WOMAN-AN OPINION
ADDRESS AT AN EARLY BANQUET OF THE WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENTS" CLUB
The twelfth toast was as follows: "Woman-The pride of any profession, and the jewel of ours."
MR. PRESIDENT,-I do not know why I should be singled out to receive the greatest distinction of the evening-for so the office of replying to the toast of woman has been regarded in every age. I do not know why I have received his distinction, unless it be that I am a trifle less homely than the other members of the club. But be this as it may, Mr. President, I am proud of the position, and you could not have chosen any one who would have accepted it more gladly, or labored with a heartier good-will to do the subject justice than I-because, sir, I love the s.e.x. I love all the women, irrespective of age or color.
Human intellect cannot estimate what we owe to woman, sir. She sews on our b.u.t.tons; she mends our clothes; she ropes us in at the church fairs; she confides in us; she tells us whatever she can find out about the little private affairs of the neighbors; she gives us good advice, and plenty of it; she soothes our aching brows; she bears our children-ours as a general thing. In all relations of life, sir, it is but a just and graceful tribute to woman to say of her that she is a brick.
Wheresoever you place woman, sir-in whatever position or estate-she is an ornament to the place she occupies, and a treasure to the world. [Here Mr. Clemens paused, looked inquiringly at his hearers, and remarked that the applause should come in at this point. It came in. He resumed his eulogy.] Look at Cleopatra! look at Desdemona!-look at Florence Nightingale!-look at Joan of Arc!-look at Lucretia Borgia! [Disapprobation expressed.] Well [said Mr. Clemens, scratching his head, doubtfully], suppose we let Lucretia slide. Look at Joyce Heth!-look at Mother Eve! You need not look at her unless you want to, but [said Mr. Clemens, reflectively, after a pause] Eve was ornamental, sir-particularly before the fashions changed. I repeat, sir, look at the ill.u.s.trious names of history. Look at the Widow Machree!-look at Lucy Stone!-look at Elizabeth Cady Stanton!-look at George Francis Train! And, sir, I say it with bowed head and deepest veneration-look at the mother of Washington! She raised a boy that could not tell a lie-could not tell a lie! But he never had any chance. It might have been different if he had belonged to the Washington Newspaper Correspondents" Club.
I repeat, sir, that in whatever position you place a woman she is an ornament to society and a treasure to the world. As a sweetheart, she has few equals and no superiors; as a cousin, she is convenient; as a wealthy grandmother with an incurable distemper, she is precious; as a wetnurse, she has no equal among men.
What, sir, would the people of the earth be without woman? They would be scarce, sir, almighty scarce. Then let us cherish her; let us protect her; let us give her our support, our encouragement, our sympathy, ourselves-if we get a chance.
But, jesting aside, Mr. President, woman is lovable, gracious, kind of heart, beautiful-worthy of all respect, of all esteem, of all deference. Not any here will refuse to drink her health right cordially in this b.u.mper of wine, for each and every one has personally known, and loved, and honored the very best one of them all-his own mother.
ADVICE TO GIRLS
In 1907 a young girl whom Mr. Clemens met on the steamer Minnehaha called him "grandpa," and he called her his granddaughter. She was attending St. Timothy"s School, at Catonsville, Maryland, and Mr. Clemens promised her to see her graduate. He accordingly made the journey from New York on June 10, 1909, and delivered a short address.
I don"t know what to tell you girls to do. Mr. Martin has told you everything you ought to do, and now I must give you some don"ts.
There are three things which come to my mind which I consider excellent advice: First, girls, don"t smoke-that is, don"t smoke to excess. I am seventy-three and a half years old, and have been smoking seventy-three of them. But I never smoke to excess-that is, I smoke in moderation, only one cigar at a time.
Second, don"t drink-that is, don"t drink to excess.
Third, don"t marry-I mean, to excess.
Honesty is the best policy. That is an old proverb; but you don"t want ever to forget it in your journey through life.
TAXES AND MORALS
ADDRESS DELIVERED IN NEW YORK, JANUARY 22, 1906
At the twenty-fifth anniversary of the founding of Tuskeegee Inst.i.tute by Booker Washington, Mr. Choate presided, and in introducing Mr. Clemens made fun of him because he made play his work, and that when he worked hardest he did so lying in bed.
I came here in the responsible capacity of policeman to watch Mr. Choate. This is an occasion of grave and serious importance, and it seems necessary for me to be present, so that if he tried to work off any statement that required correction, reduction, refutation, or exposure, there would be a tried friend of the public to protect the house. He has not made one statement whose veracity fails to tally exactly with my own standard. I have never seen a person improve so. This makes me thankful and proud of a country that can produce such men-two such men. And all in the same country. We can"t be with you always; we are pa.s.sing away, and then-well, everything will have to stop, I reckon. It is a sad thought. But in spirit I shall still be with you. Choate, too-if he can.
Every born American among the eighty millions, let his creed or dest.i.tution of creed be what it may, is indisputably a Christian-to this degree that his moral const.i.tution is Christian.
There are two kinds of Christian morals, one private and the other public. These two are so distinct, so unrelated, that they are no more akin to each other than are archangels and politicians. During three hundred and sixty-three days in the year the American citizen is true to his Christian private morals, and keeps undefiled the nation"s character at its best and highest; then in the other two days of the year he leaves his Christian private morals at home and carries his Christian public morals to the tax office and the polls, and does the best he can to damage and undo his whole year"s faithful and righteous work. Without a blush he will vote for an unclean boss if that boss is his party"s Moses, without compunction he will vote against the best man in the whole land if he is on the other ticket. Every year in a number of cities and States he helps put corrupt men in office, whereas if he would but throw away his Christian public morals, and carry his Christian private morals to the polls, he could promptly purify the public service and make the possession of office a high and honorable distinction.
Once a year he lays aside his Christian private morals and hires a ferry-boat and piles up his bonds in a warehouse in New Jersey for three days, and gets out his Christian public morals and goes to the tax office and holds up his hands and swears he wishes he may never-never if he"s got a cent in the world, so help him. The next day the list appears in the papers-a column and a quarter of names, in fine print, and every man in the list a billionaire and member of a couple of churches. I know all those people. I have friendly, social, and criminal relations with the whole lot of them. They never miss a sermon when they are so"s to be around, and they never miss swearing-off day, whether they are so"s to be around or not.
I used to be an honest man. I am crumbling. No-I have crumbled. When they a.s.sessed me at $75,000 a fortnight ago I went out and tried to borrow the money, and couldn"t; then when I found they were letting a whole crop of millionaires live in New York at a third of the price they were charging me I was hurt, I was indignant, and said: "This is the last feather. I am not going to run this town all by myself." In that moment-in that memorable moment-I began to crumble. In fifteen minutes the disintegration was complete. In fifteen minutes I had become just a mere moral sand-pile; and I lifted up my hand along with those seasoned and experienced deacons and swore off every rag of personal property I"ve got in the world, clear down to cork leg, gla.s.s eye, and what is left of my wig.
Those tax officers were moved; they were profoundly moved. They had long been accustomed to seeing hardened old grafters act like that, and they could endure the spectacle; but they were expecting better things of me, a chartered, professional moralist, and they were saddened.
I fell visibly in their respect and esteem, and I should have fallen in my own, except that I had already struck bottom, and there wasn"t any place to fall to.
At Tuskeegee they will jump to misleading conclusions from insufficient evidence, along with Doctor Parkhurst, and they will deceive the student with the superst.i.tion that no gentleman ever swears.
Look at those good millionaires; aren"t they gentlemen? Well, they swear. Only once in a year, maybe, but there"s enough bulk to it to make up for the lost time. And do they lose anything by it? No, they don"t; they save enough in three minutes to support the family seven years. When they swear, do we shudder? No-unless they say "d.a.m.n!" Then we do. It shrivels us all up. Yet we ought not to feel so about it, because we all swear-everybody. Including the ladies. Including Doctor Parkhurst, that strong and brave and excellent citizen, but superficially educated.
For it is not the word that is the sin, it is the spirit back of the word. When an irritated lady says "oh!" the spirit back of it is "d.a.m.n!" and that is the way it is going to be recorded against her. It always makes me so sorry when I hear a lady swear like that. But if she says "d.a.m.n," and says it in an amiable, nice way, it isn"t going to be recorded at all.
The idea that no gentleman ever swears is all wrong; he can swear and still be a gentleman if he does it in a nice and, benevolent and affectionate way. The historian, John Fiske, whom I knew well and loved, was a spotless and most n.o.ble and upright Christian gentleman, and yet he swore once. Not exactly that, maybe; still, he-but I will tell you about it.
One day, when he was deeply immersed in his work, his wife came in, much moved and profoundly distressed, and said: "I am sorry to disturb you, John, but I must, for this is a serious matter, and needs to be attended to at once."
Then, lamenting, she brought a grave accusation against their little son. She said: "He has been saying his Aunt Mary is a fool and his Aunt Martha is a d.a.m.ned fool." Mr. Fiske reflected upon the matter a minute, then said: "Oh, well, it"s about the distinction I should make between them myself."
Mr. Washington, I beg you to convey these teachings to your great and prosperous and most beneficent educational inst.i.tution, and add them to the prodigal mental and moral riches wherewith you equip your fortunate proteges for the struggle of life.
TAMMANY AND CROKER
Mr. Clemens made his debut as a campaign orator on October 7, 1901, advocating the election of Seth Low for Mayor, not as a Republican, but as a member of the "Acorns," which he described as a "third party having no political affiliation, but was concerned only in the selection of the best candidates and the best member."
Great Britain had a Tammany and a Croker a good while ago. This Tammany was in India, and it began its career with the spread of the English dominion after the Battle of Pla.s.sey. Its first boss was Clive, a sufficiently crooked person sometimes, but straight as a yard stick when compared with the corkscrew crookedness of the second boss, Warren Hastings.
That old-time Tammany was the East India Company"s government, and had its headquarters at Calcutta. Ostensibly it consisted of a Great Council of four persons, of whom one was the Governor-General, Warren Hastings; really it consisted of one person-Warren Hastings; for by usurpation he concentrated all authority in himself and governed the country like an autocrat.
Ostensibly the Court of Directors, sitting in London and representing the vast interests of the stockholders, was supreme in authority over the Calcutta Great Council, whose membership it appointed and removed at pleasure, whose policies it dictated, and to whom it conveyed its will in the form of sovereign commands; but whenever it suited Hastings, he ignored even that august body"s authority and conducted the mighty affairs of the British Empire in India to suit his own notions.
At his mercy was the daily bread of every official, every trader, every clerk, every civil servant, big and little, in the whole huge India Company"s machine, and the man who hazarded his bread by any failure of subserviency to the boss lost it.
Now then, let the supreme masters of British India, the giant corporation of the India Company of London, stand for the voters of the city of New York; let the Great Council of Calcutta stand for Tammany; let the corrupt and money-grubbing great hive of serfs which served under the Indian Tammany"s rod stand for New York Tammany"s serfs; let Warren Hastings stand for Richard Croker, and it seems to me that the parallel is exact and complete. And so let us be properly grateful and thank G.o.d and our good luck that we didn"t invent Tammany.
Edmund Burke, regarded by many as the greatest orator of all times, conducted the case against Warren Hastings in that renowned trial which lasted years, and which promises to keep its renown for centuries to come. I wish to quote some of the things he said. I wish to imagine him arraigning Mr. Croker and Tammany before the voters of New York City and pleading with them for the overthrow of that combined iniquity of the 5th of November, and will subst.i.tute for "My Lords," read "Fellow-Citizens"; for "Kingdom," read "City"; for "Parliamentary Process," read "Political Campaign"; for "Two Houses," read "Two Parties," and so it reads: "Fellow-citizens, I must look upon it as an auspicious circ.u.mstance to this cause, in which the honor of the city is involved, that from the first commencement of our political campaign to this the hour of solemn trial not the smallest difference of opinion has arisen, between the two parties.
"You will see, in the progress of this cause, that there is not only a long, connected, systematic series of misdemeanors, but an equally connected system of maxims and principles invented to justify them. Upon both of these you must judge.
"It is not only the interest of the city of New York, now the most considerable part of the city of the Americans, which is concerned, but the credit and honor of the nation itself will be decided by this decision."
At a later meeting of the Acorn Club, Mr. Clemens said: Tammany is dead, and there"s no use in blackguarding a corpse.
The election makes me think of a story of a man who was dying. He had only two minutes to live, so he sent for a clergyman and asked him, "Where is the best place to go to?" He was undecided about it. So the minister told him that each place had its advantages-heaven for climate, and h.e.l.l for society.
MUNIc.i.p.aL CORRUPTION
ADDRESS AT THE CITY CLUB DINNER, JANUARY 4,1901
Bishop Potter told how an alleged representative of Tammany Hall asked him in effect if he would cease his warfare upon the Police Department if a certain captain and inspector were dismissed. He replied that he would never be satisfied until the "man at the top" and the "system" which permitted evils in the Police Department were crushed.
The Bishop has just spoken of a condition of things which none of us can deny, and which ought not to exist; that is, the l.u.s.t of gain-a l.u.s.t which does not stop short of the penitentiary or the jail to accomplish its ends. But we may be sure of one thing, and that is that this sort of thing is not universal. If it were, this country would not be. You may put this down as a fact: that out of every fifty men, forty-nine are clean. Then why is it, you may ask, that the forty-nine don"t have things the way they want them? I"ll tell you why it is. A good deal has been said here to-night about what is to be accomplished by organization. That"s just the thing. It"s because the fiftieth fellow and his pals are organized and the other forty-nine are not that the dirty one rubs it into the clean fellows every time.
You may say organize, organize, organize; but there may be so much organization that it will interfere with the work to be done. The Bishop here had an experience of that sort, and told all about it down-town the other night. He was painting a barn-it was his own barn-and yet he was informed that his work must stop; he was a non-union painter, and couldn"t continue at that sort of job.
Now, all these conditions of which you complain should be remedied, and I am here to tell you just how to do it. I"ve been a statesman without salary for many years, and I have accomplished great and widespread good. I don"t know that it has benefited anybody very much, even if it was good; but I do know that it hasn"t harmed me very much, and is hasn"t made me any richer.
We hold the balance of power. Put up your best men for office, and we shall support the better one. With the election of the best man for Mayor would follow the selection of the best man for Police Commissioner and Chief of Police.
My first lesson in the craft of statesmanship was taken at an early age. Fifty-one years ago I was fourteen years old, and we had a society in the town I lived in, patterned after the Freemasons, or the Ancient Order of United Farmers, or some such thing-just what it was patterned after doesn"t matter. It had an inside guard and an outside guard, and a past-grand warden, and a lot of such things, so as to give dignity to the organization and offices to the members.
Generally speaking it was a pretty good sort of organization, and some of the very best boys in the village, including-but I mustn"t get personal on an occasion like this-and the society would have got along pretty well had it not been for the fact that there were a certain number of the members who could be bought. They got to be an infernal nuisance. Every time we had an election the candidates had to go around and see the purchasable members. The price per vote was paid in doughnuts, and it depended somewhat on the appet.i.tes of the individuals as to the price of the votes.
This thing ran along until some of us, the really very best boys in the organization, decided that these corrupt practices must stop, and for the purpose of stopping them we organized a third party. We had a name, but we were never known by that name. Those who didn"t like us called us the Anti-Doughnut party, but we didn"t mind that.
We said: "Call us what you please; the name doesn"t matter. We are organized for a principle." By-and-by the election came around, and we made a big mistake. We were triumphantly beaten. That taught us a lesson. Then and there we decided never again to nominate anybody for anything. We decided simply to force the other two parties in the society to nominate their very best men. Although we were organized for a principle, we didn"t care much about that. Principles aren"t of much account anyway, except at election-time. After that you hang them up to let them season.
The next time we had an election we told both the other parties that we"d beat any candidates put up by any one of them of whom we didn"t approve. In that election we did business. We got the man we wanted. I suppose they called us the Anti-Doughnut party because they couldn"t buy us with their doughnuts. They didn"t have enough of them. Most reformers arrive at their price sooner or later, and I suppose we would have had our price; but our opponents weren"t offering anything but doughnuts, and those we spurned.
Now it seems to me that an Anti-Doughnut party is just what is wanted in the present emergency. I would have the Anti-Doughnuts felt in every city and hamlet and school district in this State and in the United States. I was an Anti-Doughnut in my boyhood, and I"m an Anti-Doughnut still. The modern designation is Mugwump. There used to be quite a number of us Mugwumps, but I think I"m the only one left. I had a vote this fall, and I began to make some inquiries as to what I had better do with it.
I don"t know anything about finance, and I never did, but I know some pretty shrewd financiers, and they told me that Mr. Bryan wasn"t safe on any financial question. I said to myself, then, that it wouldn"t do for me to vote for Bryan, and I rather thought-I know now-that McKinley wasn"t just right on this Philippine question, and so I just didn"t vote for anybody. I"ve got that vote yet, and I"ve kept it clean, ready to deposit at some other election. It wasn"t cast for any wildcat financial theories, and it wasn"t cast to support the man who sends our boys as volunteers out into the Philippines to get shot down under a polluted flag.
MUNIc.i.p.aL GOVERNMENT
ADDRESS AT THE ANNUAL DINNER OF THE ST. NICHOLAS SOCIETY, NEW YORK, DECEMBER 6, 1900.
Doctor Mackay, in his response to the toast "St. Nicholas,"
referred to Mr. Clemens, saying:-"Mark Twain is as true a preacher of true righteousness as any bishop, priest, or minister of any church to-day, because he moves men to forget their faults by cheerful well-doing instead of making them sour and morbid by everlastingly bending their attention to the seamy and sober side of life."
MR. CHAIRMAN AND GENTLEMEN OF THE ST. NICHOLAS SOCIETY,-These are, indeed, prosperous days for me. Night before last, in a speech, the Bishop of the Diocese of New York complimented me for my contribution to theology, and to-night the Reverend Doctor Mackay has elected me to the ministry. I thanked Bishop Potter then for his compliment, and I thank Doctor Mackay now for that promotion. I think that both have discerned in me what I long ago discerned, but what I was afraid the world would never learn to recognize.
In this absence of nine years I find a great improvement in the city of New York. I am glad to speak on that as a toast-"The City of New York." Some say it has improved because I have been away. Others, and I agree with them, say it has improved because I have come back. We must judge of a city, as of a man, by its external appearances and by its inward character. In externals the foreigner coming to these sh.o.r.es is more impressed at first by our sky-sc.r.a.pers. They are new to him. He has not done anything of the sort since he built the tower of Babel. The foreigner is shocked by them.
In the daylight they are ugly. They are-well, too chimneyfied and too snaggy-like a mouth that needs attention from a dentist; like a cemetery that is all monuments and no gravestones. But at night, seen from the river where they are columns towering against the sky, all sparkling with light, they are fairylike; they are beauty more satisfactory to the soul and more enchanting than anything that man has dreamed of since the Arabian nights. We can"t always have the beautiful aspect of things. Let us make the most of our sights that are beautiful and let the others go. When your foreigner makes disagreeable comments on New York by daylight, float him down the river at night.
What has made these sky-sc.r.a.pers possible is the elevator. The cigar-box which the European calls a "lift" needs but to be compared with our elevators to be appreciated. The lift stops to reflect between floors. That is all right in a hea.r.s.e, but not in elevators. The American elevator acts like the man"s patent purge-it worked. As the inventor said, "This purge doesn"t waste any time fooling around; it attends strictly to business."
That New-Yorkers have the cleanest, quickest, and most admirable system of street railways in the world has been forced upon you by the abnormal appreciation you have of your hackman. We ought always to be grateful to him for that service. n.o.body else would have brought such a system into existence for us. We ought to build him a monument. We owe him one as much as we owe one to anybody. Let it be a tall one. Nothing permanent, of course; build it of plaster, say. Then gaze at it and realize how grateful we are-for the time being-and then pull it down and throw it on the ash-heap. That"s the way to honor your public heroes.
As to our streets, I find them cleaner than they used to be. I miss those dear old landmarks, the symmetrical mountain ranges of dust and dirt that used to be piled up along the streets for the wind and rain to tear down at their pleasure. Yes, New York is cleaner than Bombay. I realize that I have been in Bombay, that I now am in New York; that it is not my duty to flatter Bombay, but rather to flatter New York.
Compared with the wretched attempts of London to light that city, New York may fairly be said to be a well-lighted city. Why, London"s attempt at good lighting is almost as bad as London"s attempt at rapid transit. There is just one good system of rapid transit in London-the "Tube," and that, of course, had been put in by Americans. Perhaps, after a while, those Americans will come back and give New York also a good underground system. Perhaps they have already begun. I have been so busy since I came back that I haven"t had time as yet to go down cellar.