was also too much about us-like our own ancestry and history-that I didn"t know.
At last one day there came to me the idea of starting with the Port of Spain street to which we had moved from Chaguanas. There was no big corrugated-iron gate shutting out the world there. The life of the street was open to me. It was an intense pleasure for me to observe it from the verandah. This street life was what I began to write about. I wished to write fast, to avoid too much self-questioning, and so I simplified. I suppressed the child-narrator"s background. I ignored the racial and social complexities of the street. I explained nothing. I stayed at ground level, so to speak. I presented people only as they appeared on the street. I wrote a story a day. The first stories were very short. I was worried about the material lasting long enough. But then the writing did its magic. The material began to present itself to me from many sources. The stories became longer; they couldn"t be written in a day. And then the inspiration, which at one stage had seemed very easy, rolling me along, came to an end. But a book had been written, and I had in my own mind become a writer.
The distance between the writer and his material grew with the two later books; the vision was wider. And then intuition led me to a large book about our family life. During this book my writing ambition grew. But when it was over I felt I had done all that I could do with my island material. No matter how much I meditated on it, no further fiction would come.
Accident, then, rescued me. I became a traveller. I travelled in the Caribbean region and understood much more about the colonial set-up of which I had been part. I went to India, my ancestral land, for a year; it was a journey that broke my life in two. The books that I wrote about these two journeys took me to new realms of emotion, gave me a world view I had never had, extended me technically. I was able in the fiction that then came to me to take in England as well as the Caribbean-and how hard that was to do. I was able also to take in all the racial groups of the island, which I had never before been able to do.
This new fiction was about colonial shame and fantasy, a book, in fact, about how the powerless lie about themselves, and lie to themselves, since it is their only resource. The book was called The Mimic Men. The Mimic Men. And it was not about mimics. It was about colonial men mimicking the condition of manhood, men who had grown to distrust everything about themselves. Some pages of this book were read to me the other day-I hadn"t looked at it for more than thirty years-and it occurred to me that I had been writing about colonial schizophrenia. But I hadn"t thought of it like that. I had never used abstract words to describe any writing purpose of mine. If I had, I would never have been able to do the book. The book was done intuitively, and only out of close observation. And it was not about mimics. It was about colonial men mimicking the condition of manhood, men who had grown to distrust everything about themselves. Some pages of this book were read to me the other day-I hadn"t looked at it for more than thirty years-and it occurred to me that I had been writing about colonial schizophrenia. But I hadn"t thought of it like that. I had never used abstract words to describe any writing purpose of mine. If I had, I would never have been able to do the book. The book was done intuitively, and only out of close observation.
I have done this little survey of the early part of my career to try to show the stages by which, in just ten years, my birthplace had altered or developed in my writing: from the comedy of street life to a study of a kind of widespread schizophrenia. What was simple had become complicated.
Both fiction and the travel-book form have given me my way of looking; and you will understand why for me all literary forms are equally valuable. It came to me, for instance, when I set out to write my third book about India-twenty-six years after the first-that what was most important about a travel book were the people the writer travelled among. The people had to define themselves. A simple enough idea, but it required a new kind of book; it called for a new way of travelling. And it was the very method I used later when I went, for the second time, into the Muslim world.
I have always moved by intuition alone. I have no system, literary or political. I have no guiding political idea. I think that probably lies with my ancestry. The Indian writer R. K. Narayan, who died this year, had no political idea. My father, who wrote his stories in a very dark time, and for no reward, had no political idea. Perhaps it is because we have been far from authority for many centuries. It gives us a special point of view. I feel we are more inclined to see the humour and pity of things.
Nearly thirty years ago I went to Argentina. It was at the time of the guerrilla crisis. People were waiting for the old dictator Peron to come back from exile. The country was full of hate. Peronists were waiting to settle old scores. One such man said to me, "There is good torture and bad torture." Good torture was what you did to the enemies of the people. Bad torture was what the enemies of the people did to you. People on the other side were saying the same thing. There was no true debate about anything. There was only pa.s.sion and the borrowed political jargon of Europe. I wrote, "Where jargon turns living issues into abstractions, and where jargon ends by competing with jargon, people don"t have causes. They only have enemies."
And the pa.s.sions of Argentina are still working themselves out, still defeating reason and consuming lives. No resolution is in sight.
I am near the end of my work now. I am glad to have done what I have done, glad creatively to have pushed myself as far as I could go. Because of the intuitive way in which I have written, and also because of the baffling nature of my material, every book has come as a blessing. Every book has amazed me; up to the moment of writing I never knew it was there. But the greatest miracle for me was getting started. I feel-and the anxiety is still vivid to me-that I might easily have failed before I began.
I will end as I began, with one of the marvellous little essays of Proust in Against Sainte-Beuve. Against Sainte-Beuve. "The beautiful things we shall write if we have talent," Proust says, "are inside us, indistinct, like the memory of a melody which delights us though we are unable to recapture its outline. Those who are obsessed by this blurred memory of truths they have never known are the men who are gifted ... Talent is like a sort of memory which will enable them finally to bring this indistinct music closer to them, to hear it clearly, to note it down ...." "The beautiful things we shall write if we have talent," Proust says, "are inside us, indistinct, like the memory of a melody which delights us though we are unable to recapture its outline. Those who are obsessed by this blurred memory of truths they have never known are the men who are gifted ... Talent is like a sort of memory which will enable them finally to bring this indistinct music closer to them, to hear it clearly, to note it down ...."
Talent, Proust says. I would say luck, and much labour.
2001.
CREDITS.
Some of the essays in this work have been previously published in the following:
"Conrad"s Darkness and Mine": New York Review of Books New York Review of Books (1974) (1974) "East Indian": The Reporter The Reporter (7 June 1965), and subsequently in (7 June 1965), and subsequently in The Overcrowded Barracon The Overcrowded Barracon (Andre Deutsch, 1972) (Andre Deutsch, 1972) "Foreword to The Adventures of Gurudeva The Adventures of Gurudeva": The Adventures of Gurudeva The Adventures of Gurudeva (Andre Deutsch, June 1975) (Andre Deutsch, June 1975) "Foreword to A House for Mr. Biswas A House for Mr. Biswas": A House for Mr. Biswas A House for Mr. Biswas (Alfred A. Knopf, 1983) (Alfred A. Knopf, 1983) "Indian Autobiographies": New Statesman New Statesman (29 January 1965), and subsequently in (29 January 1965), and subsequently in The Overcrowded Barracon The Overcrowded Barracon (Andre Deutsch, 1972) (Andre Deutsch, 1972) "Jasmine": The Times Literary Supplement The Times Literary Supplement (4 June 1964), and subsequently in (4 June 1964), and subsequently in The Overcrowded Barracon The Overcrowded Barracon (Andre Deutsch, 1972) (Andre Deutsch, 1972) "The Last of the Aryans": Encounter Encounter (January 1966), and subsequently in (January 1966), and subsequently in The Overcrowded Barracon The Overcrowded Barracon (Andre Deutsch, 1972) (Andre Deutsch, 1972) "Prologue to an Autobiography": Finding the Center Finding the Center (Alfred A. Knopf, 1984) (Alfred A. Knopf, 1984) "Reading and Writing, a Personal Account": New York Review of Books New York Review of Books (1999) (1999) "Theatrical Natives": New Statesman New Statesman (2 December 1966), and subsequently in (2 December 1966), and subsequently in The Overcrowded Barracon The Overcrowded Barracon (Andre Deutsch, 1972) (Andre Deutsch, 1972) "Two Worlds (the n.o.bel Lecture)": 7 December 2001 (www.n.o.bel.se/literature/laureate/2001/naipaul-lecture-e.html)
A NOTE ABOUT THE AUTHOR.
V. S. Naipaul was born in Trinidad in 1932. He went to England on a scholarship in 1950. After four years at University College, Oxford, he began to write, and since then has followed no other profession. He has published more than twenty books of fiction and nonfiction, including Half a Life, A House for Mr. Biswas, A Bend in the River, Half a Life, A House for Mr. Biswas, A Bend in the River, and a collection of letters, and a collection of letters, Between Father and Son. Between Father and Son. In 2001 he was awarded the n.o.bel Prize in Literature. The citation of the Swedish Academy praised his "having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories." In 2001 he was awarded the n.o.bel Prize in Literature. The citation of the Swedish Academy praised his "having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories."