Hope-Scott was consulted by his French neighbours, even in affairs belonging to their own law. Whenever there was a difficulty, a sort of instinct led people to turn to him for counsel.
As it was at Hyeres that I first became acquainted with Mr. Hope-Scott, I may introduce into this chapter, perhaps as conveniently as anywhere, such personal recollections of him as I can call to mind. They are much more scanty than I could wish; still, where the memorials to be collected from any sources are but few, and rapidly pa.s.sing away, surviving friends may be glad of the preservation of even these slight notices.
In 1864-5 I had the honour of being entrusted with the tuition of Henry, Duke of Norfolk, and, as the Duke spent that winter with his relatives at Hyeres, I had several opportunities of conversing with Mr. Hope-Scott in his domestic circle, as on other occasions afterwards.
Mr. Hope-Scott was then in his fifty-third year. He was tall, largely built, with ma.s.sive head, dark hair beginning to turn grey, sanguine, embrowned complexion, very dark eyes, fine, soft, yet penetrating. "_Quel bel homme! quel homme magnifique_!" the French would exclaim in talking of him. In his features might be remarked that indefinable expression which belongs to the practised advocate. He had an exceedingly winning smile, an harmonious voice, and deliberate utterance. His manners, I need hardly say, showed all that simplicity and perfection of good breeding which art may simulate, but can never completely attain to.
I am not aware that there is any likeness of Mr. Hope-Scott in his later years. There is an excellent one of him about the age of thirty-two, painted by Richmond for Lady Davy, and now at Abbotsford, of which an engraving was published by Colnaghi. Mr. Lockhart, writing to Mrs. Hope- Scott on August 29, 1850, says: "I called, yesterday at Mr. Richmond"s to inspect his picture of J. R. H., and was extremely pleased--a capital likeness, and a most graceful one.... I am at a loss to say whether I think Grant or he has been most lucky--and they are very different too." I have heard that the portrait by Richmond is supposed to represent his expression when pleading. Mr. Richmond also drew (in crayon, previously to 1847) two others, one for Lady Frances Hope, subsequently given to the Hon. Mrs. G.
W. Hope, and another for Mr. Badeley, after whose decease it was given by Mr. Hope to the Dowager d.u.c.h.ess of Norfolk. There was also a small life- portrait, done after his marriage by Mr. Frank Grant, but not thought so pleasing a likeness as Richmond"s. There is a good bust by n.o.ble at Abbotsford, but this was made after his death, by study of casts, &c. It might express the age of about thirty-five or forty.
In his hospitality Mr. Hope-Scott showed great kindness and thoughtfulness.
One day, for example, he would invite to dinner the cure of Hyeres and his clergy; on another occasion, a young lady having become engaged, a party must be given in her honour; or an English prelate pa.s.ses Hyeres on his way home, and must be entertained. He was very attentive to guests, took pains to make people feel at their ease, and dispensed with unnecessary formality, but not with such usages as have their motive in a courteous consideration for others. Thus, when there were French guests, he was particular in exacting the observance of the rule that the English present should talk to each other, as well as to the strangers, in French. He had a thorough colloquial knowledge of the French language, marked not so much by any French mannerism, of which there was little, as by a ready command of the vocabulary of special subjects--for instance, agriculture.
In society Mr. Hope-Scott"s table-talk was highly agreeable. There was, however, a certain air of languor about him, caused partly by failing health, but far more, no doubt, by that "softened remembrance of sorrow and pain" which my readers can by this time understand better than any of those who then surrounded him. His conversation, therefore, when the duty of entertaining his guests did not require him to exert himself, was liable to lapse into silence. Some people seem to think it a duty to break a dead silence at any price; but this, in Mr. Hope-Scott"s opinion, was not always to be followed as a rule of etiquette; so, at least, I have heard.
I cannot remember that he showed any great interest in politics. He told me that he seldom read the leading articles of the "Times," which he thought had little influence on public events. I can, however, recall an interesting conversation on the social state of France, of which he took a very melancholy view; and again, in 1870, when he p.r.o.nounced decisively against the chances of the permanent establishment of the Commune, on the ground of the total change in the condition of Europe since the Middle Ages--the old Italian republics having been alleged in favour of the former.
His conversation seldom turned upon general literature, and at the time I knew him he had given up the "bibliomania." His favourite line of reading, for his own amus.e.m.e.nt, seemed to be glossaries, such as those of the Provencal dialect, and the archaeology of Hyeres, on which a friend of his, the late M. Denis, had written an interesting volume. Le Play"s elaborate treatise, "La Reforme Sociale," strongly attracted his attention. He was fond of statistical works, such as the "Annuaire du Bureau des Longitudes,"
a little compilation bristling with facts. He greatly cherished, as might be expected, the memory of Sir Walter Scott; and, had his life been prolonged, would probably have done more for it than the republication of the abridgment of Lockhart"s Life. I recollect his mentioning that there were in his hands unpublished MSS. of Sir Walter"s which would furnish materials for a volume. [Footnote: In a letter to Lord Henry Kerr, dated "Norfolk House, London, S.W., July 6, 1867," Mr. Hope-Scott says:--
"I have, because everybody seemed to think I must, become a purchaser to- day of some of Sir Walter"s MSS., viz. _Rokeby, Lord of the Isles_, _Anne of Geierstein_, and a volume of fragments of _Waverley, Ivanhoe, &c._ I am ashamed to say what they cost, but the _Lady of the Lake_ alone cost _another_ purchaser more than half what I paid for the four, and I can hardly say that it was to please myself that I bought at all."] "What he chiefly valued in the character of Sir Walter Scott (remarks a correspondent) was his _manliness_. I noticed that when Sir Walter was praised, Mr. Hope-Scott always spoke of his manliness." These observations may somewhat qualify the impression of an intimate friend of his later years, by whom I have been told that Mr. Hope-Scott "hardly opened a book, read scarcely at all, though he seemed to know about books."
He certainly could not, in the ordinary sense of the word, be called a literary man; but the active part of his life was far too busy for study, unless study had been a pa.s.sion with him; and towards its close the state of his health made reading impossible.
Mr. Hope-Scott very rarely made mention of himself, and his conversation accordingly supplied little or no biographical incident. Yet I have heard him allude, more than once, to his intimacy with Mr. Gladstone. "They had been," he said, "like brothers;" and he spoke also with pleasure of visits to the house of Sir John Gladstone, from whom he thought the Premier had derived much of his _back_.
Everything that I saw or heard of Mr. Hope-Scott conveyed the impression that he always acted on a plan and an idea; but this is so evident from what I have already related of him, that I am unwilling to add trivial anecdotes in its ill.u.s.tration. That tenderness of heart of which such ample proof has also been given, I recollect once coming curiously out in a chance expression. "If a man wants to cry," said Mr. Hope-Scott, "_let him read the Police Reports_, or (checking himself with that humour by which deep feeling is often veiled) take a cup of coffee!"
He was a thoroughly kind friend in this way, that, unasked, he thought of openings which might be available, and, without offering direct advice, threw out, as if incidentally, useful hints. In giving advice, he applied his mind to the subject; and a small matter, such as the interpretation of a route in _Bradshaw_, received as complete consideration, as far as was needed, as he could have given to the most difficult case submitted by a client.
As to his religious habits, I only had the opportunity of remarking his regularity in attending ma.s.s. I recollect, too, that he was anxious that one in whom he took an interest should not leave Hyeres without visiting a favourite place of pilgrimage in the vicinity called L"Ermitage, and heard with pleasure that St. Paul"s, in the upper town, had not been forgotten--a church where St. Louis heard ma.s.s before setting out on his crusade, and which rivals the Hermitage as a resort of popular devotion.
I now throw together a few scattered recollections communicated to me by friends, for which I have not been able to find a place elsewhere.
Mr. Hope-Scott often talked of Merton College; he used to compare his affection for it to that felt for a wife.
In his professional habits of mind he was a contrast in one respect to his friend Mr. John Talbot. The latter (as he himself once remarked) was always anxious about a case, and a failure was a great blow to him; but Mr. Hope- Scott, on the other hand, did the best he could, and if he failed, he failed; but he did not allow _that_ to wear him out. He always met the thing in the face, never _mourned_ over it.
He never gave way to small troubles; yet he was not a calm person by nature, but by self-command.
The only occasion on which I ever knew Mr. Hope put out (said a friend who knew him well) was when one of his fellow-counsel, whom he had endeavoured to supply with a complete answer to the whole difficulty in an important case, made a mess of it. "How hard it is," said Mr. Hope, "to sit by and listen to a man speaking on one"s side, and _always_ missing the point!"
Mr. Hope-Scott was a man _run away with by good sense_. He had great playfulness of character (by no means inconsistent with the last trait), and was especially addicted to punning. A constant fire of puns was kept up when he, Bishop Grant, and Mr. Badeley were together, though the Bishop always sought a moral purpose in his jesting.
After having heard Mr. Hope-Scott"s and Mr. Serjeant Wrangham"s arguments on the Thames Watermen and Lightermen"s Bill (1859), the chairman of the committee said: "Mr. Hope-Scott, the committee have three courses--either to throw the bill out, to pa.s.s it in its entirety, or to pa.s.s it with alterations. Therefore we shall be glad if counsel will retire." After waiting for half an hour, the door opened. Mr. Hope-Scott said to Serjeant Wrangham: "Come along, Serjeant; now that they have disposed of their three courses, we shall have our _dessert_."
A speech of his at the Galashiels Mechanics" Inst.i.tute gave great amus.e.m.e.nt at the time: "I am a worker like you," he said; "my head is the _mill_, my tongue is the _clapper_, and I _spin long yarns_."
Once, after signing a good many cheques in charity matters, he said, "They talk of hewers of wood and drawers of water; but I think I must be called _a drawer of cheques_."
He was highly genial with everybody, and even in reproving his servants would mingle it with humour.
The last of Sir Walter Scott"s old servants, John Swanston the forester (often mentioned in _Lockhart_), seemed rather shocked when Mr. Hope- Scott"s son and heir was named Michael; upon which Mr. Hope-Scott said to him playfully: "Ye mauna forget, John, that there was an Archangel before there was a Wizard; and besides, the Michael called the Wizard was, in truth, a very good and holy Divine."
With servants Mr. Hope-Scott was very popular. He took great interest in people, taking them up, forwarding their views, advising, protecting, even interfering.
He was very fond of children, and they of him. The presence of "Uncle Jim"
was the signal for fun with his little nephews and nieces: but the case was different with young people; they rather stood in awe of him (but another informant thinks these were the exceptions).
He abhorred gossip and spreading of t.i.ttle-tattle; avoided speaking before servants, or any one who would retail what was said. When there was any danger of this, he relapsed into total silence; and was, indeed, on some occasions over-cautious. He especially avoided talking of his good deeds, or of himself generally. He was singularly reserved; not by nature, but from his long habituation to be the depositary of important secrets. Sir Thomas Acland worked a good deal with him in Puseyite days. "Tell me what my brother is about," asked Lady H. K. "I cannot tell," was the reply; "he is a well too deep to get at."
He had a determined will, though affectionate and kind-hearted. When entertaining guests, he made all the plans day by day; used to lay out the day for them, seeing what could be done, though he might not himself be well enough to join the party.
He was extremely systematic in his habits, paid for everything by cheques; and used to preserve even notes of invitation, cards of visitors, and the envelopes of letters. [Footnote: I recollect the great importance he attached to them as dates, and his regret at the change from the old method of folded sheets.--W. E. G.]
Yet he had not punctuality naturally; he _drilled_ himself to it. Nor was he naturally particular, but, when married, became over-particular.
He had great kindness and tact, and was always kind in the right way. He was once seen, as a lad, flying to open a gate for perhaps the most disgusting person in the parish.
It was a feature in his life"s history to keep up intimacies for a certain number of years; the intercourse ceased, but not friendliness.
"In giving me an explanation of the ma.s.s before I was received into the Church, I remember" (said a near relative of his) "his saying that he delighted especially in the _Domine, non sum dignus_. "It is to me [he remarked] the most beautiful adaptation of Scripture.""
In discussing religion with Presbyterians, he was fond of a.s.serting the truth, "I, too, am a _Bible Christian_."
In conversation once chancing to turn on the subject of one"s being able to judge of character and conduct by looking at people in the street, Mr.
Hope-Scott remarked: "Yes, if you saw a novice of the Jesuits taking a walk, you would see what that means."
The following more detailed recollections appear to deserve a place by themselves:--
When residing on his Highland property at Lochshiel, Mr. Hope-Scott personally acquainted himself with his smaller tenantry, and entered into all their history, going about with a keeper known by the name of "Black John," who acted as his Gaelic interpreter. His frank and kindly manners quite won their hearts. Sometimes he would ask his guests to accompany him on such visits, and make them observe the peculiarities of the Celtic character. On one of these occasions he and the late Duke of Norfolk went to visit an old peasant who was blind and bedridden. After the usual greetings, they were both considerably astonished to hear the old man exclaim, in great excitement: "But tell me, how is Schamyl getting on?" It was long after the Circa.s.sian chief had been captured; but his exploits were still clinging to the old Highlander"s imagination, full of sympathy for warfare and politics. The natural ease and politeness of the Highland manners in this cla.s.s, as contrasted with the rougher type of the Lowlands, used always to delight Mr. Hope-Scott. Over and over again, after the ladies had withdrawn from the dinner-table, he would send for a keeper, or a gillie, or a boatman, and ply them with plausible questions, that his guests might have the opportunity of witnessing the good breeding of the Highlands. John, or Ronald, or Duncan, or whoever it might be, would stand a few yards away from the table, and, bonnet in hand, reply with perfect deference and self-possession, his whole behaviour free, on the one hand, from servility, and on the other, from the slightest forwardness. As will readily be supposed, the interview commonly ended with a dram from the laird"s own hand.
In one respect he was very strict with his people. He never would tolerate the slightest interference on their part with the rights of property. Some of them were in the habit of presuming on the laird"s permission, and helping themselves--no leave asked--to an oar, or a rope, or any implement which they chanced to stand in need of, belonging to the home farm. They indeed brought back these articles when done with; but Mr. Hope-Scott ever insisted they should be _asked for_, and would not accept the excuse that the things were taken without leave in order to save him the trouble of being asked. He was very severe in repressing drunkenness and dissipation, though no one was readier to make allowance for a little extra merriment on market days and festive gatherings.
Mr. Hope-Scott"s chief source of relaxation and pleasure, when he could escape from his professional duties, was building. In this amus.e.m.e.nt he followed his own ideas, sifting the plans of architects with the most rigid scrutiny, and never hesitating to alter, and sometimes to pull to pieces, what it had cost hours of hard brain-work to devise. No amount of entreaty could extort his consent to what did not commend itself as clear and faultless to his understanding. It might not be a very agreeable process to some of those concerned, but the result was generally satisfactory to the one who had a right to be the most interested. As for contractors, he latterly abjured them altogether; and Dorlin House was commenced and brought to completion under the management of a clerk of the works in whom he had great confidence. In the kindred pursuit of planting (as has already been noticed) Mr. Hope-Scott also took great interest, and the young plantations which now adorn the neighbourhood of Dorlin are the result of his care.
Strong-minded lawyer as he was, he had a firm belief in second-sight. One case in particular, which occurred in his immediate vicinity, is remembered to have made a deep impression on his mind. The facts were these: One Sunday, shortly before Mr. Hope-Scott came to Lochshiel, it happened, during service in a small country chapel close to the present site of Dorlin House, that one of the congregation fainted, and had to be carried out. After the service was over, the late Mr. Stewart, proprietor of Glenuig, asked this man what was the cause of his illness. For a long time he refused to tell, but at length, being pressed more urgently, declared that, of the four men who were sitting on the bench before him, three suddenly appeared to alter in every feature, and to be transported to other places. One seemed to float, face upwards, on the surface of the sea; another lay entangled among the long loose seaweed of the sh.o.r.e; and the third lay stretched on the beach, completely covered with a white sheet.
This sight brought on the fainting fit. Somehow the story got abroad, and the consequence was, that the fourth individual, who did not enter into the vision at all, pa.s.sed, in the course of the next four months, into a state verging on helpless idiocy, from the fear that he was among the doomed.
But, strange to tell, the three men who were the subjects of the warning were drowned together, a few months later on, when crossing an arm of the sea not far from the hamlet in which they dwelt. One of the bodies was found floating, as described above. Another was washed ash.o.r.e on a sandy part of the coast, and, on being found, was covered with a sheet supplied by a farmer"s family living close to the spot. The third was discovered at low water, half buried under a ma.s.s of seaweed and shingle. The fourth, who had survived to lose his senses, as we have said, died only two years ago.
CHAPTER XXV.
1867-1869.
Visit of Queen Victoria to Abbotsford in 1867--Mr. Hope-Scott"s Improvements at Abbotsford--Mr. Hope-Scott"s Politics--Toryism in Early Life--Const.i.tutional Conservatism--Mr. Hope-Scott as an Irish and a Highland Proprietor--Correspondence on Politics with Mr. Gladstone, and with Lord Henry Kerr in 1868--Speech at Arundel in 1869.